Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:05:55.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turtle remains (Testudines, Chelonioidea) from the Middle Turonian of northwest Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

C. Diedrich
Affiliation:
Nansenstr. 8, D-33790 Halle/Westphalia, e-mail:[email protected]
R. Hirayama
Affiliation:
Faculty of Information Teikyo Heisei University Uruido, 2289-23 Ichihara, Chiba 290-0193, Japan; e-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Turtle remains ascribed to the family Cheloniidae (Testudines, Cryptodira, Chelonioidea), collected from the lamarcki zone (Middle Turonian) at Wüllen (NW Germany) are described. The material consists of a right humerus, a scapula, a complete costalia, and costalia fragments of a single individual with the humerus indicating a primitive cheloniid of the ‘toxochelyid grade’. The present material, as well as previously recorded chelonioid humeri from the Cenomanian and Turonian of Germany illustrate a progressive diversification of chelonioids during the early Late Cretaceous.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2003

References

Case, E.C. 1897. On the osteology and relationships of Protostega . Journal of Morphology 14: 21–60.Google Scholar
Collins, J.I., 1970. The chelonian Rhinochelys Seeley from the Upper Cretaceous of England and France. Palaeontology 13 (3): 355–378.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C. 1997. Ein Dentale von Coniosaurus crassidens Owen (Varanoidea) aus dem Ober-Cenoman von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen 47: 43–51.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C. 1999a. Erster Nachweis von Dolichosaurus longicollis Owen (Varanoidea) aus dem Ober-Cenoman von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 1999 (6): 372–384.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C. 1999b. Ein Humerus der Chelonide Rhinochelis (?) cf. carusiana (Geinitz 1872–75) aus dem Mittel-Cenoman von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 1999 (9): 541–550.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C. 2001. Die Großammoniten-Kolktaphozönosen des Puzocia-Event I (Ober-Cenoman) von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Münstersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Paläontologie 90: 1–208.Google Scholar
Elliott, D.K., Irvy, G.V. & Hutchison, J.H., 1997. Desmatochelys lowi, a marine turtle from the Upper Cretaceous. In: Callaway, J.M. & Nicholls, E.L., (eds.): Ancient Marine Reptiles, Academic Press, San Diego: 243–258.Google Scholar
Ernst, G., 1967. Über Fossilnester in Pachydiscus-Gehäusen und das Lagenvorkommen von Echiniden in der Oberkreide NW-Deutschlands. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 41 (3/4): 211–229.Google Scholar
Ernst, G., 1978. Wüllen bei Ahaus - Kalkbruch des Kalkwerkes Hollekamp. In: Kemper, E., Ernst, G. & Thiermann, (eds.): Symposium Deutsche Kreide Münster i. W. 1978, Exkursion A: A II, Münster: 10–20.Google Scholar
Ernst, G., Seibertz, E. & Wood, C.J., 1998. D 2.4 Cenomanian-Turonian of Wüllen near Ahaus. In: Mutterlose, J., Bornemann, A., Rauer, S., Spaeth, C. & Wood, C.J. (eds.): Key localities of the northwest European Cretaceous. Bochumer geologische und geotechnische Arbeiten, 48: 157–164.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A., 1878. Die Reptilien und Fische der böhmischen Kreideformation. The author, Praha: 44 pp.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H.B., 1849. Das Quadersandsteingebirge oder Kreidegebirge in Deutschland. Craz & Gerlach Verl., Freiberg: 290 pp.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H.B., 1872-75. Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. Zweiter Theil. Der mittlere und obere Quader. Palaeontographica 20 (2): 7 + 245 pp.Google Scholar
Hay, O.P., 1908. The fossil turtles of North America. Publications of the Carnegie Institute, 75: 568 pp.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R., 1992. Humeral morphology of chelonioid sea-turtles; its functional analysis and phylogenetic implications. Bulletin of the Hobetsu Museum 8: 17–57 (in Japanese with English Abstract).Google Scholar
Hir1ayama, R., 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of chelonioid sea turtles. The Island Arc 1994, 3 (4): 270–284.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R., 1997. Distribution and diversity of Cretaceous chelonioids. In: Callaway, J.M. & Nicholls, E.L. (eds): Ancient Marine Reptiles, Academic Press, San Diego: 225–241.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R., 1998. Oldest known sea turtle. Nature 392: 705–708.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R. & Chitoku, T., 1996. Family Dermochelyidae (Superfamily Chelonioidea) from the Upper Cretaceous of North Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan New Serie 184: 597–622.Google Scholar
Hirayama, R. & Hikida, Y., 1998. Mesodermochelys (Testudines, Chelonioidea, Dermochelyidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Nakagawa-cho, Hokkaido, North Japan. Bulletin of the Nakagawa Museum of Natural History 1: 69–76.Google Scholar
Hooks, G.E.I., 1998. Systematic revision of the Protostegidae, with a revision of Calcarichelys gemma Zangerl, 1953. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18: 85–98.Google Scholar
Löscher, W., 1910. Die Westfälischen Galeritenschichten mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Seeigelfauna. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie Beilagen-Band 30: 269–312.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R., 1889a. Catalogue of the fossil Reptilia and Amphibia in the British Museum (Natural History). III. Order Chelonia. London: 28 + 309 pp.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R., 1889b. On remains of Eocene and Mesozoic Chelonia and a tooth of (?) Ornithopsis . Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society London 45: 227–246.Google Scholar
Mantell, G., 1841. On the fossil remains of turtles, discoverd in the Chalk Formation of South-East England. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London 131: 153–158.Google Scholar
Meyer, H.v., 1856. Helochelis Danubia, aus dem Grünsande von Kelheim in Bayern. Palaeontographica 4 (3): 96–105.Google Scholar
Milner, A.C., 1987. Reptiles. In: Owen, E. & Smith, A.B. (eds.): Fossils of the Chalk. Palaeontological Assotiation London. Field Guides to Fossils 2: 266–280.Google Scholar
Moret, L., 1935. Rhinochelys amaberti, nouvelle espèce de tourtue marine du Vraconien de la Fauge, près du Villard-de-Lans (Isère). Bulletin de la Societé géologique Francaise (5), V (1): 605–619.Google Scholar
Mlynarski, M., 1976. Testudines. In: Kuhn, O. (ed.): Handbuch der Palaeoherpetologie 7: 130 pp.Google Scholar
Moody, R.T.J., 1974. The taxonomy and morphology of Puppigerus camperi (Gray), an Eocene sea-turtle from Northern Europe. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 25 (2): 155–186.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M., Kuypers, M.M.M., Peeters, H.H.G. & Rompen, P., 1998. Preliminary observations on the stratigraphic distribution of Late Cretaceous marine and terrestrial reptiles from the Maastrichtian type area (SE Netherlands, NE Belgium). Oryctos 1: 55–64.Google Scholar
Nessov, L.A., 1987. The Paleogene sea turtles of Southern Kasakhstan and the phylogenetic relationhips between Toxochelyidae and the Cheloniidae. Paleontological Journal 21: 73–84 (translated from Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 1987 (4): 76–87.Google Scholar
Nicholls, E.L. & Russell, A.P., 1990. Paleobiogeography of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway of North America: the vertebrate evidence. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 79: 149–169.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1842. Description of the remains of a chelonian reptile from the chalk. Trans. Geological Society (2) 6: 412.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1850. Description of the fossil reptiles of the Chalk formations In: Dixon, F. (ed.): The geology and fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations of Sussex, Longman, Brown, Green and Longman, London: 378–405.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1851. A monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous formations. Palaeontological Society Monographs 5 (1851–64): 1–118.Google Scholar
Seeley, H.G., 1869. Index to the fossil remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia from the Secondary System of Strata arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge: 23 + 143 pp.Google Scholar
Tong, H., Gaffney, E.S. & Buffetaut, E., 1998. Foxemys, a new sidenecked turtle (Bothremydidae: Palomedusoides) from the Late Cretaceous of France. American Museum Novitatis 3251: 1–19.Google Scholar
Woodward, A.S., 1889. A synopsis of the vertebrate fossils of the English chalk. Procedings of the Geological Association 10: 273–338.Google Scholar
Walker, W.E. Jr., 1971. Swimming in sea turtles of the family Cheloniidae. Copeia 1971: 229–233.Google Scholar
Zangerl, L.R., 1953a. The vertebrate fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part III, The turtles of the family Protostegidae. Fieldiana Geology 3 (3): 59–133.Google Scholar
Zangerl, L.R., 1953b. The vertebrate fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part IV, The turtles of the family Toxochelidae. Fieldiana Geology Memoirs 3 (4): 137–277.Google Scholar
Zangerl, L.R. & Sloan, R.E., 1960. A new specimen of Desmatochelis lowi Williston, a primitive chelonid sea-turtle from the Cretaceous of South Dakota. Fieldiana Geology 14 (2): 7–40.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., 1960. The vertebrate fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part 5. An advanced cheloniid sea turtle. Fieldiana Geology Memoirs 3: 281–312.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., Hendrickson, L.P. & Hendrickson, J.R., 1988. A redescription of the Australian flat back sea turtle, Natator depressus . Bishop Museum Bulletin of Zoology 1: 1–69.Google Scholar