No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Advisory Opinion on Namibia of the International Court of Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2009
Extract
The pronouncement of the International Court of Justice on Namibia lends itself to commentaries of many kinds. Far-reaching conclusions, even too far-reaching for many people, can be drawn from it. The accuracy of these conclusions, however, will depend primarily on the definition of the context within which the Court made its pronouncement. It is my firm conviction that this context is determined by the characteristics of the Mandate “Agreement”, characteristics which are absolutely unique and which can, therefore, in my opinion, be used as a basis for an argument per analogiam only with the greatest caution.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1973
References
1. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 31.Google Scholar
2. Ars Aequi, vol. XXI, p. 386.
3. Jaarboek van het Departement van Buitenlandse Zaken/Yearbook of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs/1971–72, Annex 6, p. 25.
4. Goodrich and Hambro, Charter of the United Nations, 2nd ed., 1949, pp. 442 ff.
5. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 278.Google Scholar
6. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 162.Google Scholar
7. Op cit., p. 387.
8. I.C.J. Reports 1955, p. 76.Google Scholar
9. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 146.Google Scholar
10. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 163.Google Scholar
11. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 147Google Scholar
12. Op. cit., p. 388.
13. Op. cit., p. 389.
14. Goodrich, and Hambro, , op. cit., p. 205.Google Scholar
15. I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 340.Google Scholar