Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:36:10.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Richard Pipes in Soviet Publications: Implications of the Reactions of Soviet Printed Media to Richard Pipes's Work on Soviet Nationalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Yaroslav Bilinsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This essay in political historiography aims to show how Professor Richard Pipes's monumental work on Soviet nationalities has been received by Soviet publications. It is more limited in scope than the main title connotes, since it does not deal with Soviet reactions to the totality of Pipes's scholarly work, only to an early but important part of his opus; nor is it concerned with Soviet attacks on Pipes's government service. The printed media surveyed include mostly articles in professional journals and books. Working through the Current Digest of the Soviet Press, this writer has tried to locate Soviet newspaper articles dealing with Pipes's work on nationalities, but has had no success. This is less of a shortcoming than it first appears, because even articles in Soviet scholarly journals, even books undergirded with an impressive scholarly apparatus, insofar as they deal with such a sensitive topic as the partial failure to solve the nationality problem, cannot but follow the party's policies of the moment. Apolitical historiography in the Soviet Union simply does not exist.

Type
Symposium: Soviet Responses to Western Studies on Soviet Nationalities
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , Spring-Fall 1986 , pp. 21 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Association for the Study of the Nationalities (USSR and East Europe) Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kissinger, Henry A., in an interview in Washington, D.C. See Chicago Tribune, 7 March 1982 (2): 2.Google Scholar

2. “Alexandre Bennigsen in the Eyes of the Soviet Press”, this volume.Google Scholar

3. Romanovsky, N.V., “Richard Paips — professional'nyi antisovetchik,” Voprosy istorii, 1982 (3): 27–42; biographical note on p. 188.Google Scholar

∗ See also the bibliography in Appendix A.Google Scholar

4. Pipes, Richard, “Muslims of Soviet Central Asia: Trends and Prospects,” The Middle East Journal, 1955, vol. 9, Part I: 147-62; Part II: 295–308.Google Scholar

5. Zhdanko, T. A., “Demagogicheskie izmyshleniia i istoricheskaia pravda (Po povodu stat'i amerikanskogo istorika Richard Paipsa ’Musul'mane Sovetskoi Srednei Azii: tendentsii i perspektivy‘),” Sovetskaia etnografiia, 1958, (4): 134-41.Google Scholar

6. Zhdanko denounces them as “spiteful traitors to their Fatherland.” Ibid., 134.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., 135.Google Scholar

8. , Pipes, “Muslims,” p. 154; Zhdanko, “Demagogicheskie,” p. 136.Google Scholar

9. , Zhdanko, “Demagogicheskie,” p. 137.Google Scholar

10. This lacuna has been pointed out to me by Professor Pipes himself in a conversation.Google Scholar

11. Sovetskaia etnografiia does not identify Zhdanko beyond saying that she comes from Moscow (in Table of Contents, p. 182).Google Scholar

12. Kazakevich, R.A. and Suslova, R.M., Mister Paips fal'sifitsiruet istoriiu: O knige R. Paipsa “Sotsial-demokratiia i rabochee dvizhenie v S.-Peterburge, 1885-1897.” Leningrad: Lenizdat, 1966.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., 4.Google Scholar

∗ See the reviews of The Formation of the Soviet Union in Appendix B.Google Scholar

14. Khrisanfov, I., “Ob iskazhenii v burzhuaznoi istoriografii reshenii II Kongressa Kominterna po natsional'nomu i kolonial'nomu voprosam, in Leningradskii … gosudarstvennyi universitet im. A.A. Zhdanova, Kafedra istorii KPSS. Nekotorye voprosy natsional'noi politiki KPSS (Leningrad: Leningrad University Press, 1974), pp. 21–29. The contributors are identified as juniort faculty at Leningrad University and other higher educational institutions in Leningrad and graduate students.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., 25.Google Scholar

16. Ibid. Google Scholar

17. “The Bolshevik approach to the nationality questions,” Pipes [allegedly] writes, “can under no circumstances be considered the program of a party which has arrived in power.” Khrisanfov, “Ob iskazhenii …,” pp. 25–26, referring to R. Pipes, The Formation of the Soviet Union … (1964), p. 296. The actual quotation reads: “The Bolshevik approach, however, although it had brought immediate advantages, also had its shortcomings. It was more useful as a means for fighting for power, than as a program for a party which had acquired power.”Google Scholar

18. Bronskii, N. and Badal'ian, S., “Natsional'nye otnosheniia na Severnom Kavkaze v kryvom zerkale antikommunizma.” In Ministerstvo prosveshcheniia RSFSR, Piatigorskii Gosudarstvennyi Pedagogicheskii Institut Innostrannykh Iazykov, S.M. Arutiunian, ed., Razvitie natsional'nykh otnoshenii na sovremennom etape kommunisticheskogo stroitel'stva (Piatigorsk, 1968), pp. 189–219.Google Scholar

19. Inamdzhanova, Gul'chekhra Z., Natsional'naia gosudarstvennost' Uzbekistana i ee fal'sifikatory. Tashkent: “FAN” publishers of the Uzbek SSR, 1977. At top of title page: Akademiia nauk Uzbekskoi SSR, Otdel nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam.Google Scholar

20. first, At, the evidence was admittedly only suggestive, based on an analogy. In Voprosy istorii, 1984 (1), p. 189, a certain Yurii Ivanovich Igritskii, “the author of many works dedicated to the critique of anti-communism and of bourgeois conceptions of the history of the USSR” (i.e., a professional “rebuff writer”) is identified as a kandidat of history and senior scholarly associate (sotrudnik) of the INION of the USSR Academy of Sciences. My reading of the initials is Institut Nauchnoi Informatsii po /Obshchestvennym Naukam (Institute of Scholarly Information in the Social Sciences), which has been confirmed by a reference librarian at the Library of Congress.Google Scholar

21. , Inamdzhanova, Natsional'naia, p. 6, referring to Pipes, “‘Solving’ the Nationality Problem.”Google Scholar

22. , Inamdzhanova, Natsional'naia, pp. 18,32.Google Scholar

23. Ibid., 12–13. See also Pipes, Formation of the Soviet Union (1964), p. 91.Google Scholar

24. , Inamdzhanova, Natsional'naia, p. 43.Google Scholar

25. Zenushkina, I. S., Sovetskaia natsional'naia politika i burzhuaznye istoriki: Stanovlenie Sovetskogo mnogonatsional'nogo gosudarstva (1917-1922 gody) v sovremennoi amerikanskoi istoriografii (Moscow: Mysl Publishers, 1971), p. 72.Google Scholar

26. , Inamdzhanova, Natsional'naia, pp. 36, 37.Google Scholar

27. Iakubovskaia, S.I., Stroitel'stvo Soiuznogo Sovetskogo sotsialisticheskogo gosudarstva v 1922-1925 gg. (Moscow: USSR Academy of Science Publishers, 1960).Google Scholar

28. Iakubovskaia, S.I., Ob“edinitel'noe dvizhenie za obrazovanie SSSR, (1917-1922) (Moscow, 1947); and “K voprosu ob obrazovanii SSR,” Voprosy istorii, 1947(1): 3-24.Google Scholar

29. , Pipes, Formation of the Soviet Union (1954), p. 296.Google Scholar

30. Iakubovskaia, S.I., “Rol' V.I. Lenina v sozdanii Soiuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik,” Kommunist, 1956 (10): 27–41.Google Scholar

31. , Iakubovskaia, Stroitel'stvo, p. 45.Google Scholar

32. Ibid., 124.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., 53.Google Scholar

34. Ibid., 532-55, 58.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., 65.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., 68.Google Scholar

37. Ibid., 68–69. The first quotation from Pipes is accurate, the rest not quite.Google Scholar

38. , Pipes, Formation of the Soviet Union (1964), Ch. 6, pp. 242-93 passim, 327. Pipes found her 1960 book “based on a rich selection of archival materials, … quite indispensable …”Google Scholar

39. , Iakubovskaia, Stroitel'stvo, pp. 38, 157.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., 41, with reference to a paragraph she wrote in SSSR v period vosstanovleniia narodnogo khoziaistva (Moscow, 1955), p. 348.Google Scholar

41. , Iakubovskaia, Stroitel'stvo, pp. 49, 145, referring to her 1956 Kommunist article (see note 30).Google Scholar

42. See note 25.Google Scholar

43. , Zenushkina, Sov. nats. politika, p. 8.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., 6–7.Google Scholar

45. Ibid., 174.Google Scholar

46. Ibid., 286.Google Scholar

47. Ibid., 3.Google Scholar

48. Ibid., 16–17.Google Scholar

49. Ibid., 12–13.Google Scholar

50. Stenograficheskii otchet X s'ezda Rossiiskoi kommunisticheskoi partii (8-16 marta 1921 g.) (Petersburg: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo, 1921), p. 83.Google Scholar

51. , Pipes, Formation (both eds.), p. 93.Google Scholar

52. , Pipes, Formation (1964), p. 126; Zenushkina, Sov. nats. politika, p. 141.Google Scholar

53. , Zenushkina, Sov. nats. politika, pp. 120-21, 143, 144.Google Scholar

54. Ibid., 191-97.Google Scholar

55. Ibid., 249.Google Scholar

56. Groshev, I. I. and Chechenkina, O. I., Kritika burzhuaznoi fal'sifikatsii natstonal'noi politiki KPSS. (Moscow: Mysl Publishers, 1974).Google Scholar

57. See note 3.Google Scholar

58. In note 1 of his article, Romanovsky has assembled what should have been a representative sample of anti-Pipes newspaper articles: A. Kostin, “Razoblachenie fal'sifikatora,” Pravda, 9 April 1967; G. Gerasimov, “Alkhimiki ot nauki, ili pochemu chakhnet plemia ‘sovetologov’,” Komsomol'skaia Pravda, 29 Sept. 1974; G. Vasil'ev, “Ostraia diskussiia,” Pravda, 1 July 1977; S. Vishnevskii, “Vnimanie: Paips!,” Pravda, 18 Feb. 1981; and A.O. Krivitskii, “O, litsemery!,” Pravda, 11 May 1981. Item 1 concerns Pipes's book on the workers' movement in St. Petersburg; items 3,4 and 5 all bear on Soviet-American relations. Item 2 is a general comment on old versus new Sovietologists, on the occasion of the First World Congress for Soviet and East European Studies at Banff, Canada, 1974.Google Scholar

59. Groshev, and Chechenkina, , Kritika, pp. 47–50, 76f.Google Scholar

60. Ibid., 70.Google Scholar

61. Ibid., 47 especially.Google Scholar

62. Pipes, R.: “Nationalism and Nationality.” In Leonard Schapiro (ed.), The USSR and the Future: An analysis of the New Programme of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Munich: Institute for the Study of the USSR, 1962), pp. 69–85; “The Forces of Nationalism,“ Problems of Communism, 1964, vol. 13(1): 1-6; and “‘Solving’ the Nationality Problem,” Problems of Communism, 1967, vol. 16(5): 125-31.Google Scholar

63. Groshev, and Chechenkina, , Kritika p. 134.Google Scholar

64. Ibid., 190.Google Scholar

65. Ibid., 216. The accurate quote is from Pipes's “Nationalism and Nationality,” p. 81. The authors used a different edition from my own.Google Scholar

66. , Romanovsky, “Richard Paips,” pp. 27–30.Google Scholar

67. , Ibid, 30.Google Scholar

68. Pipes, R. Survival Is Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America's Future (New York: Simon ∧ Schuster, 1984), pp. 179-86.Google Scholar

69. Pipes, R., “Introduction: The Nationality Problem.” In Zev Katz et al. (eds.), Handbook of Major Soviet Nationalities (New York: Free Press, 1975), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

70. Pipes, R., “Reflections on the Nationality Problems in the Soviet Union.” In Nathan Glazer and Daniel P. Moynihan (eds.), Ethnicity: Theory and Experience (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975), pp. 453-65.Google Scholar

71. Ibid., 456.Google Scholar

72. Ibid., 457.Google Scholar

73. Ibid., 462.Google Scholar

74. Ibid., 464.Google Scholar

75. Pipes, R., Struve: Liberal on the Right, 1905-1944 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980), p. ix. Romanovsky, in his article on Pipes (p. 37), catches that passage and cites part of the emphasized sentence, but interprets it negatively, as a “panegyric to subjectivism.”Google Scholar