Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:46:29.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unraveling the Black Mountain: Authoritarian Submission and Party Preference in Montenegro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2020

Jovana Davidović Open the ORCID record for Jovana Davidović [Opens in a new window]
Jovana Davidović*
Affiliation:
University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do some post-communist countries regularly experience democratic overturn of power while others do not? This article analyzes the role of authoritarianism, adopting a novel approach concentrating on three separate dimensions (authoritarian submission, conventionalism, authoritarian aggression). Examining Montenegro, a country that has not changed its incumbent government since the breakdown of communism, the article argues that authoritarian submission, which stands for an obedient relationship to a political authority, is a relevant factor for the domination of a single party—the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS). I test my assumptions using two surveys: the Montenegrin National Elections Study (2016) and a self-designed student survey. Notwithstanding the Montenegrin and Serb ethnic cleavage and economic preferences that remain significant for voting patterns, findings from both analyses confirm that submissive tendencies are important for voting behavior both for the national sample and for the educated young. This emphasizes the importance of psychological factors and the need to break submissive mindsets for successful democratic transformation in post-communist countries.

Keywords

authoritarian submissionethnicityeconomic preferencespost-communismMontenegro
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 49 , Issue 4: Special Issue on 1918 and the Ambiguities of “Old-New Europe” , July 2021 , pp. 738 - 756
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor, Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel, and Sanford, Nevitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Alonso, Sonia, Keane, John, and Merkel, Wolfgang, eds. 2011. The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altemeyer, Bob. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher, and LoTempio, Andrew. 2002. “Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2003. Montenegrin politics since the disintegration of Yugoslavia. Montenegro in Transition: Problems of Identity and Statehood: 11–42.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2018. “Patterns of Competitive Authoritarianism in the Western Balkans.” East European Politics 34 (3): 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2018. “Self-Entrapment of the Eternal Leader: Milo Đukanović’s imminent return as Montenegrin President.” Florian Bieber’s Notes from Syldavia, April 1, 2018. https://florianbieber.org/2018/04/01/self-entrapment-of-the-eternal-leader-milo-djukanovic-to-be-return-as-montenegrin-president/. (Accessed March 13, 2020.)Google Scholar
Bittner, Amanda. 2011. Platform or personality?: the role of party leaders in elections. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2018. “De-Democratization in Hungary: Diffusely Defective Democracy.” Democratization 25 (8): 1481–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, William, and Mitchell, Susan. 2000. “Leading Transition: A New Model for Change.” Leader to Leader 16 (3): 30–36.Google Scholar
Catón, Matthias. 2007. Effective Party Assistance: Stronger Parties for Better Democracy. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
CSES (Comparative Study of Electoral Systems). 2012. https://cses.org/data-download/module-4-2011-2016/. (Accessed March 25, 2020.)Google Scholar
Darmanović, Srđan. 2007. “Montenegro: A Miracle in the Balkans?” Journal of Democracy 18 (2): 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunwoody, Philip, and Funke, Friedrich. 2016. “The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a New Three Factor Measure of Authoritarianism.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 4(2): 2195–3325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Đurić, Dragan. 2003. “The Economic Development of Montenegro.” Montenegro in Transition: Problems of Identity and Statehood, edited by Bieber, Florian, 139–157. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Džankić, Jelena, and Keil, Soeren. 2017. “State-Sponsored Populism and the Rise of Populist Governance: The Case of Montenegro.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 19 (4): 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Džankić, Jelena. 2014. “Citizenship Between the ‘Image of the Nation’ and ‘the Image of Politics’: The Case of Montenegro.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 14 (1): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Džankić, Jelena. 2015. Citizenship in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro: Effects of Statehood and Identity Challenges. Southeast European Studies. UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Unit, Economist Intelligence. 2019. “Democracy Index 2019: A Year of Democratic Setbacks and Popular Protest.” The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited: 2–65.Google Scholar
Ethier, Diane. 2016. Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Southern Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia. Macmillan International Political Economy. London: Macmillan Press LTD.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2019. “Montenegro 2019 Report.” https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20190529-montenegro-report.pdf. (Accessed March 10, 2020.)Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2015. “Why Is Democracy Performing so Poorly?” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funke, Friedrich. 2005. “The Dimensionality of Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement.” Political Psychology 26 (2): 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedeshi, Ilir, Kritzinger, Sylvia, Poghosyan, Gevorg, Rotman, David, Pachulia, Merab, Fotev, Georgy, and Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka. 2020. “European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset.” Mannheim: GESIS Data Archive. https://search.gesis.org/research_data/ZA7500. (Accessed: May 10, 2020.)Google Scholar
