Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:42:59.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extraterritorial Application of Anti-Trust Legislation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

J. J. A. Ellis
Get access

Extract

The primary object of writing this article in the Conference issue of the Netherlands International Law Review is to acquaint those who want to participate in the discussions on the Conference Topic “Anti-Trust” with the previous work done by the I.L.A. Committee on Anti-Trust and reported in the Tokyo, Helsinki and Buenos Aires Conference Reports. In the absence of some introduction to the subject matter, Conferees would have to study no fewer than 288 pages of the Tokyo Report, 116 pages of the Helsinki Report and 66 pages of the Buenos Aires Report. Obviously, this introduction can only cover the main lines of the work done during the past six years.

Type
Articles
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , May 1970 , pp. 51 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I.L.A. Tokyo Conference Report (1964), pp. 565–592.Google Scholar

2 See ILA Buenos Aires Report, and the Report of the ILA Anti-Trust Committee to the 1970 Conference.

3 ILA Tokyo Conference Report page 539 (partly published).

4 1962 ALI Proceedings at 334.

5 This decision was given prior to the ratification by a great number of countries of the Brussels Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules relating to Penal Jurisdiction (1952), Article 1, and of the Geneva Convention on the High Seas (1958), Article 11, in which the Lotus doctrine (objective territoriality) was rejected as a basis for jurisdiction over acts committed on the high seas.

6 OECD Document Nr. C (67) 53 (Final).

7 Third General Report, February 1970, page 65, under paragraph 34.