Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:20:13.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social network change after moving into permanent supportive housing: Who stays and who goes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2020

Harmony Rhoades Open the ORCID record for Harmony Rhoades [Opens in a new window] ,
Hsun-ta Hsu ,
Eric Rice ,
Taylor Harris ,
Wichada La Motte-Kerr ,
Hailey Winetrobe ,
Benjamin Henwood  and
Suzanne Wenzel
Harmony Rhoades*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Hsun-ta Hsu
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, School of Social Work, 709 Clark Hall, Columbia, MO65211, USA (e-mail: [email protected])
Eric Rice
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Taylor Harris
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Wichada La Motte-Kerr
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Hailey Winetrobe
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Benjamin Henwood
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Suzanne Wenzel
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA90089, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social relationships are important among persons experiencing homelessness, but there is little research on changes in social networks among persons moving into permanent supportive housing (PSH). Using data collected as part of a longitudinal study of 405 adults (aged 39+) moving into PSH, this study describes network upheaval during this critical time of transition. Interviews conducted prior to and after three months of living in PSH assessed individual-level (demographics, homelessness history, health, and mental health) and social network characteristics, including network size and composition (demographics, relationship type, and social support). Interviewers utilized network member characteristics to assess whether network members were new or sustained between baseline and three months post-housing. Multilevel logistic regression models assessed characteristics of network members associated with being newly gained or persisting in networks three months after PSH move-in. Results show only one-third of social networks were retained during the transition to PSH, and veterans, African Americans, and other racial/ethnic minorities, and those living in scattered site housing, were more likely to experience network disruption. Relatives, romantic partners, and service providers were most likely to be retained after move-in. Some network change was moderated by tie strength, including the retention of street-met persons. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

homelessnesspermanent supportive housingsocial networksnetwork change
Type
Research Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 18 - 34
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Action Editor: Thomas Valente

References

Barrow, S. M., Herman, D. B., Córdova, P., Struening, E. L. (1999). Mortality among homeless shelter residents in New York City. American Journal of Public Health, 89(4), 529–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassuk, E. L., Buckner, J. C., Perloff, J. N., & Bassuk, S. S. (1998). Prevalence of mental health and substance use disorders among homeless and low-income housed mothers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(11), 1561–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, T., Fargo, J. D., Montgomery, A. E., Munley, E., & Culhane, D. P. (2014). The Relationship between Community Investment in Permanent Supportive Housing and Chronic Homelessness. Social Service Review, 88(2), 234–263. doi: 10.1086/676142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). 2014 NHIS Questionnaire-Sample Adult.ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Survey_Questionnaires/NHIS/2014/EnglishGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, B. (2015). Social disadvantage and network turnover. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 132–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwell, B., Schumm, L. P., Laumann, E. O., Kim, J., & Kim, Y. J. (2014). Assessment of social network change in a national longitudinal survey. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(Suppl 2), S75–S82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, A. M. (2009). Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2–3), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertel, K. A., Glymour, M. M., & Berkman, L. F. (2009). Social networks and health: A life course perspective integrating observational and experimental evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, S., Geddes, J. R., & Kushel, M. (2014). The health of homeless people in high-income countries: Descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations. The Lancet, 384(9953), 1529–1540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, H., Browne, W., & Rasbash, J. (2002). Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 1(4), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golembiewski, E., Watson, D. P., Robison, L., & Coberg, J. W. II (2017). Social network decay as potential recovery from homelessness: A mixed methods study in housing first programming. Social Sciences, 6(3), 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, H. D., Tucker, J. S., Golinelli, D., & Wenzel, S. L. (2013). Social networks, time homeless, and social support: A study of men on Skid Row. Network Science, 1(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1017/nws.2013.18 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, H. M., Shaffer, P. M., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2016). Changing social networks among homeless individuals: A prospective evaluation of a job-and life-skills training program. Community Mental Health Journal, 52(7), 799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulcur, L., Tsemberis, S., Stefancic, A., & Greenwood, R. M. (2007). Community integration of adults with psychiatric disabilities and histories of homelessness. Community Mental Health Journal, 43(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrisunpress Harris, T., Dunton, G., Henwood, B., Rhoades, H., Rice, E. & Wenzel, S. (2018). Housing models and neighborhoods associated with social integration among supportive housing residents in Los Angeles. Housing Studies. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2018.1462308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, B. F., Byrne, T., & Scriber, B. (2015). Examining mortality among formerly homeless adults enrolled in Housing First: An observational study. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henwood, B. F., Stefancic, A., Petering, R., Schreiber, S., Abrams, C., & Padgett, D. K. (2015). Social relationships of dually diagnosed homeless adults following enrollment in Housing First or traditional treatment services. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 6(3), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henwood, B. F., Rhoades, H., Hsu, H. T., Couture, J., Rice, E., & Wenzel, S. L. (2017). Changes in social networks and HIV risk behaviors among homeless adults transitioning into permanent supportive housing: A mixed methods pilot study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S. W. (2001). Homelessness and health. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164(2), 229–233. National Health Care for the Homeless Council. (2011). Homeless and health: What’s the connection? Retrieved from http://www.nhchc.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/09/Hln_health_factsheet_Jan10.pdf Google ScholarPubMed
Hwang, S. W., Kirst, M. J., Chiu, S., Tolomiczenko, G., Kiss, A., Cowan, L., & Levinson, W. (2009). Multidimensional social support and the health of homeless individuals. Journal of Urban Health, 86(5), 791–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, S. W., & Burns, T. (2014). Health interventions for people who are homeless. The Lancet, 384(9953), 1541–1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling. In Hox, J. J., & Roberts, J. K. (Eds.), European Association for Methodology series. Handbook for advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 335–370). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. P., Tucker, J. S., Green, H. D., Golinelli, D., & Ewing, B. (2012). Unprotected sex of homeless youth: Results from a multilevel dyadic analysis of individual, social network, and relationship factors. AIDS and Behavior, 16(7), 2015–2032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, D. P., Wenzel, S. L., Brown, R., Tucker, J. S., & Golinelli, D. (2013). Unprotected sex among heterosexually active homeless men: Results from a multi-level dyadic analysis. AIDS and Behavior, 17(5), 1655–1667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, K., & Merlo, J. (2005). Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: Integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. American journal of epidemiology, 161(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. (2016). Homeless Management Information System Data, Los Angeles Continuum of Care (LA CoC HMIS). Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2016). Chronic Homelessness-Overview. Retrieved May 17, 2016, from http://www.endhomelessness.org/pages/chronic_homelessness_overview Google Scholar
National Health Care for the Homeless Council. (2011). Homelessness & Health: What’s the Connection? Fact Sheet.Google Scholar
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIDA Quick Screen V1.0F1, Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/nmassist.pdf Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, J. (2005). Premature Mortality in Homeless Populations: A Review of the Literature. Nashville: National Health Care for the Homeless Council.Google Scholar
O’Malley, A. J., Arbesman, S., Steiger, D. M., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2012). Egocentric social network structure, health, and pro-social behaviors in a national panel study of Americans. PLoS One, 7(5), e36250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M. L., Currie, L., Rezansoff, S., & Somers, J. M. (2015). Exiting homelessness: Perceived changes, barriers, and facilitators among formerly homeless adults with mental disorders. