Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T11:19:11.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opposite hysteresis of sand and gravel transport upstream anddownstream of a bifurcation during a flood in the River Rhine, theNetherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

M.G. Kleinhans ,
A.W.E. Wilbers  and
W.B.M. ten Brinke
M.G. Kleinhans*
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, Fac. of Geosciences, Dept. of Physical Geography, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
A.W.E. Wilbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, Fac. of Geosciences, Dept. of Physical Geography, now at Becker & Van De Graaf, P.O. Box 3012, 2220 CA Katwijk, the Netherlands
W.B.M. ten Brinke
Affiliation:
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Institute for Inland Water Management and Wastewater Treatment(RIZA)
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At river bifurcations water and sediment is divided among the downstreambranches. Prediction of the sediment transport rate and division thereof atbifurcations is of utmost importance for understanding the evolution of thebifurcates for short-term management purposes and for long-term fluvialplain development. However, measured sediment transports in rivers rarelyshow a uniquely determined relation with hydrodynamic parameters. Commonly ahysteresis is observed of transport rate as a function of discharge or shearstress which cannot be explained with the standard sediment transportpredictor approach. The aim of this paper is to investigate the causes ofhysteresis at a bifurcation of the lower Rhine river, a meandering riverwith stable banks, large dunes during flood, and poorly sorted bed sediment.The hydrodynamics and bed sediment transport were measured in detail duringa discharge wave with a recurrence interval larger than 10 years.Surprisingly, the hysteresis in bedload against discharge was in theopposite direction upstream and downstream of the bifurcation. The upstreamclockwise hysteresis is caused by the lagging development of dunes duringthe flood. The counter-clockwise hysteresis downstream of the bifurcation iscaused by a combination of processes in addition to dune lagging, namely 1)formation of a scour zone upstream of the bifurcation, causing a migratingfine sediment wave, and 2) vertical bed sorting of the bed sediment by duneswith avalanching lee-sides, together leading to surface-sediment fining andincreased transport during and after the flood. These findings lead tochallenges for future morphological models, particularly for bifurcations,which will have to deal with varying discharge, sediment sorting in thechannel bed, lagging dunes and related hydraulic roughness.

Keywords

bedload transportbifurcationhysteresissandy gravel-bed riversediment sortingsuspended bed sediment transport
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 273 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2007

