Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:02:25.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SaferDrive: An NLG-based behaviour change support system for drivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

DANIEL BRAUN Open the ORCID record for DANIEL BRAUN [Opens in a new window] ,
EHUD REITER  and
ADVAITH SIDDHARTHAN
DANIEL BRAUN
Affiliation:
Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
EHUD REITER
Affiliation:
Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK e-mail: [email protected]
ADVAITH SIDDHARTHAN
Affiliation:
Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the long history of Natural Language Generation (NLG) research, the potential for influencing real world behaviour through automatically generated texts has not received much attention. In this paper, we present SaferDrive, a behaviour change support system that uses NLG and telematic data in order to create weekly textual feedback for automobile drivers, which is delivered through a smartphone application. Usage-based car insurances use sensors to track driver behaviour. Although the data collected by such insurances could provide detailed feedback about the driving style, they are typically withheld from the driver and used only to calculate insurance premiums. SaferDrive instead provides detailed textual feedback about the driving style, with the intent to help drivers improve their driving habits. We evaluate the system with real drivers and report that the textual feedback generated by our system does have a positive influence on driving habits, especially with regard to speeding.

Type
Article
Information
Natural Language Engineering , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 551 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, C., and Michie, S., 2008. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology 27 (3): 379.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Arroyo, E., Sullivan, S., and Selker, T. 2006. Carcoach: a polite and effective driving coach. In Proceedings of the CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’06), pp. 357–62. New York, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
Association of Chief Police Officers. 2015. ACPO Speed Enforcement Policy Guidelines 2011–2015: Joining Forces for Safer Roads.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1994. Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In Preventing AIDS, pp. 25–59. New York, USA: Springer US.Google Scholar
Becker, M. H., 1974. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education & Behavior 2 (4): 354–86.Google Scholar
Bhatia, P. 2003. Vehicle Technologies to Improve Performance and Safety. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Blake, S., Siddharthan, A., Nguyen, H., Sharma, N., Robinson, A.-M., O’Mahony, E., Darvill, B., Mellish, C., and van der Wal, R. 2012. Natural language generation for nature conservation: automating feedback to help volunteers identify bumblebee species. In Proceedings of COLING 2012, pp. 311–24. Mumbai, India: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Boriboonsomsin, K., Vu, A., and Barth, M. 2010. Eco-driving: Pilot Evaluation of Driving Behavior Changes Among Us Drivers. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Braun, D., Endres, C., and Müller, C. 2011. Determination of mobility context using low-level data. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2011), pp. 41–2. Salzburg, Austria: ACM.Google Scholar
Braun, D., Reiter, E., and Siddharthan, A. 2015. Creating textual driver feedback from telemetric data. In Proceedings of the 15th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG), pp. 156–65. Brighton, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for Automotive Management. 2013. The used car market report 2013. The University of Buckingham Business School.Google Scholar
Department for Transport. 2016. Reported road casualties great Britain: 2013 annual report.Google Scholar
Di Eugenio, B., Fossati, D., Yu, D., Haller, S., and Glass, M. 2005. Aggregation improves learning: experiments in natural language generation for intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 50–7. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dohrenwend, A., 2002. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Family Practice Management 9 (10): 43–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Endlein, M., Trede, S., and Letzner-Friedlein, P. 2014. Dat report 2014. Deutsche Automobil Treuhand GmbH (DAT).Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., 2000. The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care 12 (3): 273–8.Google Scholar
Fogg, B. J. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology, p. 40. Claremont, CA, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
Gale, E. A. 2004. The Hawthorne studies – a fable for our times? QJM 97 (7): 439–49.Google Scholar
Gatt, A., Portet, F., Reiter, E., Hunter, J., Mahamood, S., Moncur, W., and Sripada, S., 2009. From data to text in the neonatal intensive care unit: using NLG technology for decision support and information management. AI Communications 22 (3): 153–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatt, A., and Reiter, E. 2009. SimpleNLG: a realisation engine for practical applications. In Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 90–3. Athens, Greece: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gkatzia, D., Hastie, H., Janarthanam, S., and Lemon, O. 2013. Generating student feedback from time-series data using reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 14th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 115–24. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gkatzia, D., Lemon, O., and Rieser, V. 2016. Natural language generation enhances human decision-making with uncertain information. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 264–8. Berlin, Germany: Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, E., Driedger, N., and Kittredge, R. I., 1994. Using natural-language processing to produce weather forecasts. IEEE Expert 9 (2): 45–53.Google Scholar
Hallett, C., Power, R., and Scott, D. 2006. Summarisation and visualisation of e-health data repositories. In Proceedings of the UK E-Science All-Hands Meeting. Edinburgh, UK: National e-Science Centre.Google Scholar
Händel, P., Skog, I., Wahlström, J., Bonawiede, F., Welch, R., Ohlsson, J., and Ohlsson, M., 2014. Insurance telematics: opportunities and challenges with the smartphone solution. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 6 (4): 57–70.Google Scholar
Harris, M. D. 2008. Building a large-scale commercial NLG system for an EMR. In Proceedings of the 5th International Natural Language Generation Conference, pp. 157–60. Salt Fork, Ohio, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., and Timperley, H., 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.Google Scholar
