Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:58:04.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geo (Im) pulse Caprovis savinii (Bovidae, Mammalia) rediscovered: horn core finds of an Early Pleistocene antelope from the North Sea floor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

B. De Wilde
B. De Wilde*
Affiliation:
Bochtenstraat 47, 9270 Laarne, Belgium. Email:[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For more than 120 years since the name Caprovis savinii was founded on the basis of a bovid horn core from the ‘Forest Bed’ at Overstrand (Norfolk, UK), only one other find has been assigned to this species. Recently, two horn cores and one horn core fragment of the species have been discovered at two sand and gravel sorting centres in the Netherlands. The bone-bearing sediments are exposed on the North Sea floor, just off the coast of Great Yarmouth (Norfolk, UK). By comparing fossil and extant taxa, a classification within the bovid tribe Antilopini is proposed. Based on the accompanying fauna from the specific dredging area and the litho- and chronostratigraphy at Overstrand, C. savinii is placed within the Early Pleistocene.

Keywords

boviddredgingForest BedYarmouth Roads Formation
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 239 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2006

References

Cameron, T.D.J., Laban, C. & Schüttenhelm, R.T.E., 1984. Flemish Bight: sheet 52°N/02°E, Quaternary Geology, 1 : 250,000 series. British Geological Survey and Geological Survey of The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Cameron, T.D.J., Crosby, A., Balson, P.S., Jeffery, D.H., Lott, G.K., Bulat, J. & Harrison, D.J., 1992. United Kingdom offshore regional report: the geology of the southern North Sea, HMSO for the British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Crégut-Bonnoure, E. & Guérin, C., 1996. Ordre des Artiodactyles. Famille des Bovidae. In: C., Guérin & M., Patou-Mathis (eds): Les grands mammifères Plio-Pléistocènes d’Europe. Masson (Paris): 62–106.Google Scholar
Eisenmann, V., 2003. Gigantic horses. In: Petculescu, A. & Stiuca, E. (eds): Advances in Vertebrate Paleontology ’Hen to Panta’ (Papers in Honour of Constantin Radulescu and Petre Mihai Samson). Institute of Speleology (Bucharest): 31–40.Google Scholar
Harington, C.R., 1989. Soergelia: an indicator of holarctic middle Pleistocene deposits? In: Second Annual Muskox Symposium, University of Saskatchewan, 1 - 4 october 1987. National Research Council (Ottawa): A1–A9.Google Scholar
Harrison, D.J., 1988. The marine sand and gravel resources off Great Yarmouth and Southwold, East Anglia. British Geological Survey Technical Report WB/88/9C (Keyworth): 88 pp.Google Scholar
Kostopoulos, D.S., 1997. The Plio-Pleistocene artiodactyls (Vertebrata, Mammalia) of Macedonia (N. Greece). 1. The fossiliferous site ’Apollonia-1’, Mygdonia basin of Greece. Geodiversitas 19: 845–475.Google Scholar
Lister, A.M., 1996. The stratigraphical interpretation of large mammal remains from the Cromer Forest-bed Formation. In: Turner, C. (ed.): The early Middle Pleistocene in Europe (Proceedings of the SEQS Cromer Symposium, Norwich, United Kingdom, 3 - 7 September 1990). Balkema (Rotterdam): 25–44.Google Scholar
Mol, D., Van den Bergh, G.D. & de Vos, J., 1999. Fossil proboscideans from the Netherlands, the North Sea and the Oosterschelde Estuary. In: Haynes, G., Klimowocz, J. & Reumer, J.W.F. (eds): Mammoths and the Mammoth Fauna: Studies of an Extinct Ecosystem (Proceedings of the First International Mammoth Conference, St. Petersburg, October 16 - 21, 1995). Deinsea 6: 119–146.Google Scholar
Mol, D., Post, K., Reumer, J.W.F., de Vos, J. & Laban, C., 2003. Het Gat: preliminary note on a Bavelian fauna from the North Sea with possibly two mammoth species. In: Reumer, J.W.F., de Vos, J. & Mol, D. (eds): Advances in Mammoth Research (Proceedings of the Second International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, May 16-20 1999). Deinsea 9: 253–266.Google Scholar
Newton, E.T., 1882. The Vertebrata of the Forest Bed Series of Norfolk and Suffolk. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Reid, C., 1890. The Pliocene Deposits of Britain. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Schaub, S., 1951. Soergelia n. gen., ein Caprine aus dem thüringischen Altpleistocaen. Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae 44: 375–381.Google Scholar
Spencer, H.E.P., 1970. A contribution to the geological history of Suffolk. Part 4: The Interglacial Epochs. Suffolk Natural History 15: 148–196.Google Scholar
Teihard de Chardin, P. & Trassaert, M., 1938. Cavicornia of Southeastern Shansi. Palaeontologia Sinica C 6 (115): 1–106.Google Scholar
Verescagin, N., Alexejeva, L., David, A. & Baigusheva, V., 1971. Genus Pontoceros. In: Nikiforova, K.V. (ed.): Pleistocene of Tiraspol. Shtiintsa Publishing (Kishinev): 167–170. (in Russian)Google Scholar
West, R.G., 1980. The pre-glacial Pleistocene of the Norfolk and Suffolk coasts. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge): 203 pp.Google Scholar