Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:21:33.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annotated catalogue of marine squamates (Reptilia) from the Upper Cretaceous of northeastern Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

M.-C. Buchy ,
K.T. Smith ,
E. Frey ,
W. Stinnesbeck ,
A.H. González González ,
C. Ifrim ,
J.G. López-Oliva  and
H. Porras-Muzquiz
M.-C. Buchy*
Affiliation:
Universität Karlsruhe, Geologisches Institut, Postfach 6980, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany; current address: Geowissenschaftliche Abteilung, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Erbprinzenstrasse 13, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
K.T. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208109, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8109, USA
E. Frey
Affiliation:
Geowissenschaftliche Abteilung, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Erbprinzenstrasse 13, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
W. Stinnesbeck
Affiliation:
Universität Karlsruhe, Geologisches Institut, Postfach 6980, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
A.H. González González
Affiliation:
Museo del Desierto, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico
C. Ifrim
Affiliation:
Universität Karlsruhe, Geologisches Institut, Postfach 6980, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
J.G. López-Oliva
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra, Linares, Nuevo León, Mexico
H. Porras-Muzquiz
Affiliation:
Museo Historico de Múzquiz, Múzquiz, Coahuila, Mexico
*
* Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent work in the Upper Cretaceous of northeastern Mexico has produced a diversity of vertebrate remains. For specimens referable to Squamata, both old and new, an annotated catalogue is here provided, wherein are summarised the geological context and morphological features of each specimen. All specimens appear to represent marine squamates, including an aigialosaur-like reptile preserving integumentary structures, several vertebrae possibly representing mosasauroids, the first Mexican mosasaur known from significant cranial material, an isolated mosasaur mandibular fragment, and the holotype of Amphekepubis johnsoni (considered to belong to Mosasaurus). These discoveries are auspicious and should deepen our understanding of palaeobiogeographic and evolutionary patterns

Keywords

MosasauridaeAigialosauridaeUpper CretaceousMexicocatalogue
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 84 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting , September 2005 , pp. 195 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2005

