Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:51:49.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is Turkey coming to terms with its past? Politics of memory and majoritarian conservatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Onur Bakiner*
Affiliation:
International Studies, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

There is unprecedented domestic and international interest in Turkey's political past, accompanied by a societal demand for truth and justice in addressing past human rights violations. This article poses the question: Is Turkey coming to terms with its past? Drawing upon the literature on nationalism, identity, and collective memory, I argue that the Turkish state has recently taken steps to acknowledge and redress some of the past human rights violations. However, these limited and strategic acts of acknowledgment fall short of initiating a more comprehensive process of addressing past wrongs. The emergence of the Justice and Development Party as a dominant political force brings along the possibility that the discarded Kemalist memory framework will be replaced by what I call majoritarian conservatism, a new government-sanctioned shared memory that promotes uncritical and conservative-nationalist interpretations of the past that have popular appeal, while enforcing silence on critical historiographies that challenge this hegemonic memory and identity project. Nonetheless, majoritarian conservatism will probably fail to assert state control over memory and history, even under a dominant government, as unofficial memory initiatives unsettle the hegemonic appropriation of the past.

Type
Analysis of Current Events
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akçam, Taner. 2004. From Empire to Republic: Turkish Nationalism and the Armenian Genocide. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 2008. “Kemalism.” London Review of Books 30 (17), 11 September: 312.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. 2000. Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Stefan, Donovan, Mark, and Passmore, Kevin. 1999. “Apologias for the Nation-state in Western Europe since 1800.” In Writing National Histories: Western Europe since 1800, edited by S. Berger, M. Donovan and K. Passmore, 3-14. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cizre Sakallıoğlu, Ümit. 1996. “Parameters and Strategies of Islam-State Interaction in Republican Turkey.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28 (2): 231251.Google Scholar
Connerton, Paul. 1989. How Societies Remember. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davison, Andrew. 2003. “Turkey, a ‘Secular’ State? The Challenge of Description.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 102 (2/3): 333350.Google Scholar
Eissenstat, Howard. 2012. “The Ghosts of Sivas: Justice Denied in Turkey.” Amnesty International Publication, 12 March.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Göçek, Fatma Müge. 2011. The Transformation of Turkey: Redefining State and Society from the Ottoman Empire to the Modern Era. New York: LB. Tauris.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On Collective Memory. Translated by Lewis A. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth. 2003. State Repression and the Labors of Memory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kadıoğlu, Ayşe. 2007. “Denationalization of Citizenship? The Turkish Experience.” Citizenship Studies 11 (3): 283299.Google Scholar
Lind, Jennifer M. 2008. Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nalepa, Monika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nora, Pierre. 1996. “General Introduction: Between Memory and History.” In Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past, Vol. 1, edited by Lawrence Kritzman, 1-20. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ökten, Nazlı. 2007. “An Endless Death and Eternal Mourning: November 10 in Turkey.” In The Politics of Public Memory in Turkey, edited by Özyürek, Esra, 95113. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey. 2007. The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Özyürek, Esra. 2006. Nostalgia for the Modern: State Secularism and Everyday Politics in Turkey. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha. 1992. Kemalist Tek-Parti İdeolojisi ve CHP'nin Altı Ok'u. Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Portelli, Alessandro. 2003. The Order Has Been Carried Out: History, Memory and the Meaning of a Nazi Massacre In Rome. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stern, Steve J. 2004. Remembering Pinochet's Chile: On the Eve of London 1998. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Taşpınar, Ömer. 2008. “Turkey's Middle East Policies: Between Neo-Ottomanism and Kemalism.” Carnegie Papers, Carnegie Middle East Center, Number 10.Google Scholar
Wilde, Alexander. 1999. “Irruptions of Memory: Expressive Politics in Chile's Transition to Democracy.” Journal of Latin American Studies 31: 473500.Google Scholar
Yerushalmi, Yosef H. 1982. Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe. 2010. “Ontological (In)security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan.” International Relations 24 (3): 323.Google Scholar
Zürcher, Eric Jan. 2004. Turkey: a Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar