Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T03:29:21.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Position of the Slovenes in Austria: Recent Developments in Political (and other) Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Tom Priestly
Tom Priestly*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Slovene-speaking minority in Austria—when compared with many other linguistic minorities in Europe—is in an enviable position. Superficially, its minority rights are both constitutionally guaranteed and, for the most part, legally enforced; in the province of Carinthia/Kärnten/Koroška (the home of nearly all the minority; see Map 1) bilingual education is available in many communities at the primary level, and there is a thriving bilingual secondary school; Slovene is officially used in many offices and churches, and can be heard in many shops and on many street corners; there are two weekly newspapers. The picture below the surface is not quite as pleasant: there is anti-Slovene discrimination in several forms, and the pressure on minority members to Germanize themselves is strong; in particular, it must be emphasized that although the minority enjoys virtually full support from the federal government in Vienna, the provincial government in Carinthia has seldom been as favorably disposed. Still, most of the other minorities in Central and Eastern Europe can only dream of living in conditions like those of the Carinthian Slovenes.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 103 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, T., The Slovene Minority of Carinthia (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1984).Google Scholar
Dotter, F. et al., eds, Kein einig Volk von Brüdern. Studien zum Mehrheiten-Minderheitenproblem am Beispiel Kärntens (Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, 1982).Google Scholar
Fischer, G., Das Slowenische in Kärnten. Bedingungen der sprachliche Sozialisation. Eine Studie zur Sprachenpolitik (Klagenfurt: Slovenski informacijski center, 1980).Google Scholar
Flaschberger, L. and Reiterer, A. F., Der tägliche Abwehrkampf. Erscheinungsformen und Strategien der ethnischen Assimilation bei den Kärtnter Slowenen (Vienna: Braumüller, 1980).Google Scholar
Galanda, B. et al., eds, Rechtsextremismus in Ősterreich nach 1945 (Vienna: Ősterreichischer Bundesverlag, 1981).Google Scholar
Haas, H. and Stuhlpfarrer, K., Ősterreich und seine Slowenen (Vienna: Locker & Wogenstein, 1977).Google Scholar
Holzer, W. and Munz, R., “Ethnic Diversity in Eastern Austria: The Case of Burgenland,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1995, pp. 697–723.Google Scholar
Janschitz, H., Gailtal/Zilja 1848–1918. Eine Region wird deutsch (Klagenfurt: Hermagoras, 1990).Google Scholar
Jesih, B., ed., Slovenci v Avstrijski zvezni deželi Štajerski. Zbornik referatov na znanstvenem srečanju v Mariboru, 25–27. maja 1993 (Ljubljana: Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, 1994).Google Scholar
Lukan, W. and Moritsch, A., eds, Geschichte der Kärntner Slowenen von 1918 bis zur Gegenwart unter Berücksichtigung der gesamtslowenischen Geschichte (Klagenfurt: Hermagoras, 1988).Google Scholar
Moritsch, A., ed., Worn Ethnos zur Nationalität. Der nationale Differenzierungsprozeβ am Beispiel ausgewählter Orte in Kärnten und im Burgenland (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1991).Google Scholar
Moritsch, A., “Das Windische-eine nationale Hilfsideologie,” in Problemfelderder Geschichte und Geschichtsschreibung der Kärntner Slovenen. Problemska polja zgodovine in zgodovinopisja koroških Slovencev (Klagenfurt: Drava, 1995).Google Scholar
Pohl, H-D., Kleine Karntner Mundartkunde (Klagenfurt: Heyn, 1989).Google Scholar
Priestly, T., “Accelerated Grammatical Change in Carinthian Slovene: Dialect Mixture, or ‘Linguistic Decay'?” Canadian Slavonic Papers, Vol. 30, 1988, pp. 62–80.Google Scholar
Priestly, T., “Cultural Consciousness and Political Nationalism: Determinants of Language-Choice in Carinthia,” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, Vol. 16, 1989, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Priestly, T., “‘Our Dialect Sounds Stupid:’ The Importance of Attitudes to So-called Sub-standard Language Codes as a Factor in the (Non)-retention of Slovene in Carinthia, Austria,” in Gorter, D. et al., eds, Fourth International Conference on Minority Languages. Volume 11: Western and Eastern European Papers (Clevedon, U.K./Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters, 1990).Google Scholar
Priestly, T., “Effects of Educational and Social Mobility on Language Maintenance, Language Attitudes and Language Structure: The Case of Sele in Carinthia,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Vol. 15, Nos. 2–3, 1994, pp. 199–217.Google Scholar
Priestly, T., “On the Etymology of the Ethnic Slur Tschusch,” Journal of Slavic Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1996a, pp. 109–132.Google Scholar
Priestly, T., “Denial of Ethnic Identity: The Political Manipulation of Beliefs about Language in Slovene Minority Areas of Austria and Hungary,” Slavic Review, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1996b, pp. 364–398.Google Scholar