Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:26:23.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thin- and thick-skinned salt tectonics in the Netherlands; a quantitative approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

J.H. ten Veen ,
S.F. van Gessel  and
M. den Dulk
J.H. ten Veen*
Affiliation:
TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
S.F. van Gessel
Affiliation:
TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
M. den Dulk
Affiliation:
TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
*
[email protected].

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Zechstein salt in the Dutch part of the North Sea Basin played a key role in the generation of successful petroleum plays. This is not only because of its sealing capacity, but also because the salt occurs in structures that provide lateral and vertical traps. The structural styles of areas with thick salt and those with none- or thin salt are completely different during phases of extensional or compressional tectonics. This indicates that, indirectly, the depositional thickness of the main Zechstein salt is essential in regulating the loci of the Dutch petroleum systems. In this paper we aim at quantifying current ideas on the relationship between 1) depositional salt thicknesses; 2) structural style of the main structural elements identified in the Dutch subsurface; 3) timing of deformation; and 4) thickness of the overburden. By finalisation of TNO's subsurface mapping program (see Kombrink et al., this issue), several data products are available that allow evaluation of these relationships. The depositional thickness of the salt was estimated using iterative smoothing of the present day thickness, the results of which account both for regional thickness variations and volume preservation (99%). Fault-distribution analysis shows that faults are only able to penetrate salt with a depositional thickness of <300 m, a transition that demarcates the division between thin- and thick-skinned salt tectonics. In the southern offshore where the salt is thin or absent, the overburden shows the same fault pattern throughout the stratigraphic sequence. In the northern realm, where salt is thicker than 300 m, the salt layer acted as decollement and sub- and supra salt strain are dissimilar. A strong genetic and temporal relationship exists between periods of regional tectonism, halokinetic intensity and thickness distribution of the Zechstein overburden. This relationship is further proven by burial history analysis across two selected profiles in the northern offshore. The analysis focuses on the vertical distribution of the salt by taking into account the depositional and erosional history of the salt overburden, without a-priori defined periods of salt flow. The results corroborate the notion that platforms and highs experienced less extension during the major phases of Jurassic rifting and further suggest that the absence of a thick Jurassic overburden precludes major salt flow during this tectonic phase. Main salt flow was triggered during the Sub-Hercynian and later phases of compression resulting in salt pillow geometries. In the basinal areas, where the Jurassic succession is thickest, salt diapirs and walls formed that are almost exclusively linked to major subsalt faults. Main salt flow occurred during Late Kimmerian rifting, whereas some minor structuration occurred during Sub-Hercynian inversion.

Keywords

ZechsteinNorth Sea Basinhalokinesisstructural evolutionburial history analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 447 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2012

