Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:14:33.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

National identity and the “Kohn dichotomy”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

John Coakley*
Affiliation:
aSchool of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK bGeary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This article assesses the analytical value of the “Kohn dichotomy” – the notion that there are two types of nationalism, resting on civic values in the West and on ethnic values outside the West. It begins by outlining the intellectual history of this dichotomy since its origin in the 1860s and by analyzing its main features. It contrasts the state traditions of Central and Eastern Europe and Western Europe in three areas: the geopolitical evolution of the state, the state's perspective on its own population as reflected in efforts to measure “ethnic nationality” through such instruments as the population census, and divergences in citizenship law. It shows that data from recent programs of comparative survey research, and analysis of nationalist ideology, highlight the variety of forms that nationalism may take in the two parts of Europe. The article concludes that the “ethnic–civic” dichotomy is valuable as an ideal type with the capacity to shed light on the nature of ethnic affiliation, not as a categorical classification system. Different ethnonational groups comprise mixtures of people who use a combination of “ethnic” and “civic” reference points; they do not coincide with global territorial zones that may be identified with any level of clarity.

Type
Special Section: Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges Guest Editors: Licia Cianetti and Jelena Lončar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariely, Gal. 2013. “Nationhood across Europe: The Civic-ethnic Framework and the Distinction between Western and Eastern Europe.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14 (1): 123143.Google Scholar
Auer, Stefan. 1997. ‘Two Types of Nationalism in Europe?” Russian and Euro-Asian Bulletin 7 (12): n.p.Google Scholar
Auerhan, Jan. 1926. Die sprachlichen Minderheiten in Europa. Berlin: Hensel.Google Scholar
Barnard, F. M. 1983. “National Culture and Political Legitimacy: Herder and Rousseau.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (2): 231253.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, Perching, Bernhard, and Sievers, Wiebke. 2007. “Preface.” In Citizenship Policies in the New Europe, edited by Rainer Bauböck, Bernhard Perching, and Sievers, Wiebke, 1115. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Björklund, Fredrika. 2006. “The East European ‘Ethnic Nation’ – Myth or Reality?European Journal of Political Research 45 (1): 93121.Google Scholar
Blaschke, Jochen, ed. 1980. Handbuch der europäischen Volksgruppen. Frankfurt-am-Main: Syndikat.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Kaspar. 1852. Allgemeines Staastrecht, geschichtlich begrŭndet. Mŭnchen: Verlagder literarisch-artistischen Anstalt.Google Scholar
Bös, Mathias. 2000. The Legal Construction of Membership: Nationality Law in Germany and the United States. [Working Papers Series, 00.5]. Cambridge, MA: Program for the Study of Germany and Europe, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Brown, David. 1999. “Are There Good and Bad Nationalisms?Nations and Nationalism 5 (2): 281302.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2002. “Ethnicity without Groups.” European Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 163189.Google Scholar
Cabanel, Patrick. 1997. La question nationale au XIXe siècle. Paris: Editions La Découverture.Google Scholar
Cebotari, Victor. 2016. “Civic, Ethnic, Hybrid and Atomised Identities in Central and Eastern Europe.” Identities 23 (6): 648666.Google Scholar
Ceobanu, Alin M., and Escandell, Xavier. 2008. “East Is West? National Feelings and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Europe.” Social Science Research 37 (4): 11471170.Google Scholar
Clark, Colin. 2010. “The Nation-state: Civic and Ethnic Dimensions.” In Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict, edited by Cordell, Karl and Wolff, Stefan, 4454. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coakley, John. 1994. “Contrastando las perspectivas europeas oriental y occidental sobre el nacionalismo.” Revista international de filosofía politíca 3: 81101.Google Scholar
Coakley, John. 2012. Nationalism, Ethnicity and the State: Making and Breaking Nations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dumbrava, Costica. 2010. “Five Comments on Citizenship in CEE Countries.” In Is There (Still) an East-West Divide in the Conception of Citizenship in Europe?, edited by Rainer Bauböck and André Liebich, 17–18. [EUI Working Papers RSCAS2010/19] San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
European Communities: Commission. 1986. Linguistic Minorities in Countries Belonging to the European Community: Summary Report Prepared by the Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, Rome. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community.Google Scholar
Extra, Guus, and Gorter, Durk. 2008. “The Constellation of Languages in Europe: An Inclusive Approach.” In Multilingual Europe: Facts and Policies, edited by Extra, Guus and Gorter, Durk, 361. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Francis, E.K. 1976. Interethnic Relations: An Essay in Sociological Theory. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Germane, Marina. 2012. “Civic or Ethnic Nation? Two Competing Concepts in Interwar Latvia.” Nations and Nationalism 18 (3): 439460.Google Scholar
Gordon, Adi. 2011. “The Need for West: Hans Kohn and the North Atlantic Community.” Journal of Contemporary History 46 (1): 3357.Google Scholar
Harris, Erika. 2012. “What Is New about ‘Eastern Nationalism’ and What Are the Implications for Studies of Ethnicity Today?Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (3): 337357.Google Scholar
Hjerm, Mikael. 2003. “National Sentiments in Eastern and Western Europe.” Nationalities Papers 31 (4): 413429.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2009. The Politics of Citizenship in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. “The Clash of Civilizations?Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 2249.Google Scholar
Iordachi, Constantin. 2010. “How (Not) to Think about Historical Regions.” In Is There (Still) an East-West Divide in the Conception of Citizenship in Europe?, edited by Rainer Bauböck and André Liebich, 9–15. [EUI Working Papers RSCAS2010/19] San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Janmaat, Jan Germen. 2006. “Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European Member States: Partial Support for the Ethnic-civic Framework.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 29 (1): 5078.Google Scholar
Jaskułowski, Krzysztof. 2010. “Western (Civic) Versus Eastern (Ethnic) Nationalism: The Origins and Critique of the Dichotomy.” Polish Sociological Review 3 (171): 289303.Google Scholar
Jones, Frank L., and Smith, Philip. 2001. “Diversity and Commonality in National Identities: An Exploratory Analysis of Cross-national Patterns.” Journal of Sociology 37 (1): 4563.Google Scholar
Junghahn, Otto. 1932. National Minorities in Europe. New York: Covici, Friede, Inc.Google Scholar
Kasprzak, Michal. 2012. “To Reject or Not to Reject Nationalism: Debating Marx and Engels’ Struggles with Nationalism, 1840s–1880s.” Nationalities Papers 40 (4): 585606.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Eric, and Zimmer, Oliver. 2004. “'Dominant Ethnicity’ and the ‘Ethnic-civic’ Dichotomy in the Work of AD Smith.” Nations and Nationalism 10 (1/2): 6378.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1922. Nationalismus: über die Bedeutung des Nationalismus im Jugentum und in der Gegenwart. Wien, Leipzig: R. Löwit.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1944. The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in its Origins and Background. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1965. Nationalism: Its Meaning and History. Rev. ed. New York: Van Nostrand [1st ed. 1955].Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1968. The Age of Nationalism: The First Era of Global History. New ed. New York: Harper and Row [1st ed. 1962].Google Scholar
Koning, Edward A. 2011. “Ethnic and Civic Dealings with Newcomers: Naturalization Policies and Practices in Twenty-Six Immigration Countries.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34 (11): 19741994.Google Scholar
Kovács, Mária M. 2010. “Ethnic Preferentialism in European Union States: East and West.” In Is There (Still) an East-West Divide in the Conception of Citizenship in Europe?, edited by Rainer Bauböck and André Liebich, 5–6. [EUI Working Papers RSCAS2010/19] San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. 2002. “The Myth of the Civic State: A Critical Survey of Hans Kohn's Framework for Understanding Nationalism.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (1): 2039.Google Scholar
Larin, Stephen. 2010. “Conceptual Debates in Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Migration.” In International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Denemark, Robert A., 438457. Maiden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Larin, Stephen. 2012. “Challenging the Civic Nation.” Doctoral diss., Queen's University, Kingston, ON.Google Scholar
Latvia 1930. Trešā tautas skaitīšana Latvijā 1930. gadā: Troisième recensement de la population en Lettonie en 1930. Vol. 2 Tautība: Nationalité ethnique. Riga: Valsts statistiskā pārvalde.Google Scholar
Laveleye, Émile de. 1868. “L'Allemagne depuis la guerre de 1866: VII: Les nationalités en Hongrie et les Slaves du Sud (Yougo-Slaves).” Revue des deux mondes 76 (1 August): 513549.Google Scholar
Liebich, André. 2006. “Searching for the Perfect Nation: The Itinerary of Hans Kohn (1891–1971).” Nations and Nationalism 12 (4): 579596.Google Scholar
Liebich, André. 2010. “Is There (Still) an East-West Divide in the Conception of Citizenship in Europe?” In Is There (Still) an East-West Divide in the Conception of Citizenship in Europe?, edited by Rainer Bauböck and André Liebich, 1–3. [EUI Working Papers RSCAS2010/19] San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Makaryan, Shushanik. 2010. “Towards a Global Theory of Citizenship.” In Is There (Still) an East-West Divide in the Conception of Citizenship in Europe?, edited by Rainer Bauböck and André Liebich, 7–8. [EUI Working Papers RSCAS2010/19] San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. 1908. Weltbŭrgertum und Nationalstaat: Studien zur Genesis des deutschen Nationalstaates. Mŭnchen, Berlin: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son and Bourn.Google Scholar
Neumann, Friedrich Julius. 1888. Volk und Nation: eine Studie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Nieguth, Tim. 1999. “Beyond Dichotomy: Concepts of the Nation and the Distribution of Membership.” Nations and Nationalism 5 (2): 155173.Google Scholar
Pan, Christoph, and Sibylle Pfeil, Beate. 2003. National Minorities in Europe: Handbook. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2010. “'The Most Natural State': Herder and Nationalism.” History of Political Thought 31 (4): 657689.Google Scholar
Pianko, Noam. 2010. “Did Kohn Believe in the ‘Kohn Dichotomy'? Reconsidering Kohn's Journey from the Political Idea of Judaism to the Idea of Nationalism.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 55:295–311.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John. 1973. “Two Types of Nationalism.” In Nationalism: The Nature and Evolution of an Ideal, edited by Kamenka, Eugene, 2236. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2003. Political Philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Impossibility of Reason. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Rabow-Edling, Susanna. 2008. “The Relevance of Kohn's Dichotomy to the Russian Nineteenth-century Concept of Nationalism.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 8 (3): 560578.Google Scholar
Reeskens, Tim, and Hooghe, Marc. 2010. “Beyond the Civic-ethnic Dichotomy: Investigating the Structure of Citizenship Concepts across Thirty-three Countries.” Nations and Nationalism 16 (4): 579597.Google Scholar
Roshwald, Aviel. 2016. “Civic and Ethnic Nationalism.” In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism, edited by John Stone, Rutledge M. Dennis, Polly Rizova, Anthony D. Smith, and Xiaoshuo Hou. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rothfels, Hans. 1956. “Die Nationsidee in westlicher und östlicher Sicht.” In Osteuropa und der deutschen Osten, edited by Rothfels, Hans and Schieder, Theodor, 718. Köln-Braunsfeld: Rudolf Müller.Google Scholar
Schnapper, Dominique. [1994] 2003. La communauté des citoyens: sur Vidée moderne de nation. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Seymour, Michel, Couture, Jocelyne, and Nielsen, Kai. 1996. “Introduction: Questioning the Ethnic/Civic Dichotomy.” In Rethinking Nationalism, edited by Jocelyne Couture, Kai Nielsen, and Seymour, Michel, 161. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Shoup, Paul S. 1981. The East European and Soviet Data Handbook: Political, Social, and Developmental Indicators, 1945–1975. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Shulman, Stephen. 2002. “Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (5): 554585.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Snyder, Louis. 1968. The New Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Philip, and Wollman, Howard. 1998. “Good and Bad Nationalisms: A Critique of Dualism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 3 (3): 255274.Google Scholar
Stephens, Meic. 1976. Linguistic Minorities in Western Europe. Llandysul: Gomer Press.Google Scholar
Straka, Manfred. 1970. Handbuch der europäischen Volksgruppen. Wien, Stuttgart: Wilhelm Braumüller.Google Scholar
Symmons-Symonolewicz, Konstantin. 1965. “Nationalist Movements: An Attempt at a Comparative Typology.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 7 (2): 221230.Google Scholar
Teleki, Count Paul, and Rónai, Andrew. 1937. The Different Types of Ethnic Mixture of Population. Budapest: Athenaeum.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand. [1887] 1955. Community and Association (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). Translated and supplemented by Charles F Loomis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2017. 2020 World Housing and Population Census Programme. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/censusquest.htm.Google Scholar
USSR. 1996. 1989 USSR Population Census [Electronic Resource]. Minneapolis: East View.Google Scholar
Wolf, Ken. 1976. “Hans Kohn's Liberal Nationalism: The Historian as Prophet.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (4): 651672.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. [1996] 1999. “The Myth of the Civic Nation.” In Theorizing Nationalism, edited by Beiner, Ronald, 103118. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Zubrycki, Geneviève. 2001. “'We the Polish Nation': Ethnic and Civic Visions of Nationhood in Post-communist Constitutional Debates.” Theory and Society 30 (5): 629668.Google Scholar