Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:22:06.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Jurisdiction and Enforcement Conventions: Interpretation, Concurrence and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

H. Duintjer Tebbens
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Articles
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 471 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Netherlands Treaty Series 1992, No. 74, OJEC No. C 224, p. 1 of 31 August 1992, ILM (1992) p. 247, in force as of November 1, 1993.Google Scholar

2. For another view see Struycken, in 232 Hague Recueil (1992–1991) pp. 257 and 291 et seq.Google Scholar

3. Judgment of 6 October 1976, 12/76, Tessili v. Dunlop, [1976] ECR 1473.Google Scholar

4. Judgment of 8 March 1988,9/87, Arcado v. Haviland, [ 1988] ECR 1539 (Directive 86/653, OJ No. L 382, p. 17 of 31 December 1986).Google Scholar

5. Judgment of 14 October 1976, 29/76, LTU v. Eurocontrol, [1976] ECR 1541.Google Scholar

6. See the judgment of 21 June 1978, 150/77, Bertrand v. Ott, [1978] ECR 1431.Google Scholar

7. Judgment of 26 May 1982, 133/81, [1982] ECR 1891;Google Scholar 30 NILR (1983) p. 248, note by Verheul.Google Scholar

8. Judgment of 15 January 1987, 266/85, [1987] ECR 239;Google Scholar 34 NILR (1987) p. 100, note by Verheul.Google Scholar

9. Arcado v. Haviland, supra n. 4.

10. OJEC No. L. 319 of 25 November 1988, p. 37 (the second EC Declaration) and p. 40 (EFTA Declaration).

11. It would have been clearer if these declarations had been added expressly to Protocol no. 2.

12. Lugano Convention, II Travaux préparatoires, Publications of the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, No. 14 (1991) p. 104.Google Scholar

13. Wahl, , The Lugano Convention and Legal Integration (1991) pp. 65–77;Google Scholar see also Möller, in Court of Justice of the EC, ed., Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments in Europe (1992) pp. 215 and 220.Google Scholar

14. Stone, , in Y. Eur. L. (1988) pp. 105 and 117.Google Scholar

15. Pellis, , in 37 NILR (1990)p. 395; cf., also Vlas in Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering, 1 (‘Verdra-gen’), EVEX, p. D-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. McCaffrey, , in Civ. JQ (1992) pp. 12 and 25.Google Scholar

17. OLG Munich, 28 September 1989, IPRax (1991) p. 46, with critical note by Geimer, p. 31.Google Scholar

18. In Re Harrods (BuenosAires) Ltd. [1991] 3 WLR 397, [1991] 4 All ER 334, [1991] I.L.Pr. 331.Google Scholar

19. Briggs, , in 107 LQR (1991) p. 180;Google ScholarGaudemet-Tallon, , in Rev. crit. d.i.p. (1991) p. 491;Google ScholarKaye, , in j. Bus. L. (1992) p. 47;Google ScholarCheshire and North, Private International Law, 12th edn. (1992) p. 333;Google ScholarSchwartz, , in Fordham Int. LJ (1991) p. 174;Google ScholarMennie, , in Jayme, ed., Ein internationales Zivilverfahrensrechtfür Gesamteuropa (1992) pp. 173, 195 et seq. (in English);Google ScholarDuintjer, Tebbens, in Sumampouw et al., eds., Law & Reality - Voskuil Essays (1992) p. 47;Google ScholarKohler, , in Verfahrensga-rantien im nationalen und internationalen Prozessrecht - Matscher Festschrift (1993) p. 251;Google ScholarFentiman, , in Corn. Int. LJ (1993) p. 59;Google ScholarByrne, , in Ir. LT (1993) p. 84.Google Scholar

20. Cf., Struycken, De bevoegdheidsregeling van het Europees Executieverdag getoetst aan een universalistisch model (The jurisdiction rules of the European Judgments Convention assessed by reference to a universalist model), Mededelingen NVIR, No. 77 (April 1978) p. 12 et seq., summary in 25 NILR (1978) p. 354 et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Struycken, ibid.; see also Kropholler, , Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht, 4th edn. (1993) pp. 78, 164, 186 concerning Arts. 4, 16 and 17 respectively.Google Scholar

22. See the Spanish Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial of 1 July 1985, Art. 22; the Swiss Private International Law Act of 18 December 1987, Arts. 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 - cf., also the Italian draft legislation on private international law, Riv. dir. int. priv. proc. (1989) p. 932, Arts. 3, 4, 5 and 7.Google Scholar

23. Supreme Court, 1 February 1985 (‘Piscator’), NJ 1985, 698,Google Scholar with note by Schultsz, , 34 NILR (1989) p. 59Google Scholar with note by Verheul, , Int. Bus. Lawyer (1986) p. 48; and 16 November 1990, NJ 1992, 107Google Scholar with note by Schultsz, , 38 NILR (1991) p. 413,Google Scholar with note by Haak, - see in Germany BGH 2 July 1991, NJW 1991, p. 3092,Google Scholar with note by Geimer, ibid., p. 3072, IPRax (1992) p. 160, with note by SchlosserGoogle Scholar, ibid., p. 140.

24. Compétence judiciaire et effets desjugements dans le Marché commun (1972) No. 164, and in Rev. crit. d.i.p. (1990) p. 1, at p. 14.Google Scholar

25. Kropholler, , op. cit. n. 21, p. 164.Google Scholar

26. Struycken, , in Met hoofd en hart (With head and heart) (Leijten collection) (1991) p. 341, at p. 348.Google Scholar

27. See Schröder, , Internationale Zuständigkeit (1971) passim.Google Scholar