Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:26:30.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship between International and Municipal Law and Fundamental Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

D.H.M. Meuwissen
Get access

Extract

Both the relationship between international and municipal law and fundamental rights are important themes of contemporary public law, and have been frequently discussed, among others by Professor Tammes, to whom these lines are devoted in gratitude. This is no reason, however, to consider these matters as closed. Both are still of current interest since they affect the very foundations of law. New developments give rise to new reflections. In law, man's freedom is constantly at stake. Breaches of fundamental rights are the order of the day. But also, and this may justify cautious optimism, these rights are no longer a merely national responsibility. Fundamental human rights, if anything, manifest the relationship between international and municipal law. They are no longer the basis of municipal law only, but also of international law. Fundamental rights occur in both spheres and therefore play a part in the problems of the relationship between them.

Type
Articles
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 24 , Issue 1-2 , May 1977 , pp. 189 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tammes, A.J.P., “Het Europees Verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en het nationale recht”, 43 Mededelingen van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Internationaal Recht, 1960)Google Scholar, Tammes, A.J.P., “Een ieder verbindende verdragsbepalingen”, Nederlands Juristenblad 1962, pp. 69–80 and 89–99.Google Scholar

2. Eg. Tammes, A.J.P., Het universele rechtsstelsel beschreven aan de hand van een classificatie (Amsterdam: Noord Hollandse Uitgevers Mij., 1969).Google Scholar Also: Conflicten, (Amsterdam: Noord Hollandse Uitgevers Mij, 1971)Google Scholar, and De leefruimte van de mens, (Amsterdam: Noord Hollandse Uitgevers Mij., 1973).Google Scholar

3. Heller, H., Staatslehre, (3. Aufl., Leiden: Sijthoff, 1963), pp. 32 ff.Google Scholar

4. Baton van Haersolte, R.A.V., “Het lege woord ‘recht’”, De Gids 1971, pp. 152–155.Google Scholar

5. In particular the relevant notes in Knox, T.M., Hegel's Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar Cf. also Meuwissen, D.H.M., Elementen van Staatsrecht Vol. I, (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1975), pp. 16 ff.Google Scholar

6. E.g. Heller, Schindler and Larenz.

7. Larenz, K., Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft (3. Aufl., Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1975), pp. 439 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Schindler, D., Verfassungsrecht und soziale Struktur (4. Aufl., Zürich: Schulthess & Co. A.G., 1970).Google Scholar

9. Heller, , op. cit., p. 225.Google Scholar

10. Schindler, D., “Gedanken zum Wiederaufbau des Völkerrechts” in Recht, Staat, Völkergemeinschaft (Zürich: Schulthess & Co A.G., 1948), pp. 238–239.Google Scholar

11. Heller, , op. cit., p. 81 ff.Google Scholar

12. For details see Burdeau, G., Traité de Science Politique, Vol. 1, (2me Ed., Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1966).Google Scholar

13. Cf. Vol. II of the Traité mentioned in note 12.

14. Burdeau, , Traité, Vol. I, pp. 362–379.Google Scholar

15. Burdeau, , Traité, Vol. I, pp. 379–400.Google Scholar

16. Het universele rechtsstelsel (see note 2).

17. Heller, , op. cit., pp. 261–267.Google Scholar

18. Scholten, Paul, Traité de Droit Civil Néerlandais, Partie Générate (Zwolle-Paris: N.V. W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, S.A. R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias, 1954), pp. 105 ff.Google Scholar (“Le système ouvert du droit”).

19. Cf. Bos, M., “Van Panhuys' ‘Carnaval des Animaux’”, Nederlands Juristenblad 1975, pp. 1117 ff.Google Scholar See also Bos, M., “Notices pour servir à une théorie de la force obligatoire du droit international”, in Recht als instrument van behoud en verandering (Van der Venbundel), (Deventer: Kluwer, 1972), pp. 345Google Scholar ff. Both articles are most enlightening.

20. Waelbroeck, M., Traités internationaux et juridictions internes dans les pays du Marche Commun (Bruxelles-Paris: C.I.D.C. et Editions A. Pedone, 1969), pp. 279, 296 ff.Google Scholar

21. Cf. Schindler, , op. cit., 1970, pp. 104 ff.Google Scholar

22. Hollak, J.H.A., “Vrijheid en Noodzakelijkheid”, Wijsgerig Perspectief (1972/1973), pp. 65 ff.Google Scholar

23. Ryffel, H., Grundprobleme der Rechts- and Staatsphilosophie. Philosophische Anrhropologie des Politischen, (Neuwied-Berlin: Luchterhand, 1969).Google Scholar

24. Ipsen, H., Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht (Tübingen: Mohr, 1972).Google Scholar

25. See the various reports prepared for the FIDE Conference at Luxembourg in 1973.

26. Donner, A.M., “Grondrechten als constitutionele rechten”, Speculum Langemeijer (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1973), p. 23.Google Scholar

27. Donner, Likewise, op. cit., pp. 20–21.Google Scholar

28. Fawcett, J.E.S., The Application of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969), pp. 6 ffGoogle Scholar; Castberg, F., The European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden-Dobbs Ferry N.Y.: Sijthoff, Oceana, 1974), pp. 13 ff.Google Scholar

29. Tammes, , “Het Europese Verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en het nationale recht”, 1960 (see note 1).Google Scholar

30. Donner, Similarly, op. cit., pp. 15–28 passim.Google Scholar