References

Abdul Fattah, R., Verweij, J.M., Witmans, N. & Ten Veen, J.H., 2012. Reconstruction of burial history, temperature, source rock maturity and hydrocarbon generation for the NCP-2D area, Dutch Offshore. TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands (Utrecht), Report number TNO-034-UT-2010-0223.Google Scholar
Bally, A.W., Bernouilli, D., Davis, G.A. & Montadert, L., 1981. Listric normal faults. Oceanologica Acta 9: 7–101.Google Scholar
Bishop, D.J., Buchanan, P.G. & Bishop, C.J., 1995. Gravity-driven thin-skinned extension above Zechstein Group evaporates in the Western Central North Sea: an application of computer-aided section restoration techniques. Marine and Petroleum Geology 12: 115–135.Google Scholar
Brun, J.P. & Mauduit, T.P.O., 2009. Salt rollers: Structure and kinematics from analogue modeling. Marine and Petroleum Geology 26: 249–258.Google Scholar
Cartwright, J., Stewart, S. & Clark, J., 2001. Salt dissolution and salt-related deformation of the Forth Approaches Basin, UK North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology 18: 757–778.Google Scholar
De Jager, J., 2003. Inverted basins in the Netherlands, similarities and differences. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 82: 355–366.Google Scholar
De Jager, J., 2007. Geological development. In: Wong, T.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & De Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (Amsterdam): 5–26.Google Scholar
De Jager, J. & Geluk, M.C., 2007. Petroleum geology. In: Wong, T.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & De Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (Amsterdam): 241–264.Google Scholar
De Jager, J., 2012. The discovery of the Lower Triassic Fat Sand Play (Middle Solling Sandstone), Northern Dutch offshore – a case of serendipity. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 91–4: 609–619, this issue.Google Scholar
Dronkert, H., Nio, S.D., Kouwe, W., Van der Poel, N. & Baumfalk, Y., 1989. Exploration and production potential of the Buntsandstein – Non Exclusive Study. Intergeos B.V., 450.Google Scholar
Geluk, M.C., 1999. Late Permian (Zechstein) rifting in the Netherlands: models and implications for petroleum geology. Petroleum Geoscience 5: 189–199.Google Scholar
Geluk, M.C., 2000. Late Permian (Zechstein) carbonate-facies maps, the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 79: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geluk, M.C., 2005. Stratigraphy and tectonics of Permo-Triassic basins in the Netherlands and surrounding areas. PhD thesis Utrecht University (Utrecht), 171.Google Scholar
Geluk, M.C., 2007. Permian. In: Wong, T, Batjes, D.A.J. & De Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (Amsterdam): 63–84.Google Scholar
Geluk, M.C., Paar, W. & Fokker, P., 2007. Salt. In: Wong, T, Batjes, D.A.J. & De Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (Amsterdam): 283–294.Google Scholar
Gussow, W.C., 1968. Salt diapirism: importance of temperature, and energy source of emplacement. In: Memoir of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 8: 16–52.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.B., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., Hübscher, C., Lykke-Andersen, H., Dehghani, A., Hell, B. & Gajewski, D., 2007. Basin evolution of the northern part of the Northeast German Basin – Insights from a 3D structural model. Tectonophysics 437: 1–16.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.A. & Talbot, C.J., 1991. Glossary of salt tectonics. Geological Circular 91-4, Bureau of Economic Geology. University of Texas at Austin, 44.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.P.A. & Vendeville, B.C., 1994. Regional extension as a geological trigger for diapirism. Geological Society of America Bulletin 106: 57–73.Google Scholar
Kombrink, H., Doornenbal, J.C., Duin, E.J.T., Den Dulk, M., Van Gessel, S.F., Ten Veen, J.H. & Witmans, N., 2012. New insights into the geological structure of the Netherlands; results of a detailed mapping project. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 91–4: 419–446, this issue.Google Scholar
Mohr, M., Kukla, P.A., Urai, J.L. & Bresser, G., 2005. Multiphase salt tectonic evolution in NW Germany: seismic interpretation and retro-deformation. International Journal of Earth Sciences 94: 917–940.Google Scholar
Nalpas, T., Le Douaran, S., Brun, J.P., Unternehr, P. & Richert, J.P., 1995. Inversion of the Broad Fourteens Basin (offshore Netherlands), a small scale model investigation. Sedimentary Geology 95: 237–250.Google Scholar
Peryt, T.M., Geluk, M.C., Mathiesen, A., Paul, J. & Smith, K., 2010. Zechstein. In: Doornenbal, J.P. & Stevenson, A.G. (eds): Petroleum Geological Atlas of the Southern Permian Basin Area. EAGE Publications b.v. (Houten): 123–147.Google Scholar
Racero-Baena, A. & Drake, S.J., 1996. Structural style and reservoir development in the West Netherlands oil province. In: Rondeel, H, Batjes, D.A.J. & Nieuwenhuijs, W.H. (eds): Geology of gas and oil under the Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers (Dordrecht): 211–228.Google Scholar
Remmelts, G., 1995. Fault-related salt tectonics in the southern North Sea, the Netherlands. In: Jackson, M.P.A., Roberts, D.G. & Snelson, S. (eds): Salt Tectonics: a Global Perspective. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir: 261–272.Google Scholar
Remmelts, G., 1996. Salt tectonics in the southern North Sea, the Netherlands. In: Rondeel, H.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & Nieuwenhuijs, W.H. (eds): Geology of gas and oil under the Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers (Dordrecht): 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheck, M., Bayer, U. & Lewerenz, B., 2003a. Salt redistribution during extension and inversion inferred from 3D backstripping. Tectonophysics 373: 55–73.Google Scholar
Scheck, M., Bayer, U. & Lewrenz, B., 2003b. Salt movements in the Northeast German Basin and its relation to major post-Permian tectonic phases – results from 3D structural modelling, backstripping and reflection seismic data. Tectonophysics 361: 277–299.Google Scholar
Schroot, B & De Haan, H.B., 2003. An improved regional structural model of the Upper Carboniferous of the Cleaver Bank High based on 3D seismic interpretation. In:Nieuwland, D.A. (ed.): New Insights into Structural Interpretation and Modelling. Geological Society Special Publications 212 (London): 23–37.Google Scholar
Stewart, S.A., 2007. Salt tectonics in the North Sea Basin: a structural style template for seismic interpreters. In: Ries, A.C., Butler, R.W.H. & Graham, R.H. (eds): Deformation of the Continental Crust: The Legacy of Mike Coward. Geological Society Special Publication 272 (London): 361–396.Google Scholar
Stewart, S.A., Harvey, M.J., Otto, S.C. & Weston, P.J., 1996. Influence of salt on fault geometry: examples from the UK salt basin. In: Alsop, G.I., Blundell, D.J. & Davison, I. (eds): Salt Tectonics. The Geological Society (London): 175–202.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.C.M., 1998. Upper Permian – Zechstein. In: Glennie, K.W. (ed.): Petroleum Geology of the North Sea: Basic Concepts and Recent Advances. Blackwell (Oxford): 174–212.Google Scholar
Trusheim, F., 1960. Mechanism of Salt Migration in Northern Germany. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 44: 1519–1540.Google Scholar
Urai, J, Schleder, Z., Spiers, C.J. & Kukla, P.A., 2008. Flow and transport properties of salt rocks. In: Littke, R., Bayer, U., Gajewski, D. & Nelskamp, S. (eds): Dynamics of Complex Intracontinental Basins: The Central European Basin System. Springer-Verlag (Berlin, Heidelberg): 277–290.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem Boogaert, H.A. & Kouwe, W.F.P., 1993. Stratigraphic nomenclature of the Netherlands, revision and update by RGD and NOGEPA, Section A, General. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 50: 1–40.Google Scholar
Van Buggenum, J.M. & Den Hartog Jager, D.G., 2007. Silesian. In: Wong, T.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & De Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (Amsterdam): 43–62.Google Scholar
Van Gent, H., Urai, J.L. & Keijzer, M.D., 2011. The internal geometry of salt structures – A first look using 3D seismic data from the Zechstein of the Netherlands. Journal of Structural Geology 33: 292–311.Google Scholar
Vendeville, B, 2002. A new interpretation of Thrusheim's classic model on saltdiapir growth. Transactions Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 52: 943–952.Google Scholar
Vendeville, B.C. & Cobbold, P.R., 1987. Glissements gravitaires synsedimentaires et failles normales listriques: mode les experimentaux. Comptes Rendues de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris 305: 1313–1319.Google Scholar
Vendeville, B.C. & Jackson, M.P.A., 1992. The rise of diapirs during thin skinned extension. Marine and Petroleum Geology 9: 331–353.Google Scholar
Verweij, J.M., Souto Carneiro Echternach, M. & Witmans, N., 2009. Terschelling Basin and southern Dutch Central Graben. Burial history, temperature, source rock maturity and hydrocarbon generation – Area 2A. TNO (Utrecht), Report number 034-UT-2009-02065.Google Scholar
Verweij, J.M. & Witmans, N., 2009. Terschelling Basin and southern Dutch Central Graben Mapping and modeling – Area 2A. TNO Built Environment and Geosciences (Utrecht). Report number TNO-034-UT-2009-01569, 65.Google Scholar