Article contents
The Return of the Repressed? Post-1989 Nationalism in the “New” Eastern Europe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
The intractable war in Yugoslavia, the breakup of Czechslovakia, the nationalist rumblings in Hungary and Romania, and manifestations of imperial and nationalist longings in Russian politics signify nationalism's enduring potency in Central and Eastern Europe. While some foreign observers worried about this potency, the new elites largely believed that liberalism in power could overcome those forces. Liberal democracy's triumph supposedly meant the end of History, inter alia, aggressive nationalism in Eastern Europe. They believed that these national liberation movements had cooperative, mutually supportive relationships that would flower after Communism ended. Nationalist discords were due to Eastern Europe's previous historical post-1914 nightmares, but the new post-1989 states would have amicable relations with their neighbors. Ostensibly, nationalism, once freed from Soviet repression, would bring an end to Soviet rule and usher in a new ‘springtime of nations.'
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1994 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe and ex-USSR
References
Notes
* The views expressed here do not represent those of the US Army, Department of Defense, or the US Government.Google Scholar
1. Vladimir Tismaneanu, Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe From Stalin to Havel, New York: The Free Press, 1992, p. 286, Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Avon Books, 1992, p. 37.Google Scholar
2. This was also argued by Nadia Diuk and Adrian Karatnycky, “Nationalism—Part of the Solution,” Orbis, Vol. XXXV, No. 3, Fall, 1990, pp. 341–342 and their book: Nadia Diuk and Adrian Karatnycky, The Hidden Nations: The People Challenge the Soviet Union, New York: William Morrow & Company, 1990, pp. 233–234.Google Scholar
3. Eric J. Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 163–183.Google Scholar
4. For recent examples of this continuing trend see, Robert M. Hayden, “Constitutional Nationalism in the Formerly Yugoslav Republics,” Slavic Review, LI, No. 4, Winter, 1992, pp. 654–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Valery Tishkov, “Inventions and Manifestations of Ethno-Nationalism in and After the Soviet Union,” Kumar Rupesingh, Peter King, and Olga Vorkunova, Eds., Ethnicity and Conflict in a Post-Communist World, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992, pp. 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Paul B. Henze, “Ethnic Dynamics and Dilemmas of the Russian Republic,” Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Ca., 1991, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
7. Fukuyama, p. 17.Google Scholar
8. Stjepan Merstrovic, “A Cultural Analysis of the Fall of Communism,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. IV, No. 1–2, 1992, p. 109.Google Scholar
9. Alexander J. Matejko, “Virtue and Social Organization in Poland: Response to Wrobel,” Ibid., p. 163.Google Scholar
10. “Latvia's Depopulation Dynamics Explored,” Foreign Broadcast Information Service Central Eurasia (henceforth FBIS USR), 93–003, January 8, 1993, p. 131.Google Scholar
11. Blaine Harden, “Serbia's Treacherous Gang of Three,” Washington Post, February 7, 1993, p. C1.Google Scholar
12. “Azerbaijan's Foreign Minister on Ties With Neighbors,” Foreign Broadcast Information Service Western Europe (henceforth FBIS WEU), 93–018, January 29, 1993, pp. 56–57, Thomas G. Friedman, From Beirut to Jerusalem, New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, 1989, pp. 273–284.Google Scholar
13. “Ethnopolitical Research Center Views Interethnic Conflicts,” FBIS USR, 92–009, January 30, 1992, p. 105, “Caucasian Confederation Chairman on Ethnic Issue,” FBIS USR, 92–020, February 26, 1992, p. 15, Hayden, pp. 654–673.Google Scholar
14. For the concept of identity politics see, the two articles by George Schopflin, “Post-Communism: Constructing New Democracies in Central Europe,” International Affairs (London), Vol. LXVII, No. 2, 1991, pp. 235–250, and “Nationalism and National Minorities in East and Central Europe,” Journal of International Affairs, Vol. XLIV, No. 1, 1991, pp. 51–65, and Todd Gitlin, “From Universality to Difference: Notes on the Fragmentation of the Idea of the Left,” Contention: Debates in Society, Culture, and Science, Vol. II, No. 2, Winter, 1993, pp. 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Tishkov, pp. 41–44.Google Scholar
16. Sabrina P. Ramet, Social Currents in Eastern Europe: the Sources and Meaning of the Great Transformation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991, pp. 308–309.Google Scholar
17. Ibid. Google Scholar
18. “European Demilitarization, Security Policy Viewed,” Foreign Broadcast Information Service Soviet Union (Henceforth FBIS SOV), 89–123, June 28, 1989, p. 2.Google Scholar
