Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:46:51.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comprehensive seismic velocity model for the Netherlands based on lithostratigraphic layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

W. van Dalfsen ,
J.C. Doornenbal ,
S. Dortland  and
J.L. Gunnink
W. van Dalfsen*
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J.C. Doornenbal
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
S. Dortland
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J.L. Gunnink
Affiliation:
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
*
*Corresponding author. Email:[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A seismic velocity model is necessary to map depth and thickness of subsurface layers interpreted from seismic reflection images. We have built a seismic velocity model (VELMOD-1) for the entire Netherlands area, both onshore and offshore, using non-confidential data (sonic logs, time-depth pairs, lithostratigraphic marker depths and downhole position data) of 720 boreholes in DINO - National Geoscientific Portal, and a preliminary isochore map (in seismic traveltime representation) of the layer of the Zechstein Group. The model is based on the Vint-zmid method applied to the following lithostratigraphic layers: Lower, Middle and Upper North Sea groups; Chalk Group; Rijnland Group; Schieland, Scruff and Niedersachsen groups; Altena Group; Lower and Upper Germanic Trias groups; Upper Rotliegend Group; and Limburg Group. Per layer, the linear least squares approximation, applied to Vint as a function of zmid, provides parameters V0 and K for a linear velocity function V(z) = V0 + K · z. In VELMOD-1, K is constant, at least at the scale of structural elements, whereas V0 varies with location. At borehole locations, V0 is calibrated such that traveltime through the layer according to the linear velocity model equals the traveltime according to the borehole data. A kriging procedure is applied to the calibrated V0(x, y)-values resulting in an estimated V0-value at any other location. The model V0-values were determined on an areal grid with cells of 1 km × 1 km. On the same grid, kriged interval velocities constitute the model for the Zechstein Group. These interval velocities stem directly from interval velocities at borehole locations; at other positions they are also dependent on the thickness (in terms of seismic traveltime isochores) of the layer of the Zechstein Group. Maps are presented of the distributions of both V0 and its standard deviation for two layers: that of the Chalk Group and that of the Lower and Upper Germanic Trias groups.

Keywords

Netherlandsgeostatisticsinterval velocitieslithostratigraphic layersseismic velocitiessonic logs
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 85 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 277 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2006

References

Deutsch, C.V. & Journel, A.G., 1998. GSLIB, Geostatistical Software, Library and User’s Guide, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doornenbal, J.C. 2001. Regional velocity models of the Netherlands territory. 63rd EAGE Conference Expanded Abstracts, Paper A08.Google Scholar
Duin, E.J.T., Doornenbal, J.C. Rijkers, R.H.B., Verbeek, J.W. & Wong, Th.E. (this volume). Subsurface structure of the Netherlands - results of recent onshore and offshore mapping. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 85-4: 245–276.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford University Press: 496 pp.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G. & Smith, A.G. (eds), 2004. A geologic time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press: 589 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japsen, P. 1993. Influence of lithology and Neogene uplift on seismic velocities in Denmark: implications for depth conversion of maps. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 77, No. 2: 194–211.Google Scholar
Japsen, P., 1998. Regional velocity-depth anomalies, North Sea Chalk: a record of overpressure and Neogene uplift and erosion. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 82, No. 11: 2031–2074.Google Scholar
Japsen, P., 2000. Investigation of multi-phase erosion using reconstructed shale trends based on sonic data. Sole Pit axis, North Sea. Global and Planetary Change 24: 189–210.Google Scholar
Robein, E., 2003. Velocities, Time-imaging and Depth-imaging in Reflection Seismics. Principles and Methods, EAGE Publications b.v.Google Scholar
Simmelink, E., Verweij, H., Underschultz, J. & Otto, C.J., 2005. A guality controlled pressure database and a regional hydrodynamic and overpressure assessment in the Dutch North Sea. Poster at the AAPG 2005 Annual Convention.Google Scholar
TNO-NITG, 2004. Geological Atlas of the Subsurface of the Netherlands - onshore: 103 pp.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem Boogaert, H.A. & Kouwe, W.F.P., 1993 -1997 (eds). Stratigraphic nomenclature of the Netherlands, revision and update by RGD and NOGEPA, Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, nr. 50.Google Scholar