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 38(1), 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, B. L., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2012). Social network dynamics and biographical disruption: The case of “first-timers” with mental illness. American Journal of Sociology, 118(1), 134–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilgars, D., & Pleace, N. (2016). Housing first and social integration: A realistic aim? Social Inclusion, 4(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, H., Wenzel, S. L., Golinelli, D., Tucker, J. S., Kennedy, D. P., Green, H. D., & Zhou, A. (2011). The social context of homeless men’s substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118(2), 320–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, E., Milburn, N. G., & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2007). Pro-social and problematic social network influences on HIV/AIDS risk behaviours among newly homeless youth in Los Angeles. AIDS Care, 19(5), 697–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, E., Milburn, N. G., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Mallett, S., & Rosenthal, D. (2005). The effects of peer group network properties on drug use among homeless youth. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(8), 1102–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, E., Milburn, N. G., & Monro, W. (2011). Social networking technology, social network composition, and reductions in substance use among homeless adolescents. Prevention Science, 12(1), 80–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, E., Kurzban, S., & Ray, D. (2012). Homeless but connected: The role of heterogeneous social network ties and social networking technology in the mental health outcomes of street-living adolescents. Community Mental Health Journal, 48(6), 692–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rog, D. J., Marshall, T., Dougherty, R. H., George, P., Daniels, A. S., Ghose, S. S., & Delphin-Rittmon, M. E. (2014). Permanent supportive housing: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65(3), 287–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smelson, D. A., Zaykowski, H., Guevermont, N., Siegfriedt, J., Sawh, L., Modzelewski, D., Kane, V. (2016). Integrating permanent supportive housing and co-occurring disorders treatment for individuals who are homeless. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 1–9. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1174010 Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. P., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stergiopoulos, V., Gozdzik, A., O’Campo, P., Holtby, A. R., Jeyaratnam, J., & Tsemberis, S. (2014). Housing First: Exploring participants’ early support needs. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, J., Mares, A. S., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2012). Does housing chronically homeless adults lead to social integration? Psychiatric Services, 63(5), 427–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, J. S., Kennedy, D., Ryan, G., Wenzel, S. L., Golinelli, D., & Zazzali, J. (2009). Homeless women’s personal networks: Implications for understanding risk behavior. Human Organization, 68(2), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, J. S., Hu, J., Golinelli, D., Kennedy, D. P., Green, H. D., & Wenzel, S. L. (2012). Social network and individual correlates of sexual risk behavior among homeless young men who have sex with men. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(4), 386–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, K. A. (2008). Social network characteristics and risky sexual and drug related behaviors among homeless young adults. Social Science Research, 37(2), 673–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Way of Greater Los Angeles. (2016). Greater Los Angeles Coordinated Entry System Survey Packet Version 2.2 (Vol. 2.2).Google Scholar
United Way of Greater Los Angeles. (n.d.). Using CES to fill your units/vouchers (Vol. 1.8).Google Scholar
Watson, D. P., Wagner, D. E., & Rivers, M. (2013). Understanding the critical ingredients for facilitating consumer change in Housing First programming: A case study approach. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 40(2), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, L.C., Henwood, B.F., Matejkowski, J., & Santana, A. (2011). Moving from street to home: Health status of entrants to a Housing First program. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health, 2(1), 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, S. L. (2014). HIV risk, drug use, social networks: Homeless persons transitioned to housing. Grant No. R01DA036245. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
Wenzel, S. L., Green, H. D., Tucker, J. S., Golinelli, D., Kennedy, D. P., Ryan, G., & Zhou, A. (2009). The social context of homeless women’s alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 105(1), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenzel, S. L., Tucker, J. S., Golinelli, D., Green, H. D., & Zhou, A. (2010). Personal network correlates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use among homeless youth. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 112(1), 140–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y. C., Boen, C., Gerken, K., Li, T., Schorpp, K., & Harris, K. M. (2016). Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 578–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanos, P. T. (2007). Beyond “Landscapes of Despair”: The need for new research on the urban environment, sprawl, and the community integration of persons with severe mental illness. Health & Place, 13(3), 672–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanos, P. T., Stefancic, A., & Tsemberis, S. (2012). Objective community integration of mental health consumers living in supported housing and of others in the community. Psychiatric Services, 63(5), 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar