Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:09:50.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Europeanization and Euroscepticism: Experiences from Poland and the Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Søren Riishøj*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Email: [email protected]

Extract

National identity was already the object of scholarly studies by the 1950s and 1960s, e.g. by analysts such as Karl Deutsch and Ernest Hass, to a great extent inspired by the start of European integration and German and French reconciliation. One of the crucial questions has been (and still is) to what extent national identity constitutes a barrier to Europeanization and integration, and to what extent overlapping multiple identities can co-exist.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ágh, Atilla. The Politics of Central Europe. London: Sage, 1998.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
“Czechs Still Have Certain Fears of EU after One Year Membership.” Czech Happenings, 2005, <www.ceskenoviny.cz>..>Google Scholar
Daskalov, Roumen. The Making of a Nation in the Balkans: Historiography of the Bulgarian Revival. Budapest: CEU Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rosa, A. S. “Reality Changes Faster than Research: National and Supranational Identity in Social Representations of European Community in the Context of Changes in International Relations. In Changing European Identities: Advances in Social Psychology, edited by Breakwell, G. and Lyons, E. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1996.Google Scholar
Drulák, Petr. National and European Identities in EU Enlargement. Prague: Institute of International Relations, 2001.Google Scholar
“European Elections Important for Poland.” Insight Central Europe, 11 June 2004, < www.incentralEurope.com>..>Google Scholar
Gmyz, Cezary. “Praktyczna pani, Danuta Hübner bedzie najlepszym komisarzym Unii Europ.” 2003/ jskiej- dla Francji i Niemiec.” Wprost, 31 December 2003.Google Scholar
Grote, Jürgen R.Delimiting Europeanization.” Paper presented at the Marburg Conference Session, ECPR, Marburg, 18–21 September 2003.Google Scholar
Gwiazda, Anna. “Europeanisation in Candidate Countries and Eastern Europe.” Paper prepared for the EPIC workshop in Florence, EUI, 19–22 September 2002.Google Scholar
Gyarfasova, Olga. “From Defence against the ‘Others’ to the Formation of its Own Interests: The Case of Slovakia.” In National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, by Petr Drulák. Prague: Institute of International Relations, 2001.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sean. “Czechs Seek Yet Another Model.” Central Europe Review, 19 April 1999.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sean. “Party Institutionalisation and Centre-Right Euroscepticism in East Central Europe: The Case of the Civic Democratic Party in the Czech Republic.” Paper presented at the 29th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Turin, 22–27 March 2002.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sean. The Political Context of EU Accession in the Czech Republic. Royal Institute of International Affairs, European Programme, Briefing Paper, October 2002.Google Scholar
Kelstrup, Morten. “Small States and European Integration.” In Small States and European Integration: Reflections on Theory and Strategy, edited by Tiikainen, Teija and Petersen, lb Damgaard. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelstrup, Morten. “Danish Integration Policies: Dilemmas and Options.” In Denmark's Policy towards Europe after 1945: History, Theory and Options, edited by Branner, Hans and Kelstrup, Morten. Odense: Odense University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kim, Inassa. “Poland Continues to Muse over the EU Constitution Impasse,” 22 January 2005, <www.tol.cz>..>Google Scholar
Kiss, Paszkál. Hungarians About their Nation, Others, and Europe: Popular Views in Public. Report (D5) prepared for the EURONAT project by the European Commission Research DG. Brussels: European Commission, 2001.Google Scholar
Klaus na Ukrajine: Jsem Eurooptimista,” 15 June 2005, <www.ceskenoviny.cz>..>Google Scholar
Klaus-Svoboda Meeting Does Not Settle their Dispute over EU,” 23 April 2003, <www.ceskenoviny.cz>..>Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. Nationalism and Nationalities in the New Europe. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. “Managing Europe from Home: Impact of the EU on Executive Government: A Comparative Analysis.” Paper prepared for the ECPR Conference, Marburg, September 2003.Google Scholar
Lapid, Y.Cultures Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory.” In The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, edited by Lapid, Y. and Kratochwil, F. London and Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996.Google Scholar
Lesaar, Henrik Richard. “Simper Idem? The Relationship of European and National Identities.” In National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, by Petr Drulák. Prague: Institute of International Relations, 2001.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B.Diskursanalyse av politikk: Forutsetninger og metodeproblemer.” Statsvetenskaplig Tidsskrift 102, no. 2 (1999).Google Scholar
Olechowski, Andrzej. “Oglad I poglad, Nadal sami?” Polityka, 9 October 2004, 28.Google Scholar
Radielli, Claudio M.Whither Europeanization? Conceptual Stretching and Substantive Change?,” 2000, <http://eiop.or.at>..>Google Scholar
Rupnik, Jacques. “Europe Moves Eastward: Concluding Reflections.” Journal of Democracy 15, no. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
“Rzeczpospolita silna jak nigdy.” Gazeta Wyborcza, 22 January 2004, 8.Google Scholar
Schöpflin, Georg. Nations, Identity, Power. London: Hurst, 2000.Google Scholar
Spritzer, Dinah A. “Czech MEPs Lead Euroskeptic Faction.” The Prague Post, 19–25 January 2005.Google Scholar
Starucha, Ateusz. “Z zachodnieogo na nasze.” Gazeta Wyborcza, 10 February 2004, 16.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Taggart, Paul. Theorising Party-Based Euro scepticism: Problems of Definition, Measurement and Causality. SEI Working Paper no. 69. Brighton: Sussex European Institute, 2003, <www.sussex.ac.uk>..>Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul, and Szczerbiak, Aleks. Parties, Positions and Europe: Euroscepticism in the EU Candidate States of Central and Eastern Europe. SEI Working Paper no. 46. Brighton: Sussex European Institute, 2001, <www.sussex.ac.uk>..>Google Scholar
“Trójkat berlinski?” Gazeta Wyborcza, 4 February 2004, 11.Google Scholar
Zahradil, Jan. “EU Enlargement Will Help Prevent its Further Unification,” 11 March 2002, <www.ceskenoviny.cz>..>Google Scholar