No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Shading, lines, colors: mapping ethnographic taxonomies of European Russia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
This article explores the role of maps in the construction and development of ethnographic taxonomies in the mid-century Russian Empire. A close reading of two ethnographic maps of “European Russia” produced by members of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society, Petr Keppen (1851) and Aleksander Rittikh (1875), is used to shine a spotlight on the cartographical methods and techniques (lines, shading, color, hatching, legends, text, etc.) employed to depict, construct, and communicate these taxonomies. In doing so, this article draws our attention to how maps impacted visual and spatial thinking about the categories of ethnicity and nationality, and their application to specific contexts and political purposes within the Empire. Through an examination of Keppen's and Rittikh's maps, this article addresses the broader question of why cartography came to be regarded as such a powerful medium through which to communicate and consolidate particular visions of an ethnographic landscape.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Nationalities Papers , Volume 46 , Issue 4: Special Section: Classification , July 2018 , pp. 592 - 611
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1993. “Number in the Colonial Imagination.” In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament, edited by Breckenridge, Carol A., and van der Veer, Peter, 314–339. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Nick. 2007. “New Spatial Histories of Twentieth Century Russia and the Soviet History: Surveying the Landscape.” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas
55 (3): 374–400.Google Scholar
Baron, Nick. 2008. “New Spatial Histories of 20th-Century Russia and the Soviet Union: Exploring the Terrain.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History
9 (2): 433–447.Google Scholar
Brokgaus, F. A., and Efron, I. A., eds. 1890–1907. Entsiklopedicheskii Slovar'. 86 vols. St. Petersburg: Tipo-litografiia I. A. Efrona.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, Karsten. 2012. “The Baltic Provinces and Russian Perceptions.” In Russland an Der Ostsee: Imperiale Strategien der Macht und Kulturelle Wahrnehmungsmuster (16. Bis 20. Jahrhundert (Russia on the Baltic: Imperial Strategies of Power and Cultural Patterns of Perception (16th-20th Centuries)), edited by Brüggemann, Karsten, and Woodworth, Bradley D., 111–141. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Cadiot, Juliette. 2007. Le laboratoire impérial: Russie-URSS, 1860–1940. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar
Darrow, David W.
2002. “Census as a Technology of Empire.” Ab Imperio
2002 (4): 145–176.Google Scholar
d'Erkert, Roderich F.
1863. Atlas ethnographique des provinces habitées en totalité ou en partie par les polonais. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Dolbilov, Mikhail. 2010. Russkii krai, chuzhaia vera: Ethnokonfessional'naia politika imperii v Litve i Belorussii pri Aleksandre II. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.Google Scholar
Driver, Felix. 2001. Geography Militant: Cultures of Exploration and Empire. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Dullin, Sabine. 2014. La frontière épaisse: aux origines des politiques soviétiques, 1920–1940. Paris: Éd. de l'École des hautes études en sciences sociales.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Piotr. 2004. Polska i jej granice: z historii polskiej geografii politycznej. Lublin: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej.Google Scholar
Edney, Matthew H.
1997. Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2007. “Governmentality, Calculation, Territory.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
25:562–580.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2013. The Birth of Territory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erkert, Roderich F.
1863. Etnograficheskii atlas zapadno russkikh gubernii i sosednikh oblastei. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Faehndrich, Jutta, and Perthus, Sophie. 2013. “Visualizing the Map-making Process. Studying Century Holy Land Cartography with Map Analyst.” e-Perimetron
8:60–84.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2002. Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Franklin, Simon. 2010. “Printing and Social Control in Russia 1: Passports.” Russian History
37 (3): 208–237.Google Scholar
Franklin, Simon. 2015. “Printing Social Control in Russia 3: Blank Forms.” Russian History
42 (1): 114–135.Google Scholar
Friendly, Michael. 2008. “The Golden Age of Statistical Graphics.” Statistical Science
23 (4): 502–535.Google Scholar
Galkin, N. N.
1871. “Obiasnite'naia zapiska k ethnograficheskoi karte Tsarstva Pol'skago.” Zapiski IRGO po otdeleniyu etnografii
4:155–220.Google Scholar
Gerasimov, Ilya, Glebov, Serguei, Kaplunovski, Alexander, Mogilner, Marina, and Semyonov, Alexander. 2005. “In Search of a New Imperial History.” Ab Imperio (1): 33–56.Google Scholar
Gerasimov, Ilya, Glebov, Serguei, and Mogilner, Marina. 2016. “Hybridity: Marrism and the Problems of Language of the Imperial Situation.” Ab Imperio (1): 27–68.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. 1810. Zur Fahbenlehre. Tübingen: J.G. Cotta'schen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Gorizontov, Leonid. 2007. “The Great Circle of Interior Russia: Representations of the Imperior Center in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” In Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700–1930, edited by Burbank, Jane, Hagen, Mark von, and Remnev, Anatolyi, 67–93. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Jason D.
2015. Mapping the Germans: Statistical Science, Cartography and the Visualization of the German Nation, 1848–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, John Brian. 1988. “Silences and Secrecy: The Hidden Agenda of Cartography in Early Modern Europe.” Imago Mundi
40:57–76.Google Scholar
Harley, John Brian, and Laxton, Paul. 2002. The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. 2005. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kamusella, Tomasz. 2005. “The Triple Division of the Slavic Languages: A Linguistic Finding, a Product of Politics, or an Accident?” IWM Working Paper 1. Vienna.Google Scholar
Kappeler, Andreas. 2009. “Russia as a Multi-Ethnic Empire. Classifying People by Estate, Religion and Ethnicity, 1760–1855.” In Defining Self: Essays on Emergent Identities in Russia Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Branch, Michael, 59–74. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Keppen, Petr. 1848. Etnograficheskii atlas evropeiskoi Rossii. St. Petersburg: Voenno-topografiches-koe delo.Google Scholar
Keppen, Peter. 1851. Etnograficheskaia karta evropeiskoi Rossii. St. Petersburg: (no publisher).Google Scholar
Keppen, Petr. 1852. Ob etnograficheskoi karte evropeiskoi Rossii. St. Petersburg: Izdannoi imperatorskim russkim geograficheskim obschestvom.Google Scholar
Keppen, Petr. 1861. Khronologicheskii ukazatel' materialov dlia istorii inorodtsev evropeiskoi Rossii. St. Petersburg: Imperatorskaia Akademia Nauk.Google Scholar
Keppen, Fedor Petrovich. 1911. “Biografiia P. I. Keppena.” Sbornik otdeleniia russkago iazyka i slovesnosti imperatorskoi akademii nauk. 89 (5): 1–170.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I., and Arel, Dominique. 2002. Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Census. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kivelson, Valerie. 2006. Cartographies of Tsardom: The Land and its Meanings in Seventeenth-Century Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Nathaniel. 1998. “Science, Empire, and Nationality Ethnography in the Russian Geographical Society, 1845–1855.” In Imperial Russia: New Histories for the Empire, edited by Burbank, Jane, and Ransel, David L., 108–141. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Nathaniel. 2009. “Seeking the Self in the Other: Ethnographic Studies of Non-Russians in the Russian-Geographical Society, 1845–1860.” In Defining Self: Essays on Emergent Identities in Russia Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Branch, Michael, 117–138. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Knight, Nathaniel. 2010. “Russian Ethnography and the Visual Arts in the 1840s and 1850s.” In Visualising Russia: Fedor Solntsev and Crafting a National Past, edited by Whittaker, Cynthia Hyla, 127–144. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Koerner, Lisbet. 1999. Linnaeus: Nature and Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krasnikova, Ol'ga. 2011. “Osnovnye napravleniia razvitiia etnicheskogo kartograflrovaniia v Rossii XIX – nachale XX vv.” In Proniknovenie I primenenie diskursa natsional'nosti v Rossii i SSSR v kontse XVIII – pervoi polovine XX vv, edited by Jaats, Indrek, and Tammiksaar, Erki, 29–60. Tartu: Estonskii natsional'nyi myzeipp.Google Scholar
Labbé, Morgane. 2004. “La carte ethnographique de l'empire autrichien: la multinationalité dans 'l'ordre des choses.” CFC
180:71–84.Google Scholar
Labbé, Morgane. 2007. “Institutionalizing the Statistics of Nationality in Prussia in the 19th Century (From Local Bureaucracy to State-Level Census of Population).” Centaurus
49 (4): 289–306.Google Scholar
Loskutova, Marina. 2014. “Early Research on Insect Pests in the Russian Empire: Bureaucracy, Academic Community and Local Knowledge in the 1830s-1840s.” Centaurus
56 (4): 229–253.Google Scholar
Lotz, Christian. 2017. “The International Union of Forestry Organizations (IUFRO) and Debates About Forest-Water Relations During the Late Century.” History Research
7 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Mastianitsa, Olga. 2015. “Proizvodstvo i representatsiia ‘svoego’ prostranstva belaruskim natsional'-nym dvizheniem v nachale XX veke.” Ab Imperio (1): 175–211.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2015. “Taxonomies of the Slavic World Since the Enlightenment: Schematizing Perceptions of Slavic Ethnonymsin a Chart.” Language & History
58 (1): 24–54.Google Scholar
Mayr, Georg von. 1874. Gutachten über die Anwendung der graphischen und geographischen Methode in der Statistik. Munich: J. Gotteswinter.Google Scholar
Mogilner, Marina. 2013. Homo Imperii: A History of Physical Anthropology in Russia. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 1991. How to Lie with Maps. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 2006. From Squaw Tit to Whorehouse Meadow: How Maps Name, Claim and Inflame. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nenartovic, Tomas. 2016. Kaiserlich-russische, deutsche, polnische, litauische, belarussische und sowjetische kartographische Vorstellungen und territoriale Projekte zur Kontaktregion von Wilna 1795–1939. Munich: Collegium Carolinum e.V.Google Scholar
Palsky, Gilles. 1984. “La naissance de la démocartographie: analyse historique et sémiologique.” Espace, Populations, Sociétés
2:25–34.Google Scholar
Palsky, Gilles. 1991. “La cartographie statistique de la population au XIXe siècle.” Espace, Populations, Sociétés
9:451–458.Google Scholar
Palsky, Gilles. 1999. “The Debate on the Standardization of Statistical Maps and Diagrams (1857–1901). Elements for the History of Graphical Language.” Cybergo: European Journal of Geography [Online]. Accessed October 10, 2016. http://cybergeo.revues.org/148.Google Scholar
Palsky, Gilles. 2008. “Connections and Exchanges in European Thematic Cartography. The Case of Century Choropleth Maps.”
Belgeo
3–4:2–14.Google Scholar
Petronis, Vytautas. 2007. “Constructing Lithuania: Ethnic Mapping in Tsarist Russia, ca. 1800–1914.” Stockholm Studies in History, 91; Södertörn Doctoral diss., 21. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M.
1986. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Psianchin, Aibulat Valievich. 2004. Istoriia etnicheskoi kartografii v Rossi (do 30-x gg. XX v.). Moscow: Rossiiskaia Akademiia Nauk, Institut istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki im. S. I. Vavilova.Google Scholar
Pypin, Aleksandr Nikolaevich. 1892. Istoriia russkoi etnografii. Tom 1. St. Petersburg: M. M. Stasyulevich.Google Scholar
Randeraad, Nico. 2011. “The International Statistical Congress (1853—1876): Knowledge Transfers and Their Limits.” European History Quarterly
41 (1): 50–65.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, Henry C.
1874. “Address to the Royal Geographical Society. Delivered at the Anniversary Meeting on the 24th May, 1875.” Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society of London
19 (6): 368–460.Google Scholar
Report of the Delegates to the International Statistical Congress held at St. Petersburg in August, 1872. Washington, DC, Govt. offprint, 1875. Accessed October 10, 2016. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011407923.Google Scholar
Rittikh, Aleksandr F.
