Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:10:58.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Out of sync, out of society: Political beliefs and social networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Won-tak Joo Open the ORCID record for Won-tak Joo [Opens in a new window]  and
Jason Fletcher
Won-tak Joo*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Jason Fletcher
Affiliation:
La Follette School of Public Affairs and Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA (e-mail: [email protected])
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Who is more likely to be isolated from society in terms of political beliefs? To answer this question, we measure whether individuals’ beliefs are “out of sync”—the extent to which their views differ with their contemporaries—and examine how the level of synchronization is associated with the size of important-matter and political-matter discussion networks. The results show that people with weaker belief synchronization are more likely to have smaller important-matter discussion networks. However, additional analyses of political-matter discussion networks show that weaker belief synchronization is associated with smaller networks only among those without a high school diploma and even provides some advantage in maintaining larger networks for the college-educated. Overall, the results imply that political beliefs that are “out of sync” correspond to the individual being “out of society,” whereas the aspects of “out of society” are quite different among educational groups.

Keywords

belief synchronizationsocial spacenetwork homophilydiscussion networksegocentric networks
Type
Research Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 8 , Issue 3: Special Issue Ego Networks , September 2020 , pp. 445 - 468
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Special Issue Editors: Brea L. Perry, Bernice A. Pescosolido, Mario L. Small, and Ann McCranie

References

Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 784–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldassarri, D., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Neither ideologues nor agnostics: Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of partisan politics. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 45–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, P., & Parigi, P. (2004). Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: Conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces, 83(2), 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, L., & Licari, F. C. (1989). Education and political tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(3), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological theory, 7(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutyline, A., & Vaisey, S. (2017). Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1371–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual review of psychology, 64, 527–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, K. E., Marsden, P. V., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Centola, D. (2015). The social origins of networks and diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1295–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and its discontent. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Cowan, S. K., & Baldassarri, D. (2018). “It could turn ugly”: Selective disclosure of attitudes in political discussion networks. Social Networks, 52(4), 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee, T. S. (2004). Are there civic returns to education? Journal of public economics, 88(9–10), 1697–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y., & Macy, M. (2015). Why do liberals drink lattes? American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1473–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P., & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual review of sociology, 38, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of political Economy, 65(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1983). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. H. (2003). Have Americans’ attitudes become more polarized?—An update. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization science, 26(4), 1243–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabennesch, H. (1972). Authoritarianism as world view. American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 857–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012a). Disagreement and the avoidance of political discussion: Aggregate relationships and differences across personality traits. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 849–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012b). Personality and the strength and direction of partisan identification. Political Behavior, 34(4), 653–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golebiowska, E. A. (1995). Individual value priorities, education, and political tolerance. Political Behavior, 17(1), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, S. B., & Segura, G. M. (1997). Cross-national variation in the political sophistication of individuals: Capability or choice? The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 126–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, G., & Tausig, M. (1990). Network range in personal networks. Social Networks, 12(3), 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J., & Levine, J. (2000). The dynamics of collective deliberation in the 1996 election: Campaign effects on accessibility, certainty, and accuracy. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, D. (1990). Networks of political action: Toward theory construction. Social Forces, 68(4), 1041–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Berger, M. (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M. (2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication, 27(3), 248–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., & Bearman, P. (2017). Important matters in political context. Sociological Science, 4, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1057–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsitz, L. (1965). Working-class authoritarianism: A re-evaluation. American Sociological Review, 30(1), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, N. (2003). Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, A. K. (2011). Does education increase political participation? The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, M. (1983). An ecology of affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., & Ranger-Moore, J. R. (1991). Evolution on a dancing landscape: organizations and networks in dynamic Blau space. Social Forces, 70(1), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55(5), 726–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, B. (2018). How Are We Apart? Continuity and Change in the Structure of Ideological Disagreement in the American Public, 1980–2012. Social Forces, 96(4), 1757–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 6(2), 559–572.Google Scholar
Phelan, J., Link, B. G., Stueve, A., & Moore, R. E. (1995). Education, social liberalism, and economic conservatism: Attitudes toward homeless people. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, S. L., & Dimock, M. A. (1999). Political knowledge and citizen competence. In Elkin, S. L. & Soltan, K. E. (Eds.), Citizen competence and democratic institutions (pp. 117–146). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rivera, L. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 432–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Ginkel, J. R., Kroonenberg, P. M., & Kiers, H. A. (2014). Missing data in principal component analysis of questionnaire data: a comparison of methods. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 84(11), 2298–2315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(6), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, D. J., Dodds, P. S., & Newman, M. E. (2002). Identity and search in social networks. Science, 296(5571), 1302–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weakliem, D. L. (2002). The effects of education on political opinions: An international study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, S., Esbensen, K., & Geladi, P. (1987). Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Joo and Fletcher supplementary material

Appendix

Download Joo and Fletcher supplementary material(File)
File 115.9 KB