Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:37:00.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a New Soviet Party Program on the Nationalities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Julian Birch
Julian Birch*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield (England)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has often been declared that the CPSU cannot cope with the problems of its national minorities because it cannot understand, or rather is not willing to understand, the very nature of the beast. There is much to be said for this proposition, mirrored as it is in the agricultural sphere where Professor Peter Wiles has long insisted that to put a Marxist in a field is to pave the way for famine in no time. The Party in power, from Lenin onwards, has constantly sought to analyze the complex ethnic structure of Russia and the USSR with a view to “solving” it as a problem once and for all. Quite apart from the question of whether there is in fact “a” solution (or even solutions) to such a complex melange of problems, much of what has resulted has been more concerned with the idealistic world as it could be, or should be, rather than with an acceptance of the world as it is.

The solutions adopted have variously involved planned economic development and redistribution to achieve a greater measure of equality and levels of development; temporary federation during the process of adjustment; uniform education and socialization programs; population mixing across boundaries; de facto Russification; and a measure of stick to go with the carrots, as and where necessary.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 17 , Issue 2: With a Special Focus on the Baltics , Fall 1989 , pp. 98 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Association for the Study of the Nationalities of the USSR and Eastern Europe, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Pravda, 5 July 1988.Google Scholar

2. Tass, (Moscow), 13 March 1989.Google Scholar

3. Moscow Radio, 26 and 27 July 1989; Financial Times, The Guardian, and International Herald Tribune, 28 July 1989.Google Scholar

4. See interview with Deputy Svyatislav Fyodorov in the Daily Telegraph (London), 28 July 1989.Google Scholar

5. Reuters, 12 April 1989.Google Scholar

6. Pravda, 27 August 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Financial Times and International Herald Tribune, 29 August 1989.Google Scholar

8. Reuters, 28 June 1989.Google Scholar

9. Moscow Radio, 1 July 1989.Google Scholar

10. At a meeting of the first secretaries from all the republics, regions and territories—Pravda, 19 July 1989. See also A. Sheehy: Gorbachev announces postponement of Plenum on nationalities, Radio Liberty Research Report RL 335/89, 20 July 1989, in Report on the USSR, vol. 1, no. 30, 28 July 1989, p. 19-20; and Financial Times, 20 July 1989.Google Scholar

11. The Times, 18 August 1989.Google Scholar

12. Pravda, 16 July 1989.Google Scholar

13. Pravda, 17 August 1989.Google Scholar

14. See Sovetskaya Litva, 25 and 28 June 1989; and see also below under response.Google Scholar

15. Text of speech in Morning Star (London), 28 August 1989.Google Scholar

16. This issue in fact resulted in the refusal of the Lithuanian Supreme Soviet in May 1989 to implement a road tax rise, which was felt to be for the benefit of peoples outside the Lithuanian republic.Google Scholar

17. See below.Google Scholar

18. See Nekrich, A.: Nakazannye narody, New York, 1978, p. 124; The Financial Times, 24 November, 1981; and A Sheehy. North Ossetian First Secretary Fired, Radio Liberty Research Paper, RL 25/82, 18 January 1982.Google Scholar

19. Tsjornovil, V.M.: Rassenstrijd, in Russlandbulletin, vol, 5, no 1, 1980, p. 18-22; and Racial Tensions in Yakutia, in Soviet Analyst, Pt 25, 1980, pp. 6-8.Google Scholar

20. See eg Sovetskaya Rossiya, 30 August 1989.Google Scholar

21. Estonia subsequently ignored this decision, though, up to the time of the new draft discussion document, neither side pressed the point.Google Scholar

22. The Estonian leaders declared this an invalid act since the decision had been approved in the Estonian Supreme Soviet.Google Scholar

23. The Guardian, 30 November 1988.Google Scholar

24. Ibid, 4 September 1989.Google Scholar

25. Financial Times, 11 September 1989.Google Scholar

26. Tass (Moscow), 19 September 1989.Google Scholar

27. Sovetskaya Rossiya (Moscow), 30 August 1989.Google Scholar

28. Pravda, 19 August 1989.Google Scholar

29. Financial Times, 16-17 September 1989, and Soviet News (London), 20 September 1989.Google Scholar

30. Tass, 19 September 1989—the speech was broadcasted live.Google Scholar

31. Michael Dobbs in the International Herald Tribune, 22 September 1989.Google Scholar

32. Pravda, 24 September 1989.Google Scholar

33. The Guardian, 20 September 1989.Google Scholar

34. Le Monde (Paris), 24-25 September 1989, and International Herald Tribune, 25 September 1989.Google Scholar

35. Tass, 24 September 1989.Google Scholar

36. The Washington Post, 22 November 1988.Google Scholar

37. Such as Ivars Kezberis in Latvia or Mikk Tiitma of Estonia—see report on their broadcast critiques in The Times, 29 August 1989.Google Scholar

38. Financial Times, 3 October 1989.Google Scholar