1873. Materialy dlia etnografii Rossii. Pribaltiiskii krai. St. Petersburg: A. II'in.Google Scholar
Rittikh, Aleksandr F.
1875. Etnograficheskaia karta evropeiskoi Rossii. St. Petersburg: Kartograficheskoe zavedanie A. A. Il'ina.Google Scholar
Rittikh, Aleksandr F.
1885. Slavianskii Mir. Istoriko-geograficheskoe i etnograficheskoe izsledovanie. Warsaw: V. M. Istomin.Google Scholar
Rittikh, Aleksandr F., and Batiushkov, Pompei N.
1864. Atlas narodonaseleniia zapadno- russkago kraia po veroispovedaniiam. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Rodkiewicz, Witold. 1998. Russian Nationality Policy in the Western Provinces of the Empire: 1863–1905. Lublin: Scientific Society of Lublin.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S.
1976. “The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760—1840.” History of Science
14:149–195.Google Scholar
Sach, Maike. 2013. “Symbols, Conventions, and Practices: Visual Representation of Ethnographic Knowledge on Siberia in Early Modern Maps and Reports.” In An Empire of Others: Creating Ethnographic Knowledge in Imperial Russia and the USSR, edited by Cvetkovski, Roland, and Hofmeister, Alexis, 171–210. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer-Weiss, Dorothea, and Versemann, Jens. 2005. “The Influence of Goethe's Farbenlehre on Early Geological Map Colouring: Goethe's Contribution to Christian Keferstein's General Charte von Teutschland (1821).” Imago Mundi
57 (2): 164–184.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1993. “Why Mammals are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History.” The American Historical Review
98 (2): 382–411.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1863. Die Darwinsche Theorie und Sprachwissenschaft: offenes Sendschreiben an Herrn Dr. Ernst Hackel. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Seegel, Steven. 2012. Mapping Europe's Borderlands: Russian Cartography in the Age of Empire. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Semenov (-Tian-Shanski), Petrovich, Petr. 1896. Istoriia poluvekoboe deiatel'nosti imperatorskago russkago geograficheskago obschestva 1845–1895. Chast' I-ia. St. Petersburg: Otdel IV.Google Scholar
Slocum, John W.
1998. “Who, and When, Were the Inorodtsy? The Evolution of the Category of ‘Aliens’ in Imperial Russia.” Russian Review
57 (2): 173–190.Google Scholar
Smith-Peter, Susan. 2007. “Defining the Russian People: Konstantin Arsen'ev and Russian Statistics Before 1861.” History of Science
45 (1): 47–64.Google Scholar
Société de géographie. 1875. Congrès international des sciences géographiques. Compte rendu des séances 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Sreznevskii, Izmail. 1851. “Zamechaniia o materialiakh dlia geografii russkago iazyka.” Vestnik IRGO
1:1–24.Google Scholar
Staliunas, Darius. 2007. Making Russians: Meaning and Practice of Russification in Lithuania and Belarus After 1863. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Staliunas, Darius. 2009. “National Census in the Service of the Russian Empire: The Western Borderlands in the Mid-Nineteenth Century, 1830–1870.” In Defining Self: Essays on Emergent Identities in Russia Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Branch, Michael, 435–448. Studia Fennica. Ethnologica. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Staliunas, Darius, ed. 2016. Spatial Concepts of Lithuania in the Long Nineteenth Century. Brighton, MA: Academic Studies Press.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael. 1988. Reichspublizistik und Policeywissenschaft: 1600–1800. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Sukhova, Natalia G.
1993. “Petr Ivanovich Keppen kak geograf: k 200-letiyu so dnia rozhdeniia.” Izvestiia RGO
125 (5): 1–11.Google Scholar
Turoma, Sanna, and Waldstein, Maxim. 2016. Empire De/Centred: New Spatial Histories of Russia and the Soviet Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weeks, Theodore R.
1996. Nation and State in Late Imperial Russia: Nationalism and Russification on the Western Frontier 1863–1914. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Theodore R.
2015. Vilnius Between Nations, 1795–2000. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar