Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T03:23:12.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finno-Ugrians of Russia: Vanishing Cultural Communities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Seppo Lallukka
Seppo Lallukka*
Affiliation:
Academy of Finland and the Institute for Russian and East European Studies, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1990 a Mordvin scholar released an alarming forecast about the fate awaiting his people: provided that those adverse demographic trends that had established themselves over the course of the twentieth century continued, the last member of his million-strong nation would disappear by the year 2135. This statement was not the only one of its kind. During the final years of Soviet rule, the recently realized opportunity to speak out about the concerns of the non-Russian groups was being utilized speedily. Journalistic and scholarly reports on the various problems of Russia's minority groups, often painted in highly dramatic language, became common in both regional and central publications.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 9 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. “Trevozhnyi prognoz professora Setina: v 2097 godu v nashei respublike ischeznet poslednii mordvin,” Mokshen' pravda (Saransk), 25 December 1990.Google Scholar

2. See, for example, V. I. Kozlov, “K voprosu ob izuchenii etnicheskikh protsessov u narodov SSSR,” Sovetskaia etnografiia, No. 4, 1961, pp. 58–73; Itogi Vsesoiuznoi perepisi naseleniia 1970 g., Vol. 4 (Moscow: Statistika, 1973), pp. 4–5. A comparative Western analysis also shows that assimilation rates of the Finno-Ugrian groups of Russia ranked highest among the nationalities of the former Soviet Union (Barbara A. Anderson and Brian D. Silver, “Estimating Russification of Ethnic Identity among Non-Russians in the USSR,” Demography, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1983, pp. 461–488). See also Seppo Lallukka, The East Finnic Minorities in the Soviet Union. An Appraisal of the Erosive Trends. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Ser. B, Vol. 252 (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1990), pp. 247–252.Google Scholar

3. See, for example, I. N. Smirnov, “Obrusenie inorodtsev i zadachi obrusitel'noi politiki,” Istoricheskii vestnik, Vol. 47, 1892, pp. 752–765; N. Kharuzin, “K voprosu ob assimilatsionnoi sposobnosti russkago naroda,” Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1894, pp. 43–78.Google Scholar

4. Wixman, Ron, “The Middle Volga: Ethnic Archipelago in a Russian Sea,” in ed. Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras, Nation and Politics in the Soviet Successor States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 423.Google Scholar

5. Raeff, Marc, “Patterns of Russian Imperial Policy toward the Nationalities,” in Edward Allworth, ed., Soviet Nationality Problems (New York: Columbia University Press, 1971), pp. 38–40; Rein Taagepera, The Finno-Ugric Republics and the Russian State (London: Hurst, 1999), pp. 135–136, 395-396.Google Scholar

6. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Endangered Uralic Minority Cultures (Doc. 8126, 2 June 1998, http://stars.coe.fr/doc/doc98/EDOC8126.htm). In the document, the “potentially endangered” category includes the Komi, Mari, Mordvin, and Udmurt languages. In fact the categorization applied in the document follows the one presented by Mikko Korhonen, “Uralin tällä ja tuolla puolen,” in Johanna Laakso, ed., Uralilaiset kansat. Tietoa suomen sukukielistä ja niiden puhujista (Helsinki: WSOY, 1991), pp. 39–48.Google Scholar

7. If the Baltic-Finnic groups are excluded, the list of such English-language studies would not include much else besides the following: Isabelle Kreindler, “The Mordvinian Languages: A Survival Saga,” in Isabelle Kreindler, ed., Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Soviet National Languages (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1985), pp. 237–264; Lallukka (1990), op. cit.; Jeffrey Harling, “The Mordvin Mastorava (‘Motherland‘) Movement in Sociocultural Perspective,” in Howard Aronson, ed., NSL.7. Linguistic Studies in the Non-Slavic Languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic Republics (Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1994), pp. 95–111; Paul J. W. Fryer, Elites, Language and Education in the Komi Ethnic Revival (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1998); Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer, The Tenacity of Ethnicity. A Siberian Saga in Global Perspective (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999); Taagepera, op. cit. Admittedly, a number of studies exist in which the Finno-Ugrians are treated along with other groups. See, for example, E. Glyn Lewis, Multilingualism in the Soviet Union (The Hague: Mouton, 1972); Wixman, op. cit.; Robert J. Kaiser, The Geography of Nationalism in Russia and the USSR (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994); and the last sections in Yuri Slezkine, Arctic Mirrors (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

8. See, for example, Peter Hajdu, Finno-Ugrian Languages and Peoples (London: Andre Deutsch, 1975), p. 32.Google Scholar

9. For an illuminating survey of the evolution and relations in the Uralic linguistic family, see Michael Branch, “Finno-Ugrian Peoples,” in The Great Bear. A Thematic Anthology of Oral Poetry in the Finno-Ugrian Languages. Finnish Literature Society Editions, Vol. 533 (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 1993), pp. 25–41.Google Scholar

10. Ibid., p. 36.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., pp. 36–37.Google Scholar

12. Raeff, “Patterns of Russian Imperial Policy,” pp. 39–40; Andreas Kappeler, Russlands erste Nationalitäten. Das Zarenreich und die Völker der Mittleren Wolga vom 16. bis 19. Jahrhundert (Cologne: Böhlau, 1982), pp. 193–198, 270-292; R. G. Kuzeev, Narody Srednego Povolzh'ia i Iuzhnogo Urala (Moscow: Nauka, 1992), pp. 116–118.Google Scholar

13. Kappeler, op. cit., p. 505.Google Scholar

14. Raeff, “Patterns of Russian Imperial Policy,” p. 38.Google Scholar

15. Kreindler, Isabelle, Educational Policies towards the Eastern Nationalities in Tsarist Russia. A Study of Il'minskii's system (Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1969), pp. 30–31, 38,73-74.Google Scholar

16. While most Mari and Udmurt residents of Ufa and Perm' provinces were animists, their coethnics in Kazan' and Viatka provinces were for the larger part Christianized. See Pervaia vseobshchaia perepis' naseleniia Rossiiskoi imperii, 1897 g., Vols 14, 31, 45 (St Petersburg: Izdanie Tsentral'nogo statisticheskogo komiteta ministerstva vnutrennykh del, 1904), table 15. About proselytizing efforts among the Mari of Birsk district in the 1840s, see Paul W. Werth, “Baptism, Authority and the Problem of Zakonnost' in Orenburg Diocese: The Introduction of over 800 ‘Pagans‘ into the Christian Faith,” Slavic Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1997, pp. 454–480.Google Scholar

17. G. I. Ibulaev, “Mariitsy Ufimskoi gubernii i natsional'noe dvizhenie,” in Etnicheskaia mobilizatsiia vo vnutrennei periferii. Volgo-Kamskii region nachala XX v. (Izhevsk: Finliandskii institut Rossii i Vostochnoi Evropy & Udmurtskii institut istorii, iazyka i literatury, 2000), pp. 83–84.Google Scholar

18. Anatoly M. Khazanov, After the USSR. Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Politics in the Commonwealth of Independent States (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

19. Kappeler, op. cit., pp. 161–162.Google Scholar

20. Rokkan, Stein and Derek W. Urwin, Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries (London: Sage, 1983), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

21. For more about the demographic trends of the Finno-Ugrian peoples see Lallukka (1990), op. cit., pp. 85–86, 150-154.Google Scholar

22. Benjamin B. Ringer and Elinor R. Lawless, Race-Ethnicity and Society (New York: Routledge, 1989), pp. 136–137.Google Scholar

23. Kappeler, op. cit., pp. 87–94, 137-148; A. G. Bakhtin, XV-XVI veka v istorii Mariiskogo kraia (Ioshkar-Ola: Mariiskii poligrafichesko-izdatel'skii kombinat, 1998), pp. 139–175. In the Cheremis Wars, the Mari (formerly known as Cheremis) formed the backbone of the anti-Muscovite fighters. However, the resistance movement also included representatives of other non-Russian groups of the Volga-Kama region.Google Scholar

24. Ringer and Lawless, op. cit., pp. 137–138.Google Scholar

25. See Seppo Lallukka, “The Breakdown of Tver' Karelian Demographic Continuity,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1996, pp. 316–338, in particular p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. See, for example, Mezhnatsional'nye otnosheniia v Respublike Marii El (Ioshkar-Ola: Nauchnyi tsentr finno-ugrovedeniia, 1995), p. 29; O. V. Kotov, M. B. Rogachev and Iu. P. Shabaev, Sovremennye komi (Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 1996), p. 102.Google Scholar

27. Lallukka (1990), op. cit., p. 275; Council of Europe, op. cit., p. 17.Google Scholar

28. See, for example, Paul M. Austin, “Soviet Karelian: The Language that Failed,” Slavic Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 1992, pp. 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. Brian D. Silver, “The Ethnic and Language Dimensions in Russian and Soviet Censuses,” in Ralph S. Clem, ed., Research Guide to the Russian and Soviet Censuses (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 94.Google Scholar

