Introduction
We report here new aristonectine elasmosaurid plesiosaur material from the Early Maastrichtian of Angola. Comparisons and phylogenetic analyses suggest it is closely related to and may be conspecific with an unnamed species from the Late Maastrichtian of northern Patagonia, Argentina, previously assigned to Tuarangisaurus? cabazai Gasparini, Salgado & Casadío Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Casadío2003 (MML PV 5), subsequently reassigned to Plesiosauroidea indet. by Gasparini et al. (Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Parras2007) and more recently to Aristonectinae gen. et. sp. indet. by O’Gorman et al. (Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014). It is also indistinguishable from an unnamed taxon from New Zealand (MONZ R1526, Welles & Gregg, Reference Welles and Gregg1971 and GNS CD427-429, Wiffen & Moysley, Reference Wiffen and Moisley1986). The material described here retains juvenile features in a relatively large individual. Araújo et al. (Reference Araújo, Lindgren, Jacobs, Polcyn and Schulp2013) and Gorman et al. (Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014) reported a high proportion of ‘osteologically immature’ individuals in their investigated samples of elasmosaurid specimens, raising the possibility of paedomorphism in adults, a hypothesis we test through histological analysis of our material.
Geological setting and age
Strganac et al. (Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Ferguson, Polcyn, Mateus, Schulp, Morais and Gonçalves2014) reported the carbon isotope stratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy and 40Ar/39Ar dates for the section at Bentiaba, Angola, which ranges in age from Cenomanian to Late Maastrichtian. Mateus et al. (Reference Mateus, Polcyn, Jacobs, Araújo, Schulp, Marinheiro, Pereira and Vineyard2012) summarised the amniote fauna, reporting three plesiosaur taxa from that locality. Two of the three plesiosaur taxa reported by Mateus et al. (Reference Mateus, Polcyn, Jacobs, Araújo, Schulp, Marinheiro, Pereira and Vineyard2012) are found in the so-called Bench 19 interval, in which the majority of vertebrate fossils are concentrated (Strganac et al., Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Mateus, Myers, Salminen, May, Araújo, Ferguson, Gonçalves, Morais, Schulp and Tavares2015a), including the plesiosaur taxon described herein and a second elasmosaurid described in Araújo et al. (2015). The interval falls within magnetochron C32n.1n and is thus placed in a chronological bin approximately 240 ka in duration (71.64–71.40 Ma; Strganac et al., Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Mateus, Myers, Salminen, May, Araújo, Ferguson, Gonçalves, Morais, Schulp and Tavares2015a,Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Ferguson, Mateus, Gonçalves, Morais and Tavaresb). The sediments of the Bench 19 interval are immature feldspathic sand derived from nearby granitic shield rocks, deposited on a narrow shelf at approximately 24°S paleolatitude in waters between 50 and 100 m in depth (Strganac et al., Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Mateus, Myers, Salminen, May, Araújo, Ferguson, Gonçalves, Morais, Schulp and Tavares2015a) and 18°C paleotemperature (Strganac et al., Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Ferguson, Mateus, Gonçalves, Morais and Tavares2015b). The early Maastrichtian age of the specimens described here is biochronologically compatible with that of the New Zealand and South American aristonectine material summarised by Otero et al. (Reference Otero, Soto-Acuña and Rubilar-Rogers2012), but the Angola specimens mark the northernmost occurrence of an aristonectine elasmosaurid and extend the geographic range of the Late Cretaceous Weddellian Biogeographic Province (Zinsmeister, Reference Zinsmeister1979).
Institutional abbreviations
AIM – Auckland Museum, Auckland, New Zealand; BMNH – The Natural History Museum, London, UK; GNS – Geological National Survey (New Zealand), Lower Hutt, New Zealand; MGUAN – Museu de Geologia da Universidade Agostinho Neto, Luanda, Angola; MML – Museo Municipal de Lamarque, Río Negro, Argentina; MONZ – Museum of New Zealand, Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand; QMF – Queensland Museum, Brisbane, Australia.
Material and methods
Materials
Plesiosaur specimens MGUAN PA85 (Fig. 1), MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2), MGUAN PA248 (Figs 3 and 4) and MGUAN PA250 (Fig. 5), collected by Projecto PaleoAngola in 2007 and 2010 from Bentiaba, Namibe. The specimens are temporarily housed in the Shuler Museum of Paleontology (SMU) and Museu da Lourinhã (Portugal) but will be transferred to the Museu de Geologia da Universidade Agostinho Neto (MGUAN) collections at a later date.
Fig. 1. Aristonectinae indet. A. MGUAN PA85 in distal (1), dorsal (2) and preaxial or postaxial (3) views. 4. Ventral view. 5. Preaxial or postaxial view (distal epiphysis on top). B. Cervical and pectoral vertebrae and ribs in lateral view.
Histological procedures
Two isolated propodials from Angola (femur of MGUAN PA85 and a possible humerus MGUAN PA550) were moulded and cast prior to sampling. Transverse sections approximately 5 mm thick were removed using a diamond saw. The larger and more complete of the two elements (MGUAN PA85) was sampled at mid-diaphyseal and metaphyseo-diaphyseal height but only the metaphyseo-diaphyseal region was examined in MGUAN PA550. The samples were vacuum-embedded in polyester resin (Araldit DBF from ABIC Kemi®) to prevent shattering during slide preparation. Once embedded, one approximately 1 mm thick cross-section was cut from each block. The sections were attached to petrographic slides with polyester resin and ground to optical translucency. The cross-sections were imaged using a SONY 200 digital camera with a Tamron SPAF 90 mm macro lens and a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera attached to a binocular microscope. The osteohistological terminology follows that of Wiffen et al. (Reference Wiffen, De Buffrénil, De Ricqlès and Mazin1995).
