Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:14:31.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bonhoeffer's Footnote and the Moral Absolute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In much contemporary discussion of ethics, the Roman Catholic tradition — particularly in questions of sexual morality — has been characterized as the last refuge of the absolute. On questions such as the morality of contraception, the Church has been remarkably out of phase with other churches and other ethical traditions, insisting on a particular approach to natural law theory which has, by now, become identified with the Roman Catholic tradition.

It is interesting then, to find the following footnote in Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Ethics, as edited from Bonhoeffer’s papers by Eberhard Bethge:

Marriage is not founded upon the purpose of reproduction but on the union of man and woman. Woman is given to man as ‘an help rheet for him’ (Gen.2:18). The two shall be ‘one flesh’ (Gen.2:23). But the fruitfulness of this union is not something that is commanded. For biblical thought this would have been impossible; it was only in the age of rationalism and technology that it could come to be understood in this way.

Writing at a time when the Roman Catholic tradition maintained a strong consensus on the question, Bonhoeffer notes that this tradition “does not indeed, as is often asserted, maintain that reproduction is the only purpose of marriage. No one did that before Kant”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Bonhoeffer, D., Ethics, New York , Macmillan, 1965, p 179, n. 16.Google Scholar

2 Ibid, p 178.Google Scholar

3 Cf. ZeMin, Th., France, 1848 1945, Oxford , 1977, II, p 1031.Google Scholar

4 Cf. Macphenon, C. B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Oxford , O.U.P. 1964, p 81 ss, on Hobbes's deduction of value from fact.Google Scholar

5 The Dynamic Element in the Church, Freiburg , Herder / Montreal , Palm PubHihers, 1964, p 110.Google Scholar