Hunter, J., Freer, Y., Gatt, A., Reiter, E., Sripada, S., Sykes, C., and Westwater, D., 2011. BT-nurse: computer generation of natural language shift summaries from complex heterogeneous medical data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18 (5): 621–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., and Taylor, M. S., 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (4): 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstas, I., and Lapata, M. 2012. Unsupervised concept-to-text generation with hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 752–61. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Langkilde, I., and Knight, K. 1998. Generation that exploits corpus-based statistical knowledge. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pp. 704–10. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lehto, T. 2012. Designing persuasive health behavior change interventions. In Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable E-health Solutions, pp. 163–81. New York, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Mairesse, F., Gašić, M., Jurčíček, F., Keizer, S., Thomson, B., Yu, K., and Young, S. 2010. Phrase-based statistical language generation using graphical models and active learning. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1552–61. Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Masthoff, J., Grasso, F., and Ham, J., 2014. Preface to the special issue on personalization and behavior change. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24 (5): 345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noël, M. 2015. The role of OBD in the 2015 connected car market. In SMi’s Telematics for Usage-Based Insurance Conference. London, UK: SMi Group.Google Scholar
Ponnamperuma, K., Siddharthan, A., Zeng, C., Mellish, C., and van der Wal, R. 2013. Tag2blog: narrative generation from satellite tag data. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 169–74. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ramos-Soto, A., Bugarín, A., Barro, S., Gallego, N., Rodríguez, C., Fraga, I., and Saunders, A. 2015. Automatic generation of air quality index textual forecasts using a data-to-text approach. In Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 164–74. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ratsameethammawong, P., and Kasemsan, K., 2010. Mobile phone location tracking by the combination of GPS, Wi-Fi and cell location technology. Communications of the IBIMA 2010: 1–7.Google Scholar
Reiter, E. 2007. An architecture for data-to-text systems. In Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 97–104. Saarbrücken, Germany: Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, E., and Dale, R., 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, E., Robertson, R., and Osman, L. M., 2003. Lessons from a failure: generating tailored smoking cessation letters. Artificial Intelligence 144 (1): 41–58.Google Scholar
Riederer, M. 2014. Developments in neighbouring countries offer potential for synergies. Swiss Platform for the Promotion of ITS.Google Scholar
Rose, S. 2013. Telematics: How Big Data is Transforming the Auto Insurance Industry. SAS.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., and Becker, M. H. 1994. The health belief model and hiv risk behavior change. In Preventing AIDS, pp. 5–24. New York, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Sharon, T., Selker, T., Wagner, L., and Frank, A. J. 2005. Carcoach: a generalized layered architecture for educational car systems. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software-Science, Technology and Engineering, pp. 13–22. New York, USA: IEEE.Google Scholar
Sripada, S. G., Burnett, N., Turner, R., Mastin, J., and Evans, D. 2014. A case study: NLG meeting weather industry demand for quality and quantity of textual weather forecasts. In INLG 2014 - Proceedings of the 8th International Natural Language Generation Conference, Including Proceedings of the INLG and SIGDIAL 2014 Joint Session, 19–21 June 2014, pp. 1–5. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt. 2016. Unfallentwicklung auf deutschen strassen 2015.Google Scholar
Steelman, L. A. and Rutkowski, K. A., 2004. Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19 (1): 6–18.Google Scholar
Stephens, E., Mylne, K., and Spiegelhalter, D. 2011. Using an online game to evaluate effective methods of communicating ensemble model output to different audiences. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, vol. 1, p. 776. San Francisco, California, USA: American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
Teach, R. L. and Shortliffe, E. H. 1987. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. In Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine, pp. 68–85. New York, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Towne, D. M., 1997. Approximate reasoning techniques for intelligent diagnostic instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8: 262–83.Google Scholar
Tulusan, J., Staake, T., and Fleisch, E. 2012. Providing eco-driving feedback to corporate car drivers: what impact does a smartphone application have on their fuel efficiency? In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 212–15. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
Turner, R., Sripada, S., Reiter, E., and Davy, I. 2008. Selecting the content of textual descriptions of geographically located events in spatio-temporal weather data. In Ellis, R., Allen, T., and Petridis, M. (eds.), Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XV, pp. 75–88. London, UK: Springer.Google Scholar
Unger, T. 2012. Junge Fahrer 2012. In Berichte der ADAC Unfallforschung. Munich, Germany: ADAC.Google Scholar
van der Wal, R., Sharma, N., Mellish, C., Robinson, A., and Siddharthan, A., 2016. The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conservation Biology 30 (3): 550–61.Google Scholar
van der Wal, R., Zeng, C., Heptinstall, D., Ponnamperuma, K., Mellish, C., Ben, S., and Siddharthan, A., 2015. Automated data analysis to rapidly derive and communicate ecological insights from satellite-tag data: a case study of reintroduced red kites. Ambio 44 (4): 612–23.Google Scholar
Weiner, J., 1980. Blah, a system which explains its reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 15 (1): 19–48.Google Scholar
Williams, S. 2004. Natural Language Generation (NLG) of Discourse Relations for Different Reading Levels. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Williams, S., and Reiter, E. 2008. Skillsum: basic skills screening with personalised, computer-generated feedback. In Proceedings 11th International Conference on Interactive Computer aided Learning. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, K., Ba, J., Kiros, R., Cho, K., Courville, A., Salakhudinov, R., Zemel, R., and Bengio, Y. 2015. Show, attend and tell: neural image caption generation with visual attention. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2048–57. Lille, France: IMLS.Google Scholar
Ye, L. R., and Johnson, P. E., 1995. The impact of explanation facilities on user acceptance of expert systems advice. MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 157–72.Google Scholar
Yue, Y., Zhang, K., and Jacobsen, H.-A. 2013. Smart phone application for connected vehicles and smart transportation. In Proceedings Demo & Poster Track of ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference, p. 12. ACM.Google Scholar