Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:29:30.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New geological data (Middle Triassic, Rhaetian-Liassic and Oligocene) of the Winterswijk quarry, the eastern Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

G.F.W. Herngreen ,
J.H.A. van Konijnenburg - van Cittert  and
H.W. Oosterink
G.F.W. Herngreen*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands
J.H.A. van Konijnenburg - van Cittert
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
H.W. Oosterink
Affiliation:
Hortensialaan 64, 7101 XH Winterswijk, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present publication deals with recent palynological results of a relatively small interval of Muschelkalk and exposures of the overlying clay deposits in the Winterswijk quarries. For the first time the Lower Muschelkalk Member in the Netherlands could be independently dated as Bithynian (Anisian, Middle Triassic). Contrary to widely accepted opinions the overlying almost black clay deposit is not Liassic but Rhaetian in age and it is assigned to the Sleen Shale Formation. This marginal marine clay which pinches out to the south, is in turn overlain by a light gray, full-marine Lower-Oligocene clay of the Rupel Formation. An anomalous occurrence of Liassic clay is now attributed to subrosion of Röt salt followed by collapse of the overlying Muschelkalk, Rhaetian and Lias strata.

Keywords

eastern NetherlandsMuschelkalkRhaetianLiassicOligocenesubrosion
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 84 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 409 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2005

References

Commissaris, A.L.Th.M., 1965. Pollenanalytisch onderzoek van de Winterswijkse Muschelkalk (Onder Muschelkalk). Doctoral essay Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, University Utrecht: 1–28.Google Scholar
Crommelin, R.D., 1943. Een karrenveld bij Winterswijk. Tijdschrift Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, 2e Reeks 60(2): 154–163.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C, 2001. Vertebrate track bed stratigraphy of the Rot and basal Lower Muschelkalk (Anisian) of Winterswijk (East Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw / Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 80(2): 31–39.Google Scholar
Harsveldt, H.M., 1973. The Middle Triassic limestone (Muschelkalk) in the Achterhoek (E. Gelderland). Verhandelingen Koninklijk Nederlands Geologisch Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap, Geologische Serie 29: 43–50.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W., 1989. Resultaat van het palynologisch onderzoek van een kleimonster uit Steengroeve III te Winterswijk,1989. Rijks Geologische Dienst, Paleontologie Mesozoicum (Palynologie), Intern rapport 2217.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W., 2005. Triassic sporomorphs of NW Europe: taxonomy, morphology, and ranges of marker species, with remarks on botanical relationship and ecology, and comparison with ranges in the Alpine Triassic.- Internal report TN0, NITG 04–176-C, 83 pp.Google Scholar
Kozur, H.W., 1999. The correlation of the Germanic Buntsandstein and Muschelkalk with the Tethyan scale. In: Bachmann, G.H. & Lerche, I. (eds): Epicontinental Triassic. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie 1998(7/8): 701–725.Google Scholar
Laemmlen, M., 1991. Subrosionsschlote - Vulkanschlote - einige Beispiele aus Osthessen. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A 124: 31–58.Google Scholar
Lissenberg, Th., 1989. Mikropaleontologisch onderzoek aan een kleimonster uit de steengroeve te Winterswijk. Rijks Geologische Dienst, Paleontologie Mesozoicum, (Foraminiferen en Ostracoden), Intern rapport 497.Google Scholar
N1TG-TN0, 1998. Geologische Atlas van de Diepe Ondergrond van Nederland, Toelichting bij kaartblad X: Almelo-Winterswijk. NITG TNO, Haarlem, 146 pp.Google Scholar
Oestreich, K., 1943. Beschouwingen omtrent een blootgekomen karstoppervlak bij Winterswijk. Tijdschrift Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, 2de Reeks 60(2): 163–166.Google Scholar
Oosterink, H.W., 1986. Winterswijk, Geologie deel II: De Trias-periode (geologie, mineralen en fossielen). Wetenschappelijke Mededelingen KNNV 178: 120 pp.Google Scholar
Peletier, W. & Kolstee, H.G., 1986. Winterswijk, Geologie deel I: Inleiding tot de geologie van Winterswijk. Wetenschappelijke Mededelingen KNNV 175:136 pp.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem Boogaert, H.A. & Kouwe, W.F.P., 1994-1997. Stratigraphie nomenclature of the Netherlands, revision and update by RGD and N0GEPA. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 50.Google Scholar
Van, den Bosch, M., 1984. Lithostratigraphy of the Brinkheurne Formation (Oligocene, Rupelian) in the eastern part of the Netherlands. Mededelingen Werkgroep Tertiaire Kwartaire Geologie 21(2): 93–113.Google Scholar
Van Simaeys, S., Munsterman, D. & Brinkhuis, H., 2005. Oligocene dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy of the southern North Sea Basin. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 134(1-2): 105–128.Google Scholar
Visscher, H. & Commissaris, A.L.T.M., 1968. Middle Triassic pollen and spores from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk (the Netherlands). Pollen et Spores 10(1): 161–176.Google Scholar