Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:28:56.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hague Case Law – Latest Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Peter Morris
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Hague Case Law – Latest Developments
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 459 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The procedure in Rule 61 is not a trial in absentia, which is not formally provided for by Tribunal's Statute, under which every accused has the right to attend his trial; moreover, Rule does not allow for a determination of the accused's guilt and it thereby follows that the Trial Chamber cannot pronounce any sentence.