Article contents
History, Memory and Nation Building in the Post-Soviet Colonial Space
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
The disintegration of the Soviet Union in December 1991 led to the de-colonization of the world's last remaining empire. Taking this into account, this article seeks to argue two points. Firstly, many of the imperial policies imposed by the imperial core in the Soviet empire were similar in nature to those imposed by imperial powers in Ireland, Africa, and Asia. Secondly, the nation and state building policies of the post-Soviet colonial states are therefore similar to those adopted in many other post-colonial states because they also seek to remove some—or all—of the inherited colonial legacies. A central aspect of overcoming this legacy is re-claiming the past from the framework imposed by the former imperial core and thereby creating, or reviving, a national historiography that helps to consolidate the new national state. All states, including those traditionally defined as lying in the “civic West,” have in the past—and continue to—use national historiography, myths, and legends as a component of their national identities.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2002 Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Notes
1. Motyl, Alexander J., “Why Empires Reemerge: Imperial Collapse and Imperial Revival in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1999, pp. 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Doyle, Michael, Empires (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 45.Google Scholar
3. Motyl, Alexander J., Revolutions, Nations, Empires. Conceptual Limits and Theoretical Possibilities (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
4. The Russian SFSR obtained republican institutions only in 1990 with the rise of Russian republican leader and future President Borys Yeltsin.Google Scholar
5. Kuzio, Taras, Ukraine. State and Nation Building (New York: Routledge, 1998), pp. 18–21, 178–179,231,235.Google Scholar
6. Birch, Anthony H., “Minority Nationalist Movements and Theories of Political Integration,” World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1978, pp. 341–344.Google Scholar
7. Hutchinson, John, “Archaeology and the Irish Discovery,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1991, pp. 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. On this question see Brown, Terrence, Ireland. A Social and Cultural History, 1922–1985 (London: Fontana, 1981), pp. 47, 53, 62–63, 79, 84, 92–93, 98, 107; Victor Kiernan, “The British Isles: Celts and Saxons,” in Mikulas Teich and Roy Porter, eds, The National Question in Historical Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 1–34; and F. S. L. Lyons, Culture and Anarchy in Ireland, 1890–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), pp. 8–9, 16, 22, 32, 42, 48, 57–84.Google Scholar
9. See Petheridge-Hernandez, Patricia and Raby, R. Latiner, “Twentieth-Century Transformations in Catalonia and the Ukraine: Ethnic Implications in Education,” Comparative Education Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1993, pp. 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. On this see the comparison between the ethno-cultural Irish and civic Finnish nationalism in Kissane, Bill, “Nineteenth-Century Nationalism in Finland and Ireland: A Comparative Analysis,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2000, pp. 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. See Frayling, Canon Nicholas, “An English Repentance,” The Guardian, 11 March 2000.Google Scholar
12. See Kuzio, Taras, “Identity and Nation Building in Ukraine. Defining the ‘Other',” Ethnicities, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001, pp. 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Said, Edward, Culture and Imperialism (London: Vintage, 1994), p. 266.Google Scholar
14. Paxman, Jeremy, The English. A Portrait (London: Penguin, 1999), p. 45. See also Hickman, Mary J., “Reconstructing, Deconstructing ‘Race': British Political Discourses about the Irish,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 288–307.Google Scholar
15. Velychenko, Stephen, “Empire Loyalism and Minority Nationalism in Great Britain and Russia, 1707–1914: Institutions, Law, and Nationality in Scotland and Ukraine,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1997, pp. 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. See Kuzio, Taras, “Geopolitical Pluralism in the CIS: The Emergence of GUUAM,” European Security, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2000, pp. 81–114; Taras Kuzio, “Promoting Geopolitical Pluralism in the CIS. GUUAM and Western Foreign Policy,” Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2000, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
