No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
In the new situation created by the collapse of the Tsarist regime in March 1917, the non-Russian peoples directed their efforts towards the realization of their national goals. Ukrainians, who took an active part in the overthrow of the Tsarist rule in Petrograd, were among the most active in asserting their national aspirations and laying foundations for a new relationship with Russia. Leadership of the Ukrainian national movement was in the hands of the Ukrainian Central Rada. The Rada was formed on March 17, 1917, with the participation of representatives of principal Ukrainian organizations. It established a broader base when the All-Ukrainian National Congress convened in Kiev on April 19–21, 1917. The Congress was attended by 900 delegates and some 600 other participants, representing peasant, professional, military, and cultural-educational organizations, in addition to political parties, municipalities, and zemstvos, within as well as beyond the Ukraine.
1 All dates in this paper are given according to the Gregorian calendar.Google Scholar
2 For an account of Ukrainian activities in Petrograd see: O. Lototskyi, Storinky mynuloho, Vol. III (Warsaw: Ukrainskyi Naukovyi Instytut, 1934), pp. 315, 327; I. G. Tsereteli, Vospominaniia o Fevralskoi Revolutsii (Paris: Mouton & Co., 1963); V. Vynnychenko, Vidrodzhennia natsii, Vol. I (Kiev-Vienna: Vyd. Dzvin, 1920), p. 252; and D. Doroshenko, Istoriia Ukrainy, 1917–1923rr., Vol. I (2nd ed.; New York: Bulava Publ. Corp., 1954).Google Scholar
3 V. Mänilov (ed.), 1917 god na Kievshchine: khronika sobytii (Kiev: Gos. Izd. Ukrainy, 1928), p. 6; D. Doroshenko, Vol. I, p.42.Google Scholar
4 N. Avdeev, Revoliutsiia 1917 goda: khronika sobytii, Vol. II (Moscow: Gos. Izd., 1923), p. 24.Google Scholar
5 Text of the resolution in R. P. Browder and A. F. Kerensky (eds.), The Russian Provisional Government, 1917: Documents (Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1961), Vol. I, pp. 372–373. A slightly different version appears in Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar
6 Vynnychenko, Vol. I, pp. 543–544.Google Scholar
7 S. Yefremov, Istoriia Ukrainskoho pysmenstva, Vol. II (Kiev-Leipzig: Ukraiinska Nakl., 1919), pp. 242–244.Google Scholar
8 B. Martos, “First Universal of the Ukrainian Central Rada,” The Ukrainian Quarterly, XXIV, 1 (New York, 1968), pp. 23ff.; M. Kovalevskyi, Pry dzherelakh borotby (Munich: ‘Biblos,’ 1960), pp. 285–286. For a different interpretation see L. Shankovskyi, “Ukrainska natsionalno-vyzvolna revoliutsiia,” Almanakh Providinnia na rik 1967 (Philadelphia: Vyd. ‘America,’ 1967), pp. 124–156.Google Scholar
9 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, p. 370; D. Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 42.Google Scholar
10 V. Chernov, The Great Russian Revolution (New York: Russell and Russell, 1966), p. 266. See also Manilov, pp. 3–4, and Tsereteli, Vol. II, p. 90.Google Scholar
11 S. M. Dimanstein, (ed.), Revoliutsiia i natsionalnyi vopros, fev.-okt. 1917, Vol III (Moscow: Izd. Kom. Akademii, 1930), pp. 143–149; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 374–376.Google Scholar
12 Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 88–89.Google Scholar
13 Ibid.; P. Khrystiuk, Zamitky i materialy do istorii Ukrainskoi Revolutsii, 1917–1920, Vol. I (Vienna, 1921), p. 128, n. 19.Google Scholar
14 Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 83–84; F. F. Kokoshkin, Avtonomiia i federatsiia (Petrograd: ‘Svoboda,‘ 1917).Google Scholar
15 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, p. 317.Google Scholar
16 The deliberations of the commission can be found in “Iz istorii natsional'noi politiki Vremennogo Prayitelstva,” Krasnyi Arkhiv, Vol. XXX (Moscow: Goz. Izd., 1928), pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
17 Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 83; for the text of the resolutions see Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 150–153.Google Scholar
18 Manilov, p. 99.Google Scholar
19 Text of the communique in Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 376–377.Google Scholar
20 Tsereteli, Vol. II, p. 96.Google Scholar
21 Vynnychenko, Vol. I, p. 200.Google Scholar
22 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 89 ff.; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 383 ff.; Chernov, p. 277.Google Scholar
23 Krasnyi Arkhiv, Vol. XXX, p. 55; Tsereteli, Vol. II, p. 104.Google Scholar
24 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 94–95; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 386–389.Google Scholar
25 Tsereteli, Vol. II, pp. 100 ff.; Vynnychenko, Vol. I, pp. 240ff.; Khrystiuk, Vol. I, pp. 62–64, 88–89; Manilov, pp. 118–122, 127–128.Google Scholar
26 Browder and Kerensky, Vol., I, pp. 385–386; Manilov, p. 484.Google Scholar
27 Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 98 ff; Tsereteli, Vol. II, pp. 107ff.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., p. 133.Google Scholar
29 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 389–390.Google Scholar
30 Ibid., Vol. I, pp. 392–393. Vynnychenko contends in his memoirs that de facto autonomy already existed in July, 1917. Vynnychenko, Vol. I, pp. 284–285.Google Scholar
31 F. A. Golder (ed.), Documents of Russian History, 1914–17 (New York-London: The Century Co., 1927), p. 441. For an account of the Provisional Government meeting see Tsereteli, Vol. II, pp. 149 ff.; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 390–392.Google Scholar
32 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 115–116.Google Scholar
33 Miliukov, Vol. I, pt. 1, p. 80 ff.; Manilov, p. 153; S. Shemet, “M. Mikhnovskyi,” Khliborobska Ukraina, kn. 5 (Vienna, 1924–25), p. 21; Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 368.Google Scholar
34 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 119 ff. The number of non-Ukrainian members in the Rada was to be 202 and 51 candidates out of a total of 822. Ibid., P. 123; Manilov, p. 184.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., pp. 489 ff.; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 394 ff.Google Scholar
36 Miliukov, Vol. I, pt. 2, p. 86.Google Scholar
37 Text in Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 396–397.Google Scholar
38 Manilov, p. 503; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 398–399; Khrystiuk, Vol. I, pp. 118–119.Google Scholar
39 Vynnychenko, Vol. II, p. 37.Google Scholar
40 Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 139; Vynnychenko, Vol. II, pp. 40, 52, 54.Google Scholar
41 Materials of that Congress are published in the first issue of the organ of the Council of Peoples, Svobodnyi Soyuz, Kiev, Oct., 1917.Google Scholar
42 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, p. 401; Manilov, p. 298.Google Scholar
43 Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 157; Khrystiuk, Vol. II, p. 40.Google Scholar
44 Dimanstein, Vol. III, p. 202; Manilov, p. 303.Google Scholar
45 Ibid., pp. 303–304; Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 153–157.Google Scholar
46 Regarding this question see the minutes of the most revealing discussion by the Juridical Council in Krasnyi Arkhiv, Vol. III, pp. 56–71.Google Scholar