No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
It has been conventional to describe theology as ‘faith seeking understanding’. We might, however, care to shift from the private sphere of understanding to the public sphere of language and call theology ‘watching one’s language in the presence of God’. Either way Christian theology must show itself to be truly Christian. It should seek understanding in the light of Jesus Christ. It should watch its language in the presence of the God-man.
Using either version of theology, what might we say about the New China and the recent Chinese experience? What insights and reflections does faith in Christ suggest about the era and the nation on which Mao Tse-tung has put his stamp? Where can belief in the Crucified and risen Jesus take its stand vis-a-vis contemporary China?
When asked to confront Christ and Mao’s China I have no short or easy answer to give. Let me single out two themes (suffering and the emulation of heroes), and then conclude by listing some major points of comparison and contrast when we bring together the two figures themselves, Jesus and Mao.
First of all, suffering. Over twenty years ago Father Robert W. Greene’s Calvary in China appeared. In 1937 he had begun his missionary career in China. He was imprisoned after the Communist victory in 1949, put on trial in 1952, and then expelled from the country.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1976 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 London, 1954.
2 Theological Implications of the New China, Papers presented at the Ecumenical seminar held in Bastad, Sweden from January 29 to Februrary 2, 1974 (Luthern World Federation); hereafter Bastad.
3 (New York), pp. 81f.; italics mine.
4 Bastad, p. 82; italics mine.
5 Bastad. P.108.