No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cross-Border Insolvency
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Netherlands Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of Private International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1995
References
1. See also: R.I.V.F. Bertrams, ‘Set-off in Private International Law’, in Boele-Woelki, K. et al. , eds., Comparability and Evaluation. Essays on Comparative Law, Private International Law and International Commercial Arbitration (1994) p. 164.Google Scholar
2. P. Vlas, ‘Bilaterale Executieverdragen’, in Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering, loose-leaf pub., p. 5 et seq. See also: Hanisch, H., ‘Die Wende im deutschen internationalen Insolvenzrecht’, ZIP (1985) p. 1243.Google Scholar
3. J.H. Dalhuisen, ‘Report for the Netherlands’, in Fletcher, I.F., ed., Cross-Border Insolvency: National and Comparative Studies (1992) pp. 190–191.Google Scholar
4. Drobnig, U., ‘Cross-border Insolvency: General Problems‘, 19 FORUM Int. (11 1993) p. 13Google Scholar (Special Issue Seminar on Cross-border Insolvency).
5. I.F. Fletcher, ‘General Report’, in Fletcher, I.F., ed., Cross-Border Insolvency: National and Comparative Studies (1992) p. 281.Google Scholar
6. Beukenhorst, D.H., ‘Het Internationale faillissementsrecht’, in Het faillissement in de tijd van Molengraaff en nu. Preadvies van de Vereeniging Handelsrecht (1993) p. 192.Google Scholar
7. In much the same way as the German Supreme Court clarified matters for German legal practice with a judgment rendered in 1985 (BGH 11 July 1985 IPRspr. 1985 No. 218).