Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:16:18.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Special Issue on National Cultural Autonomy in Diverse Political Communities: Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2020

David J. Smith Open the ORCID record for David J. Smith [Opens in a new window]
David J. Smith*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Numerous contemporary examples attest to the continued political salience of ethnic identification. This is the case even in multi-ethnic societies bound together by a strong overarching sense of patriotism, but it is most especially so in contexts where ethnicity has historically functioned as the building block of modern nations (Rudolph 2006). Since today’s world contains many more ethnoculturally defined nations than it does states, a tension persists between the principle of self-determination of peoples and the principle of territorial integrity of existing polities (Dembinska, Máracz, and Tonk 2014). The almost invariable overlapping of different ethno-national populations within the same territorial space renders the nation-state concept inherently problematic as a modality for ethnically based self-determination, for while all nation-state projects dictate cultural uniformity, all must contend with differing degrees of pluralism. Within the nation-state frame, those who do not profess belonging to the dominant ethnocultural community are consigned to the category of “national minority” and thereby deemed an anomaly and a barrier to the creation of a “good political order.”1 In this context, claims by minority national and ethnic communities for recognition of collective rights can be easily construed as a threat to the security of the state and its dominant ethno-national group, leading to situations of tension and—in the worst case—open conflict.

Keywords

nonterritorial autonomynational cultural autonomyminority rightsCentral and Eastern EuropeMiddle East
Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 48 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue on National Cultural Autonomy in Diverse Political Communities: Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives , March 2020 , pp. 224 - 234
Copyright
© Association for the Study of Nationalities 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauböck, Rainer. 2001. “Territorial or Cultural Autonomy for National Minorities?” IWE Working Paper 22. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Forschungsstelle für institutionellen Wandel und Europäische Integration.Google Scholar
Bauer, Otto. 2000. The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy. Translated by O’Donnell, Joseph. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bowring, Bill. 2007. “The Tatars of the Russian Federation and National–Cultural Autonomy: A Contradiction in Terms?” Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buquicchio, Gianni. 2008. “Introductory Address.” In Council of Europe Venice Commission, The Participation of Minorities in Public Life, 7–10. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cheskin, Ammon. 2015. “Identity and Integration of Russian Speakers in the Baltic States: A Framework for Analysis.” Ethnopolitics 14 (1): 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheskin, Ammon, and Kachuyevski, Angela. 2019. “The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Post-Soviet Space: Language, Politics and Identity.” Europe-Asia Studies 71 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheskin, Ammon, and March, Luke. 2015. “State–Society Relations in Contemporary Russia: New Forms of Political and Social Contention”. East European Politics 31 (3): 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, John. 1994. “Approaches to the Resolution of Ethnic Conflict: The Strategy of Non-territorial Autonomy.” International Political Science Review 15 (3): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, John. 2016a. “Conclusion: Patterns of Non-territorial Autonomy.” Ethnopolitics 15 (1): 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, John. 2016b. “Introduction: Dispersed Minorities and Non-Territorial Autonomy.” Ethnopolitics, 15 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohler, Anne M. 1970. Rousseau and Nationalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
of Europe, Council: Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. 2016. Fourth Report submitted by the Russian Federation pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Received on 20 December 2016), December 20, ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006. https://www.refworld.org/docid/587379614.html. (Accessed October 8, 2019.)Google Scholar
Csergő, Zsuzsa, and Regelmann, Ada-Charlotte. 2017. “Europeanization and Collective Rationality in Minority Voting.” Problems of Post-Communism 64 (5): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, D. Christopher. 2007. “The Use of Cultural Autonomy to Prevent Conflict and Meet the Copenhagen Criteria: The Case of Romania.” Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembinska, Magdalena, Máracz, László, and Tonk, Márton. 2014. “Introduction to the Special Section: Minority Politics and the Territoriality Principle in Europe.” Nationalities Papers 42 (3): 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobos, Balázs. 2011. A kisebbség joga: Kisebbségi törvénykezés Magyarországon (1988–2006) [Minority Rights: Minority Legislation in Hungary (1988-2006]. Budapest: Argumentum.Google Scholar
Galbreath, David J., and McEvoy, Joanna. 2011. The European Minority Rights Regime: Towards a Theory of Regime Effectiveness. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germane, Marina. 2013. “Paul Schiemann, Max Laserson and Cultural Autonomy: A Case Study from Interwar Latvia.” In The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Practice, edited by Nimni, Ephraim, Osipov, Alexander, and Smith, David J., 101–116. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gunes, Cengiz. 2013. “Accommodating Kurdish National Demands in Turkey.” In The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Practice, edited by Nimni, Ephraim, Osipov, Alexander, and Smith, David J., 71–84. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hiden, John. 2004. Defender of Minorities: Paul Schiemann, 1876–1944. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1992. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housden, Martyn. 2014. On Their Own Behalf: Ewald Ammende, Europe’s National Minorities and the Campaign for Cultural Autonomy 1920–1936.” Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson Preece, Jennifer. 1998. National Minorities and the European Nation-States System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenne, Erin K. 2007. Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kántor, Zoltán, ed. 2014. Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges. Budapest: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2007. “National Cultural Autonomy and International Minority Rights Norms.” Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, Tove H. 2015. Introduction to Managing Diversity through Non-Territorial Autonomy: Assessing Advantages, Deficiencies, and Risks, edited by Malloy, Tove H., Osipov, Alexander, and Vizi, Balázs, 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, Tove H., Osipov, Alexander, and Vizi, Balázs, eds. 2015. Managing Diversity through Non-territorial Autonomy: Assessing Advantages, Deficiencies, and Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, Tove H., and Palermo, Francesco, eds. 2015. Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nancheva, Nevena. 2016. “Imagining Policies: European Integration and the European Minority Rights Regime.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (1): 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim. 1999. “Nationalist Multiculturalism in Late Imperial Austria as a Critique of Contemporary Liberalism: The Case of Bauer and Renner.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 4 (3): 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim. 2000. “Introduction for the English-reading Audience.” In The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy, edited by Otto Bauer, xv–xlv. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim, ed. 2005. National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim. 2007. “National–Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism.” Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim, and Aktoprak, Elçin, eds. 2018. Democratic Representation in Plurinational States: The Kurds in Turkey. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimni, Ephraim, Osipov, Alexander, and Smith, David J., eds. 2013. The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Practice. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe High Commissioner on National Minorities. 1999. The Lund Recommendations on the Effective Participation of National Minorities in Public Life. The Hague: OSCE.Google Scholar
Osipov, Aleksander. 2004. Natsional’no-kul’turnaia avtonomiia: idei, resheniia, instituty [National Cultural Autonomy: Ideas, Decisions, Institutions]. St. Petersburg: Tsentr nezavisimykh sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii.Google Scholar
Osipov, Alexander. 2010. “National Cultural Autonomy in Russia: A Case of Symbolic Law.” Review of Central and East European Law 35 (1): 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, Francesco. 2015. “Owned or Shared? Territorial Autonomy in the Minority Discourse.” In Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy, edited by Tove H. Malloy and Francesco Palermo, 13–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petsinis, Vassilis. 2012. “Minority Legislation in Two Successor States. A Comparison through the Lens of EU Enlargement.” Baltic Worlds 1: 31–35. http://balticworlds.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/BW-1-2012.pdf. (Accessed October 6, 2019.)Google Scholar
Prina, Federica. 2015. National Minorities in Putin’s Russia: Diversity and Assimilation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prina, Federica. 2018. “National in Form, Putinist in Content: Minority Institutions ‘Outside Politics.’” Europe-Asia Studies 70 (8): 1236–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prina, Federica, Smith, David J., and Sansum, Judit Molnar. 2018. “National Cultural Autonomy in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Possibilities.” In Democratic Representation in Plurinational States: The Kurds in Turkey, edited by Nimni, Ephraim and Aktoprak, Elçin, 85–111. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prina, Federica, Smith, David J., and Sansum, Judit Molnar. 2019. “National Cultural Autonomy and Linguistic Rights in Central and Eastern Europe.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities, edited by Hogan-Brun, Gabrielle and O’Rourke, Bernadette, 181–205. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purger, Tibor. 2012. “Ethnic Self-Governance in Serbia: The First Two Years of the National Minority Councils.” South-East Europe International Relations Quarterly 3 (2): 1–17.Google Scholar
Renner, Karl. 1899/2005. “State and Nation.” In National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, edited by Nimni, Ephraim, 15–47. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roach, Steven C. 2005. Cultural Autonomy, Minority Rights and Globalization. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Roshwald, Aviel. 2007. “Between Balkanization and Banalization: Dilemmas of Ethno-cultural Diversity.” Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Joseph. 2006. Politics and Ethnicity: A Comparative Study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salat, Levente, Constantin, Sergiu, Osipov, Alexander, and Székely, István Gergő, eds. 2014. Autonomy Arrangements around the World: A Collection of Well and Lesser Known Cases. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities.Google Scholar
Schulze, Jennie L. 2018. Strategic Frames: Europe, Russia, and Minority Inclusion in Estonia and Latvia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David J. 1999. “Retracing Estonia’s Russians: Mikhail Kurchinskii and Interwar Cultural Autonomy.” Nationalities Papers 27 (3): 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David J. 2002. “Framing the National Question in Central and Eastern Europe: A Quadratic Nexus?” Global Review of Ethnopolitics 2 (1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David J. 2013. “Non-territorial Autonomy and Political Community in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 12 (1): 27–55.Google Scholar
Smith, David J. 2018. Interview with Ambassador Lamberto Zannier, Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe High Commissioner on National Minorities, University of Glasgow, November, 13. https://www.gla.ac.uk/research/az/crcees/research/kinpol. (Accessed July 31, 2019.)Google Scholar
Smith, David J., and Cordell, Karl. 2008. Cultural Autonomy in Contemporary Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, David J., Germane, Marina, and Housden, Martyn. 2019. “‘Forgotten Europeans’: Transnational Minority Activism in the Age of European Integration .” Nations and Nationalism 25 (2): 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David J., and Hiden, John. 2012. Ethnic Diversity and the Nation State: National Cultural Autonomy Revisited. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David J., and Semenyshyn, Mariana. 2016. “Territorial-Administrative Decentralisation and Ethno-Cultural Diversity in Ukraine: Addressing Hungarian Autonomy Claims in Zakarpattya.” ECMI Working Paper 95. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues. http://www.ecmi.de/publications/detail/95-territorial-administrative-decentralisation-and-ethno-cultural-diversity-in-ukraine-addressing-hungarian-autonomy-claims-in-zakarpattya-361/. (Accessed October 6, 2019.)Google Scholar