No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
New Dimensions to Tripartism in the International Labour Organization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2009
Extract
One of the main problems of the implementation of rules of international law, whether they are created at a multilateral or at a bilateral level, is the confluence of the decision making process at both the international and the national level. Especially within international organizations, that do not have a supranational structure, the activation of the enforcement process needs a series of decisions at the national level, which are mostly beyond the effective control of the international body concerned.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1977
References
1. The terms employers and workers are used in accordance with the Constitution of the ILO.
2. Article 19, 5c and 6c Constitution ILO.
3. See for a closer examination Conventions No. 67 (hours of work and rest periods, road transport); 92 (accomodation of crews, revised); 109 (wages, hours of work, and manning, sea, revised); 115 (radiation protection); 119 (guarding of machinery); 120 (hygiene, commerce and offices); 124 (medical examination of young persons, underground work); 126 (accomodation of crews, fishermen); 127 (maximum weight) and 133 (accomodation of crews, supplementary provisions).
4. Article 5, 1.
5. Paragraph 6.
6. Article 7, 1 Constitution ILO.
7. Article 16, 1 Constitution ILO.
8. Article 3, 1 Constitution ILO.
9. Article 3, 9 Constitution ILO.
10. Permanent Court of International Justice, Series B, No. 1 (1922), p. 23.Google Scholar
11. See for example: ILO, Record of Proceedings, 10th session, pp. 72–93, 473–512Google Scholar, and 17th session, pp. 227–234, 485–491.
12. Osakwe, Chris, The Participation of the Soviet Union in Universal International Organizations (Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1972), pp. 72–75.Google Scholar
13. ILO, Governing Body, 127th session, p. 125Google Scholar (Appendix XXI).
14. Report and minority report Mc Nair Committee, ILO, Official Bulletin, XXXLX (1956), No. 9, pp. 475–599.Google Scholar
15. Valticos, Nicolas, Droit International du Travail (Paris: Librairie Dalloz, 1970), p. 216Google Scholar; bach, Alfred Fern, Soviet Coexistence Strategy (Washington D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1960), pp. 23–29.Google Scholar
16. Report of Ago Committee GB 141/2/9, 141st session ILO.
17. ILO, 43rd session, Report I (Part I) p. 5.Google Scholar
18. Jenks, C. Wilfred, The International Protection of Trade Union Freedom (New York: Praeger, 1957) pp. 180–187Google Scholar; Jenks, C. Wilfred, “The International Protection of Freedom of Association for Trade Union Purposes”, 87 Recueil des Cours (1955), I), pp. 7–107Google Scholar; von Potobsky, G., “Protection of Trade Union Rights; Twenty Years' Work by the Committee on Freedom of Association”, 105 International Labour Review (1972) pp. 69–83.Google Scholar
19. Articles 22 and 23 Constitution ILO.
20. Wolf, Francis, “L' Interdépendence des Conventions Internationales du Travail”, 121 Recueil des Cours (1967,11), pp. 133, 134.Google Scholar
21. Articles 26–29 Constitution ILO.
22. Article 26 of the Statute and Article 7 of the Rules of the Court.
23. Article 30, 2 of the Statute and Article 7 of the Rules of the Court.