Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:48:53.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

B: Supreme Court, 1 November 1991, Isopad v. Huikeshoven

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

L.Th.L.G. Pellis
Affiliation:
Lecturer in (int.) civil procedural law and private int. law, University of Limburg
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Netherlands Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of Private International Law
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Hoge Raad is not alone in adopting that interpretation: ‘Der Vergleich zeigt, daΒ von den sich unmittelbar aus dem Rahmenvertrag ergebenden Leistungspflichten die den Alleinvertriebsvertrag charakterisierende Pflicht diejenigedes Alleinvertriebshandlersist, den Vertrieb der Vertragswaren in dem Vertragsgebiet zu fordern oder zumindest durchzufuhren’ (Kleinschmidt, para. 786, in Reithmann, and Martiny, , Internationales Vertragsrecht, 4th edn. (1988)).Google Scholar

2. Cf., the description of an exclusive sales agreement (Alleinvertriebsvertrag) given by Kleinschmidt, paras. 778 and 779, in Reithmann and Martiny, Internationales Vertragsrecht, 4th edn. (1988).