Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:33:13.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Housing Property as a Major Dispute over Power and Allocation of Rights in Post-War Kosovo: A Legal Plurality Case?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Georgia Kretsi
Georgia Kretsi*
Affiliation:
Osteuropa-Institute, Freie Univ. Berlin, Garystr. 50, 14195. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While a large number of Kosovo Albanians before the war longed for international intervention in their province, after the “national victory” social and economic grievances put an end to the illusion of a “great” future in a “free” Kosovo. High unemployment rates as well as property and housing became the most vital issues for a majority of the Kosovar population. For minorities such as the Roma, Ashkali, Egyptians, and Serbs, issues of security and future integration in an eventually independent, Albanian-dominated country were added to the general economic crisis and to the difficulties of repossessing properties lost as a result of the war.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , September 2007 , pp. 663 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkan, E. “Restitution and Amending Historical Injustices.” In Politics and the Past: On Repairing Historical Injustices, edited by Torpey, John. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003: 91–102.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, F. v., and Benda-Beckmann, K. “A Functional Analysis of Property Rights, with Special Reference to Indonesia.” In Property Rights and Economic Development: Land and Natural Resources in Southeast Asia and Oceania, edited by van Meijl, T. and Benda-Beckman, F. v. London and New York: Kegan Paul International, 1999: 15–56.Google Scholar
Blitz, B. “Refugee Returns, Civic Differentiation, and Minority Rights in Croatia 1991-2004.” Journal of Refugee Studies 18, no. 3 (2005): 362–36.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. “Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital.” In Zur Theorie sozialer Ungleichheiten, edited by Kreckel, R. Göttingen: Schwartz, 1983: 183–198.Google Scholar
Brand, M. “Effective Human Rights Protection when the UN ‘Becomes the State': Lessons from UNMIK.” In The UN, Human Rights and Post-Conflict Situations, edited by White, N. and Klaasen, D. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005: 347–34.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. Der neue militärische Humanismus. Lektionen aus dem Kosovo. Zurich: edition 8, 2001 (1999).Google Scholar
Coordinators of the Minority Working Group. On the Implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities in Kosovo. Shadow Report. Kosovo, Priština, November 2004-August 2005.Google Scholar
Duijzings, G. Religion and the Politics of Identity in Kosovo. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Eidenstedt, L. “Legal Aspects on the Creation of a Modern Cadastre in Kosovo.” Paper presented at the FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, DC, USA, 19–26 April 2002.Google Scholar
Elwert, G. “Anthropologische Perspektiven auf Konflikt.” In Anthropologie der Konflikte. Georg Elwerts konflikttheoretische Thesen in der Diskussion, edited by Eckert, J. M. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2004: 26–38.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
European Stability Initiative (ESI). The Lausanne Principle: Multiethnicity, Territory and the Future of Kosovo's Serbs. Berlin, Brussels and Sarajevo: ESI, 2004.Google Scholar
Eyre, D., and Wittkowsky, A. The Political Economy of Consolidating Kosovo: Property Rights, Political Conflict and Stability. Electronic ed. Bonn: FES Library, 2002, <http://library.fes.de/fulltext/id/01351.htm#E9E2>..>Google Scholar
Eyre, D. “Privatisation in Kosovo: The Political Economy of Property Rights and Stability in a Peace-Building Mission.” Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 42, no. 4 (2002): 16–35.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. “What is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism, no. 24 (1986): 1–5.Google Scholar
Hann, Ch.M. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Property.” In Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, edited by Hann, Ch. M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998: 1–47.Google Scholar
HPD. Annual Report 2004–2005—with a Statistical Update to June 2005, Housing and Property Directorate. Pristina: UNMIK, 2005.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG). Return to Uncertainty: Kosovo's Internally Displaced and Return Process. Europe Report no. 139, 13 December 2002. Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG). Bridging Kosovo's Mitrovica Divide. European Report no 165, 13 September 2005. Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
Leckie, Scott. “Resolving Kosovo's Housing Crisis: Challenges for the UN Housing and Property Directorate.” FMR, no. 7 (April 2000), <http://www.fmreview.org/text/FMR/07/04.htm>..>Google Scholar
Lessons Learned and Analysis Unit of the EU Pillar of UNMIK in Kosovo. The Ottoman Dilemma: Power and Property Relations under the United Nations Mission in Kosovo. Berlin, Brussels and Istanbul: ESI, 2002.Google Scholar
Leutloff-Grandits, C. “Claiming Ownership in Post-War Croatia: The Dynamics of Property Relations and Ethnic Conflict in the Knin Region.” Doctoral diss., Faculty of Philosophy, Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg, 2005.Google Scholar
Meijl, T. van, and Benda-Beckman, F. v. Property Rights and Economic Development: Land and Natural Resources in Southeast Asia and Oceania. London and New York: Kegan Paul International, 1999.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. “Human Rights and Global Legal Pluralism: Reciprocity and Disjuncture.” In Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Pluralism in a Contracting World, edited by Benda-Beckman, F. v., Benda-Beckman, K. and Griffiths, A. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2005: 215–21.Google Scholar
Muharremi, R. “Social, State and Private Ownership on Immovable Objects in Kosovo.” In Papers from the Department of Public Services. Pristina: UNMIK, 22 August 2001: 9–10.Google Scholar
Pupavac, V. “Multiculturalism and its Discontents in SFR Yugoslavia and Bosnia: A Critique of the Multi-Culturalist Rights Model.” In The UN, Human Rights and Post-Conflict Situations, edited by White, N. and Klaasen, D. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005: 213–21.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Niels Aadal. Kosovo Independence—De Jure versus De Facto. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), October 2005.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sampson, S. “From kanun to Capacity-Building: The ‘Internationals', Civil Society Development and Security in the Balkans.” In International Intervention in the Balkans since 1995, edited by P. Siani-Davies. London and New York: Routledge, 2003: 136–13.Google Scholar
Schäfers, B. “Eigentum.” In Grundbegriffe der Soziologie, edited by Schäfers, B. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1986: 58–59.Google Scholar
Trubeta, S. “Balkan Egyptians and Gypsy/Roma Discourse.” Nationalities Papers 33, no. 1 (2005): 71–95.Google Scholar
USAID. An Assessment of Property Rights in Kosovo. Final Report. Washington, DC: USAID, March 2004, <http://www.usaid.gov/missions/kosovo/pdf/kosovo_property_rights.pdf>..>Google Scholar
World Bank. Kosovo Economic Memorandum. Report no. 28023-KOS. Washington, DC: World Bank, 18 May 2004.Google Scholar
World Bank. Kosovo Poverty Assessment: Promoting Opportunity, Security and Participation for All. Report no. 32378-XK. Washington, DC: World Bank, 16 June 2005.Google Scholar
Zitelmann, T. “Wege zur Konfliktethnologie. Eine subjektive Erinnerung.” In Anthropologie der Konflikte. Georg Elwerts konflikttheoretische Thesen in der Diskussion, edited by Eckert, J. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2004: 39–57.Google Scholar