Phylogenetic analysis
We employed the data matrix of Benson & Druckenmiller (Reference Benson and Druckenmiller2014), which included 270 characters and 81 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) to which we added the Angolan taxon reported here and another apparently closely related form from New Zealand (MONZ R1526 and GNS CD427-429). Two separate analyses were performed, one with the Angolan and New Zealand forms coded as individual OTUs and a second analysis with all specimens combined as a single unit to increase character coverage (see Appendix 1). The analyses were performed using TNT 1.1 (Dec 2013 version; Goloboff et al., Reference Goloboff, Farris and Nixon2008) using the ‘fuse’ search algorithm. The group supports were calculated using absolute and relative Bremer support (Goloboff & Farris, Reference Goloboff and Farris2001) by TBR-swapping the trees found, keeping note of the number of steps needed to lose each group. Resampling was done by calculating the frequency and frequency differences (Goloboff et al., Reference Goloboff, Farris, Källersjö, Oxelman, Ramírez and Szumika2003) with 100 replications of symmetric resampling (Goloboff et al., Reference Goloboff, Farris, Källersjö, Oxelman, Ramírez and Szumika2003), in which each matrix was analysed with a single random addition sequence and TBR, and then collapsing the resulting tree with TBR (Goloboff & Farris, Reference Goloboff and Farris2001). During the calculation of the strict consensus the branches with no possible support were collapsed (‘rule 3’). See Appendix 1 for the taxon/character matrix.
Systematic paleontology
Sauropterygia Owen Reference Owen1860
Plesiosauria de Blainville, Reference de Blainville1835
Elasmosauridae Cope Reference Cope1869 (sensu Ketchum & Benson, Reference Ketchum and Benson2010)
Aristonectinae Otero, Soto-Acuna, and Rubilar-Rogers, Reference Otero, Soto-Acuña and Rubilar-Rogers2012
Aristonectinae gen. et. sp. indet.
Fig. 2. Aristonectinae indet. A. MGUAN PA120, right femur in proximal (1), preaxial (2), ventral (3), postaxial (4), dorsal (5) and distal (6) views. B. Right ischium in medial (1), posterior (2), ventral (3), anterior (4), dorsal (5) and lateral (6) views. C. Left sacral rib in medial (1), anterior (2), ventral (3), posterior (4), dorsal (5) and lateral (6) views.
Fig. 3. Aristonectinae indet. MGUAN PA248. A. Mesopodial element in proximal (1), postaxial (2), dorsal (3) and ventral (4) views. B. Cervical centrum in dorsal (1), anterior (2) and ventral (3) views. C. Pectoral centrum in left lateral (1), anterior (2), right lateral (3) and ventral (4) views. D. Posterior caudal vertebra (?) in dorsal (1) and ventral (2) views. E. Distal mesopodial element in dorsal (1) and ventral (2) proximal views. F. Cervical neural arch in lateral (1) and anterior (2) views. G. Autopodial element in proximal (1) and distal, preaxial, postaxial, dorsal or ventral (2) views.
Fig. 4. Aristonectinae indet. MGUAN PA248. A. Posterior cervical centrum in dorsal (1), left lateral (2), anterior (3), right lateral (4) and ventral (5) views. B. Posterior cervical centrum in anterior (1), ventral (2) and lateral (3) views. C. Posterior cervical centrum in left lateral (1), anterior (2), right lateral (3) and ventral (4) views. D. Left humerus dorsal (1), postaxial (2), proximal (3), ventrsal (4), preaxial (5) and distal (6) views. E. Cervical neural arch in dorsal (1), lateral (2) and ventral (3) views. F. Right coracoid fragment in ventral (1), medial (2) and dorsal (3) views. G. Right coracoid fragment in ventral (1), medial (2) and dorsal (3) views.
Fig. 5. Aristonectinae indet. MGUAN PA250. A. Left humerus in preaxial (1), proximal (2), dorsal (3), distal (4), postaxial (5) and ventral (6) views. B. Left coracoid in lateral (1), dorsal (2), medial (3) and ventral (4) views. C. Right coracoid in ventral (1) and dorsal (2) views.
Referred specimens: MGUAN PA85 (Fig. 1), a series of 13 cervical and dorsal vertebrae with dorsal and pectoral ribs and a partial femur; MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2), one ischium, one femur, six autopodial elements and two sacral ribs; MGUAN PA248 (Figs 3 and 4), two autopodial elements, one phalanx, two partial coracoids, partial propodial, two neural arches and five cervical and one pectoral centra; MGUAN PA250 (Fig. 5), two coracoids, two humeri, two vertebral centra and rib fragments.
Locality and horizon: Bentiaba, Angola, Mocuio Formation; from the Bench 19 interval dated at approximately 71.5 Ma (Strganac et al., Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Mateus, Myers, Salminen, May, Araújo, Ferguson, Gonçalves, Morais, Schulp and Tavares2015a).
Osteological description and comparisons
Cervical and pectoral vertebrae
The Angolan specimen MGUAN PA248 (Fig. 3) has an anterior cervical centrum with the neural arch, but a comparable anterior centrum is seen in the New Zealand specimen MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6, Appendix 2). The cervical centrum can only be distinguished from the pectoral centrum due to the relative position of the rib facet, higher on the pectoral (see Sachs et al., Reference Sachs, Kear and Everhart2013). Although all centra present a shallow depression in the centre of the articular facets, the centra are effectively platycoelous. The vertebrae are wider than high and higher than long (W > H > L). The lateral sides are shallow and concave, and the ventral sides are flat. There is no evidence of a lateral keel. In anterior and posterior views, a shallow ventral and dorsal notch on the articular facets is reminiscent of the binocular-shaped vertebrae of other elasmosaurids (e.g. Kaiwhekea). The ellipsoidal foramina subcentralia are separated by a thick rounded ridge. The dorsal sides of the vertebrae have a concave medial region (which formed the floor of the neural canal) comprising about one-third of the dorsal area. This area is perforated by two ellipsoidal foramina that are separated by a sharp ridge. Laterally, the articular surface for the neural arch forms a crater-like D-shaped region, which is bounded by distinct edges. The rib facets are also single crater-like structures formed by ellipsoidal depressions with the long axis parallel to the anteroposterior axis of the centra. Two neural arches are preserved; one is missing one pedicle and the apex of the neural spine and the other comprises only the neural spine. The pedicle is thick at the base, becomes very thin in the middle and then expands to meet the neural spine. In ventral view, the articular surface with the centrum is roughened and oval. In the posterior part of the pedicle, at the junction with the neural spine, there is a small foramen. The prezygapophyses are proportionally small relative to the centra and form a rounded cup with no separation between the two. The prezygapophyses protrude at a high angle to the vertical plane (∼70°). The surface of the prezygapophyses is roughened. The dorsal edge of the prezygapophyses extends to the neural spine about one fifth its length in the form of a crest. The connection of the prezygapophyses to the neural spine is a smooth upwards curve. In anterior view, the base of the neural spine is pierced by two teardrop-shaped foramina. The postzygapophyses are in contact with each other, although at the intersection there is a shallow depression between them. The neural spine borders are straight and sub-parallel to each other. At mid-height, the anterior border is pierced by an elongated foramen, and the posterior border is excavated by an elongate slit.
Fig. 6. MONZ R1526, previously referred to 'Plesiosaurus australis' by Hector (1874). A. Anterior cervical vertebral centrum in anterior (1), lateral (2), dorsal (3), posterior (4) and ventral (5) views. B. Dorsal vertebral centrum in dorsal (1), anterior or posterior (?) (2), ventral (3) and lateral (4) views. C. Pubis in ventral (1), acetabular (2) and dorsal (3) views. D. Mesopodial element: ventral or dorsal views (1 and 4), preaxial or postaxial view (2), proximal or distal views (3 and 5). E. Right ischium in posterior (1), medial (2), dorsal (3), acetabular (4) and anterior (5) views. F. Left ilium in anterior (1), medial (2) and posterior (3) views. G. Right femur in preaxial (1), distal (2), dorsal (3), proximal (4), postaxial (5) and ventral (6) views.
The cervicals preserved in MGUAN PA85 (Fig. 1B) represent a more posterior position than those of MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6A) and MGUAN PA248 (Fig. 3). The cervicals do not increase significantly in length posteriorly. Also, the vertebral width does not increase significantly relative to their length. The length of the centra is consistently less than is the height. The articular surfaces of the cervical centra are markedly elliptical with the short axis corresponding to the height. Cervical centra are concave laterally and slightly amphicoelous. The cervical centra have slightly concave articular facets in some vertebrae and do not present the binocular-shape as in other species (e.g. Kaiwhekea, Cruickshank & Fordyce, Reference Cruickshank and Fordyce2002). The vertebrae are from the posterior portion of the neck because they are flat (Sato, Reference Sato2005) and do not have a cylinder-like, gentle restriction on the adjacent vertebral facets (Carpenter, Reference Carpenter1996; Williston, Reference Williston1903). Furthermore, there are no lateral or ventral keels on the cervical vertebrae, indicative of a posterior position (Sato, Reference Sato2002). The articular facets for the ribs are sub-circular and single-headed. There is a well-defined protruding rim for the rib articulation. The pectoral centra can be identified by possessing functional rib facets transected by the neurocentral suture (Sachs et al., Reference Sachs, Kear and Everhart2013). In the pectoral centra, the areas of attachment for the neural spine form a lateral bump, and in dorsal view a D-shaped area of articulation (Fig. 1B). The area of attachment for the neural spine is not visible in the cervical centra. The foramina subcentralia are present in the cervical and pectoral vertebrae. These foramina are situated far apart from each other in the cervical centra. Some pectoral vertebrae bear a maximum of six foramina subcentralia. The widely separated foramina are shared by cryptocleidoids (O’Keefe & Street, Reference O’Keefe and Street2009), but are also visible in posterior cervical vertebrae of Dolichorhynchops osborni (Williston, Reference Williston1903). In addition to the ventral foramina, there are two elliptical dorsal foramina edged laterally and medially by two ridges; the median ridge only extends along the side of the foramina. Pedicles are thinnest halfway from the centrum to the neural spine. The neural spines are straight (i.e. not angled posteriorly), compressed and blade-like; as opposed to those seen in pliosaurids such as Macroplata (White, Reference White1940) or in the rhomaleosaurid Stratesaurus (Benson et al., Reference Benson, Evans and Druckenmiller2012). The apex of the neural spine is slightly rounded or flat and there is no swelling of the neural spine apex as in the elasmosaurid Futabasaurus (Sato et al., Reference Sato, Hasegawa and Manabe2006). The neural spine is slightly concave along the posterior border, producing a small space between neural spines for relative movement; the apex actually touches the adjacent neural spines. In the cervicals the prezygapophyses are conjoined yet distinct, but in the pectorals they are fully separated. The pre- and postzygapophyses are narrower than the centrum, and the zygapophyses are nearly horizontal. The zygapophyseal angle along the cervical vertebral series remains constant. The prezygapophysis dorsal surface is markedly concave whereas that of the postzygapophysis is flat. There is a slight ridge extending posteriorly from the prezygapophysis.
