Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:31:08.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retracing Estonia's Russians: Mikhail Kurchinskii and Interwar Cultural Autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

David J. Smith
David J. Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of European Studies at the University of Bradford, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In exploring the history of the Russian minority in Estonia during 1918–1940, one is inevitably drawn to the figure of Professor Mikhail Anatolevich Kurchinskii (1876–1939). An academic and journalist, Kurchinskii was also an important political actor devoted to the quest for a satisfactory resolution of the nationality question in Estonia and Europe. It is with good reason that Kurchinskii has been called “the most important theoretician and practical advocate of cultural autonomy amongst the [interwar] Russian minority in Estonia.” From 1927 he also served as a leading member of the Congress of European Minorities (CEM), which became the main promoter of the cultural autonomy concept on the wider European stage. During the same period he took a deep interest in the work of the Pan-Europe movement and the quest for a durable settlement of European affairs following the traumas of World War I. Until very recently, however, Kurchinskii has remained a neglected figure among historians, even within the narrow field of Baltic studies. This neglect is symptomatic of the lack of attention devoted to the political history of the Russian minority more generally. As the first group to implement Estonia's celebrated 1925 law on cultural autonomy, the interwar German minority has already formed the object of a number of studies. By contrast, Kurchinskii's failure to realize the autonomy project means that he—and, indeed, the Russian minority as a whole—barely receives a mention in most histories of Estonia. Just as Kurchinskii's aspirations regarding cultural autonomy were never realized during his lifetime, so his vision of building a “New Europe” faded against the background of economic depression and a retreat into inward-looking national particularism during the 1930s. The tragic fate that befell central and eastern Europe after 1939 has in turn tended to obscure many of the ideas and positive achievements of the interwar minorities movement. This article uses Kurchinskii's career to illuminate issues relating to the sociopolitical development of the Russian minority between the wars. In particular it compares Kurchinskii's thinking on minority issues with that of his rival Aleksei Janson (1866–1940), a socialist politician and pedagogical expert who served as Russian National Secretary in the Estonian Ministry of Education from 1922 to 1927. Finally, by linking Kurchinskii's quest for cultural autonomy to his broader thinking on the “New Europe,” the article assesses the relevance of these ideas to contemporary debates on the nationality question.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 455 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Tat'iana Shor, “Problemy Kul'turnoi Avtonomii v Trudakh M.A. Kurchinskogo,” unpublished draft document (Tartu, 1998), p. 1. My thanks to Dr Shor for her kind permission to use this material. I am also extremely grateful to Professor Lyubov Kiseleva of the University of Tartu and Mr Aleksandr Dormidontov for their invaluable assistance in the preparation of this paper. Finally, I wish to thank Dr Rein Ruutsoo for providing me with certain key source materials.Google Scholar

2. Brubaker, Rogers, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (London: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Ibid, p. 2.Google Scholar

4. Ibid, p. 105.Google Scholar

5. Ibid, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

6. The model according to which minority groups are granted not only equal rights as citizens but also certain specific collective minority rights. Ibid, pp. 47, 105–106.Google Scholar

7. Dormidontov, Aleksandr, “Russkie v Estonii,” unpublished draft document prepared for the Estonian Institute, 1994, p. 10. For a useful summary of the 1925 law, see G. Von Rauch, The Baltic States: The Years of Independence 1917–1940 (London: Hurst, 1995), pp. 135–145.Google Scholar

8. Ruutsoo, Rein, “Rahvusvähemused Eesti Vabariigis,” Vähemusrahvuste Kultuurielu Eesti Vabariigis (Tallinn: Olion, 1993), pp. 13–14. Similarly, Kristian Gerner and Stefan Hedlund (The Baltic States and the End of the Soviet Empire (London: Routledge, 1993), p. 57) reiterate the widely held view that the Pats regime maintained certain essential traits of the rechtsstaat.Google Scholar

9. Isakov, Sergei, Russkie v Estonii 1918–1940: Istoriko–kul'turnye ocherki (Tartu, 1996); Baltiiskii Arkhiv, 3 vols (Vilnius: Avenarius, 1996); see also Dormidontov, op. cit.Google Scholar

10. Hiden, John, The Baltic States and Weimar Ostpolitik (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Ruutsoo, Rein, “Rahvusvähemused Eesti Vabariigis,” op. cit.; Die Herausbildung einer russischen Minderheit in der Republik Estland 1918–1940 (Lüneberg: Nordost-Archiv, 1995); “Russkoe natsional'noe men'shinstvo I formirovanie novoi identichnosti russkikh v Estonskoi Respublike (1920–1940)”, Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, (Tallinn: Kiriastus, 1996), pp. 203–204. The two chapters by Viktor Boikov in Baltiiskii Arkhiv, Vols. I and II are also a useful source of factual information.Google Scholar

12. Shor, op. cit . Viktor Boikov has produced a paper (as yet unseen by the present author) on Kurchinskii's work as a parliamentary deputy.Google Scholar

13. Ruutsoo, “Rahvusvähemused Eesti Vabariigis,” p. 12. A similar point is made by Michael Garleff, “Ethnic Minorities in the Estonian and Latvian Parliaments: The Politics of Coalition,” in V. Vardys and R. Misiunas, eds, The Baltic States in Peace and War 1917–1945 (London: Pennsylvania University Press, 1978), p. 86; and Rein Taagepera, Estonia: Return to Independence (Boulder: Westview Press, 1993), p. 51.Google Scholar

14. “To the fundamental principles which humanity has elaborated in its cultural evolution … such as religious and personal liberty … must now be added national liberty and the possibility of free development of national culture, not only for the single individual, but also for every national group.” From “The Proposals of the Congress of Nationalities for the Improvement and Generalisation of the Rights of Minorities and the Procedure of the League of Nations, Address by Professor M. Kurtschinsky,” in The Congress of the European National Minorities, London Meeting 14th–15th July 1937 (Vienna and Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1938), p. 32.Google Scholar

15. All details taken from a copy of Kurchinskii's Curriculum Vitae (undated), obtained by the author in Tartu, May 1998.Google Scholar

16. Pearson, Raymond, “Miliukov,” in E. Acton, V. Cherniaev and W. Rosenberg, eds, Critical Companion to the Russian Revolution 1914–1921 , (London: Arnold, 1997), p. 168.Google Scholar

17. Eesti Riigiarhiiv (ERA), f.1108, n.8, s.233, p. 101.Google Scholar

18. Shor, op. cit ., p. 2.Google Scholar

19. M. A. Kurchinskii, Apostol Egoizma: Max Stirner i ego Filosofiia Anarkhii (St Petersburg: Ogni, 1920). On Stirner, see R. Paterson, The Nihilistic Egoist: Max Stirner (London: Oxford University Press, 1971); M. Stirner, The Ego and His Own (London: Jonathon Cape, 1971).Google Scholar

20. Kurchinskii, Apostol Egoizma , p. 251.Google Scholar

21. Ibid.Google Scholar

22. Kurchinskii, Curriculum Vitae .Google Scholar

23. M. A. Kurchinskii, Evropeiskii Khaos: Ekonomicheskie Posledstviia Velikoi Voiny (Dorpat, 1925).Google Scholar

24. M. K. Kurtschinsky, “Die slavischen Minderheiten,” Nation und Staat , January 1929, p. 255. See also Sbornik Postoiannago Byuro Russkikh Men'shinstv' v Zhenev', Vypusk' Pervyi, August 1927, p. 2.Google Scholar

25. Kurtschinsky, “Die slavischen Minderheiten,” loc. cit.; Sitzungsbericht des Kongresses des Organisierten Nationalen Gruppen in den Staaten Europas, Genf, 3 bis 6. September 1930 (Wien–Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1931).Google Scholar

26. Kurtschinsky, “Die slavischen Minderheiten,” loc. cit .Google Scholar

27. Baron A. Heyking, The Main Issues Confronting the Minorities of Latvia and Estonia (London: P. S. King ∧ Son, 1922), p. 20. Cited in Hiden, op. cit., p. 51.Google Scholar

28. Sbornik …, op. cit ., p. 6.Google Scholar

29. Isakov, op. cit ., p. 12.Google Scholar

30. Sbornik …, op. cit., p. 20; P. Bogdanov, “Nuzhdy Prichudskikh dereven,” Vestnik Sel'skogo Khoziastva, November 1929; S. Klenskii, “Zemledel'cheskaia Palata i Russkoe Krest'ianstvo,” Vestnik Sel'skogo Khoziastva, December 1931.Google Scholar

31. Ruutsoo, “Rahvusvähemused Eesti Vabariigis,” op. cit ., p. 12.Google Scholar

32. M. A. Kurchinskii, Kul'turnaia Avtonomiia (Narva: Russkii Natsional'nyi Soyuz, 1930), p. 9.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., pp. 8–12.Google Scholar

34. ERA, f.1108, n.8, s.197, p. 10.Google Scholar

35. Shor, op. cit ., p. 5.Google Scholar

36. Kurchinskii, Kul'turnaia Avtonomiia , p. 10.Google Scholar

37. Ibid., p. 11.Google Scholar

38. M. A. Kurchinskii, Soedinennie Shtati Evropy: Ekonomicheskie i Politicheskie Perspektivy Etoi Idei' (Yur'ev [Tartu], Series: Eesti Vabariigi Tartu Ülikooli toimetused, B.18, 1930), p. 12.Google Scholar

39. Ibid.Google Scholar

40. Kurchinskii, Soedinennie Shtati Evropy, op. cit ., p. 27.Google Scholar

41. Ibid., p. 33.Google Scholar

42. Ibid., p. 32.Google Scholar

43. Ibid.Google Scholar

44. Ibid.Google Scholar

45. Kurtchinsky, “Die slavischen Minderheiten,” op. cit ., pp. 264–265.Google Scholar

46. Hiden, op. cit ., p. 56.Google Scholar

47. Ruutsoo, “Rahvusvähemused Eesti Vabariigis,” op. cit ., pp. 20–21.Google Scholar

48. Sitzungsbericht des Kongresses des Organisierten Nationalen Gruppen in den Staaten Europas, Genf, 29 bis 31. August 1928 (Vienna and Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1928), pp. 40–43.Google Scholar

49. Ibid.Google Scholar

50. Kurchinskii, Kul'turnaia Avtonomiia , p. 9.Google Scholar

51. Ibid.Google Scholar

52. All biographical details taken from Isakov, op. cit ., pp. 377–378.Google Scholar

53. Ruutsoo, “Rahvusvähemused Eesti Vabariigis,” op. cit ., p. 15.Google Scholar

54. ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.190, p. 63.Google Scholar

55. ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.243, p. 11.Google Scholar

56. Isakov, op. cit ., pp. 379.Google Scholar

57. ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.190, p. 41.Google Scholar

58. ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.196, p. 3.Google Scholar

59. ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.190, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar

60. Letter from Janson to the head of the Prinarova branch of the Russian National Union, 14 February 1923, ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.190, p. 15.Google Scholar

61. This list incorporated the Russian National Union, the Russian Peasant Workers Party, URECS and the Union of Russian Teachers. ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.190, p. 19.Google Scholar

62. ’“Ob'iasneniia‘ ili ’Obvinenie,”‘ Nasha Gazeta , 25 November 1927.Google Scholar

63. “Waba Maa ob' Ukhod' A. Iansona,” Nasha Gazeta , 3 December 1927.Google Scholar

64. A. Egorov', “K' Ukhodu A.K. Iansona,” Nasha Gazeta , 1 December 1927.Google Scholar

65. “Sotsialistu A.K. Iansonu,” Nasha Gazeta , 21 August 1927.Google Scholar

66. ’“Ob'iasneniia‘ ili ’Obvinenie.”Google Scholar

67. Isakov, op. cit ., p. 380.Google Scholar

68. Garleff, op. cit ., p. 89.Google Scholar

69. Letter from Janson to the editor of Posledniia Izvestiia , 12 May 1925, ERA, f.1108, n.8, a.190, p. 66.Google Scholar

70. Shor, op. cit ., pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

71. Kurtschinky, “Die slavishen Minderheiten,” p. 265.Google Scholar

72. Rauch, Von, op. cit ., pp. 169; Ruutsoo, “Rahvusvähemused …,” p. 13.Google Scholar

73. Shor, op. cit ., pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

74. ERA, f.1108, n.8, s.233, p. 103.Google Scholar

75. Ruutsoo, “Russkoe natsional'noe men'shinstvo …,” p. 204.Google Scholar

76. Isakov, op. cit ., pp. 380–381.Google Scholar

77. Professor Lyubov Kiseleva, interview with author, Tartu, May 1998.Google Scholar

78. On favorable attitudes among the younger generation, see J. Rotko, “Viron Venäläisten Asenne Virolaisuuteen Riipuu Iästä,” Helsingin Sanomat , 6 January 1997. In 1995, however, 62% of Russian speakers surveyed in Tallinn considered the language provisions of the citizenship law to be “unfulfillable” within the next two years. Tartu University Market Research team, The Attitude of Town Residents of North-Eastern Estonia towards Estonian Reforms and Social Policy: A Comparative Study of 1993, 1994 and 1995 (Tartu: University of Tartu, 1995), p. 8.Google Scholar

79. Statement by H.E. Mr Toomas Hendrik lives, Foreign Minister of Estonia, on the meeting of the foreign ministers of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and the United States of America in Vilnius, Lithuania, on 13 July 1997, to discuss NATO enlargement in the light of the Madrid Summit, the charter between the United States and Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and regional cooperation.Google Scholar

80. Meri, Lennart, “Euroopa on programm,” speech at the conference “The Baltic States in the Architecture of the New Europe,” Tallinn, 2 March 1991, in Lennart. Meri, Presidendi Kôned (Tartu: Ilmamaa, 1996), p. 255; Lennart Meri, “Euroopa kui Eesmärk,” speech at the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 26 November 1991, in L. Meri, Presidendi Kôned (Tartu: Ilmamaa, 1996), p. 268; T. Tammerk and E. Lucas, “Meri Blasts Moscow's Monroe Doctrine,” Baltic Independent, 14–20 May 1993; Lennart Meri, “Meie Piir on Euroopa Väärtuste Piir,” speech at the “Estonia” Concert Hall, Tallinn, on 75th Anniversary of Estonian Independence, 24 February 1993, in Lennart Meri, Presidendi Kôned, pp. 325–331.Google Scholar