Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:23:25.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aruba - a geochemical baseline study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

F. van den Oever
F. van den Oever*
Affiliation:
TAUW, Australiëlaan 5, P.O. Box 3015, 3502 GA UTRECHT, the Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A stream-sediment survey was carried out for the island of Aruba. Concentrations in stream sediments represent the abundance of chemical elements in the drainage basins. A geochemical atlas was created from the collected data and natural background values were established. Cluster analysis and pattern recognition techniques were used to gain a better understanding of the data set.

Two cluster models were selected to study the various geochemical controls on the sediments and to establish a spatial basis of environmental-quality settings for the development of future environmental policies. The first cluster model was suitable to recognise in some detail the reflection of the geology on the geochemistry of the stream sediments. The second, coarser cluster model stressed the importance to distinguish between the two main lithological units of the island when instituting natural background values. Not one uniform value per element is valid, but the value depends on the lithology.

Keywords

background valuesenvironmentgeochemical mappingthreshold values
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 79 , Special Issue 4: Geochemical mapping in the Kingdom of the Netherlands , December 2000 , pp. 467 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2000

References

Beeson, R., 1984. The use of fine fractions of stream sediments in geochemical exploration in arid and semi-arid terrains. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 22: 119–132.Google Scholar
Beets, D.J., & MacGillavry, H.J., 1977. Outline of the Cretaceous and Early Tertiary history of Curaçao, Bonaire and Aruba. In: Guide to the field excursions on Curaçao, Bonaire and Aruba. GUA Papers of Geology (series 1) 10: 1–6.Google Scholar
Bezdek, J.C., Ehrlich, R. & Full, W., 1984. FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences 10: 191–203.Google Scholar
Björklund, A. & Gustavsson, N., 1987. Visualisation of geochemical data on maps: new options. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 29:89–103.Google Scholar
Broecker, W.S. & Peng, T., 1982. Tracers in the sea. Palisades (New York): 690 pp.Google Scholar
Chao, X.T. & Sanzaolone, R.F., 1992. Decomposition techniques. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 44: 65–106 Google Scholar
Chork, C.Y. & Govett, G.J.S., 1985. Comparison of interpretations of geochemical soil data by some multivariate statistical methods, Key Anacon, NB, Canada. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 23: 213–242.Google Scholar
Cox, K.G., Bell, J.D. & Pankhurst, R.J., 1979. The interpretation of igneous rocks. George Allen & Unwin (London): 450 pp.Google Scholar
Darnley, A.G., 1990. International geochemical mapping: a new global project. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 39: 1–13.Google Scholar
Darnley, A.G., Björklund, A., Bølviken, B., Gustavsson, N., Koval, P.V., Plant, J.A., Steenfelt, A., Tauchid, M. & Xie, Xuejing, 1995. A global geochemical database for environmental and resource management. Earth Science (UNESCO Publishing) 19: 122 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, J.C., 1986. Statistics and data analysis in geology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons (London): 646 pp.Google Scholar
De Buisonjé, P.H., 1974. Neogene and Quaternary geology of Aruba, Curaçao and Bonaire. Natuurwetenschappelijke Studiekring voor Suriname en de Nederlandse Antillen (Utrecht) 78: 293 pp.Google Scholar
Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A. & Zussman, J., 1992. An introduction to the rock forming minerals. John Wiley & Sons (London): 696 pp.Google Scholar
Donnelly, T. & Rogers, J.J.W. 1978. The distribution of igneous rock suites throughout the Caribbean. Geologie en Mijnbouw 57: 151–162.Google Scholar
Frapponi, G., Vriend, S.P. & Van Gaans, P.F.M., 1993. Geochemical and statistical interpretation of a ground water monitoring network, province of Zuid Holland. H20 9: 237–244.Google Scholar
Hawkes, H.E., 1976. The downstream dilution of stream sediment anomalies. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 6: 345–358.Google Scholar
Helmers, H., 1977. The hooibergites of Aruba, a preliminary note. Abstracts of the 8th Caribbean Geological Conference (Curaçao): 70–71.Google Scholar
Helmers, H. & Beets, D.J., 1977. Geology of the Cretaceous of Aruba. Abstracts of the 8th Caribbean Geological Conference (Curaçao): 29–35.Google Scholar
Herweijer, J.P. & Focke, J.W., 1978. Late Pleistocene depositional and denundational history of Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao. Geologie en Mijnbouw 57: 177–187.Google Scholar
Howarth, R.J., 1984. Statistical applications in geochemical prospecting: a survey of recent developments. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 21:41–61.Google Scholar
Jarvis, E. & Jarvis, K.E., 1992. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry in exploration geochemistry. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 44: 139–200.Google Scholar
Kürzl, H., 1988. Exploratory data analysis: recent advances for the interpretation of geochemical data. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 30: 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monen, H.P., 1980. The Aruba Lava Formation. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis Universiteit Amsterdam: 43 pp.Google Scholar
O’Conner, P.J. & Reimann, C. 1993. Multi-element regional geochemical reconnaissance as an aid to target selection in Irish Caledonian terrains. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 47: 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, J.A., Hale, M. & Ridgway, J., 1988. Developments in regional geochemistry for mineral exploration. Transactions of the Institute of Mining Metallurgy 97: BI16–B139.Google Scholar
Priem, H.N.A., Beets, D.J., Boelrijk, N.A.I.M. & Hebeda, E.H., 1986. On the age of the Late Cretaceous tonalitic/gabbroic batholite on Aruba, Southern Caribbean borderland. Geologie en Mijnbouw 65: 247–256.Google Scholar
Reid, J.C., 1993. A geochemical atlas of North Carolina, USA. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 47: 11–27.Google Scholar
Steenfelt, A., 1987. Geochemical mapping and prospecting in Greenland - a review of results and experience. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 29: 183–203.Google Scholar
Van den Oever, F., 1993. Unpublished M. Sc. thesis Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Vriend, S.P., Van Gaans, P.F.M., Middelburg, J. & DeNijs, A., 1988. The application of fuzzy c-means cluster analysis and non-linear mapping to geochemical datasets: examples from Portugal. Applied Geochemistry 3: 213–224.Google Scholar
Webb, J.S. (ed.), 1978. The Wolfson geochemical atlas of England and Wales. Clarendon Press (Oxford): 69 pp.Google Scholar
Westermann, J.H., 1932. The geology of Aruba. Geographische en Geologische Mededeelingen, Physiographisch-Geologische Reeks 7: 129 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., 1989. Igneous petrogenesis, a global tectonic approach. Unwin Hyman (London): 466 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B. & Xie, X., 1985. Fuzzy cluster analysis in geochemical exploration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 23: 281–291.Google Scholar