Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:44:13.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The United Nations and Ethnic Conflict Management: Lessons from the Disintegration of Yugoslavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

William Maley
William Maley*
Affiliation:
University College, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 14 December 1995, an agreement as the Elysée Treaty (earlier initialled in Dayton after weeks of difficult negotiation) was signed in Paris by the Heads of State of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia, and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. One of the witnesses at the ceremony was the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Dr. Boutros Boutros-Ghali, and, in a real sense, it marked the nadir of his term of office. In June 1992, amidst the euphoria of U.S. President George Bush's articulation of hopes for a new world order, Boutros-Ghali had presented a report to U.N. members entitled An Agenda for Peace which painted an ambitious picture of the opportunities for constructive involvement of the U.N. in conflict resolution. Yet ironically, this was almost the moment at which the intensification of intergroup conflict precipitated Bosnia-Hercegovina's slide into social and political disarray. The ultimate humiliation for the U.N. came in July 1995 when the massacre of Bosnian Muslims by Bosnian Serb forces in the U.N.-declared “safe area” of Srebrenica triggered the chain of events which saw responsibility for Bosnia-Hercegovina decisively removed from the U.N.'s grasp, and assumed by the United States and its NATO allies. The U.N. may recover from the shame of its Balkan entanglement, but the scars are likely to prove permanent.

Type
Part III: International Reactions to Yugoslavia's Disintegration
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 25 , Issue 3: The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: Inevitable or Avoidable? , September 1997 , pp. 559 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akashi, Y., “The Limits of U.N. Diplomacy and the Future of Conflict Mediation,” Survival, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1995–1996, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Alexander, H., “U.N. Peace Forces in Civil-War Situations,” in Evan Luard, ed., The International Regulation of Civil Wars (London: Thames & Hudson, 1972), pp. 187–194.Google Scholar
Almond, M., Europe's Backyard War: The War in the Balkans (London: Mandarin, 1994).Google Scholar
Barry, B., Democracy, Power and Justice: Essays in Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Block, R., “Shameful Tale of How a Haven Fell,” The Canberra Times, 31 October 1995, p. 6.Google Scholar
Cigar, N., Genocide in Bosnia: The Policy of “Ethnic Cleansing” (College Station: Texas A and M University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Broken Bonds: The Disintegration of Yugoslavia (Boulder: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Coser, L., The Functions of Social Conflict (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956).Google Scholar
D'Amato, A., “Peace vs. Accountability in Bosnia,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1994, pp. 500–506.Google Scholar
Donia, R. J. and Fine, J. V. A., Bosnia and Hercegovina: A Tradition Betrayed (London: Hurst & Co., 1994).Google Scholar
Eknes, Å., “The United Nations’ Predicament in the Former Yugoslavia,” in Thomas G. Weiss, ed., The United Nations and Civil Wars (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1995), pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
Estrin, S., Self-Management: Economic Theory and Yugoslav Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. and Nolte, G., “The Good Offices Function of the U.N. Secretary-General,” in Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury, eds, United Nations, Divided World: The U.N.'s Roles in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 143–182.Google Scholar
Glenny, M., The Fall of Yugoslavia (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1993).Google Scholar
Gow, J., and Dandeker, C., “Peace-Support Operations: the Problem of Legitimation,” The World Today, Vol. 51, Nos 8–9, 1995, pp. 171–174.Google Scholar
Hardin, R., One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, The Fall of Srebrenica and the Failure of U.N. Peacekeeping (New York: Human Rights Watch, 1995a).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, Human Rights Watch World Report 1996 (New York: Human Rights Watch, 1995b).Google Scholar
Lane, C., “The Fall of Srebrenica,” The New Republic, Vol. 213, No. 7, 1995, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar
Lydall, H., Yugoslav Socialism: Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., Bosnia: A Short History (London: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar
Maley, W., “Ethnonationalism and Civil Society in the USSR,” in Chandran Kukathas, David W. Lovell, and William Maley, eds, The Transition from Socialism: State and Civil Society in the USSR (London: Longmans, 1991), pp. 177–197.Google Scholar
Maley, W., “Peacekeeping and Peacemaking,” in Thakur, Ramesh and Thayer, Carlyle A., eds, A Crisis of Expectations: U.N. Peacekeeping in the 1990s (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995), pp. 237–250.Google Scholar
Miller, L. B., World Order and Local Disorder: The United Nations and Internal Conflicts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Minear, L. and Weiss, T. G., Mercy Under Fire: War and the Global Humanitarian Community (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Rieff, D., Slaughterhouse: Bosnia and the Failure of the West (New York: Vintage, 1995).Google Scholar
Rikhye, I. J., “The United Nations Operation in the Congo: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking and Peacebuilding,” in Donald C. F. Daniel and Bradd C. Hayes, eds, Beyond Traditional Peacekeeping (New York: St Martin's Press, 1995), pp. 207–227.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., “From San Francisco to Sarajevo: The U.N. and the Use of Force,” Survival, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1995–1996, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Maley, W., “Conflict or Compromise in the Baltic States?” RFE/RL Research Report, Vol. 3, No. 28, 1994, pp. 26–35.Google Scholar
Rusinow, D., The Yugoslav Experiment 1948–1974 (London: C. Hurst & Co., 1977).Google Scholar
Saikal, A. and Maley, W., Regime Change in Afghanistan: Foreign Intervention and the Politics of Legitimacy (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Silber, L. and Little, A., The Death of Yugoslavia (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Thatcher, M., The Path to Power (London: HarperCollins, 1995).Google Scholar
Vincent, R. J., Non-Intervention and International Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Weiss, T. G., “U.N. Responses in the Former Yugoslavia: Moral and Operational Choices,” Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 8, 1994, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. L., Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1995).Google Scholar
Young, C., Ethnic Diversity and Public Policy: An Overview (Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 1994).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, W., “The Last Ambassador: A Memoir of the Collapse of Yugoslavia,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 2, 1995, pp. 2–20.Google Scholar