Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:39:33.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soft rock pediments in South Moravia, Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

T. Czudek
T. Czudek*
Affiliation:
Čápkova 26/19, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Soft rock pediments developed in South Moravia in some places as early as the Tertiary, in other places as late as the Pleistocene. Depending on local environmental factors the pediments developed either due to backwearing or downwearing. The most suitable conditions for the evolution of the Pleistocene pediments were during transitional periods between warm and cold climate phases and especially during periglacial conditions between cold and warm periods in the Middle and Late Pleistocene. In agricultural landscapes, the studied relief features continue to develop also at present.

Keywords

South MoraviapedimentsbackwearingdownwearingPleistoceneHolocene
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 91 , Issue 1-2 , September 2012 , pp. 215 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2012

References

Balatka, B., Czudek, T., Demek, J., Ivan, A. & Sládek, J., 1974. Geomorfologické poměry Pavlovských vrchů a jejich okolí (Geomorphology of the Pavlovské vrchy Hills and their surroundings, Czechoslovakia). Sborník Československé společnosti zeměpisné 79: 1–10.Google Scholar
Balatka, B. & Sládek, J., 1975. Geomorfologický vývoj dolního Poohří (Geomorphological development of the lower part of the Ohře River Basin). Rozpravy Československé akademie věd, ř. mat. a přír. věd 85: 1–70.Google Scholar
Beck, N., 1989. Periglacial glacis (pediment) generations at the western margin of the Rhine Hessian Plateau. Catena Suppl. 15: 189–197.Google Scholar
Brunotte, E. & Garleff, K., 1989. Structural landforms and planation surfaces in southern Lower Saxony. Catena Suppl. 15: 151–164.Google Scholar
Büdel, J., 1977. Klima-Geomorphologie. Gebrüder Borntraeger (Berlin-Stuttgart), 304 pp.Google Scholar
Czudek, T., 1988. Kryopedimente – wichtige Reliefformen der rezenten und pleistozänen Permafrostgebiete (Cryopediments – important relief forms in contemporary and Pleistocene permafrost environments). Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 132: 161–173.Google Scholar
Czudek, T., 2005. Vývoj reliéfu krajiny Česke republiky v kvarteru (Quaternary development of landscape relief of the Czech Republik). Moravske zemske muzeum (Brno): 238 pp.Google Scholar
Czudek, T., 2008. Kryopediment v údolí Litavy východně od Bučovic, Středomoravské Karpaty (Cryopediment in the Litava River valley east of Bučovice, Central Moravian Carpathians). Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku 15: 8–12.Google Scholar
Czudek, T. & Demek, J., 1970. Pleistocene cryopediments in Czecholsovakia. Acta Geographica Lodziensia 24: 101–108.Google Scholar
Czudek, T. & Demek, J., 1976. The slopes of the Central Moravian Carpathians: periglacial or temperate? Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica 10: 3–14.Google Scholar
French, H.M. & Harry, D.G., 1992. Pediments and cold-climate conditions, Barn Mountains, unglaciated Northern Yukon, Canada. Geografiska Annaler 74 A: 154–157.Google Scholar
French, H.M., 2007. The periglacial environment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester), 458 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garleff, K., Brunotte, E. & Stingl, H., 1988. Fußflächen im zentralen Teil der Hessischen Senke (Piedmont glacis in the central part of the geological structure ‘Hessische Senke’, Western Germany). Berliner Geographische Abhandlungen 47: 63–76.Google Scholar
Gullentops, F., Janssen, J. & Paulissen, E., 1993. Saalian nivation activity in the Bosbeek valley, NE Belgium. Geologie en Mijnbouw 72: 125–130.Google Scholar
Chábera, S., 1984. Údolní pedimenty na dolním toku Volyňky (Valley pediments in the lower segment of the Volyňka River). Sborník Jihočeského muzea v Českých Budějovicích, přír. vědy 24: 67–71.Google Scholar
Jahn, A., 1956. Wyżyna Lubelska – rzeźba i czwartorzęd (The Lublin Upland – relief and Quaternary). Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe (Warszawa), 453 pp.Google Scholar
Piotrovskij, M.V., 1964. Problemy formirovanija pedimentov (Problems of pediment development). In: Gerasimov, I.P., Meshcheryakov, Y.A., Vostryakov, A.V., Gorelov, S.K., Dumitrashko, N.V., Korzhenevsky, A.A., Naumov, A.D. & Timofeyev, D.A. (eds): Problemy poverchnostej vyravnivanija (Problems of palantion surfaces). Izdatelstvo ‘Nauka’ (Moskva): 50–65.Google Scholar
Rotnicki, K., 1974. Slope development of Riss Glaciation and moraines during the Würm, its morphological and geological consequences. Questiones Geographicae 1: 109–139.Google Scholar
Thorn., C.E. & Hall, K., 2002. Nivation and cryoplanation: the case for scrutiny and integration. Progress in Physical Geography 26: 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, J. & Czudek, T., 2008. Pleistocene cryopediments on variable terrain. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 19: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar