No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
The present article is concerned with the ethnopolitical dimensions of the environmental problem within the Russian nationalistic movement in the USSR. As distinct from Western Europe, there has never been a “pure” ecological movement in the Soviet Union, and until recently the environmental issue has been raised mainly by national movements as a part of the national question.
1. Zemlia, No. 1. 1974. Sobranie dokumentov samizdata. Radio Svoboda. Arkhiv Samizdata (AS), No. 1909.Google Scholar
2. Sobranie dokumentov samizdata. AS, No. 349.Google Scholar
3. Materialy samizdata. AS, No. 4987.Google Scholar
4. Sobranie dokumentoy samizdata. AS, No. 1013.Google Scholar
5. Ibid., No. 1801.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., No. 1801.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., No. 1013. He means the architects I. Rerberg, who built the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, and K. Ton, the creator of the Big Palace of the Kremlin.Google Scholar
8. Materialy Samizdata. AS, No. 4887.Google Scholar
9. On this issue see: “Vozzvaniye Patrioticheskovo Obyedineniya Pamiyat,” 1987; “Ochischeniye,” 1988; “Manifest Natsional'no patrioticheskovo Fronta Pamiyat,” 1988.Google Scholar
10. Sobranie dokumentov samizdata. AS, No. 1108.Google Scholar
11. Ibid.Google Scholar
12. Solzhenitsyn, A., “Letter to Soviet Leaders” (London: Index on Censorship, 1974).Google Scholar
13. Ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., p. 27.Google Scholar
15. Ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar
16. On the Fetisov Group see “Khronika tekuschikh sobytiy,” Sobraniye dokumentov samizdata, No. 7. AS, No. 197.Google Scholar
17. On this issue see Pika, A. and Prokhorov, B., “Bolshiye problemy malykh narodov,” Kommunist, No. 16, 1989.Google Scholar
18. Solzhenitsyn, A., op. cit ., p. 27.Google Scholar
19. Sobraniye dokumentov samizdata. AS, No. 3256.Google Scholar
20. Literaturnaya Rossiya , 16 February 1990.Google Scholar
21. Materialy Samizdata. AS, No. 6349.Google Scholar
22. Ibid.Google Scholar
23. “For the policy of the national alliance and Russian revival,” Literaturnaya Rossia , 9 February 1990.Google Scholar
24. Materialy samizdata. AS, No. 6397.Google Scholar
25. Ibid.Google Scholar
26. On the disastrous effects of the “governmental concern” about this area, see Z. Volfson, “Central Asian Environment: A Dead End?” and Khazanov, A., “The Ecological Situation and National Issue in Uzbekistan,” Environmental Policy Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1990.Google Scholar
27. Nash sovremennik , No. 2, 1989, p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. “For the policy of the National Alliance,” see Literaturnaya Rossisya , 9 February 1990.Google Scholar
29. Lemeshev, M., “To Prevent the Mortal Menace,” Literaturnaya Rossiya , 16 February 1990.Google Scholar
30. Nash Sovremennik , No. 5, 1989.Google Scholar
31. Literaturaya Rossia , 15 September 1989.Google Scholar
32. The leaflet, written after June 1989, was received from the USSR.Google Scholar
33. Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
34. Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
35. Ibid., pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
36. Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
37. Tchervova, V., “A Frantic Tribune,” Sovetskakya Sibir , 15 September 1989.Google Scholar
38. Literaturnaya Rossiya , 9 February 1990.Google Scholar
39. Ibid.Google Scholar
40. Ibid.Google Scholar
41. Ibid.Google Scholar
42. Nash Sovremennik , No. 5, 1989, p. 167.Google Scholar