Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:43:50.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Netherlands state practice for the parliamentary year 1991–1992

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Documentation
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Memorandum of 29 April 1992, Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22593 (R1433) No. 3 pp. 1–4.

2. Trb. 1992 No. 74.

3. Trb. 1986 No. 63; Trb. 1987 No. 118.

4. Memorandum of 3 June 1992, Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22647 (R 1437) No. 3 pp. 13–19.

5. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22300 VI No. 39.

6. Trb. 1985 No. 101 and Trb. 1990 No. 145.

7. Trb. 1960 No. 40.

8. Trb. 1986 No. 63.

9. Memorandum of 4 June 1991, Bijl. Hand. II 1990/91 - 22140 No. 3 pp. 3–8.

10. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22704 No. 1.

11. Letter of 11 August 1992, Bijl. Hand. II 1991 - 22704 No. 2.

12. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22475 No. 2.

13. Letter of 12 May 1992, Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22475 No. 5.

14. Series A No. 166; NJ 1990 No. 245.

15. NJB of 14 April 1990 pp. 576–579; NJCM Bulletin (1990) pp. 357–372; NJ 1990 pp. 2796–2805.

16. NJ 1990 No. 692; Advocatenblad (1990) pp. 426–429.

17. Case of X and Y against the Netherlands, Judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A No. 91, paras. 23 and 24.

18. Trb. 1990 No. 46.

19. See Alkema, E.A., ‘The Third-Party Applicability or “Drittwirkung” of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Protecting Human Rights: The European Dimension (Wiarda-Festschrift) (1988) p. 42.Google Scholar

20. NJ 1990 No. 692.

21. Kostovski v. The Netherlands, 20 November 1989, case No. 10/1988/154/208, Series A No. 166; Windisch v. Austria, 27 September 1990, case No. 25/1989/185/245, Series A No. 186.

22. Judgments of 2 July 1990, NJ 1990 No. 692; of 25 September 1990, NJ 1991 No. 97; of 2 October 1990, NJ 1991 No. 130; of 16 October 1990, NJ 1991 No. 442; of 26 March 1991, NJ 1991 No. 614; of 25 June 1991, NJ 1991 No. 109.

23. Isgrò v. Italy, 19 February 1991, case No. 1/1990/192/252, Series A No. 194A.

24. Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 Decembe 1988, caseNo. 24/1986/122/171–173, Series A No. 146, para. 78.

25. Memorandum of 6 January 1992, Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22483 No. 3 pp. 3–17.

26. Trb. 1992 Nos. 64 and 65.

27. Memorandum of 13 August 1992, Bijl. Hand. I/II 1991/92 - 22739 (R1447).

25. Trb. 1959 No. 126.

29. Trb. 1983 No. 83.

30. Stb. 1965 No. 428.

31. Stb. 1964 No. 447.

32. Stb. 1964 Nos. 459, 460 and 461.

33. Stb. 1975 No. 352 and Stb. 1983 No. 683.

34. Stb. 1989 No. 554.

35. Stb. 1990 Nos. 104 and 103; Stb. 1969 No. 469 and Stb. 1970 No. 611, respectively.

36. Trb. 1959 No. 124.

37. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22390 No. 1.

38. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22300 X No. 49.

39. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22181 No. 19.

40. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/2 - 22300 X No. 65.

41. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22300 V No. 97.

42. Letter of 2 April 1992, Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22300 V No. 101.

43. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22300 VI No. 41.

44. Bijl. Hand. II 1991/92 - 22513 No. 1.