Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:24:49.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another “strategic accession”? The EU and Serbia (2000–2010)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bernhard Stahl
Bernhard Stahl*
Affiliation:
International Politics, University of Passau, Passau, Germany
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The South-eastern enlargement currently suffers from defections, compliance problems and blockades; the results of the European Union's policy since 1999 can be called mixed at best. The “Serbian question” – for instance – remains unsolved since Serbia still means a “problem child” of the international community. The thesis generated in this paper is that all of these problems are indicators of a basic identity conflict. This conflict stems from entirely different identities, i.e. world views, perception of the state, political cultures and the meaning of international politics. The EU's enlargement policy – in its ideal type – is precisely meant to overcome this conflict by “Europeanizing” the acceding states. Yet the argument here is that the EU also pursues goals beyond Europeanization – for instance “stabilization” – hence the EU might be interested in accessions despite the fact that the Copenhagen criteria have not been fulfilled. Such “strategic accessions”, as experienced with Romania, Greece and Cyprus, tend to hinder the EU's external governance and foster enlargement fatigue in the long run. The case of Serbia serves as an example for demonstrating that Serbia is not complying with the basic standards of EU integration and that the EU is not really enforcing compliance. As a result, we are heading towards a “strategic accession” in the Serbian case.

Keywords

enlargementEuropeanizationforeign policy identitySerbia
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 41 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Europeanization, State-Building and Democratization in the Western Balkans , May 2013 , pp. 447 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emmanuel, and Barnett, Michael. 2002. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, Franz-Lothar. 2005. “EU und Westlicher Balkan: Eine schwierige Verlobung.” Südosteuropa 53 (2): 185–212.Google Scholar
Anastasakis, Othon. 2008. “The EU's Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans: Towards a More Pragmatic Approach.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 8 (4): 365–377.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher J. 2011. European Union Foreign Policy: From Effectiveness to Functionality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blockmans, Steven. 2007. Tough Love. The European Union's Relations with the Western Balkans. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. 2005. “Europeanization: How the EU Interacts with its Member States.” In The Member States of the EU, edited by Bulmer, Simon and Lequesne, Christian, 45–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bretherton, Charlotte, and Vogler, John. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Leonard J. 2002. Serpent in the Bosom: The Rise and Fall of Slobodan Milosevic. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Djordjevic, Olivera. 2008. The limits of Europeanization ‘from without’: Is there an EU-driven democratization process in Serbia? UNISCI Discussion Papers, N° 18, Oct.Google Scholar
Dyker, David A. 2004. Catching Up and Falling Behind: Post-Communist Transformation in Historical Perspective. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira Nunes, Isabel. 2011. “Civilian, Normative, and Ethical Power Europe: Role Claims and EU Discourses.” EFAR 16:1–20.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M., and Wiener, Antje. 1999. “Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement.” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (5): 721–742.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikking, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 524:887–917.Google Scholar
Gariup, Monica. 2009. European Security Culture: Language, Theory, Policy. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2006. The EU's Transformative Power. Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gross, Eva, and Juncos, Ana E. 2011. EU Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management: Roles, Institutions and Policies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2005. “Kosovo: Toward Final Status.” Europe Report Nr. 161, 24 Jan. http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=3226&1=1 Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2002. “A Kosovo Roadmap (I): Addressing Final Status.” Europe Report Nr. 124, 1 March. http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=1640&1=1 Google Scholar
Internationa] Crisis Group. 2007. “Breaking the Kosovo Stalemate: Europe's Responsibility.” Europe Report 185, 21 August http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?action=login&ref_id=5018 Google Scholar
Janković, Nikola. 2006. Die serbische Nation zwischen Ethnonationalismus und Internationalismus im 21. Jahrhundert: Analysis. Michael-Zikic-Foundation, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
Jović, Dejan. 2011. “Turning Nationalists into EU Supporters: The Case of Croatia.” In The Western Balkans and the EU: ‘The Hour of Europe’, edited by Rupnik, Jacques (33–45). Chaillot Papers No. 126. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Judah, Tim. 2004. “Serbia's Kosovo policy.” In European and US Policies in the Balkans, edited by Altmann, Franz-Lothar and Whitlock, Eugene (19–24). SWP Paper. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
Ker-Lindsey, James. 2009. Kosovo: The path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Koeth, Wolfgang. 2010. “State Building without a state: The EU's Dilemma in Defining Its Relations with Kosovo.” European Foreign Affairs Review 15:227–247.Google Scholar
Kubicek, Paul, ed. 2003. “The European Union and Democratization”. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 2010. “Is Europe a Risk-Averse Actor?” EFAR 15:411–426.Google Scholar
Lang, Kai-Olaf, and Schwarzer, Daniela. 2007. “Argumente für eine neue Erweiterungsstrategie – die Diskussion über die Aufnahmefähigkeit der EU.” Integration 30 (April): 117–128.Google Scholar
Lavenex, Sandra, and Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2007. “Relations with the Wider Europe.” JCMS 45:143–162.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Alfred, Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transitions and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Lucarelli, Sonia, and Manners, Ian. 2006. “Conclusions.” In Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy, edited by Lucarelli, Sonia and Manners, Ian, 201–215. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narten, Jens. 2009. “Dilemma of Promoting ‘Local Ownership’: The Case of Postwar Kosovo.” In Dilemmas of State-Building. Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations, edited by Paris, Roland and Sisk, Timothy, 252–283. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Noutcheva, Gergana. 2007. Fake, Partial and Imposed Compliance. The limits of the EU's Normative Power in the Western Balkans. CEPS working document No. 274, July.Google Scholar
Noutcheva, Gergana, and Bechev, D. 2008. “The Successful Laggards: Bulgaria and Romania's Accession to the EU.” East European Politics and Societies 22 (1): 114–144.Google Scholar
Nugent, Neill, ed. 2004. European Union Enlargement. Houndsmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Stefania. 2006. “The Constraints on EU Action as a ‘Norm Exporter’ in the Mediterranean.” In The European Union's Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, edited by Elgström, Ole and Smith, Michael, 136–154. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phinnemore, David. 2005. “And we'd Like to Thank…”: Romania's Integration into the European Union. Paper presented to UACES 34th Annual Conference and 10th Research Conference, Zagreb, September 5–7.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio. 2003. “Europeanization of Public Policy.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by Featherstone, Kevin and Radaelli, Claudio, 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ralchev, Plamen. 2004. The EU Conditional Assistance as a Policy Tool Towards Southeastern Europe. FORNET, Brussels. http://www.fornet.info/documents/Ralchev-Presentation20Feb2004.pdf Google Scholar
Raith, Michael. 2006. “Quo vadis Belgrad? Serbien zwischen europäischer Integration und nationalistischer Isolation.” Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 5 (June): 36–49.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P. 2007. “The Denial Syndrome and its Consequences: Serbian Political Culture Since 2000.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40:40–58.Google Scholar
Reuter, Jens. 2005. “Serbien und die EU – Wie weit ist der Weg nach Bruessel?” Südosteuropa 53 (3): 376–403.Google Scholar
Sajdik, Martin, and Schwarzinger, Michael. 2008. “European Union Enlargement. Background, Developments, Facts.” In Central and East European Policy Studies. Vol. 2, New Brunswick and London: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Sedlmeier, Ulrich. 2005. “The Politics of EU Enlargement: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives.” In The Politics of EU Enlargement. Theoretical Approaches, edited by Schimmelfennig, Frank and Sedlmeier, Ulrich, 3–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Oliver Jens. 2008. Kosovo. Kurze Geschichte einer zentralbalkanischen Landschaft. Wien: UTB.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philipp C. 1995. “Von der Autokratie zur Demokratie. Zwölf Überlegungen zur politischen Transformation” Internationale Politik 50 (6): 47–52.Google Scholar
Slobodchikoff, Michael O. 2010. “The New European Union: Integration as a Means of Norm Diffusion.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 9(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Smith, Hazel. 2002. European Union Foreign Policy: What it is and What it Does. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Karen E. 2006. “The Limits of Pro-active Cosmopolitism: The EU and Burma, Cuba, and Zimbabwe.” In The European Union's Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, edited by Elgström, Ole and Smith, Michael, 155–171. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soerensen, Georg. 2001. Changes in Statehood. The Transformation of International Relations. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Solana, Javier. 2009. Wellicht gaat Nederland anders over Senië denken. Interview in NRC Handelsblad 2 April: 7.Google Scholar
Stahl, Bernhard. 2011. “Perverted Conditionality – the Stabilisation and Association Agreement Between the European Union and Serbia.” European Foreign Affairs Review 4 (16): 465–487.Google Scholar
Stahl, Bernhard. 2013. “100-jähriges Scheitern: Die internationale Gemeinschaft und der albanischserbische Identitätskonllikt.” In Das neue Kosovo: Eigenstaatlichkeit, Demokratie und Europa, edited by Konrad Clewing and Vedran Dzihic. Südosteuropäische Arbeiten, Oldenburg-Verlag (forthcom.)Google Scholar
Stahl, Bernhard, and Harnisch, Sebastian, eds. 2009a. Vergleichende Auβenpolitikforschung und nationale Identitäten Die Europäische Union im Kosovo-Konflikt (1996-2008). Series “Außenpolitik und Internationale Ordnung”. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.Google Scholar
Stahl, Bernhard, and Harnisch, Sebastian, eds. 2009b. “Nationale Identitäten und Außenpolitiken: Erkenntnisse, Desiderate und neue Wege in der Diskursforschung.” In Vergleichende Auβenpolitikforschung und nationale Identitäten. Die Europäische Union im Kosovo-Konflikt (1996-2008), edited by Stahl, Bernhard and Harnisch, Sebastian (31–58). Series “Außenpolitik und Internationale Ordnung”, Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena. 2009. Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Teokarevic, Jovan. 2011. “Ten Years of Post-Milosevic Transition in Serbia: Problems and Prospects.” In The Western Balkans and the EU: ‘The Hour of Europe’, edited by Rupnik, Jacques (59–78). Chaillot Papers, No. 126. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided. Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verheugen, Günther. 2005. Europa in der Krise. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Weller, Marc. 2008. Negotiating the Final Status of Kosovo. Chaillot Paper 114, ISS.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. “The Agent Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41:335–370.Google Scholar