17. Tillet, L. R., “Soviet Second Thoughts on Tsarist Colonialism,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1964, p. 310. See also Tillet, L. R., “Nationalism and History,” Problems of Communism, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1967, pp. 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Velychenko, Stephen, “The Origins of the Official Soviet Interpretation of Eastern Slavic History. A Case Study of Policy Formulation,” Forschungen Zur Osteuropaischen Geschichte, Vol. 46, 1992, p. 238.Google Scholar
19. Tillet, L. R., The Great Friendship. Soviet Historians on the Non-Russian Nationalities (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969), p. 4. See also Mazour, Anatole G., Modern Russian Historiography (London: Greenwood Press, 1975).Google Scholar
20. Velychenko, Stephen, “The Official Soviet View of Ukrainian History,” Journal of Ukrainian Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1985, p. 84.Google Scholar
21. In a 1993 poll of ethnic Russians in the Russian Federation three quarters believed that Ukrainians were not a separate people and therefore should not have an independent state. See Goble, Paul A., “The Ukrainian Security Trap,” The Ukrainian Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1994, p. 230.Google Scholar
22. Velychenko, Stephen, “National History and the ‘History of the USSR': The Persistence and Impact of Categories,” in Schwartz, Donald V. and Panosian, Razmik, eds, Nationalism and History. The Politics of Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Armenia, Azerbaidzhan and Georgia (Toronto: University of Toronto, Centre for Russian and East European Studies, 1994), p. 28.Google Scholar
23. Friedman, Jonathan, “Myth, History and Political Identity,” Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1992, p. 207.Google Scholar
24. Friedman, Jonathan, “The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity,” American Anthropologist, Vol. 94, No. 4, 1992, p. 837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Miller, David, On Nationality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
26. Armstrong, John A., “Nations Before Nationalism,” in Hutchinson, John and Smith, Anthony D., eds, Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 145.Google Scholar
27. Smith, Anthony D., “Ethnic Myths and Ethnic Revivals,” Journal of European Sociology, Vol. 25, 1984, p. 288. Myths are divided by Smith into six component parts—myths of origin, myths of migration and/or liberation, myths of descent, myths of the heroic age, myths of communal decline and myths of rebirth and reawakening. The entire issue of Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1991 is devoted to “Archaeology and Nationalism.”Google Scholar
28. Friedman, , “The Past in the Future,” p. 801.Google Scholar
29. Kuzio, , “Identity and Nation Building in Ukraine.”Google Scholar
30. Friedman, , “The Past in the Future,” p. 854. See also Parkins, Helen, “Archeology and Nationalism: Excavating the Foundations of Identity,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1997, pp. 451–458; and Kohl, Philip L., “Nationalism and Archeology: On the Reconstruction of the Remote Past,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 27, 1998, pp. 223–246.Google Scholar
31. Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Citizenship (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), p. 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Emerson, Rupert, From Empire to Nation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 381–382.Google Scholar
33. Sandler, Shmuel, “Ethnonationalism and the Foreign Policy of Nation-States,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1995, p. 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Bhabha, Homi K., The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 70.Google Scholar
35. Janmaat, Jan G., Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Ukraine. Educational Policy and the Response of the Russian-Speaking Population (Amsterdam: Netherlands Geographical Studies, 2000); and Kolsto, Pal, Political Construction Sites. Nation-Building and the Post-Soviet States (Boulder: Westview, 2000). See my review article of both books in Journal of Ukrainian Studies, Vol. 25, Nos 1–2, 2000.Google Scholar
36. Chatterjee, Partha, Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World (Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1986), p. 37.Google Scholar
37. Fanon, Franz, The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Press, 1963), pp. 210–211.Google Scholar
38. Juska, Arunas, “Ethno-political Transformation in the States of the Former USSR,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1999, pp. 524–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Kolsto, Pal, “Nation-Building in the Former Soviet Union,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1996, pp. 118–132.Google Scholar
40. Crawford, Beverley and Liphart, Arend, “Enduring Political and Economic Change in Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Old Legacies, New Institutions, Hegemons, Norms and International Pressures,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1995, p. 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Rubin, Barnett, “Conclusion: Managing Normal Instability,” in Rubin, Barnett and Snyder, Jack, eds, Post-Soviet Political Order. Conflict and State Building (London: Routledge, 1998), p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Snyder, Jack, “Introduction: Reconstructing Politics Amidst the Wreckage of Empire,” in Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
43. Beissinger, Mark, “Demise of an Empire-State: Identity, Legitimacy, and the Deconstruction of Soviet Politics,” in Young, Crawford, ed., The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism. The Nation-State at Bay? (Madison: The University of Wisconsin, 1993), p. 110.Google Scholar
44. Beissinger, Mark, “The Persisting Ambiguity of Empire,” Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1995, p. 157.Google Scholar
45. Ibid, p. 173.Google Scholar
46. Ibid. Google Scholar
47. See Schopflin, George, “National Identity in the Soviet Union and East Central Europe,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1991, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Shils, Edward, “Nation, Nationality, Nationalism and Civil Society,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1995, p. 100; and Eriksen, Thomas H., Ethnicity and Nationalism. Anthropological Perspectives (London: Pluto Press, 1993), p. 69.Google Scholar
49. Connor, Walker, “Beyond Reason: The Nature of the Ethnonational Bond,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1993, pp. 376–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Calhoun, Craig, “Nationalism and Ethnicity,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 19, 1993, pp. 225–226. See also Alonso, Ana M., “The Politics of Space, Time and Substance: State Formation, Nationalism and Ethnicity,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 23, 1994, p. 387.Google Scholar
51. Emerson, , From Empire to Nation, p. 150.Google Scholar
52. Skak, Mette, From Empire to Anarchy. Postcommunist Foreign Policy and International Relations (London: Hurst, 1996), pp. 18, 21. See also Weiner, Myron, “Political Integration and Political Development,” Annals of the American Academy of Politics and Social Science, Vol. 358, 1965, pp. 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Emerson, , From Empire to Nation, p. 380.Google Scholar
54. Smolicz, Jerzy J., “Tradition, Core Values and Intercultural Development in Plural Societies,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1988, p. 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. See Eke, Stephen and Kuzio, Taras, “The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2000, pp. 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Ibid. Google Scholar
57. Carr, E. H., What is History? (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973), p. 90.Google Scholar
58. Literaturna Ukraiina, 6 October 1988.Google Scholar
59. Kul'tura i Zhyttia, 7 February and 13 March 1988.Google Scholar
60. Pravda Ukrainy, 9 June and 31 July 1987.Google Scholar
61. Radianska Ukraiina, 3 March; and Kul'tura i Zhyttia, 13 March 1988.Google Scholar
62. See Kuzio, Taras, Ukraine. Perestroika to Independence (London: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 94–95 and 101–104.Google Scholar
63. Kolsto, , Political Construction Sites, p. 35. See also Kuzio, Taras, “Historiography and National Identity Among the Eastern Slavs: Towards a New Framework,” National Identities, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2001, pp. 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64. Extracted from Kuchma's speech in the west Ukrainian city of L'viv on the eightieth anniversary of the Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR) of 1918 (Uriadovyi Kurier, 3 November 1998).Google Scholar
65. Wanner, Catherine, Burden of Dreams: History and Identity in Post-Soviet Ukraine. Post-Communist Cultural Studies (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998), p. xxiv.Google Scholar
66. Ibid, p. 103.Google Scholar
67. Kuzio, Taras, “Ukrainians in Search of Their Identity,” RFE/RL Newsline, Vol. 4, No. 193, 5 October 2000.Google Scholar
68. See Kuzio, Taras, “Borders, Symbolism and Nation-State Building: Ukraine and Russia,” Geopolitics and International Boundaries, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1997, pp. 36–56; and Kuzio, Taras, “Russia Continues to Hold Up Border Demarcation with Ukraine,” RFE/RL Newsline, 30 October 2001.Google Scholar
69. See chapter 9, “History, Myths and Symbols” in Kuzio, , Ukraine. State and Nation Building, pp. 198–229.Google Scholar
70. Quoted from L. Kuchma's Preface to Mykhailo Hrushevs'kyi (Kyiv: Ukraiina, 1996).Google Scholar
71. Popson, Nancy, “History Textbooks in Ukraine: Introducing Children to the ‘Ukrainian Nation',” paper prepared for the annual convention of the Association for the Study of Nationalities, New York, 13–15 April 2000, p. 8. Published as “The Ukrainian History Textbook: Introducing Children to the ‘Ukrainian Nation',” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2001, pp. 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. See Stepanenko, Victor, The Construction of Identity and School Policy in Ukraine (Nova Science, 1999); and Janmaat, Jan G., “Identity Construction and Education: The History of Ukraine in Soviet and Post-Soviet Schoolbooks,” in Taras Kuzio and Paul D'Anieri, eds, Nation Building and National Security in Ukraine (Westport: Praeger, 2002).Google Scholar
73. Jilge, Wilfried, “Staatssymbolik und Nationale Identitat in der Postkommunistischen Ukraine,” Ethnos-Nation, Vol. 6, Nos 1–2, 1998, pp. 85–113.Google Scholar
74. For example, see Bich, Pavel, “Ruskaia kul'tura, belaruski kharakhtar i ekanomika,” Litaratura i mastatsva, 19 February 1993.Google Scholar
75. Sanford, George, “Nation, State and Independence in Belarus,” Contemporary Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1997, p. 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76. Lindner, Rainer, “Besieged Past: National and Court Historians in Lukashenka's Belarus,” paper delivered to the Annual Convention of the Association for the Study of Nationalities, Columbia University, 16 April 1999.Google Scholar
77. Bic, Michas, “On the National Conception of History and Historical Education in the Republic of Belarus,” Belarusian Historical Journal, March 1993, p. 23.Google Scholar
78. Mihalisko, Kathleen J., “Belarus: Retreat to Authoritarianism,” in Dawisha, Karen and Parrott, Bruce, eds, Democratic Change and Authoritarian Reaction in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 246.Google Scholar
79. Zvyazda, 18 August 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80. See Kuzio, Taras and Nordberg, Marc, “Nation and State Building, Historical Legacies and National Identities in Belarus and Ukraine: A Comparative Analysis,” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, Vol. 26, Nos 1–2, 1999, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
81. IFEX Action Alert, 15 July 1999.Google Scholar
82. Zvyazda, 18 August 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. RFE/RL Newsline, 25 February 1999.Google Scholar
84. Burant, Stephen R., “Belarus and the ‘Belarusian Irrendenta’ in Lithuania,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1997, p. 654.Google Scholar
85. As Marples, David writes, “Contemporary Belarusians tend to look to the Soviet past with nostalgia.” See his Belarus. A Denationalised Nation (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999), p. 23.Google Scholar
86. Batt, Judy, “Federalism Versus Nationalism in Post-Communist State Building: The Case of Moldova,” Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1997, p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87. Ibid., p. 29.Google Scholar
88. Infotag, 11 February 1998.Google Scholar
89. King, Charles, “Moldovan Identity and the Politics of Pan-Romanianism,” Slavic Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1994, p. 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90. Ibid., p. 357.Google Scholar
91. Moskovskiy Komsomolets, 29 January 1998.Google Scholar
92. King, , “Moldovan Identity and the Politics of Pan-Romanianism,” p. 368.Google Scholar
93. See “The Central Asian States as Nationalizing States,” in Smith, Graham, Law, Vivien, Wilson, A., Bohr, Annette and Allworth, Edward, Nation-building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands. The Politics of National Identities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 139–166.Google Scholar
94. See Akiner, Shirin, “Melting Pot, Salad-Bowl or Cauldron? Manipulation and Mobilization of Ethnic, and Religious Identities in Central Asia,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1997, pp. 362–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95. See Boudreaux, Richard, “5 Nations in Search of Identity,” Los Angeles Times, 25 December 1996.Google Scholar
96. Delovaya nedelya, 11 June 1998.Google Scholar
97. See Kolsto, Pal, “Anticipating Demographic Superiority: Kazakh Thinking on Integration and Nation Building,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1998, pp. 51–69; Bremmer, Ian, “Nazarbaev and the North: State Building and Ethnic Relations in Kazakhstan,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, pp. 619–635; and Bhavina Dave, “National Revival in Kazakhstan: Language Shift and Identity Change,” Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1996, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
98. See Kuzio, Taras, “Nationalist Riots in Kazakhstan,” Central Asian Survey, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1988, pp. 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99. Michnik, Adam, “Speaking with the Kazakh President,” Transitions, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1997, p. 29.Google Scholar
100. See Kuzio, Taras, “Nationalising States or Nation Building: A Review of the Theoretical Literature and Empirical Evidence,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2001, pp. 135–154; and Kuzio, Taras, “The Myth of the Civic State: A Critical Survey of Hans Kohn's Framework for Understanding Nationalism,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1,2002, pp. 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76
- Cited by