19. General P. G. Lushev, “Unity of Warsaw Pact Countries Defense Efforts is a Factor of Socialism's Reliable Protection,” Joint Publications Research Service, Military Thought (Voennaia Mysl'), No. 1, January, 1990, p. 5.Google Scholar
20. Stephen Blank, “The Origins of Soviet Anti-Semitism, 1923–33,” Paper Presented to the XX Annual AAASS Convention, Boston, MA, October, 1987; Mikhail Agurskii, The Third Rome: National Bolshevism in the USSR, Leonard Schapiro, Foreword, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987; Robert C. Tucker, Stalin in Power: The Revolution From Above, 1928–1941, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1990.Google Scholar
21. Robert R. King, Minorities Under Communism: Nationalities as a Source of Tension Among Balkan Communist States, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1973, pp. 255–256.Google Scholar
22. Leszek Kolakowski, “Amidst Moving Ruins,” Daedalus, Vol. CXXII, No. 2, Spring, 1992, p. 52.Google Scholar
23. “Foreign Minister Views Regional Problems,” Foreign Broadcast Information Service Eastern Europe (henceforth FBIS EEU), 92–252, December 31, 1992, p. 14.Google Scholar
24. Stephen Blank, Stalin's Commissariat of Nationalities: The Sorcerer as Apprentice, 1917–1924, Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1993; and the following articles by Victor Zaslavsky, “Nationalism and Democratic Transition in Postcommunist Societies,” Daedalus, Vol CXXI, No. 2, Spring, 1992, pp. 97–121, (henceforth Zaslavsky 1992 A); “Success and Collapse: Traditional Soviet Nationality Policy,” Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras, Eds., Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 29–42 (henceforth Zaslavsky 1992 B); “The Evolution of Separatism in Soviet Society Under Gorbachev,” in Gail W. Lapidus, Victor Zaslavsky and Phillip Goldman, Eds., From Union to Commonwealth: Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 98–113 (henceforth Zaslavsky 1992 C); and Phillip Goldman, Gail W. Lapidus, and Victor Zaslavsky, “Introduction: Soviet Federalism—Its Origins, Evolution, and Demise,” Ibid., pp. 1–22 (henceforth Zaslavsky et al.).Google Scholar
25. Hobsbawm, pp. 124–130.Google Scholar
26. Cited in George Liber, Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth, and Identity Change in the Ukrainian SSR 1923–1934, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 174.Google Scholar
27. Ibid. Google Scholar
28. Zaslavsky 1992 A; Zaslavsky 1992 B; Zasalvsky 1992 C; and Zaslavsky et al. Google Scholar
29. Roman Solchanyk, “Ukraine, The (Former) Center, Russia, and ‘Russia,'” Studies in Comparative Communism, Vol. XXV, No. 1, March, 1992, p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Ibid., pp. 31–45, Zaslavsky 1992 C, p. 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Blank, “Stalin's Commissariat,” Chapter I, William G. Rosenberg, Liberals in The Russian Revolution: The Constitutional Democrats, 1917–1921, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
32. Zaslavsky et al., p. 19; Stephen Blank, “Russian Troops in the Baltic: Is There a Threat to European Security?,” Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, Carlisle Barrcks, PA, 1993; Martha Brill Olcott, “Central Asia's Catapult to Indpendence” Foreign Affairs, Vol. LXXI, No. 3, Summer, 1992, pp. 115–120.Google Scholar
33. Ramet, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
34. Zaslavsky 1992 C, p. 81; Hélène Carrère d'Encausse, The End of the Soviet Empire: The Triumph of the Nations, Franklin Philip, Trans., New York: New Republic Books, 1993, pp. 171–195.Google Scholar
35. Ibid., pp. 175–176.Google Scholar
36. Ibid. Google Scholar
37. Ghia Nodia, “Nationalism and Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, III, No. 4, 1992, p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Ibid. Google Scholar
39. Ibid., p. 15.Google Scholar
40. Roman Rosdolsky, Engles and the “Nonhistoric Peoples”: The National Question in the Revolution of 1848, John-Paul Himka, Trans., Ed., and Introduction, Critique Books, 1986.Google Scholar
41. Stephen Blank, “Political Institutions and Civil Rights in the New Democracies,” Paper Presented to the Student Symposium of the Council for the Study of the Presidency, Washington, DC, March 21, 1993.Google Scholar
42. Nodia, p. 8.Google Scholar
43. Michael Checinski, Poland: Communism, Nationalism, Anti-Semitism, Tadeusz Szafar, Trans., New York: Karz-Cohl Publishers, 1982.Google Scholar
44. Ronald Asmus, “The GDR and the German Nation: Sole Heir or Socialist Sibling?” International Affairs, Vol. LX, No. 3, 1984, pp. 414–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Ibid., p. 415.Google Scholar
46. “Presidential Adviser Stankevich Responds,” FBIS USR, 92–151, Nov. 25, 1992, p. 56.Google Scholar