Footnotes

now at Bureau Blueland, Nieuwegracht 36P, 3512 LS Utrecht, the Netherlands

References

Allen, J.R.L., 1976. Computational models for dune time-lag: general ideas, difficulties, and early results. Sedimentary Geology 15: 1–53.10.1016/0037-0738(76)90020-8Google Scholar
Allen, J.R.L., & Collinson, J.D., 1974. The superimposition and classification of dunes formed by unidirectional aqueous flows, Sedimentary Geology 12: 169–178.10.1016/0037-0738(74)90008-6Google Scholar
Beschta, R.L., 1987. Conceptual models of sediment transport in streams. In: Thorne, C.R., Bathurst, J.C. & Hey, R.D. (eds): Sediment transport in gravel-bed rivers, Wiley & Sons (UK): 387–419.Google Scholar
Blom, A. & Parker, G., 2004. Vertical sorting and the morphodynamics of bed form-dominated rivers: a modeling framework. J. of Geophysical Research 109, F02007, doi:10.1029/2003JF000069.Google Scholar
Bolla Pittaluga, M., Repetto, R. & Tubino, M., 2003. Channel bifurcation in braided rivers: equilibrium configurations and stability. Water Resources Research 39: 1046, doi:10.1029/2001WR001112.Google Scholar
Dietrich, W.E. & Whiting, P.J., 1989. Boundary shear stress and sediment transport in river meanders of sand and gravel In: Ikeda, S. & Parker, G. (eds): Water Resources Monograph 12, AGU (Houston): 1–50.Google Scholar
Frings, R.M., 2007. Published PhD-thesis in prep., The Royal Dutch Geographical Society (Utrecht, the Netherlands).Google Scholar
Frings, R.M., & Kleinhans, M.G., 2007. Complex variations in sediment transport at three large river bifurcations during discharge waves in the river Rhine. Accepted by Sedimentology.Google Scholar
Garcia, C., Laronne, J.B. & Sala, M., 1999. Variable source areas of bedload in a gravel-bed stream. Journal of Sedimentary Research 69: 27–31.10.2110/jsr.69.27Google Scholar
Gruijters, S.H.L.L., Veldkamp, J.G., Gunnink, J. & Bosch, J.H.A., 2001. The lithological and sedimentological structure of the Pannerdensche Kop bifurcation, final report (in Dutch: De lithologische en sedimentologische opbouw van de ondergrond van de Pannerdensche Kop. Interpretatie van de meetresultaten.). Geological Survey of the Netherlands, (Zwolle) TNO-report NITG01-166-B: 41 pp.Google Scholar
Hesselink, A.W., Kleinhans, M.G. & Boreel, G.I., 2006. Historie discharge measurements in three Rhine branches. J. of Hydraulic Engineering 132: 140–145, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:2(140).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:2(140)Google Scholar
Hirano, M., 1971. River bed degradation with armouring. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. 3: 194–195.Google Scholar
Mien, P.Y., Klaassen, G.J., Ten Brinke, W.B.M. & Wilbers, A.W.E., 2002. Bed resistance of the Bovenrijn River during the 1998 flood. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 128: 1042–1050.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:12(1042)Google Scholar
Klaassen, G.J., 1991. Experiments on the effect of gradation and vertical sorting on sediment transport phenomena in the dune phase. In: Jaeggi, M. & Hunziker, R. (eds): Grain Sorting Seminar. Spec. Publ. Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule (Zürich), 117: 127–146.Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G., 2001. The key role of ñuvial dunes in transport and deposition of sand-gravel mixtures, a preliminary note. Sedimentary Geology, 143: 7–13, doi:10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00109-9.10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00109-9Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G., 2002. Sorting out sand and gravel: sediment transport and deposition in sand-gravel bed rivers. Published PhD-thesis, The Royal Dutch Geographical Society (Utrecht, the Netherlands) 293: 317 pp.Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G., 2004. Sorting in grain flows at the lee-side of dunes. Earth Science Reviews 65: 75–102, doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00081-310.1016/S0012-8252(03)00081-3Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G., 2005a. Subaqueous dunes, transport and deposition of sand-gravel mixtures: linking process and deposit in fluvial channels. In: Blum, M.D., Marriott, S.B. & Leclair, S.F. (eds): Special Publication 35 of the International Association of Sedimentologists, Blackwell publishing (Maiden, USA): 75–97.Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G., 2005b. Upstream sediment input effects on experimental dune trough scour in sediment mixtures. J. Geophys. Res. 110, F04S06, doi:10.1029/2004JF000169.Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G. & Ten Brinke, W.B.M., 2001. Accuracy of cross-channel sampled sediment transport in large sand-gravel-bed rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127: 258–269, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:4(258).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:4(258)Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G. & Van Rijn, L.C., 2002. Stochastic prediction of sediment transport in sand-gravel bed rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 128: 412–425, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:4(412)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:4(412)Google Scholar
Kleinhans, M.G., Jagers, H.R.A., Mosselman, E. & Sloff, C.J., 2007. Bifurcation dynamics and avulsion duration in meandering rivers by ID and 3D models. Accepted by Water Resources Research.Google Scholar
Kuhnle, R.A., 1992. Bed load transport during rising and falling stages on two small streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 17: 191–197.10.1002/esp.3290170206Google Scholar
Lisle, T.E., Cui, Y., Parker, G., Pizzuto, J.E. & Dodd, A.M., 2001. The dominance of dispersion in the evolution of bed material waves in gravel-bed rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26: 1409–1420.10.1002/esp.300Google Scholar
McLean, S.R., Wolfe, S.R. & Nelson, J.M., 1999. Predicting boundary shear stress and sediment transport over bedforms. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125: 725–736.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:7(725)Google Scholar
Mosselman, E. & Sloff, C.J., 2005. Morphology of river bifurcations: theory, field measurements and modelling. Gravel-bed Rivers VI Conference, September 5-9 (Lienz, Austria) (in press).Google Scholar
Parker, G., Hassan, M. & Wilcock, P., 2005. Adjustment of the bed surface size distribution of gravel-bed rivers in response to cycled hydrographs. Gravel-bed Rivers VI Conference, September 5 – 9 (Lienz, Austria) (in press).Google Scholar
Reid, I. Frostick, L.E., & Layman, J.T., 1985. The incidence and nature of bedload transport during flood flows in coarse-grained alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 10: 33–44.10.1002/esp.3290100107Google Scholar
Schielen, R.M.J., Jesse, P. & Bolwidt, L.J., 2007. On the use of flexible spillways to control the discharge ratio of the Rhine in the Netherlands: hydraulic and morphological observations. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 86: 77–88.10.1017/S0016774600021338S0016774600021338Google Scholar
Sloff, C.J., Jagers, H.R.A., Kitamura, Y. & Kitamura, P., 2001. 2D Morphodynamic Modelling with Graded Sediment. Proceedings of 2nd IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics, 10 – 14 September, Obihiro, Japan: 535–544.Google Scholar
Ten Brinke, W.B.M., Wilbers, A.W.E. & Wesseling, C., 1999. Dune growth, decay and migration rates during a large-magnitude flood at a sand and mixed sand-gravel bed in the Dutch Rhine river system. Special Publications International Assembly Sedimentology, 28: 15–32.Google Scholar
Van Rijn, L.C., 1984a. Sediment transport, part I: bed load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110: 1431–1456.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:10(1431)Google Scholar
Van Rijn, L.C., 1984b. Sediment transport, part II: suspended load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110: 1613–1641.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:11(1613)Google Scholar
Wang, Z.B., De Vries, M., Fokkink, R.J. & Langerak, A., 1995. Stability of river bifurcations in ID morphodynamics models. J. of Hydraulic Research 33: 739–750.10.1080/00221689509498549Google Scholar
Wilbers, A.W.E., 2004. The development and hydraulic roughness of subaqueous dunes. Published PhD-thesis, The Royal Dutch Geographical Society (Utrecht, the Netherlands) 323: 227 pp.Google Scholar
Wilbers, A.W.E. & Ten Brinke, W.B.M., 2003. The response of subaqueous dunes to floods in sand and gravel bed reaches of the Dutch Rhine. Sedimentology, 50: 1013–1034.10.1046/j.1365-3091.2003.00585.xGoogle Scholar