Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:29:12.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Zhirinovsky Electoral Victory: Antecedence and Aftermath

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Terry D. Clark
Terry D. Clark*
Affiliation:
Creighton University, Omaha
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The December 1993 elections to the new lower house of the Russian legislature, the State Duma, resulted in a large number of seats going to parties and movements opposed to the Yeltsin reforms. Most dismaying for the democrats, however, was the attainment of seventy seats by the Liberal-Democratic Party (LDP) headed by ultranationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky. As a consequence, the progress of economic and political reform was undermined, Yeltsin having been denied the mandate which he sought with the dissolution of the Supreme Soviet in October.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 23 , Issue 4: Twentieth Anniversary Issue , December 1995 , pp. 767 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe and ex-USSR, Inc 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Tolz, Vera, “Russia's parliamentary elections: what happened and why,” RFE/RL Research Report 3, 14 January 1994, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

2. “Neo-Communist organizations in Russia,” Moscow News, 19–26 January 1992, p. 14; “The 'right-left' opposition,” Moscow News, 19–26 July 1992, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

3. Ibid. Google Scholar

4. Ibid. Google Scholar

5. Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS), “Calls for anti-government action,” FBIS-SOV-93–019, 1 February 1993, p. 24; FBIS, “First session of National Salvation Front ends,” FBIS-SOV-93–019, 1 February 1993, p. 24.Google Scholar

6. Tolz, Vera, Wendy Slater and Alexander Rahr, “Profiles of the main political blocs,” RFE/RL Research Report 2, 14 May 1993, pp. 16–25.Google Scholar

7. Ostapchuk, A., “Kommunisty vnov' stanoviatsia samoi massovoi partiei strany,” Nezavisimaia Gazeta, 16 February 1993, p. 1.Google Scholar

8. Data used in this paper were obtained from public opinion surveys conducted in Russia by the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion (VCIOM), formerly under the direction of Tatiana Zaslavskaia (the present director is Yurii Levada). VCIOM polls are not true probability samples since, given the realities of the Russian transportation and communications infrastructure, sampling sites are chosen on the basis of their proximity and accessibility to one of twenty-six regional centers. However, within the selected sites, random selection is conducted in accordance with age, gender, education, and residence parameters based on regional census data. Further, the data are weighted to correct for non-representativeness in any of these categories arising from non-response rates.Google Scholar

9. Tolz, Vera, “Russia's parliamentary elections.”Google Scholar

10. Ibid. Google Scholar

11. Slovar' oppozitsii: Novye politicheskie partii i organizatsii Rossii (Moscow, PostFactum, 1991).Google Scholar

12. Pribylovskii, Vladimir, Dictionary of Political Parties and Organizations in Russia (Washington, DC, The Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1992).Google Scholar

13. Slovar' oppozitsii. Google Scholar

14. Tolz, Vera, “Russia's parliamentary elections.”Google Scholar

15. The pro-reform bias of the Russian media during the campaign, despite Yeltsin's promise of equal treatment for all participants is noted in Julia Wishnevsky, “The role of the media in the parliamentary elections,” RFE/RL Research Report 2, 19 November 1993, pp. 8–12.Google Scholar

16. This relationship was determined using a t-test comparing Zhirinovsky supporters with the general population. The t-score of 2.59 was significant at the 0.01 level.Google Scholar

17. When considered together and compared with other socio-economic groups in the respondent population, they are even more strongly associated with Zhirinovsky supporters than they are alone.Google Scholar

18. , VCIOM, January 1995. The poll included 1,989 respondents from across the Russian Federation.Google Scholar

19. These were the results of a March 1995 VCIOM survey of 1,593 respondents drawn from the urban areas of the Russian Federation.Google Scholar

20. “100 Beduschikh politikov Rossii v fevrale,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 2 March 1995, p. 1.Google Scholar

21. Tolz, Vera, “Russia's parliamentary elections.”Google Scholar

22. See Terry D. Clark, “The Russian elections: back to square One?” PS: Political Science and Politics 27, September 1994, pp. 520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar