No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
National Self-Denial and Marxist Ideology: The Origin of the Communist Movement in Poland and the Jewish Question: 1918-1923*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
At the formation of the second Polish republic in 1918 the Communist Workers Party of Poland (KPRP) displayed total disregard for the Polish national feelings. Polish communists actively opposed the creation of the new Polish state which they thought would impede the march of revolution from Russia to the West. They saw Polish national liberation as an expression of a bourgeois ideology hostile to the interests of the Polish workers. True national liberation, they maintained, could only be achieved by the way of the international proletarian revolution.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Nationalities Papers , Volume 22 , Issue S1: Special Issue - Ethnopolitics in Poland , Summer 1994 , pp. 29 - 54
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1994 by the Association for the Study of the Nationalities of the USSR and Eastern Europe, Inc.
References
Notes
1. Compare Antoni Czubinski, Komunistyczna Partia Polski (1918-1938), (Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, 1985), pp.3-29.Google Scholar
2. Compare the most notable studies and documents about the early communist movement in Poland and the Jewish question: Abel Kainer (Stanislaw Krajewski), “Zydzi a komunizm,” Krytyka, no. 15 (1983), pp.214-247.; Celia S. Heller, “The Appeal of Polish Leftist Parties,” in Celia S. Heller, On the Edge of Destruction, Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), pp.253-260; Jaff Schatz, The Generation, The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Communists of Poland (Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press, 1991); See also the review of Schatz's book by Daniel Grinberg inBiuletyn Zydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego w Polsce, no.155-156 (1990), pp. 191-193; Jerzy Holzer, “Relations between Polish and Jewish left wing groups in interwar Poland,” in Chimen Abramsky, Maciej Jachimczyk, Antony Polonsky, ed. The Jews in Poland (New York: Basil Backwell Ltd., 1986), pp. 140-146; Leon Baumgarten, “Rewolucjonisci Zydzi w pierwszych polskich kołtkach socjalistycznych i w Wielkim Proletariacie,” Biuletyn Zydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego w Polsce, no. 47-48 (1963), pp.3-28; Henryk Piasecki, ‘Zydowscy robotnicy i polscy inteligenci pochodzenia żydowskiego w PPS-Lewicy na tle rozłtamów i secesji w latach 1907-1918,” Biuletyn Zydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego,no.129-130 (1984), pp.15-23; Maurycy Tyrman, “O żcydowskich kołtkach robotniczych PPS Lewicy i SDKPiL w Warszawie,” Biuletyn Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, no. 38 (1961), pp.128-145; Larysa Gamska, “Lewica zydowskich partii socjalistycznych wobec III Miedzynarodowki i KPRP (1918-1923),” Biuletyn Zydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, no. 97 (1976), pp.61-75; Gereon Iwański, “Powstanie i dzialalnosc komunistycznej organizacji młtodziży ‘CUKUNFT’ w Polsce (styczeń 1922-kwiecień 1923 r.),” Pokolenia, no.3/47 (1974), pp.41-62; Gereon Iwański, “Żydowski komunistyczny związek robotniczy KOMBUND w Polsce 1921-1923,” Z pola walki, no. 4/68 (1974), pp.43-78; Zbigniew Szczygielski, “Warszawska organizacja Komunistycznej Partii Polski, problemy organizacyjne,” in Warszawa II Rzeczypospolitej 1818-1938, (Warszawa: PWN, 1968), vol. I, pp. 179-205; Larysa Gamska, “KPP wobec problemów kulturalno-oświatowych ludności żydowskiej w okresie od I Zjazdu do IV Konferencji,” Biuletyn Zydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, no. 3/103 (1977), pp.35-47; Julian Auerbach, “Niektóre zagadnienia dzialalnosci KPP w srodowisku żydowskim w latach kryzysu (1929-1933),” Biuletyn Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, no.55 (1965), pp.33-56; Wladysłtaw Mroczkowski, Aleksandra Tymieniecka, “Listy Komitetu Warszawskiego KPP do kierownictwa warszawskich organizacji PPS i Bundu 1934-1936 w sprawie jednolitego frontu,” Warszawa II Rzeczypospolitej 1818-1938, (Warszawa: PWN, 1971), vol.3, pp.133-154; T. Berenstein, “KPP w walce z pogromami antyżydowskimi w latach 1935-1937,” Biuletyn Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, no. 57 (March, 1966), pp. 3-74; P. Rybak, “Wspomnienia o walce KPP z antysemityzmem i pogromami,” Biuletyn Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, no. 13-14 (January-February, 1955), pp. 268-273; “Szymon Zachariasz: Dokumenty do historii ruchu komunistycznego wsród żydowskich robotników w Polsce (in Yiddish),” Bleter Far Geszichte, no. 2/3 (1953), vol.7, pp.58-169; Henryk Lauer-Brand, Glos w kwestji żydowskiej, (Warszawa: 1924), also under the title, “Czy stosunek do kwestji żydowskiej jest dla komunistów sprawa drażliwa? (Z notatek więznia),” 158/V-4/12, pp. 11-25, Archiwum Lewicy Polskiej (The Archive of the Polish Left), Archiwum Akt Nowych, former Archiwum Centralne KC PZPR (hereafter cited as ALP); Centralne Biuro Żydowskie, 158/X-2/ vol. 1-41, ALP; Korespondencja Sekretariatu Krajowego, 158/V-3, ALP. Google Scholar
3. II Zjazd Komunistycznej Partii Robotniczej Polski (19. IX-2. X. 1923) Protokoty obrad i uchwaly, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1968), p.310. (Herafter cited as II Zjazd KPRP).Google Scholar
4. Compare Isaac Deutscher, The Non-Jewish Jew and Other Essays, (London: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp.25-41.Google Scholar
5. Heller, Compare, p.255.Google Scholar
6. Compare Tadeusz Zenczykowski, Dwa Komitety 1920 1944, (Warszawa: Editions Spotkania, 1990), pp. 9-50.Google Scholar
7. Ciolkosz, Adam, “Dzielnica Żydowska Obozu w Jabłtonnie,” Zeszyty Historyczne, no. 20 (1971), pp. 178-199.Google Scholar
8. 267/III/t.3, p.22, ALP. Google Scholar
9. Prager, Dennis, Joseph Telushkin, Why the Jews? (New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1983), pp. 62-63.Google Scholar
10. Ibid., p.62.Google Scholar
11. Heller, , p.52.Google Scholar
12. Prager, , p.63.Google Scholar
13. Heller, , p.88.Google Scholar
14. Berenstein, T., p.22.Google Scholar
15. Skalinski, J., “Demokratyczne drzwi…,” Przegląd Powszechny, vol.217 (January-February-March, 1938), pp. 3-14.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., p. 14 (trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis).Google Scholar
17. Brun, Julian, “Cel i znaczenie hecy antyżydowskiej,” in Julian Brun, Pisma Wybrane, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1956), vol II, part 2, pp.102-110.Google Scholar
18. Ibid., pp. 108-109.Google Scholar
19. Compare “Uchwałta protestacyjna przeciw pogromom antyżydowskim,” I Congress KPRP, February, 1918, in KPP Uchwałty i Rezolucje, (Warszawa: Ksiazka i Wiedza, 1954), vol. 1, p. 54; “Żydzi,” III Congress KPP, March, 1925, in KPP Uchwałty i Rezolucje, vol. 2, pp. 179-184; J. Spis (Julian Brun-Bronowicz), “Pogromy,” Nowy Przegląd, 1931, pp. 5-18; J. Brun, “Endecja,” Nowy Przegląd, 1934, pp.31-41; “Pogromy żydowskie w Niemczech i w Polsce,” Nowy Przeglqd, 1935, pp. 649-650; “Włtókniarze łtódzcy przeciw pogromom,” Przegląd, 1937, no.3, p.9; P. Rybak, “Wspomnienia o walce KPP z antysemityzmem i pogromami”; T. Berenstein, “KPP w walce z pogromami antyżydowskimi w latach 1935-1937.”Google Scholar
20. Compare “Stosunek do Bundu,” KPRP I Conference, April, 1920, in KPP Uchwaty i Rezolucje, vol. I, p. 103; Karolski-A. Waisblum, “Bolaczki roboty żydowskiej KPRP i jak je usuwać,” Nowy Przegląd, 1924-1925 (reedycja: Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1959), pp.195-230.; “Rewolucyjne perspektywy w Palestynie,” Nowy Przegląd, 1929 (reedycja: Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1966), pp.588-600; “Praca wsrod żydowskich i niemieckich mas pracujących,” V Congress KPP, September, 1930, in KPP Uchwałty i Rezolucje, vol. III, p.234-235; A. Szymonowicz, “Z walk proletariatu Żydowskiego,” Nowy Przegląd, 1931, pp.56-63; “Rezolucja KC KPP w sprawie pracy partji śród żydowskich mas pracujących,” Nowy Przegląd, 1931, pp.68-71; “Przeciw pozostałtosciom ideologicznym bundyzmu i poalejsjonizmu,” Nowy Przegląd, 1932, pp.30-39; “Dlaczego KC Bundu zerwałt rokowania o jednolity front? Rokowania powinny być natychmiast wznowione!,” Nowy Przegląd, 1934, pp.14-15; “PPS a antysemityzm,” Nowy Przegląd, 1934, pp.100-101.Google Scholar
21. Marx, Karl, Capital, Kerr Edition, vol. III, p.716. Quoted after Abram Leon, The Jewish Question, A Marxist Interpretation, (New York, London, Sydney: Pathfinder Press, 1970), p.77.Google Scholar
22. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto, (New York: Penguin Books Ltd., 1987), p.79.Google Scholar
23. Ibid., p.92. Compare James M. Blaut, The National Question, (London: Zed Books Ltd., 1987), p.23.Google Scholar
24. At the 1880 meeting in Geneva, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Polish national uprising of 1830, Ludwik Warynski, the leader of the first workers party Proletariat proclaimed: “Our motherland is the entire world…. We are compatriots, members of one great nationality, more unfortunate than Poland, the nation of proletarians.” (Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis), Alina Molska, ed. Pierwsze pokolenie marksistów polskich, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1962), Vol. I, p. 423.Google Scholar
25. Marx. Engels, p. 102.Google Scholar
26. Ibid., p.92.Google Scholar
27. Compare Walker Connor, The National Question in Marxist-Leninst Theory and Strategy, (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 1-20.Google Scholar
28. Cited in Connor, p. 15.Google Scholar
29. Cited in Connor, p. 13.Google Scholar
30. Connor, Compare, pp. 19-20.Google Scholar
31. According to Connor, “The founders of Marxism…came themselves to be influenced more substantively by national concepts than they were probably aware.” Connor, p. 19.Google Scholar
32. “On the Jewish Question,” in Selected Essays by Karl Marx (New York, 1926). Quoted after Leon, p.66.Google Scholar
33. Prager, Compare, pp. 137-140.Google Scholar
34. “On the Jewish Question,” p. 88.Google Scholar
35. According to Leon, “The social position of the Jews has had a profound, determining influence on their national character.” Leon, p.75.Google Scholar
36. “On the Jewish Question,” p. 92.Google Scholar
37. According to Leon's interpretation of Marx's thought, “It is not the loyalty of the Jews to their faith which explains their preservation as a distinct social group; on the contrary, it is their preservation as a distinct social group which explains their attachment to their faith.” Leon, p. 73.Google Scholar
38. Marx, Karl, “On the Jewish Question,” in Early writings (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1975), p. 236, p. 239.Google Scholar
39. Cited in Prager, p. 139.Google Scholar
40. Compare David McLellan, Karl Marx: His Life and Thought (New York: Harper and Row, 1973), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. S. “Das Judentum,” Die Neue Zeit, 1890, p. 28.Google Scholar
42. Lumer, Hyman, ed. Lenin on the Jewish Question, (New York: International Publishers, 1974), p. 71.Google Scholar
43. Bauer, Otto, “The National Question and Social Democracy,” in Tom Bottomore, Patrick Goode, Austro-Marxism, (Oxford: Clarendon, 1978), pp.102-117.Google Scholar
44. Compare Lenin's remarks on Austro-Marxism in Lenin on the Jewish Question, pp. 70-71.Google Scholar
45. Lenin on the Jewish Question, p. 135.Google Scholar
46. Ibid., p. 125.Google Scholar
47. Ibid., p. 125.Google Scholar
48. Ibid., p. 107.Google Scholar
49. Ibid., p. 24.Google Scholar
50. Quoted after J. P. Nettl, “Appendix: The National Question,” in J. P. Nettl, Rosa Luxemburg, (New York: Schockem Books, 1969), p.513.Google Scholar
51. Compare Feliks Tych, “The Historical Controversy on the Polish Question in the Revolutionary Movement from Marx to Lenin,” a paper presented at the IV World Congress for Soviet and East European Studies, Harrogate, England, July 1990, p. 18.Google Scholar
52. Tych, , p. 13.Google Scholar
53. Luksemburg, Roza, Wybór pism, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1959), vol. II, pp. 147-148. Trans. Julia brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
54. Ibid., pp. 123-124.Google Scholar
55. Walicki, Andrzej, Rosja, Polska, Marxism, Studia z dziejów marksizmu i jego recepcji (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1983), p. 217.Google Scholar
56. Luksemburg, Roza, Wybór pism, p. 148.Google Scholar
57. Walicki, Compare, p. 222.Google Scholar
58. Luksemburg, Roza, Wybór pism, vol I, p. 399.Google Scholar
59. Walicki, , p. 221.Google Scholar
60. J. P. Nettl, p. 517.Google Scholar
61. There are many religious references in the unpublished letters from Rosa Luxemburg's family. For example, in the postcard of Sept. 24, 1897, Rosa's sister Anna greeted her with the approaching Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year). In his mournful letter of October 30, 1897, Rosa's brother Jozef (who was a doctor) expressed his despair after their mother's death: “I can do nothing now,” he wrote, “every day I recite Kaddish for her at the temple, the way she would have done it if I were the one who left her. Mama was religius and she often asked to pray for the recovery during her illness.” (Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis). In Anna's letter to Rosa of November 11, 1897, she remembered that their mother liked to read the Bible and to translate some passages into German for the sake of her daugther. Another letter from Anna, dated September 26, 1901, described the family's recitation of Ayl mo-lay ra-cha-mim in Rosa's name on the anniversary of their mother's death. (Rosa Luxemburg Collection, Hoover Institution Archive, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
62. Quoted after J. P. Nettl, p. 517.Google Scholar
63. Tych, Feliks, ed. Rosa Luksemburg, Listy do Leona Jogichesa-Tyszki, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1968-1971), vol. I, pp. 196-197. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
64. J. P. Nettl, pp. 516-517.Google Scholar
65. Ibid., p. 517.Google Scholar
66. Walecki, Henryk, “W kwestiiżydowskiej,” in Henryk Walecki, Wybór pism, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1967), Vol I, p. 138. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
67. Ibid., p. 179.Google Scholar
68. Brun, Julian, Pisma Wybrane, (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1955), Vol I, p. 59.Google Scholar
69. During the internal party conflict between the “minority” and “majority” factions, following Jozef Pilsudski's 1926 coup, both Brun and Walecki were engaged in a crude political fighting. Ironically, two most distinguished party theoreticians on the national question were accusing each other of national Bolshevism. Compare “O polskim nacjonalizmie,” Nowy Przegląd, 1926, (reedycja),pp. 378-388; “Oswiadczenie tow. Julianskiego. Do KC KPP,” Nowy Przegląd, 1926, (reedycja), pp. 535-538; J. Spis, “Moj Błtąd,” Zbiór artykulów i materiałtów dyskusyjnych, (Warszawa, 1927), pp. 76-91.Google Scholar
70. In his unpublished letter to Franciszek Fiedler, Brun admitted that his theory was first inspired by the socialist system of the Soviet Union. 186/II-I, ALP. Google Scholar
71. II Zjazd KPRP, p. 25.Google Scholar
72. Ibid., p. 27. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis (all quotations from the II Zjazd KPRP).Google Scholar
73. Ibid., p. 176.Google Scholar
74. Ibid., p. 223.Google Scholar
75. Ibid., p. 220.Google Scholar
76. Ibid., p. 235.Google Scholar
77. Ibid., p. 197.Google Scholar
78. Ibid., p. 209.Google Scholar
79. Ibid. Google Scholar
80. Ibid., p. 339.Google Scholar
81. Ibid., p. 210. In 1925, Brun actually used his strategic “exercise in disguise,” in his famous brochure Stefana Żeromskiego tragedia pomyłtek (Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1958). In his brochure he artfully manipulated the moral dilemma of the liberal intelligentsia in order to convince it about communists' genuine Polish patriotism.Google Scholar
82. II Zjazd KPRP, p. 226.Google Scholar
83. Ibid., p. 29.Google Scholar
84. Ibid., p. 342.Google Scholar
85. Ibid., p. 333.Google Scholar
86. Ibid., p. 100.Google Scholar
87. Ibid., p. 337.Google Scholar
88. Ibid., p. 325.Google Scholar
89. Ibid., p. 391.Google Scholar
90. Ibid., p. 346.Google Scholar
91. Ibid., p. 528.Google Scholar
92. Ibid., p. 574.Google Scholar
93. Centralne Biuro Żydowskie, 158/X-2/ t. 9, p. 3, ALP. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
94. II Zjazd KPRP, pp. 507-521.Google Scholar
95. Ibid., p. 522.Google Scholar
96. Centralne Biuro Żydowskie, 158/X-2/ t. 5, p. 1, ALP. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
97. Bleter Far Geszichte, vol 7 (1954) no. 2/3. p. 67. Trans. Helena Wajcman.Google Scholar
98. “The Answer of the KPP's Central Committee to the Bund's Central Committee,” November, 1924, Bleter Far Geszichte, Vol. 7 (1954) no. 2/3, pp. 71-74.Google Scholar
99. Henryk Lauer-Brand, Głtos w kwestji żydowskiej, (Warszawa: 1924).Google Scholar
100. “Czy stosunek do kwestji żydowskiej jest dla komunistów sprawa drazliwa? (Z notatek więznia),” 158/V-4/12, p. 15, ALP. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
101. Ibid., p. 17.Google Scholar
102. Ibid., p. 18.Google Scholar
103. Ibid., p. 20.Google Scholar
104. KPP. Uchwałty i rezolucje, Vol. II, p. 68. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
105. Karolski-A. Wajsblum, p. 226. Trans. Julia brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
106. Cited in Heller, p. 268.Google Scholar
107. Cited in Heller, p. 257.Google Scholar
108. “Z manifestu Centralnego Komitetu Wybórczego Związku Proletariatu Miast i Wsi. W sprawie Wyborów do sejmu w 1922r., Sprawa mniejszości narodowych,” (in Yiddish) Bleter Far Geszichte, 1954, t. 7, no. 2/3, pp. 68-69.Google Scholar
109. I am following Heller's distinction between the term “assimilationist,” as an active conscious existential choice, rather than the term “assimilated,” which implies passivity. Compare Heller, p. 183.Google Scholar
110. Gamska, , “KPP wobec problemów kulturalno-oswiatowych…,” p. 44.Google Scholar
111. Walecki, , p. 146.Google Scholar
112. Walecki, , p. 146.Google Scholar
113. Heller, , p. 202.Google Scholar
114. Jean-Paul Sartre, Anti-Semite and Jew, (New York: Schocken Books, 1976), p. 92.Google Scholar
115. Ibid., pp. 94-95.Google Scholar
116. Heller, , p. 205.Google Scholar
117. In his book, Schatz described communist Jews who ostentatiously violated Jewish religious norms and habits, while not daring to challenge “the opium of the masses” of the Polish Catolic Church, Schatz, p. 125.Google Scholar
118. Heller, , p. 212.Google Scholar
119. Sartre, , p. 135.Google Scholar
120. Ibid. Google Scholar
121. Schatz, , p. 53.Google Scholar
122. Kainer, Abel, p. 228.Google Scholar
123. Wat, Aleksander, Mój wiek, (Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1990), Vol I, p. 66.Google Scholar
124. Kainer, , p. 229.Google Scholar
125. Wat, , p. 41. Trans. Julia Brun-Zejmis.Google Scholar
126. Ibid., p. 77.Google Scholar
127. Schatz, , pp. 40-41.Google Scholar
128. Ibid., p. 46.Google Scholar
129. Prager, , p. 150.Google Scholar
130. Wat, , p. 241.Google Scholar
131. Isaac Bashevis Singer, Love and Exile, (Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc., 1984), pp. 168-169.Google Scholar