Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:12:07.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Siberian Frontier between “White Mission” and “Yellow Peril,” 1890s–1920s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Eva-Maria Stolberg
Eva-Maria Stolberg*
Affiliation:
Institute of Russian History, University of Bonn, Germany, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Russian conquest of Siberia was not only a remarkable event in world history like the conquest of the New World by the Western European nations, but also a decisive step in Russia's empire-building. Through territorial enlargement the empire became multiethnic. This process resembled the expansion of the white settlers in North America. Like North America, Siberia represented an “open frontier.” Harsh nature and the encounter between the white settlers and the “savages” formed the identity of the frontier. From the perspective of modern cultural anthropology the frontier also shaped reflections on the self and the other. There existed, however, a decisive difference to the American frontier: Siberia became a meeting ground for Russian and Asian cultures. Whereas the American frontier—except in the encounter with Mexico—remained isolated, Russians early came in contact with Asian nations. From the early emergence of a modern state in Russia during the era of Enlightenment, Russia came into manifold contacts with “civilized” Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) and with “uncivilized” Asians, i.e. the tribes of Siberia. At the junction between Europe and Asia, Russia as a Eurasian empire was the sole country in Europe which was so near to Asia. It was therefore logical that Russia felt a kind of mission toward Asia and required the role of a mediator between Europe and Asia.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 165 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. The term “frontier” was first projected onto North America by the scholar Frederick Jackson Turner in The Frontier in American History (New York, 1931). Long before Turner, in the mid nineteenth century the Siberian regionalist A. P. Shchapov, a professor at the then sole university in Asiatic Russia, namely that of Kazan', moulded in his lectures the “Russian frontier thesis” for Siberia, comparing it to North America.Google Scholar

2. Richard Slatta, “Historical Frontier Imagery in the Americas,” in Paula Covington, ed., Papers of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the Seminar on the Acquisiton of Latin American Library Materials, Latin American Frontiers, Borders, and Hinterlands: Research Needs and Resources (Alburquque, 1990), pp. 5–25.Google Scholar

3. K. N. Pos'et, “Prekrashchenie ssylki v Sibiri,” Russkaia starina, No. 99, 1899, pp. 168–170.Google Scholar

4. E. V. Bogdanovičh, Exposé de la question relative au chemin de fer de la Sibérie et de L'Asie centrale (Paris, 1875), pp. 1, 3, 9–11.Google Scholar

5. Ministerstvo Finansov, ed., Sibir’ i Velikaia Sibirskaia Zheleznaia doroga (St Petersburg: Departament Torgovli i Manufaktur, 1896), p. 233.Google Scholar

6. Pos'et, “Prekrashchenie ssylki v Sibiri,” p. 54.Google Scholar

7. GARF, f. 818, op. 1, d. 138, 1.1-3.Google Scholar

8. Petrus Han, Soziologie der Migration. Erklärungsmodelle—Fakten—Politische Konsequenzen—Perspektiven (Stuttgart, 2000), p. 7.Google Scholar

9. Arved Schultz, Sibirien. Eine Landeskunde (Breslau, 1923), p. 164.Google Scholar

10. A. N. Koulomzine, Le Transsibérien (Paris, 1904), pp. 43–44.Google Scholar

11. RGIA, f. 1642, op. 1, d. 204, 11. 28, 61–62.Google Scholar

12. Aziatskaia Rossiia, ed., Glavnoe upravlenie zemleustroistva i zemledeliia (St Petersburg, 1914), Vol. 1, p. 70.Google Scholar

13. RGIA, f. 1642, op. 1, d. 197, 1. 31.Google Scholar

14. RGIA, f. 1642, op. 1, d. 205, 1. 25; fl. 394, op. 1, d. 7; d. 13, d. 48.Google Scholar

15. Eva-Maria Stolberg, “Prostitution, Disease, Opium Dens and the Yellow Peril along the Transsiberian Railway in Tsarist Era,” paper presented at the Department of Social and Economic History, Keiǒ-University, Tokyo, May 1998, p. 2.Google Scholar

16. F. V. Solov'ev, Kitaiskoe otkhodnichestvo na Dal'nem Vostoke Rossii v epokhu kapitalizma (1861–1917gg.) (Moscow, 1989), pp. 34–43.Google Scholar

17. I thank my colleagues Yano Hisashi (Department of Economic and Social History, Keiǒ University, Tokyo) and Michael Underdown (University of New South Wales, Sydney) for this information.Google Scholar

18. P. Kropotkin, Memoirs of a Revolutionist (New York, 1968), p. 186. Hui fang existed in the Amur region from the early appearance of Russians in the mid seventeenth century. They were well known for terrorizing the Amur natives. Hui fang demanded high tributes and kidnapped Tungus as slaves for the Chinese market. See Eva-Maria Stolberg, “Interracial Outposts in Siberia: Nerchinsk, Kiakhta and the Russo-Chinese Trade in the 17th/18th centuries,” Journal of Early Modern History, Vol. 4, Nos 3/4, pp. 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. Arkhiv N. K. Arsen'eva/Obshchestva Dal'nego Vostoka, Vladivostok (pages not numbered). Concerning the geographical names, see James Forsyth, “Chinese Place-Names in the Russian Far East,” W. Ritchie, ed., Essays for Professor R.E.H. Mellor (Aberdeen, 1986), pp. 133–139.Google Scholar

20. Arkhiv N. K. Arsen'eva.Google Scholar

21. Ibid. Google Scholar

22. Ibid. Google Scholar

23. G. T. Murov, Liudi i nravy Dal'nego Vostoka (Tomsk, 1901), p. 88.Google Scholar

24. Cao Tingjie, “Xiboli dongpian jiyao” [“Record of Eastern Siberia”], Liaohai congshu [Distant Seas Series], Vol. 26, 1971, pp. 1–48Google Scholar

25. V. P. Shmotin, “Mining Industry in the Priamur Region,” Russkii Dal'nii Vostok, No. 2 1920, p.17.Google Scholar

26. N. I. Riabov and M. G. Shtein, Ocherki istorii russkogo Dal'nego Vostoka (XVII—XX vv.) (Khabarovsk, Russia, 1958), p. 130.Google Scholar

27. F. Nansen, Through Siberia: The Land of the Future (London, 1914), pp. 369–370.Google Scholar

28. RGIA, f. 364, op. 6, d. 217, 1.33-35.Google Scholar

29. For Russian prejudice, see ibid. Google Scholar

30. Murov, Liudi i nravy Dal'nego Vostoka, p. 35.Google Scholar

31. Katǒ Kyǔzǒ, Shiberia ki [Siberian Record] (Tokyo, 1980), pp. 122–126.Google Scholar

32. Stolberg, “Prostitution, Disease, Opium Dens,” p. 2.Google Scholar

33. Pervaia vseobshchaia perepis’ naseleniia Rossiiskoi imperii 1897g. (St Petersburg, 1899–1905), Vol. 76, p. 122. Concerning Japanese prostitutes in the Russian Far East see Gaimushǒ Kiroku (Documents of the Japanese Foreign Ministry), f. 6.1.6.88, Bl. 3.Google Scholar

34. Gaimushǒ Kiroku, f. 6.1.6.88, Bl. 3.Google Scholar

35. A good insight into the genesis of the stereotype of the “Yellow Peril” delivers: Heinz Gollwitzer, Die Gelbe Gefahr: Geschichte eines Schlagwortes (Göttingen, 1962). In the 1890s American cities along the Pacific coast also experienced an Asiaphobia.Google Scholar

36. Ferdinand Ossendowski, Man and Mystery in Asia (London, 1924), p. ix.Google Scholar

37. Ossendowski, Man and Mystery in Asia, p. 81.Google Scholar

38. Ossendowski, Man and Mystery in Asia, p. 150.Google Scholar

39. Ossendowski, Man and Mystery in Asia, p. 93.Google Scholar

40. Pavel F. Unterberger, Priamurskii krai, 1906–1910gg. (St Petersburg, 1912), p. 519; Eva-Maria Stolberg, “The Prelude: From the Russo-Japanese War of 1904/1905 and the First Russian Revolution to World War I,” in Revolution and Civil War in Siberia/ Russian Far East and the Impact on East Asia, 1917–1922, paper for the British Study Group on Russian Revolution, Leeds, January 1998, p. 1.Google Scholar

41. V. O. Kliuchevskii, Pis'ma. Dnevniki. Aformizmy i mysli ob istorii (Moscow, 1968), p. 305.Google Scholar

42. Ebenda.Google Scholar

43. Jiji Shimpo, 21 June 1895, 14 February 1905.Google Scholar

44. Gaimushǒ Kiroku, f. 6.1.6.88, Bl. 3.Google Scholar

45. Nansen, Through Siberia, pp. 339–340.Google Scholar

46. G. V. Glinka, Aziatskaia Rossiia, Vol. 2 (St Petersburg, 1914), p. 541.Google Scholar

47. See footnote 22.Google Scholar

48. J. F. Fraser, The Real Siberia (London, 1909), pp. 195–196.Google Scholar

49. Pravo, 8 November 1905. Obviously, the decay of the army in the revolution of 1905 went all over the empire with pogroms against minorities, against Jews in the western provinces and against Chinese migrants in the Russian Far East. On lubki as expression of patriotic culture, albeit limited to World War I, see Hubertus F. Jahn, Patriotic Culture in Russia during World War I (Ithaca, NY and London, 1995), pp. 12–38; J. Brooks, When Russia Learned to Read: Literacy and Popular Literature, 1861–1917 (Princeton, 1985), pp.28-29, 314.Google Scholar

50. This also occurred in Siberia during the Civil War and then in the late 1930s when Japan again threatened Russia's eastern borderlands. I am currently at work on a monograph dealing with this question.Google Scholar

51. Sudzlovskii alias Russel was a globetrotter. He organized an escape of Russian prisoners from the Transbaikal region in 1903 and spent some time in the United States, including a tour to Hawaii.Google Scholar

52. Gaimushǒ Nihon Gaikǒ Bunsho: Nichiro sensǒ [Japanese Diplomatic Documents: Russo-Japanese War], Tokyo, 1958–1960, Vol. 5, pp. 252–254.Google Scholar

53. Revoliutsionnoe dvizhenie na Dal'nem Vostoke, ed. Dal'neovostochnaia komissiia po organizatsii iubileia 20-letiia 1905 g. (Vladivostok, 1925), pp. 38–43.Google Scholar

54. G. S. Chechulina, ed., V toi kipuchei bor'be: Zamechatel'nye dal'nevostochniki (Khabarovsk, Russia, 1994), p. 16.Google Scholar

55. Ishii Kikujiro, Gaikǒ Yoroku [Diplomatic Reports] (Tokyo, 1931), pp. 128–129.Google Scholar

56. On the “Korean problem” as one factor influencing Japan's intervention in Siberia, see Kan Dokusan, “Nihon teikoku-shugi no Chosen shihai to Roshia kakumei” [“Japan's Imperialistic Rule over Korea and the Russian Revolution”], Rekishigaku kenkyǔ [Historical Studies], No. 329, 1969, pp. 37–76.Google Scholar

57. Kasahara Tokushi, “Nichǔ Gunji Kyǒtei to Pekin seifu no ‘Gaigǒ Jichi torikeshi'—Roshia kakumei ga mo tarashita higashi-ajia sekai no hendo no isso-kumen” [“The Sino-Japanese Military Convention and the ‘Revocation of the Autonomy of Outer Mongolia’ by the Beijing Government. Another Aspect of the Consequences, Resulting from the Russian Revolution”], Rekishigaku kenkyǔ [Historical Studies], Vol. 515, No. 4, 1983, p. 23.Google Scholar

58. See Eva-Maria Stolberg, “Japan's Strategic and Political Involvement in Siberia and the Russian Far East, 1892–1922,” in Robert Cribb and Li Narangoa, eds, Imperial Japan and the Identity of Its Asian Neigbours, forthcoming NIAS-Series (Copenhagen, 2002), p. 51.Google Scholar

59. Kikujiro, Gaikǒ Yoroku, pp. 59–61.Google Scholar

60. The Inland Sea lies between Shikoku and southeastern Honshu. It is the old core of Japanese culture, the place where Amaterasu Omikami, the legendary goddess of the sun, founded the Japanese Imperial dynasty, according to the oldest Japanese chronicles, Kojiki (Report on Old Events) and Nihon Shoki (Japanese Chronicles). Therefore, the slogan of “New Inland Sea” had a special significance for the Japanese people.Google Scholar

61. Katǒ, Shiberia ki, pp. 120–125.Google Scholar

62. Hosoya Chihiro, “Nihon to Koruchaku seiken shonin kenkyu” [“Japan and the Recognition Problem of the Kolchak Regime”), Hitotsubashi daigaku hogaku kenkyu [Hitotsubashi Academy's Studies on Law], No. 3, 1961, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar

63. Hara, Shiberia shuppei, p. 7.Google Scholar

64. Henry K. Norton, The Far Eastern Republic of Siberia (London, 1923 [1981]), p.211. The situation in the Amurskaia oblast was insofar serious as the wages were paid in kind. Dal'nevostochnaia Respublika, 28 May 1921, p. 2.Google Scholar

65. Dal'nevostochnaia mysl', 14 September 1921, p. 1. The newspaper, published in Vladivostok, reported that 11 ships arrived from Japan, but did not mention the extent of the supplies.Google Scholar

66. Orin Keith, “Rebirth of Industry and Commerce in Eastern Siberia,” Far Eastern Review (Shanghai), Vol. 18, No. 2, 1922, pp. 127–129.Google Scholar

67. P. M. Nikiforov, Zapiski prem'era DVR (Moscow, 1974), pp. 204–206, 210–212.Google Scholar

68. Da'lnevostochnaia Respublika, 19 May 1921, p. 2.Google Scholar

69. Stolberg, Japan's Strategic and Political Involvement, p. 52.Google Scholar

70. “Iapontsy v Sibirii,” unpublished manuscript, author not known, Vladivostok, 1919.Google Scholar

71. Frederick F. Moore, Siberia Today (New York and London, 1919), p. 29.Google Scholar

72. Moore, Siberia Today, pp.78-79.Google Scholar

73. Moore, Siberia Today, pp.78-79.Google Scholar

74. National Archives (Washington, DC): file 21–33.5.Google Scholar

75. Takishiro Hattori, Japonija v voine 1941–1945 (Moscow, 1973), pp. 25, 45. Hattori had been a leading officer on the staff of the Kwantung Army during the 1930s and 1940s.Google Scholar