The dorsals preserved in MGUAN PA85 are in all respects very similar to those of MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6) and MML-PV5 (O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014). In MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6B) only the neural spines and the transverse processes are visible on the sequence of dorsal vertebrae (Fig. 6, central line drawing). In the dorsal vertebral centrum detached from the specimen block MGUAN PA85, as in MONZ R1526, the neural spines are short and thick lateromedially, bear straight or slightly concave anterior and posterior borders, and are well separated from the adjacent neural spines. The apex of the neural spines is smoothly convex in lateral view. The transverse processes arise from the anterior portion of the pedicles and are very stout and cylindrical; the rugose articular facet is flat or slightly convex. The dorsal centrum closely resembles that of MML-PV5 (Gasparini et al., Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Casadío2003; O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014) and GNS CD429 (Fig. 7C; Wiffen & Moisley, Reference Wiffen and Moisley1986); it is characteristically wide, giving an ellipsoidal shape to the sub-platycoelous anterior and posterior articular facets. The attachment area for the neural arch is sub-circular and expands slightly beyond the sides of the centrum. The neural canal carves a shallow gutter that is pierced by two anteroposteriorly elongated foramina, which in the preserved vertebrae are all in the same relative position in the centra.
Fig. 7. GNS CD427–429, previously referred to 'juvenile' cf. Tuarangisaurus keyesi by Wiffen & Moisley (Reference Wiffen and Moisley1986). A. GNS CD428 coracoid and scapula in coracoid in medial (1), scapula in dorsal (2) and coracoid in lateral (3) views. B. GNS CD428 coracoid in lateral (1), anterior (2), ventral (3), medial (4) and dorsal (5) views. C. GNS CD427 dorsal vertebrae sequence in ventral (1), posterior (2), lateral (3) and dorsal (4) views. D. GNS CD427 paddle. E. GNS CD428 scapula in lateral (1), medial (2), anterior (3), dorsal (4) and glenoidal (5) views. F. GNS CD429 pubis in acetabular (1), dorsal (2) and anterior (3) views. G. GNS CD429 dorsal neural arch in ventral (1), anterior (2) and lateral (3) views. H. GNS CD429 ischium in anterior (1), glenoidal (2), ventral (3) and medial (4) views. I. GNS CD428 humerus in preaxial or postaxial (1), proximal (2), dorsal or ventral (3) and distal (4) views. J. GNS CD429 dorsal vertebral centrum in lateral (1), dorsal (2), anterior or posterior (?) (3) and ventral (4) views.
Ribs
In MGUAN PA85 (Fig. 1B) and MGUAN PA248, as well as in MONZ R1426 (Fig. 6, central line drawing), the dorsal ribs are gently curved and cylindrical. In MGUAN PA85 there are six ribs, which are most probably pectoral ribs due to the robustness and taphonomic location. However, there is an isolated dorsal rib overlying the vertebrae in the cervical-pectoral transition. Pectoral ribs have a capitulum and tuberculum, contrary to the dorsal ribs (see also Sachs et al., Reference Sachs, Kear and Everhart2013). The pectoral rib is sub-circular in cross-section, although a slight groove is present on the anterior and posterior sides. There is a sacral rib preserved in MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2C). The medial heads of the sacral rib are heavily pitted and rugose, the lateral head is smooth. The medial head is roughly D-shaped, and it has two facets with two different orientations and the faint line that separates them is oriented anteroposteriorly. The dorsal border is slightly concave and the ventral border is more strongly concave. There are two processes: one distal on the ventral border and another anteriorly projecting. In dorsal view, the posterior border is sinusoidal and the anterior border is straight with the exception of the process.
Scapulae
Thus far a scapula has not yet been collected from the early Maastrichtian of Angola, but some material from New Zealand that is indistiguishable from Angolan material comprises overlapping material, and therefore we describe the New Zealand portions as a proxy for those not present in the Angolan material. A nearly complete scapula (AIM LH1521) has a broad base for the dorsal process and is very similar to GNS CD428, but the tip of the dorsal process is missing. The articular portion is slightly concave, highly rugose and pitted, bearing a coracoidal and glenoid facets. The glenoid in AIM LH1521 is slightly convex and without any articular facets, and differs from the condition of GNS CD428 (Fig. 7A and E), but may be due to ontogeny. The dorsal process has a broad straight base and tapers dorsally, being crushed dorsoventrally in GNS CD428 (Fig. 7A and E). The tip of the dorsal process of AIM LH1521 points slightly posteriorly. The median portion of the ventral plate of the scapula is missing. The preserved anteroposterior length of AIM LH1521 is 13.9 cm.
Coracoids
MGUAN PA250 (Fig. 5) preserves two coracoids with complete posterior borders, although the medial and lateral portions are partially damaged and compare well with GNS CD428 (Fig. 7A and E) and MML-PV5 (O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014). The coracoids are composed of the thickened and subrectangular glenoidal portion that expands into the posterior process. The anterior border is slightly concave. The glenoid border is straight and forms an angle with the lateral border of the posterior process, but there are no clearly defined glenoid and scapular facets. The posterior border is straight and nearly half the size of the anterior border. The intercoracoid vacuity is formed by a deep subcircular excavation of the medial border of the posterior process. The intercoracoid symphysis articulation is straight. The ventral buttress of the coracoid is small (∼1 cm) and semi-conical, arising from the midpoint of the intercoracoid symphysis (e.g. also known in Syxosaurus, Woolungasaurus or Wapuskanectes; Welles & Bump, Reference Welles and Bump1949; Sachs, Reference Sachs2004; Druckenmiller & Russell, Reference Druckenmiller and Russell2006). The dorsal and ventral surfaces of the coracoids are rugose, particularly near the posterior process, possibly as a result of muscle attachment. There is no evidence of the posterior cornua of the coracoids (i.e. lateral projection on the posterior border of the coracoids) or preglenoid processes (i.e. anterior projection on the medial intercoracoid symphysis). In MGUAN PA248 (Fig. 4F and G), the preserved coracoid portions comprise the intercoracoid symphysis. The ventral buttress is semicircular in medial view.
Humerus
The best preserved humeri are from MGUAN PA250 (Fig. 5A) and MGUAN PA248 (Fig. 4D), but very similar humeri are present in the New Zealand and Argentine collections (e.g. AIM LH1519, MML-Pv5). These elements are identified as humeri because in many plesiosaurs the humerus is typically more distally asymmetrical than the femur (Gasparini et al., Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Casadío2003). In these specimens the humerus possesses a well-marked postaxial angle between the articular facet and the postaxial edge. Additionally, the pre- and postaxial edges of the humerus tend to be more curved that in the femur (see also Gasparini et al., Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Casadío2003). The humeri in MGUAN PA250 and MGUAN PA248 are massive and short elements (W/L average ratio 0.76). The proximal epiphysis, although partially damaged in MGUAN PA250, is hemispherical and covered by small (0.2–0.5 cm) conical structures that occasionally anastomose with each other. These structures are probably vascular canals and not unfinished cancellous bone on the articular surfaces of the propodial. The distal end of the humerus is convex and there are no distinguishable epipodial facets for the radius and ulna. The distal end is oval in cross-section, with the dorsal border being slightly more convex than the ventral border. The dorsal and ventral sides of the humerus are heavily marked by serrations perpendicularly oriented to the proximodistal axis of the bone. These are apparently bite marks, probably caused by Squalicorax pristodontus due to the size, serration pattern and the presence of secondary lineations perpendicular to the main grooves (Schwimmer et al., Reference Schwimmer, Stewart and Williams1997; Shimada et al., Reference Shimada, Tsuihiji, Sato and Hasegawa2010). Squalicorax pristodontus is also the most common shark at the locality, represented by shed teeth associated with most amniote carcasses (Strganac et al., Reference Strganac, Jacobs, Polcyn, Mateus, Myers, Salminen, May, Araújo, Ferguson, Gonçalves, Morais, Schulp and Tavares2015a). The surface of the ventral and dorsal borders is striated on the distal end by shallow subparallel slits. The preaxial border is nearly straight whereas the postaxial border is concave, forming a distinct kink with the distal border. The whole extent of the preaxial border is covered with muscle scars. On the postaxial border there is a 1.5 cm foramen in the diaphysis but closer to the proximal end. In MGUAN PA550 (Fig. 8) the propodial element is very fragmentary; only the proximal portion is preserved and it is difficult to discern whether it is a femur or humerus. The head of the propodial is hemispherical, and, from what is preserved, is apparently a short, massive bone.
Fig. 8. Aristonectinae indet. Bone histology of specimens MGUAN PA85 and MGUAN PA550, two isolated propodials. A–E. MGUAN PA85. A. The bone prior to osteohistological analysis. The areas from which the mid-diaphyseal and metaphyseo-diaphyseal sections were taken are marked with horizontal bars. B. Mid-diaphyseal section. C. Close-up of the area marked in B. Inset shows secondary osteons from the cortical region of the bone surrounded by remains of globular calcified cartilage. D. Metaphyseo-diaphyseal section. E. Close-up of the area marked in D. Inset shows secondary osteons from the cortical region of the bone surrounded by remains of globular calcified cartilage. F–H. MGUAN PA550. F. The bone prior to osteohistological analysis. The area from which the metaphyseo-diaphyseal section was taken is marked with a horizontal bar. G. Metaphyseo-diaphyseal section. H. Close-up of the area marked in G. Inset shows primary osteons from the cortical region of the bone surrounded by globular calcified cartilage. Scale bars represent 5 cm (A, F), 2 cm (B, D, G), 5 mm (C, E, H) and 500 µm (inset in C, E, H).