References

Aranda-Manteca, F. & Stinnesbeck, W., 1993. Primer registro de mosasauridos en Mexico. Actas de la Faculdad de Ciencias de la Tierra, U.A.N.L. 8: 1–8.Google Scholar
Bardet, N. & Tunoğlu, C., 2002. The first mosasaur (Squamata) from the Late Cretaceous of Turkey. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22: 712–715.Google Scholar
Bardet, N., Pereda Suberbiola, X. & Jalil, N.-E., 2003a. A new polycotylid plesiosaur from the Late Cretaceous (Turonian) of Morocco. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2: 307–315.Google Scholar
Bardet, N., Pereda Suberbiola, X. & Jalil, N.-E., 2003b. A new mosasauroid (Squamata) from the Late Cretaceous (Turonian) of Morocco. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2: 607–616.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. & VonLoh, J.P., 1998. New records of Turonian mosasauroids from the western United States. Dakoterra 5: 15–28.Google Scholar
Bengtson, P., 1996. The Turonian stage and substage boundaries. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 66 (Suppl.): 69–79.Google Scholar
Blanco, A., Stinnesbeck, W., López-Oliva, J.G., Frey, E., Adatte, T. & Gonzalez, A.H., 2001. Vallecillo, Nuevo León: una nueva localidad fosilífera del Cretácico Tardío en el noreste de México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias geológicas 18: 186–199.Google Scholar
Blanco-Piñón, A., Frey, E., Stinnesbeck, W. & López-Oliva, J.G., 2002. Late Cretaceous (Turonian) fish assemblage from Vallecillo, northeastern Mexico. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 225: 39–54.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M.W. & Cooper, J.A., 1999. Redescription, palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of Coniasaurus crassidens Owen, 1850 (Squamata) from the Lower Chalk (Cretaceous; Cenomanian) of SE England. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 127: 423–452.Google Scholar
Calligaris, R., 1988. I Rettili fossili degli ‘strati calcarei ittiolitici di Comeno’ e dell’isola di Lesina. Atti del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Trieste 41: 85–125.Google Scholar
Camp, C.L., 1942. California mosasaurs. Memoirs of the University of California 13: 1–68.Google Scholar
Carroll, R.L. & DeBraga, M., 1992. Aigialosaurs: mid-Cretaceous varanoid lizards. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12: 66–86.Google Scholar
Cavin, L., 1995. Goulmimichthys arambourgi n.g., n.sp., un Pachyrhizodontidae (Actinopterygii, Teleostei) d’une nouvelle localité à nodules fossilifères du Turonien inférieur marocain. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris (IIa) 321: 1049–1054.Google Scholar
Cavin, L., 2001. Osteology and phylogenetic relationships of the teleost Goulmimichthys arambourgi Cavin, 1995, from the Upper Cretaceous of Goulmima, Morocco. Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae 94: 509–535.Google Scholar
DeBraga, M. & Carroll, R.L., 1993. The origin of mosasaurs as a model of macroevolutionary patterns and processes. Evolutionary Biology 27: 245–322.Google Scholar
Frey, E., Buchy, M.-C., Stinnesbeck, W., González González, A. & Di Stefano, A., in press. Muzquizopteryx coahuilensis n.g, n.sp., first evidence for the presence of nyctosaurid pterosaurs in the Coniacian (Late Cretaceous) of northeastern Mexico (Coahuila). Oryctos.Google Scholar
Goldhammer, R.K. & Johnson, C.A., 2001. Middle Jurassic-Upper Cretaceous paleogeographic evolution and sequence-stratigraphic framework of the northwest Gulf of Mexico rim. In: Bartolini, C., Buffler, R.T. & Cantú-Chapa, A. (eds): The Western Gulf of Mexico Basin - Tectonics, Sedimentary Basins, and Petroleum Systems. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 75: 45–81.Google Scholar
Graciansky, P.-C.de, Deroo, G., Herbin, J.P., Jacquin, T., Magniez, F., Montadert, L., Müller, C., Ponsot, c., Schaaf, A. & Sigal, J., 1986. Oceanwide stagnation episode in the late Cretaceous. Geologische Rundschau 75: 17–41.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C., Stinnesbeck, W. & L&pez-Oliva, J.G., 2004. Maastrichtian cephalopods from Cerralvo, north-eastern Mexico. Palaeontology 47: 1575–1627.Google Scholar
Keller, G., López-Oliva, J.G., Stinnesbeck, W. & Adatte, T., 1997. Age, stratigraphy and deposition of near K/T siliciclastic deposits in Mexico: relation to bolide impact? Geological Society of American Bulletin 109: 410–428.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W.J. & Cobban, W.A., 1991. Coniacian ammonite faunas from the United States Western Interior. Special Papers in Palaeontology 45: 1–96.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W.J., Walaszczyk, I. & Cobban, W.A., 2000. Pueblo, Colorado, USA, candidate global boundary stratotype section and point for the base of the Turanian stage of the Cretaceous, and for the base of the middle Turonian substage, with a revision of the Inoceramidae (Bivalvia). Acta Geologica Polonica 50: 295–334.Google Scholar
Lee, M.S.Y. & Caldwell, M.W., 2000. Adriosaurus and the affinities of mosasaurs, dolichosaurs, and snakes. Journal of Paleontology 75: 915–937.Google Scholar
Li, L. & Keller, G., 1998. Maastrichtian climate, productivity and faunal turnovers in planktic foraminifera on South Atlantic DSDP sites 525A and 21. Marine Micropaleontology 33: 55–86.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1995. Anatomy and functional morphology of the largest marine reptile known. Mosasaurus hoffmanni (Mosasauridae, Reptilia) from the Upper Cretaceous, Upper Maastrichtian of the Netherlands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B347: 155–180.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T. & Nolf, D., 1990. The mosasaur Prognathodon (Reptilia, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Belgium. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 59 (1989): 137–190.Google Scholar
Martill, D.M., 1988. Preservation of fish in the Cretaceous of Brazil. Palaeontology 31: 1–18.Google Scholar
Mehl, M.G., 1930. A new genus of mosasaurs from Mexico, and notes on the pelvic girdle of Platecarpus. Journal of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University 24: 383–400.Google Scholar
Páramo-Fonseca, M.E., 1997a. Les vertébrés marins du Turonien de la vallée supérieure du Magdalena, Colombie - systématique, paléoécologie et paléobiogéographie. Université de Poitiers: 173 pp. (unpubl. PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Páramo-Fonseca, M.E., 1997b. Bachea huilensisnov. gen., nov. sp., premier Tselfatoidei (Teleostei) de Colombie. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences (lib) 325: 147–150.Google Scholar
Pierce, S.E. & Caldwell, M.W., 2004. Redescription and phylogenetic position of the Adriatic (Upper Cretaceous; Cenomanian) dolichosaur Pontosaurus lesinensis (Kornhuber, 1873). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 373–386.Google Scholar
Rage, J.-C., 1989. Le plus ancien lézard varanoïde de France. Bulletin de la Société d’Études scientifiques d’Anjou 13: 19–26.Google Scholar
Rindfleisch, A., 2004. Das El Rosario Profil (Muzquiz, Coahuila). Sedimentologie und Fazies-Entwicklung. University of Karlsruhe (TH): 94 pp. (unpubl. Diploma thesis).Google Scholar
Russell, D.A., 1967. Systematics and morphology of American mosasaurs (Reptilia, Sauria). Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University 23: 1–237.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A., 1975.A new species of Globidens from South Dakota, and a review of Globidentine mosasaurs. Fieldiana, Geology 33: 235–256.Google Scholar
Sohl, N.F., Martínez, E., Salmerón-ürena, P. & Soto-Jaramillo, F., 1991.Upper Cretaceous. In: Salvador, A. (ed.): The Gulf of Mexico Basin (The Geology of North America, volume J): 205–244.Google Scholar
Stinnesbeck, W., Schulte, P., Lindenmaier, F., Adatte, T., Affolter, M., Schilli, L., Stüben, D., Berner, Z., Kramar, U. & López-Oliva, J.G., 2001.Late Maastrichtian age of spherule deposits in northeastern Mexico: implications for Chicxulub scenario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38: 229–238.Google Scholar
Stinnesbeck, W., Ifrim, C., Schmidt, H., Rindfleisch, A., Buchy, M.-C., Frey, E., González González, A.H., Poras-Muzquiz, H., Cavin, L. & Smith, K.T., in press. A new lithographic limestone deposit in the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian) Austin Group at El Rosario, municipio of Muzquiz, Coahuila, northeastern Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas.Google Scholar
Walaszczyk, I., & Cobban, W.A., 2000. Inoceramid faunas and biostratigraphy of the Upper Turonian - Lower Coniacian of the Western Interior of the United States. Special Papers in Palaeontology 64: 1–118.Google Scholar
Wiman, C., 1920. Some reptiles from the Niobrara Group in Kansas. Geological Institute of Uppsala Bulletin 18: 9–18.Google Scholar
Wright, K.R. & Shannon, S.W., 1988. Selmasaurus russelli, a new plioplate- carpine mosasaur (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from Alabama. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8: 102–107.Google Scholar