Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:14:31.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unravelling the depositional environment of the Archaean Rajkharsawan conglomerate (Jharkhand, eastern India)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

A.J. van Loon ,
R. Mazumder  and
S. De
A.J. van Loon*
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, Adam Mickiewicz University, Maków Polnych 16, 61-606 Poznań, Poland
R. Mazumder
Affiliation:
School of Biology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B.T. Road, Kolkata 700-108, India
S. De
Affiliation:
Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B.T. Road, Kolkata 700-108, India
*
Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Large conglomerate lenses occur in a fine-grained siliciclastic succession of the Singhbhum craton, eastern India. They overlie an Archaean orthogneiss, from which they are separated by a palaeosol. Neither the conglomerates nor the directly overlying rocks have been dated, but the conglomerate unit is assumed to have also an Archaean age. The conglomerate lenses occur within a succession of pelitic and mafic schists, and the depositional environment of this conglomerate/schist unit had not been clarified thus far. On the basis of a combination of the vertical and horizontal distribution of the conglomerates, their stratigraphic position and analysis of their sedimentological characteristics and the sedimentological context, it is concluded that the succession must have developed in a fluvial lowland environment where volcanic input contributed significantly to the sediment accumulation.

Keywords

Rajkharsawan conglomerateeastern IndiaArchaeanfluvial environmentSinghbhum craton
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 91 , Issue 1-2 , September 2012 , pp. 129 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2012

References

Acharyya, S.K., Gupta, A. & Orihashi, Y., 2010. Neoarchaean-Palaeoproterozoic stratigraphy of the Dhanjori basin, Singhbhum Craton, eastern India: and recording of a few U-Pb zircon dates from its basal part. Journal of Asian Earth Science 39: 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P.K., 1981. Chakradharpur Granite Gneiss – a composite batholith in the western part of the Singhbhum shear zone, Bihar. Indian Journal of Earth Sciences 8: 109–118.Google Scholar
De, A., 1957. Conglomerate deformation in the western part of the Singhbhum shear zone. Proceedings of the Indian Science Congress, Abstract: 168–169.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, K.L., 1996. A comprehensive geological review of the Precambrian Banded Iron Formation (BIF) of Bihar and Orissa, eastern India. Indian Journal of Geology 68: 211–236.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, K.L. & Majumder, T., 1986. Geological aspects of the Banded Iron Formation of Bihar and Orissa. Journal of the Geological Society of India 28: 109–133.Google Scholar
Eriksson, P.G., Mazumder, R., Sarkar, S., Bose, P.K., Altermann, W. & Van der Merwe, R., 1999. The 2.7-2.0 Ga volcano-sedimentary record of Africa, India and Australia: evidence for global and local changes in sea level and continental freeboard. Precambrian Research 97: 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullentops, F., Paulissen, E. & Vandenberghe, J., 1981. Fossil periglacial phenomena in NE Belgium. Biuletyn Periglacjalny 28: 345–365.Google Scholar
Mazumder, R., 2003. Correlations between the Eastern Block of the North China craton and the South Indian Block of the Indian shield: an Archaean to Palaeoprtoterozoic link – comment. Precambrian Research 127: 379–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumder, R., 2005. Proterozoic sedimentation and volcanism in the Singhbhum crustal province, India and their implications. Sedimentary Geology 176: 1676–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumder, R. & Sarkar, S., 2004. Sedimentation history of the Palaeoproterozoic Dhanjori Formation, Singhbhum, India, and its implications. Precambrian Research 130: 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumder, R., Bose, P.K. & Sarkar, S., 2000. A commentary on the tectonosedimentary record of the pre-2.0 Ga continental growth of India vis-a-vis Pre-Gondwana Afro-Indian supercontinent. Journal of African Earth Sciences 30: 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumder, R., Van Loon, A.J., Mallik, L., Reddy, S.M., Arima, M., Altermann, W., Eriksson, P.G., & De, S., 2012. Mesoarchean-Palaeoproterozoic stratigraphic record of the Singhbhum crustal province, eastern India: a synthesis. In: Mazumder, R. & Saha, D. (eds): Palaeoproterozoic of India. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 365: 29–46.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, D., 1988. Precambrian of eastern Indian shield – perspective of the problems. Geological Society of India Memoir 8: 1–12.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, D., 2001. The Archaean nucleus of Singhbhum: the present state of knowledge. Gondwana Research 4: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisarska-Jamrozy, M. & Börner, A., 2011. Is the Charlottenthal fan (marginal zone of the Pomeranian phase, NE Germany) an end moraine? Geologos 17: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisarska-Jamrozy, , Machowiak, K. & Krzyszkowski, D., 2010. Sedimentation style of a Pleistocene kame terrace from the western Sudety Mountains, S Poland. Geologos 16: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J.J.W., 1996. A history of continents in the past three billion years. Journal of Geology 104: 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha, A.K., 1994. Crustal evolution of Singhbhum-North, Orisa, eastern India. Geological Society of India Memoir 27.Google Scholar
Saha, A.K., Ray, S.L. & Sarkar, S.N., 1988. Early history of the Earth: evidence from the eastern Indian shield. In: Mukhopadhyay, D. (ed.): Precambrian of the eastern Indian shield. Geological Society of India Memoir 8: 13–37.Google Scholar
Salamon, T. & Zielinski, T., 2010. Unusual development of sandur sedimentary succession, an example from the Pleistocene of S Poland. Geologos 16: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, A.N., 1984. Precambrian tectonic evolution of eastern India: a model of converging microplates. Tectonophysics 86: 363–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, S., Sarkar, G., Ghosh-Roy, A.K., Bhaduri, S.K., Gupta, S.N. & Mandal, A., 2000. Geochemistrey and Rb-Sr geochronology of acid tuffs from the northern fringe of the Singhbhum craton and their significance in the Precambrian evolution. Indian Minerals 54: 43–56.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, J., 1992a. Cryoturbations: a sediment structural analysis. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 3: 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, J., 1992b. Periglacial phenomena and Pleistocene environ mental conditions in the Netherlands – an overview. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 3: 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, J. & Czudek, T., 2008. Pleistocene cryopediments on variable terrain. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 19: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, J., Cui, Z.J., Zhao, L. & Zhang, W., 2004. Thermal contraction crack networks as evidence for Late-Pleistocene permafrost in Inner Mongolia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 15: 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loon, A.J., 2009. Soft-sediment deformation structures in siliciclastic sediments: an overview. Geologos 15: 3–55.Google Scholar
Zhao, G., Sun, M. & Wilde, S.A., 2003. Correlations between the Eastern Block of the North China craton and the South Indian Block of the Indian shield: an Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic link – comment. Precambrian Research 122: 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar