No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Impact of Technological Change on a Bilingual Community: The Case of Duino-Aurisina/Devin-Nabrežina, Italy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
The impact of modernization is seen by scholars as one of the main problems met by minority communities. Essentially, it is similar to the main problem of ecology, which deals with the impact of modern means on natural environment, whereas the former studies the impact of such means on traditional cultures, which should be preserved for the future. Case studies are interesting here, as these problems have many sides, and new description may open new views or confirm old ones. This is all the more true if we are lucky enough to have quantitative data.
- Type
- Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1983 Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Notes
1. The “commune” is the smallest administrative unit in Italy, somewhere between a county and a township.Google Scholar
2. Virgil, Aeneid, I. CCXLIV — CCXLVI, “… Fontem superare Timavi / unde per ora novem vasto cum murmure montis / it mare proruptum et pelago premit arva sonanti.”Google Scholar
3. James C. Davis, “A Slovene Laborer and His Experience of Industrialization, 1888–1976”, East European Quarterly, 1976, vol. x, no. 1 (1976), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
4. Alessio Lokar, “Alcuni aspetti del quadro socio-economico degli sloveni in Italia”, Atti del Simposio sui problemi socio-economici ed ambientali degli sloveni in Italia (part I, Trieste: EST, 1978) pp. 22-34.Google Scholar
5. Milton M. Gordon, Assimilation in American Life (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1964), p. 51.Google Scholar
6. Brewton Berry and Henry L. Tischler, Race and Ethnic Relations (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978), pp. 117-145.Google Scholar
7. Alessio Lokar and Lee Thomas, “The Socioeconomic Structure of the Slovene Population in Italy,” Papers in Slovene Studies 1977, Rudolph M. Susel, ed., (New York: Society for Slovene Studies, (1978, pp. 26-39).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Toussaint Hočevar and Alessio Lokar, “Ekonomskopoliticni aspekti diferencirane zaposlitvene strukture Slovencev in Italijanov v Trustu,” Ekonomska revija, 25, n. 4 (1974), p. 374.Google Scholar
9. B. Brezigar, “Le cave di Aurisina nel periodo 1856-1914,” thesis, Istituto di storia economica, Università di Trieste, 1970.Google Scholar
9a. Brezigar, op. cit. Google Scholar
9b. Brezigar, op. cit. Google Scholar
10. M. Oblak, “Storia economica della minoranza slovena nella provincia di Trieste dal 1945 al 1981”, thesis, Istituto di Storia Economica, Università di Trieste, 1981. Production data after World War II expressed in cubic meters (m3) a year show the following pattern: 1,700 (1950), 6,100 (1960), 10,040 (1965), 26,013 (1970), 10,694 (1975), 3,854 (1980). Thus, a production peak was reached in the seventies, but with modern machines and low labor-intensity. (Courtesy of the “Corpo delle miniere”, Trieste.)Google Scholar
11. Alessio Lokar, “Sviluppo economico nel comune di Duino-Aurisina con particolare riguardo ad alcune ipotesi di valorizzazione turistica”, study carried out for the Administration of the Duino-Aurisina/Devin-Nabrežina comune, 1980.Google Scholar
12. John Kenneth Galbraith, The Nature of Mass Poverty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979), pp. 98-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar