Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:21:08.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

De mens en zijn recht in internationale verhoudingen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Get access

Extract

There is increasing disquietude, both among authors and practising lawyers, as regards the application of private international law on the basis of Von Savigny's doctrine, i.e. the principle that international legal relations are subject to the law of the country where such a relation has its “natural seat”: a study has therefore been undertaken as to the merits and practical applicability of this doctrine.

Such a study must start from a consideration of factual relationships and the actual interests stemming from such relationships. Where man admits to the existence of ethical norms for his behaviour, he necessarily finds himself confronted with obligations derived from these norms, but he also derives therefrom positive rights exercisable against his fellows; his inborn sense of justice is his criterion in determining where such rights lie. If his claims to such rights are indeed to be admitted, their validity must be tested against the legal rules which regulate mutual relations within a defined community; in the case of international relationships the question arises as to the criteria to be used in identifying the law to be applied, i.e. in determining within which complex of contacts the specific relation concerned can be said to lie, and hence where its “centre of gravity” or its “natural seat” is to be found.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “De sociale functies der rechtsnormen als grondslag voor de oplossing van internationaal privaatrechtelijke wetsconflicten”, R. M. Themis 1947, bl. 153.Google Scholar

2 Deze theorieën zijn nader toegelicht in het geschrift van Mrd'Oliveira, H. U. Jessurun, “Internationale Verkeersongelukken”, Reeks Studiekring Prof. Mr. J. Offerhaus, 1965Google Scholar, en in de inaugurele rede van Prof MrDeelen, J. E. J. Th., De blind-doek van Von Savigny, 1966.Google Scholar

3 o.c., bl. 117/118.

4 Zie b.v. de toelichting op artikel 13 van het Ontwerp-Eenvormige Wet; herziene tekstuitgave 1968, Scheltema en Holkema, bl. 85.

5 Cfm. Prof MrLemaire, W. L. G., Hoofdlijnen; bl. 162.Google Scholar

6 N.J. 19381989.Google Scholar

7 Lemaire, Anders, o.c., bl. 97Google Scholar, het belang van het kind centraal stellend.

8 “The doctrine of nationality, which in its exaggeration has so much contributed to international disorder”. Yntema in “Foreword”, bl. xv voor Rabel's Conflict of Laws.

9 o.a. aangehaald door de Winter in zijn voormelde Studie, bl. 118.

10 N.J. 1942, 286.Google Scholar

11 Van 2 april 1942, N.J. 1942, 468.Google Scholar

12 Uitwerking, waarvoor trouwens Von Savigny zelf de basis legde. Kosters-Dubbink, Zie, bl. 71/72.Google Scholar

13 o.c., bl. 110.

14 In zijn korte bestaan moest het Ontwerp-Eenvormige Wet al worden herzien, en het ziet er naar uit dat ook de herziene tekst alweer bij de nieuwste opvattingen achterbleef.

15 In het Mohammedaanse recht werd van oudsher deze moeilijkheid opgelost door indeling van de geleerden, al naar hun gezag, in klassen. De opinie van de hoogst geclasseerde was voor de rechter bindend. Wie uitmaakte, welke geleerde in welke klasse zat, is mij niet bekend…

16 Rabel, , Conflict of Laws I, bl. 13 en 40.Google Scholar