Autopodials
In both MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2) and MGUAN PA248 (Fig. 3A, E and G), the autopodial elements are discoid and sub-circular with some degree of ellipsoidal eccentricity, thus belonging to the mesopodium or epipodium. They have a cap of periosteal bone on the dorsal and ventral sides bearing randomly placed foramina. On the remainder of the surface the trabecular structure of the bone is visible. The phalanx is hourglass-shaped; the proximal and distal borders are convex, and it is pierced by several irregularly located foramina. The proximal and distal facets are perforated by several equally-spaced conical structures.
Pubis
There is no pubis collected thus far from Angola, but the pubis in MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6C) is subcircular, flat and dorsoventrally thick as in MML-PV5 (Gasparini et al., Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Casadío2003; O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014) and GNS CD429 (Fig. 7F, Wiffen & Moisley, Reference Wiffen and Moisley1986). Likewise, the excavation for the pelvic fenestrum is gently concave. The ogival to ellipsoidal acetabular region is convex and slightly rugose. A minor anterior excavation forms the short constriction for the acetabulum. Although slightly damaged, the acetabular region is unfaceted.
Ischium
A single ischium from Angola was collected in MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2B). It is comparable to MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6E), as in MML-PV5 (O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014), and GNS CD429 (Fig. 7H). The ischium is flat except on the thickened acetabular portion. The anterior and posterior borders are gently concave, whereas the medial border is convex. The shallow concavities of the pubic posterior border and the ischial anterior border form an ellipsoidal pelvic fenestra. Medially, the anterior angle is sharper than the rounded posterior angle of the ischium and bears several grooves in MGUAN PA120. The posterior projection of the ischium is short. The acetabular portion is oval and convex, bearing a rugose pattern, and anteriorly there is a small facet for the articulation of the pubis. The lateral head is ellipsoidal and fans laterally. The ischia have an anteromedial edge forming a right angle and the contour of the medial border is almost uniformly convex.
Ilium
No ilium was collected from Angola. In MONZ R1526 (Fig. 7F) and MML-PV5 (O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014) the ilium is conical but kinked with an elongated ovoid dorsal tip and hemispherical ventral articular surface. The dorsal articular surface is smoothly convex and the transition towards the more ventral portion of the ilium is smooth. The ventral articular shape is convex with a marked edge for the more dorsal portion of the ilium. The shape of the MONZ R1526 (Fig. 7F) ilium differs significantly from other Late Cretaceous elasmosaurid plesiosaur taxa (e.g. Thalassomedon, Terminonatator, Futabasaurus; Welles, Reference Welles1943; Sato, Reference Sato2003; Sato et al., Reference Sato, Hasegawa and Manabe2006) because of its simple conical but kinked shape. The ilia described here are not twisted.
Femur
The femora of MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2A) and MGUAN PA85 overlap morphologically with MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6G), GNS CD427 (Fig. 7I) and MML-PV5 (O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014). The femur is robust, with an unfaceted, flattened distal epiphysis and the proximal end is sub-circular in articular view. The postaxial and preaxial borders are sub-parallel proximally and diverging distally, producing a slightly expanded epiphysis anteroposteriorly. The hemispheric proximal articular facet is faintly delineated. No trochanter is present. Both the proximal and distal epiphysis bear striated rugosities for muscular attachment that are proximodistally oriented, especially in MGUAN PA120 (Fig. 2A). In the distal epiphysis the striations cover about one fifth of the length of the femur. The striated zone can be divided into a proximal zone (mostly composed of pits that furrow proximally), an intermediate zone (composed of deep striations) and a distal zone (defined by the hints of either striae or pits). On the anterior and posterior sides there are extensive areas with muscle scars; one of the sides bears long sub-parallel grooves ridges. The proximal and distal epiphyses are intensely covered by small crater-like structures about 0.3 cm in diameter.
The elongation ratio (i.e. distal width divided by proximodistal length) is indicative of elasmosaurid affinities assuming isometric growth: 12.3 ÷ 17.7 = 0.69. The elongation ratio is 0.46 in the plesiosaurid Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus (Storrs, Reference Storrs1995), 0.46 in the rhomaleosaurid Rhomaleosaurus cramptoni (Smith, Reference Smith2007), 0.52 in the polycotylid Trinacromerum ?bentonianum (Albright et al., Reference Albright, Gillette and Titus2007), 0.53 in the polycotylid Eopolycotylus rankini (Albright et al., Reference Albright, Gillette and Titus2007), 0.60 in the elasmosaurid Terminonatator herschlensis (Sato, Reference Sato2003), 0.66 in the elasmosaurid Thalassomedon haningtoni (Welles, Reference Welles1943), 0.68 in the elasmosaurid Mauisaurus haasti (Hiller et al., Reference Hiller, Mannering, Jones and Cruickshank2005) and 0.63 in MGUAN PA85 (Fig. 1A). The femur is a massive bone lacking part of the proximal and distal epiphyses. The distal epiphysis does not have facets, the shaft is straight, the anterior and posterior facets are equally concave. The distal epiphysis seems to be ellipsoidal. Both the proximal and distal portions of the shaft have a high density of muscle scars.
Results of phylogenetic analysis
Analysis with all specimens combined in a single OTU produced 112 MPTs, after 343,394,314 rearrangements, with the best tree length of 1336 steps. The analysis with the Angolan and New Zealand material run as separate OTUs produced 102 MPTs, after 356,273,327 rearrangements, also with the best tree length of 1336 steps. A portion of the strict consensus tree for both of these analyses and their support indices are shown in Fig. 9 (for the full trees see Supplementary Figures 1 and 2). The Angolan taxon was recovered as the sister-taxon to the New Zealand material (MONZ R1526 and GNS CD427-429), and those together as the sister-taxon to Aristonectes plus Khaiwhekea. Additionally, the new Angolan material described here is indistinguishable from the New Zealand (MONZ R1526 and GNS CD427-429) and South American material (MMLPV5) and may represent a single aristonectine elasmosaurid taxon (sensu O’Gorman et al., Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014).
Fig. 9. Strict consensus tree from phylogentic analysis. A. Phylogenetic tree with the Angolan, New Zealand and Argentine material merged into a single OTU. B. Phylogenetic tree with the Angolan and New Zealand material as separate OTUs. Symmetric resampling/GC values are noted above branches and absolute bremer support/relative bremer support values are noted below branches. See Supplementary Material Figures 1 and 2 for complete trees.
Unequivocal characters supporting the new material as an elasmosaurid are the ratio of humerus to femur length between 0.9 and 1.1 (Benson & Druckenmiller, Reference Benson and Druckenmiller2014, 241:1), and the humerus not being inclined but extending proximally so the shaft is straight (Benson & Druckenmiller, Reference Benson and Druckenmiller2014, 249:1). Aristonectine characters include the proportions of anterior-middle cervical centra that are approximately as long as high (Benson & Druckenmiller, Reference Benson and Druckenmiller2014, 153:1) and are united with the New Zealand material due to the V-shaped neurocentral suture in the anterior-middle cervical vertebrae in lateral view (Benson & Druckenmiller, Reference Benson and Druckenmiller2014, 172:1), but is differentiated from Aristonectes plus Khaiwhekea by the presence of the lateral ridges on the lateral surfaces of anterior cervical centra (Benson & Druckenmiller, Reference Benson and Druckenmiller2014, 154:1)
Histological results and discussion
The section taken from the mid-diaphyseal region of MGUAN PA85 has high compactness, although the woven-fibered bony tissues are pierced by a dense network of primarily radiating vascular canals (Fig. 8B and C). Numerous longitudinally directed vascular canals are also present, and each canal is surrounded by centripetally deposited bone tissue to form primary and secondary osteons. Three lines of arrested growth (LAGs) are visible and can be traced over long distances. Deeper in the cortices intense Haversian remodelling has contributed to the formation of abundant secondary osteons (Fig. 8C, inset). The vascular network of the medullary area is predominantly radial, although longitudinally directed canals occur (Fig. 8C). Centripetal deposits of pseudolamellar tissue surround the lumen of the densely packed canals. Larger erosional cavities are relatively few and randomly scattered.
The section taken at the metaphyseo-diaphysis of MGUAN PA85 (Fig. 8D and E) is conspicuously more cancellous than that taken at the mid-diaphysis (Fig. 8B and C), illustrating significant structural differences that appear locally in the appendicular bones of these derived plesiosaurs. The peripheral parts of the rather thin periosteal cortices contain three LAGs and primary osteons dispersed in an intercellular matrix composed predominantly of globular calcified cartilage. Further internally is a zone of densely packed secondary osteons with scattered remains of calcified cartilage (Fig. 8E, inset). The medullary spongiosa is composed of an intensively remodelled, plexiform meshwork of vascular canals made up of centripetally deposited pseudolamellar bone tissue interbedded with sparse remnants of globular calcified cartilage.
The metaphyseo-diaphyseal section taken from the smaller, more incomplete propodial, MGUAN PA550 (Fig. 8), is also highly cancellous with numerous irregular erosional cavities (Fig. 8G and H). The highly vascularized cortex of MGUAN PA550 is relatively thin and contains few secondary osteons, but primary osteons are abundant and interspersed randomly in an intercellular matrix composed of globular calcified cartilage and radially oriented Sharpey’s fibers (Fig. 8H, inset). One LAG is discernable. The trabeculae of the medullary spongiosa are composed of a core of globular calcified cartilage covered by pseudolamellar endosteal bone. Locally, the medullary zone is occupied by dense networks of plexiform and radially oriented vascular canals separated by woven-fibred bone tissue and calcified cartilage (Fig. 8H).
Wiffen et al. (Reference Wiffen, De Buffrénil, De Ricqlès and Mazin1995) concluded that plesiosaur propodials varied from a pachyostotic to osteosclerotic condition through ontogeny, a pattern more broadly recognised by Houssaye (Reference Houssaye2009; but see also Talevi & Fernández, Reference Talevi and Fernández2014). The ‘Wiffen et al. juvenile’ (Wiffen et al., Reference Wiffen, De Buffrénil, De Ricqlès and Mazin1995) histological traits are congruent with the ‘Brown juvenile’ (Brown, Reference Brown1981) external morphological traits. Following Wiffen et al. (Reference Wiffen, De Buffrénil, De Ricqlès and Mazin1995) two different ontogenetic stages are recognised: (1) the ‘juvenile’ condition in which the humerus is pachyostotic, i.e. has a thick layer of cortical bone and the medullary zone is pierced by some erosional lacunae, and (2) the ‘adult’ condition in which the propodials are largely cancellous with intense Haversian remodelling, although locally bearing a relatively compact cortex.
In the Angolan specimens analysed here, the propodials have osteosclerotic histology and secondary osteons nearly to the outermost regions of the sectioned bones. The bone is largely cancellous with intense Haversian remodelling, consistent with the ‘Wiffen et al., Reference Wiffen, De Buffrénil, De Ricqlès and Mazin1995 adult’ condition. The presence of three LAGs (in MGUAN PA85, Fig. 8) supports the adult condition of the specimen. Additionally, the muscle scars formed by deeply grooved and reworked periosteum are indicative of late ontogenetic stages as observed in other vertebrates (e.g. Tumarkin-Deratzian et al., Reference Tumarkin-Deratzian, Vann and Dodson2006). This adult histological bone fabric is in contrast to the juvenile external morphology, in particular the small size, the unfaceted distal propodials, the flat articular facets of the vertebrae, the non-fusion of the neural arches with the centra, the near-absence of the posterior cornua of the coracoids and the absence of the pectoral bar, all traits congruent with the ‘Brown juvenile’ condition. Thus, histological and osteological data presented here for the Angolan specimen suggests it is in fact a paedomorphic adult, and by extension this may be the case in the apparently closely related specimens from Argentina (MMLPV5), as suggested by O’Gorman et al. (Reference O’Gorman, Gasparini and Salgado2014), and from New Zealand (MONZ R1526 and GNS CD427-429).
Summary and conclusions
Only in rare cases can sexual maturity in plesiosaurs be assessed, such as the unambiguous preservation of a gravid female (O’Keefe & Chiappe, Reference O’Keefe and Chiappe2011). Thus, analysis of the micro-architecture of bone in conjunction with assessment of osteological maturity may be the only current approach to judge the ontogenetic maturity of an animal and the expression of paedomorphism in certain clades. In the absence of a histological analysis, the terms ‘adult’ or ‘juvenile’ become arbitrary, and we therefore recommend using the terms ‘osteologically mature’ or ‘osteologically immature’ when an osteohistological analysis is not performed.
More onerous are the affects of paedomorphism on phylogenetic analyses and taxonomic practices. Despite being a questionable taxonomic procedure (ICZN, Art. 69), numerous new genera and species have been erected using putative ‘juvenile’ and ‘subadult’ specimens (e.g. Cruickshank et al., Reference Cruickshank, Martill and Noè1996; Sato & Wu, Reference Sato and Wu2006; Druckenmiller & Russell, Reference Druckenmiller and Russell2008; Berezin, Reference Berezin2011; Ketchum & Benson, Reference Ketchum and Benson2011; Vincent & Benson, Reference Vincent and Benson2012; Knutsen et al., Reference Knutsen, Druckenmiller and Hurum2012; Vincent et al., Reference Vincent, Bardet and Mattioli2012), while others are now considered as nomina dubia due to their putative juvenile condition without critical assessment of the confounding effects of heterochrony (e.g. Tuarangisaurus? cabazai Gasparini et al., Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Parras2007 and Leurospondylus ultimus Brown, Reference Brown1913; see also Sato & Wu, Reference Sato and Wu2006). For example, Leurospondylus ultimus has been systematically ignored in phylogenetic analysis because it is thought to be a juvenile.
We have shown through the use of histological analysis that the osteologically immature specimens from Angola reported here are paedomorphic adults. Moreover, we have presented evidence that similar specimens from New Zealand and Argentina most probably belong to the same, as yet unnamed, taxon.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material for this paper available on: http://dx.doi.org/S0016774614000432
Acknowledgments
This publication results from Projecto PaleoAngola, an international cooperative research effort among the contributing authors and their institutions, funded by the National Geographic Society, the Petroleum Research Fund of the American Chemical Society, Sonangol E.P., Esso Angola, Fundação Vida of Angola, LS Filmes, Maersk, Damco, Safmarine, ISEM at SMU, the Royal Dutch Embassy in Luanda, TAP Airlines, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and the Saurus Institute. We thank Margarida Ventura and André Buta Neto for providing our team with help in the field. Tako and Henriette Koning provided valuable support and friendship in Angola. We would like to acknowledge J. Marinheiro, A.C. Silva and D. Araújo for laboratory assistance, and R. Castanhinha for help with fieldwork. We also thank the Crafoord Foundation for financial support (JL). We thank Z. Gasparini and J.P. O’Gorman for kindly providing information and images of the Argentine specimen. We thank Alexandra Houssaye and Adam S. Smith for comments on a previous version of the manuscript. We also thank Benjamin Kear, Sven Sachs and an anonymous reviewer for useful suggestions, which greatly improved this contribution.
Angolan/New Zealand/Argentine OTU0 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????0101000000001?10000??11?????????????0010320110[01]1?1011102521010439700000010001?00001?2?0?0??1?0?0
Angolan material ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1111122320?200111111100011?11111?0?????????20?????????1120000210?????????????????????0001??3200112300?????????????????
New Zealand material ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1111122320?200111111100011?11111?0?????????20?100010001120000210???01??01021001000??00001?032001123002?101?0[01]00??012?1
MONZ R1526 (Fig. 6): collected by A. McKay in 1873, Haumuri Bluff, South Island, New Zealand (Welles & Gregg, Reference Welles and Gregg1971). GNS CD 427, GNS CD 428 and GNS CD 429 (Fig. 7): collected by W.L. Moisley, T. Crabtree and M.A. Wiffen from the Mangahouanga stream, Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand (Wiffen & Moisley, Reference Wiffen and Moisley1986). MML-Pv5: collected by D. Cabaza (Lamarque City, Río Negro Province), Locality C of Gasparini et al. (Reference Gasparini, Salgado and Casadío2003), Salinas de Trapalcó, Northern Patagonia, Argentina.