Gravetter, Frederick, and Wallnau, Larry. 2016. Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Grundholm, Alexander Taaning. 2020. “Taking It personal? Investigating Regime Personalization as an Autocratic Survival Strategy.” Democratization 27 (5): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, Peter, Wood, Dustin, Landay, Karen, Lester, Paul, and Lester, Gretchen Vogelgesang. 2018. “Autocratic Leaders and Authoritarian Followers Revisited: A Review and Agenda for the Future.” The Leadership Quarterly 29 (1): 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Erika. 2012. “What Is New about ‘Eastern Nationalism’ and What Are the Implications for Studies of Ethnicity Today?” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (3): 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald F. 2017. “Evolutionary Modernization Theory: Why People’s Motivations Are Changing.” Changing Societies & Personalities 1 (2): 136–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T. 2017. “Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 38 (2):167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John. 2015. “Resistance to Change: A Social Psychological Perspective.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 82 (3): 607–636.Google Scholar
Katnić, Milorad. 2017. “Nezaposlenost mladih u Crnoj Gori - Youth (Un)employment in Montenegro.” Podgorica: UNDP. http://www.un.org.me/Library/Youth-Empowerment/Nezaposlenoh%20mladih%20u%20Crnoj%20Gori%20-%20Politike%20za%20pove%C4%87anje%20zaposlenosti%20mladih%20-%20UNDP%20-%202017.pdf, (Accessed: April 20, 2018.)Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. “Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions.” Party Politics 1 (4): 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Fuchs, Dieter, and Zielonka, Jan. 2006. Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, Olivera, and Živković, Slaven. 2016. “Montenegro: A Democracy without Alternations.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (4): 785–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, Olivera. 2013. “Birači u Crnoj Gori: Faktori izborne i partijske preferencije – Voters in Montenegro: Factors of Electoral and Party Preference.” PhD Diss., Čigoja, Beograd. Univeristy of Montenegro.Google Scholar
Komar, Olivera. 2019. “The Elephant in the Room: Illiberal Politics in Montenegro.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr, and Spirova, Maria. 2008. “Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Communist Democracies: Power of the Powerless.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 14 (1/2): 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivokapić, Nataša, and Ćeranić, Goran. 2014. “Dominant Value Patterns in the Montenegrin Society.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5 (13): 205–209.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, Nataša. 2014. “Sociološko istraživanje uticaja štampanih medija na demokratizaciju crnogorskog društva” [The Influence of the Print Media on the Process of Democratization in Montenegrin Society - Sociological Research]. PhD diss., University of Montenegro.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, David W. 2017. “Democratization and the Development of Civil Society.” Chap. 2 in The Transition. London. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührmann, Anna, Maerz, Seraphine F., Grahn, Sandra, Alizada, Nazifa, Gastaldi, Lisa, Hellmeier, Sebastian, Hindle, Garry and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2020. Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows. Democracy Report 2020. Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem).Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian. 2007. “The Personalization of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Dalton, Russell, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 571–588. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang. 2004. “Embedded and Defective Democracies.” Democratization 11 (5): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur G., Collins, Barry E., and Brief, Diana E.. 1995. “Perspectives on Obedience to Authority: The Legacy of the Milgram Experiments.” Journal of Social Issues 51 (3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MNES (Montenegrin National Elections Study). 2016. http://mnes.defacto.me/. (Accessed March 15, 2020.)Google Scholar
MONSTAT (Montenegrin Institute for Statistics). 2011. Census 2011 Data. https://www.monstat.org/eng/page.php?id=393&pageid=57. (Accessed October 15, 2017.)Google Scholar
MONSTAT (Montenegrin Institute for Statistics). 2018. Statistika dohotka i uslova života [The Statistics of Income and Living Conditions]. Podgorica: Zavod za statistiku – MONSTAT. https://monstat.org/userfiles/file/publikacije/STATISTIKA%20DOHOTKA%20I%20USLOVA%20ZIVOTA.pdf. (Accessed March 10, 2020.)Google Scholar
Morrison, Kenneth. 2009a. “The political life of Milo Đukanović.” Southeast Europe Journal of Politics and Society 01: 25–54.Google Scholar
Morrison, Kenneth. 2009b. Montenegro: A Modern History. London: IB Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, Art, Hogan, Robert, and Kaiser, Robert. 2007. “The Toxic Triangle: Destructive Leaders, Susceptible Followers, and Conducive Environments.” The Leadership Quarterly 18 (3): 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passini, Stefano. 2008. “Exploring the Multidimensional Facets of Authoritarianism: Authoritarian Aggression and Social Dominance Orientation.” Swiss Journal of Psychology 67 (1): 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passini, Stefano. 2017. “Different Ways of Being Authoritarian: The Distinct Effects of Authoritarian Dimensions on Values and Prejudice.” Political Psychology 38 (1): 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlović, Srđa. 1999. “The Podgorica Assembly in 1918: Notes on the Yugoslav Historiography (1919–1970) about the Unification of Montenegro and Serbia.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 41 (2): 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Bill E., Pratt, Michael W., Olsen, Janelle R., and Alisat, Susan. 2016. “The Authoritarian Personality in Emerging Adulthood: Longitudinal Analysis Using Standardized Scales, Observer Ratings, and Content Coding of the Life Story.” Journal of Personality 84 (2): 225–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plasser, Fritz, Ulram, Peter, and Waldrauch, Harald. 2016. Democratic Consolidation in East-Central Europe: New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Popović, Milenko. 2018. “Growth of Montenegrin Economy: 1990–2016.” In Ekonomska teorija u periodu 1958–2018 [Economic Theory between 1958–2018], edited by Drašković, Božo, Minović, Jelena, and Hanić, Aida, 314–349. Belgrade: Institute of Economic Science.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2000. “Democracies and Dictatorships.” In Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, edited by Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando, 13–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert, and Whitefield, Stephen. 2007. “Representation in New Democracies: Party Stances on European Integration in Post-Communist Eastern Europe.” The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1133–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, 1998. “What Is Democratic Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy 9 (2): 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 2015. “Crisis and Transition, but Not Decline.” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, Nemanja. 2016. “Nothing Else Matters? The Role of Ethnic Voter-Party Linkage in Voting: Experimental Evidence from Montenegro.” Master’s thesis, Central European University.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2008. “Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2012. “Gender (In)equality in Montenegro.” Infographic. https://visual.ly/community/Infographics/human-rights/gender-inequality-montenegro. (Accessed March 15, 2020.)Google Scholar
UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). 2013. “Nasilje nad djecom u Crnoj Gori – najvažniji nalazi” [Violence against Children in Montenegro – the Most Important Findings]. Presented at the Annual Project Conference “One Out of Five,” Parliament of Montenegro, Podgorica, September 26, 2013. https://www.unicef.org/montenegro/media/6676/file/MNE-media-MNEpublication305.pdf. (Accessed September 5, 2017.)Google Scholar
UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). 2014. Hidden in Plain Sight: A Statistical Analysis of Violence against Children. New York: UNICEF. http://files.unicef.org/publications/files/Hidden_in_plain_sight_statistical_analysis_EN_3_Sept_2014.pdf. (Accessed October 14, 2017.)Google Scholar
UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). 2017. KAP Survey Violence against Children. https://www.unicef.org/montenegro/sites/unicef.org.montenegro/files/2019-02/KAP_Violence_2016_ENG_final_web.pdf. (Accessed October 14, 2017.)Google Scholar
Vasović, Aleksandar. 2020. “Thousands in Montenegro March against Religion Law.” Reuters, February 29, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-montenegro-protest-religion/thousands-in-montenegro-march-against-religion-law-idUSKBN20N0LL. (Accessed March 13, 2020.)Google Scholar
Venice Commission. 2019. “Opinion on the Draft Law on Freedom of Religion or Beliefs and Legal Status of Religious Communities.” Opinion no. 953 / 2019. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2019)010-e. (Accessed March 10, 2020.)Google Scholar
Vuković, Ivan. 2014. “Party Outcomes in Hybrid Regimes in the Western Balkans and Beyond.” PhD diss., Central European University.Google Scholar
Vuković, Ivan. 2015. “Political Dynamics of the Post-Communist Montenegro: One-Party Show.” Democratization 22 (1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WFD (Westminster Foundation for Democracy). 2020. Youth Perceptions and Attitudes towards Politics in Montenegro. Western Balkans Democracy Initiative. https://www.wfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Youth-perceptions-and-attitudes-towards-politics-in-MNE.pdf. (Accessed March 20, 2020.)Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 2002. “Beyond the Catch-All Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies.” Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, edited by Gunther, Richard, Montero, José Ramón, and Linz, Juan, 136–165: Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylegała, Anna. 2017. “Managing the Difficult Past: Ukrainian Collective Memory and Public Debates on History.” Nationalities Papers 45: 780–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Živković, Slaven. 2017. “Universal Turnout and Its Implications: 2012 Parliamentary Elections in Montenegro.” Romanian Journal of Political Sciences 17 (2): 4–40.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Davidović Supplementary Materials

Davidović Supplementary Materials

Download Davidović Supplementary Materials(File)
File 25.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Davidović Supplementary Materials

Davidović Supplementary Materials

Download Davidović Supplementary Materials(File)
File 13 KB
Supplementary material: File

Davidović Supplementary Materials

Davidović Supplementary Materials

Download Davidović Supplementary Materials(File)
File 24.2 KB