47. “What Is Role of Power in Russia's Diplomacy,” Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press (henceforth CDPP), Vol. XLIV, No. 26, July 29, 1992, p. 2.Google Scholar
48. Ramet, p. 10Google Scholar
49. Irena Grudzinska Gross, “Post-Communist Resentment, Or the Rewriting of Polish History,” East European Politics and Societies, Vol. VI, No. 2, Spring, 1992, pp. 147–148.Google Scholar
50. Jan Kren, “Czech Historiography At a Turning Point,” Ibid., p. 163.Google Scholar
51. Ken Jowitt, New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992, passim.; Alla Alekseevna Yazkova, “Problemy Mezhetnicheskikh Otnosheniia i Obshcheevropeiskii Protsess,” Mirovaia Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia, No. 9, September, 1989, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
52. Schopflin, pp. 235–250.Google Scholar
53. Peter Andras Heltai and Zbigniew Rau, “From Nationalism to Civil Society and Tolerance,” Zbigniew Rau, Ed., The Reemergence of Civil Society in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992, pp. 130, 133.Google Scholar
54. Jadwiga Staniszkis, “Main Paradoxes of the Democratic Change in Eastern Europe,” and Kazimierz Poznanski, “Property Rights Perspective on Evolution of Communist-Type Economies,” in Kazimierz Z. Poznanski, Ed., Constructing Capitalism: The Reemergence of Civil Society and Liberal Economy in the Post-Communist World, Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1992, pp. 179–198, 92 respectively; Tony Judt, “Ex Oriente Lux? Post-Celebratory Speculations on the ‘Lessons’ of ‘89” Colin Crouch and David Marquand, Eds., Towards Greater Europe?: A Continent Without an Iron Curtain, London: Blackwell Publishers, 1992, pp. 98–105.Google Scholar
55. Ramet, p. 19.Google Scholar
56. Liber, p. 174; George Schopflin, “The Prospects for Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe,” Peter Volten, Ed., Uncertain Futures: Eastern Europe and Democracy, New York: Institute for East-West Security Studies, 1990, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
57. Edward Allworth, “A Theory of Soviet Nationality Policies,” in Henry Huttenbach, Ed., Soviet Nationality Policies: Ruling Ethnic Groups in the USSR, New York and London: Mansell, 1990, pp. 38–41; Maria Todorova, “Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Communist Legacy in Eastern Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, VII, No. 1, 1993, pp. 135–154.Google Scholar
58. “Ambassador Lukin On Obstacles to Democracy,” FBIS USR, 92–151, November 25, 1992, p. 2.Google Scholar
59. Solchanyk, p. 34.Google Scholar
60. Stephen Blank, “Political Institutions and Civil Rights in the New Democracies,” Forthcoming, Political Science Quarterly, 1993.Google Scholar
61. Solchanyk, p. 45.Google Scholar
62. Agnes Heller and Ferenc Feher, From Yalta to Glasnost: The Dismantling of Stalin's Empire, London: Basil Blackwell, 1991, p. 240.Google Scholar
63. “Deputy Views Policy on Hungarians Living Abroad, “Joint Publications Research Service Eastern Europe (henceforth JPRS EEU), 92–243, December 17, 1992, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
64. “Gyula Horn on Hungarian-Romanian Relations,” JPRS EEU, 92–167, December 11, 1992, p. 12–13.Google Scholar
65. Ibid., “Slovak Prime Minister Criticcizes Czech Actions,” FBIS EEU, 92–133, p. 11.Google Scholar
66. Stephen Bowers, “Ethnic Politics in Eastern Europe,” Conflict Studies, No. 248, Research Institute for the Study of Conflict, London, 1992; Robert S. Wistrich, “Once Again, Anti-Semitism Without Jews,” Commentary, August, 1992, pp. 45–49; Robert J. Brym and Andrei Degtaryev, “Anti-Semitism in Moscow: Results of an October 1992 Survey,” Slavic Review, LII, No. 1, Spring, 1993, pp. 1–12 for some very disturbing findings about the presence of antisemitism in the most liberal of Russian cities and environments.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. “Utopian Element in Independence Drive Explained,” JPRS EER, 92–172, December 22, 1992, p. 13.Google Scholar
68. “MDF Vice President Csurka's Political Treatise,” JPRS EEU, 92–132-S, September 17, 1992, pp. 13–18.Google Scholar
69. Roman Solchanyk, “Back to the USSR?,” Harriman Institute Forum, Vol. VI, No. 3, November, 1992, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
70. Max Haller, “Class and Nation as Competing Bases for Collective Identity and Action,” International Journal of Group Tensions, Vol. XXII, No. 4, 1992, pp. 229–264.Google Scholar
71. Stephen J. Blank and Thomas-Durrell Young, “Challenges to Eastern European Security,” European Security, Vol. I, No. 3, Fall, 1992, pp. 381–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. John Dunlop, “Russia: Confronting a Loss of Empire,” in Bremmer and Taras, p. 45.Google Scholar
73. Jowitt, p. 293.Google Scholar
74. Ibid., p. 320.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by