30. For summaries of survey results on proficiency in a Finno-Ugrian language and Russian, see Lallukka (1990), op. cit., pp. 213–215; Seppo Lallukka, “Komi-Permiak and Russian: Changing Patterns in Linguistic Attachment of a Small Finno-Ugric Group,” Eurasian Studies Yearbook, Vol. 68, 1996, pp. 156–157.Google Scholar

31. Igor' Levshin, “Aktivnost'—zalog uspekha,” Literaturnaia gazeta, 16 December 1988; E. Popov, “VIII s”ezd pisatelei Komi ASSR,“ Literaturnaia gazeta, 21 December 1988.Google Scholar

32. Cited in V. Lysenko, “Mordoviia: upovaniia i trevogi,” Literaturnaia Rossiia, 23 December 1988.Google Scholar

33. V. I. Kozlov, “Rasselenie mordvy,” Trudy Instituta etnografii AN SSSR, new series, Vol. 63, 1960, pp. 6, 21-23, 60; Kappeler, op. cit., pp. 228–233, 328-331.Google Scholar

34. Lallukka (1990), op. cit., pp. 127–128; Seppo Lallukka, “Assimilation of the Karelians in the Soviet Union: A Demographic Appraisal,” in Zvi Gitelman, ed., The Politics of Nationality and the Erosion of the USSR (New York: St Martin's Press, 1992), p. 112.Google Scholar

35. Lallukka (1990), op. cit., pp. 267–268.Google Scholar

36. Raspredelenie naseleniia Rossii po vladeniiu iazykami (po dannym mikroperepisi naseleniia 1994 g.) (Moscow: Goskomstat Rossii, 1995), pp. 28–52. The microcensus is based on a 5% sample.Google Scholar

37. Chashkin, Evgenii, “U okrug. Mogai tudo?” Kugarnia (Ioshkar-Ola), 9 June 2000.Google Scholar

38. Lallukka, Seppo, “Assimilation and Its Measurement: Finno-Ugrian Peoples of Russia,” in Congressus Octavus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum Jyväskylä 10.-15.8.1995. Pars I. Orationes plenariae et conspectus quinquennales (Jyväskylä, 1995), pp. 89–94.Google Scholar

39. Itogi Vsesoiuznoi perepisi naseleiia 1989 g., Vol. 7, Part 1 (Minneapolis: East View Publications, 1993), table 4.Google Scholar

40. Data for the Komi-Permiak Okrug are not available, but it is certainly among the poorest regions of Russia.Google Scholar

41. V. Kashin and G. Bylov, “Karman napolovinu pust ili napolovinu polon? O dokhodakh naseleiia v regionakh,” Ekonomika i zhizn', January 1997.Google Scholar

42. President Yeltsin used this metaphor (pruzheinaia kuznitsa Otechestva) when he congratulated the inhabitants of Udmurtia in connection with the anniversary of the republic (Nezavisimaia gazeta, 3 November 1995).Google Scholar

43. Lavrov, Aleksei, “Rossiiskii biudzhetnyi federalizm: pervye shagi, pervye itogi,” Segodnia, 7 June 1995; Daniel Treisman, “Moscow's Struggle to Control Regions through Taxation,” Transition, Vol. 2, No. 19, 1996, pp. 46–47.Google Scholar

44. Arifdzhanov, Rustam and Chugaev, Sergei, “Tiumenskii peredel,” Izvestiia, 8 October 1996.Google Scholar

45. For classifications of parties see Darrel Slider, Vladimir Gimpel'son, and Sergei Chugrov, “Political Tendencies in Russia's Regions: Evidence from the 1993 Parliamentary Elections,” Slavic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1994, pp. 711–732; V. A. Kolosov, “Politicheskie orientatsii rossiiskikh regionov: proizoshel li v dekabre 1995 ‘obval‘? (Analiz golosovaniia po partiinym spiskam),” Polis, No. 1, 1996, pp. 91–92; Nikolai Petrov, “Analiz rezul'tatov vyborov 1995 g. v Gosudarstvennuiu dumu po okrugam i regionam,” in Moskovskii Tsentr Karnegi, Nauchnye doklady, Vol. 9 (Parlamentskie vybory 1995 g. v Rossii) (Moscow, 1996, mimeo), pp. 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46. For more details about the applied classification of the parties, see Petrov, op. cit., pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

47. V. A. Kolosov and R. F. Turovskii, “Elektoral'naia karta sovremennoi Rossii: genezis, struktura i evoliutsiia,” Polis, No. 4, 1996, p. 35.Google Scholar

48. Biulleten' Tsentral'noi izbiratel'noi komissii Rossiiskoi Federatsii, No. 1, 1994, pp. 53–54, 65-67.Google Scholar

49. Vybory deputatov Gosudarstvennoi Dumy. 1995. Elektoral'naia statistika (Moscow: Ves' Mir, 1996), pp. 106–08, 142.Google Scholar

50. See, for example, Kolosov and Turnovskii, “Elektoral'naia karta sovremennoi Rossii,” pp. 37, 40; Robert W. Orttung and Anna Paretskaya, “Presidential Election Demonstrates Rural-Urban Divide,” Transition, Vol. 2, No. 19, 1996, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar

51. Ortung and Paretskaya, “Presidential Election,” p. 33.Google Scholar

52. “Mordovskii obkom deistvuet,” Sovetskaia Mordoviia, 14 December 1993; A. A. Zubkov and V. V. Mares'ev, “Demograficheskie protsessy, etnicheskaia i sotsial'no-politicheskaia struktura Mordovii k momentu dekabr'skikh vyborov 1993 goda,” Razvivaiushchiisia elektorat Rossii. Etnopoliticheskii rakurs. Vol. 2. Vybory—93 (Moscow: TsIMO In-ta etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1995), pp. 61–62.Google Scholar

53. Kolosov and Turnovskii, “Elektoral'naia karta sovremennoi Rossii,” p. 42.Google Scholar

54. V. D. Sharov, “Etnopoliticheskaia situatsiia v Respublike Marii El,” Razvivaiushchiisia elektorat Rossii. Etnopoliticheskii rakurs. Vol. 2. Vybory-93 (Moscow: TsIMO In-ta etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1995) p. 50; K. I. Kulikov and L. S. Khristoliubova, “Etnopoliticheskaia situatsiia v Udmurtskoi Respublike v 1993 g.,” Razvivaiushchiisia elektorat Rossii. Etnopoliticheskii rakurs. Vol. 2. Vybory-93 (Moscow: TsIMO In-ta etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1995) p. 176.Google Scholar

55. In the early twentieth century, one influential advocate of views of this kind was prince Nikolai Trubetskoi. In connection with his vision of the historical trajectory of Slavonic-Uralo-Altaic interaction, he argued that in terms of psychological and cultural activity, the Finno-Ugrians lag behind their main neighbours. See N. S. Trubetskoi, Istoriia. Kul'tura. Iazyk. (Moscow: Progress, 1995), pp. 152–54.Google Scholar

56. Vestnik Tsentral'noi izbiratel'noi komissii Rossiiskoi Federatsii, No. 7, 2000, pp. 32–56, No. 13, 2000, pp. 68–69.Google Scholar

57. See, Lallukka (1990), op. cit., pp. 58, 61.Google Scholar

58. Iu. P. Shabaev, “K izucheniiu i ideologii komi natsional'nogo dvizheniia,” Shtrikhi etnopoliticheskogo razvitiia Respubliki Komi. Ocherki. Dokumenty. Materialy. Vol. 1 (Moscow: TsIMO In-ta etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1994), p. 23; Probuzhdenie finno-ugorskogo Severa. Opyt Marii El. Vol. 1 (Moscow: TsIMO In-ta etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1996), pp. 20–22; K. I. Kulikov, Komu vygodna ksenofobiia (Izhevsk: Udmurtskii institut istorii, iazyka i literatury UrO RAN, 1996), p. 8.Google Scholar

59. Harling, “The Mordvin Mastorava (‘Motherland‘) Movement,” pp. 101–03; Ksenofont Sanukov, “Natsional'nye dvizheniia i ethnicheskoe samosoznanie finno-ugorskikh narodov Rossii,” Finno-ugrovedenie, No. 1, 1996, pp. 45–47.Google Scholar

60. Information about international cooperation is available at the website of the Information Centre of Finno-Ugrian Peoples (http://www.suri.ee).Google Scholar

61. Shabaev, “K izucheniiu i ideologii,” pp. 24–26; Iu. P. Shabaev, M. B. Rogachev and O. V. Kotov, “Etnopoliticheskaia situatsiia na territorii prozhivaniia narodov komi,” Razvivaiuschchiisia elektorat Rossii. Etnopoliticheskii rakurs. Vol. 2. Vybory-93 (Moscow: TsIMO In-ta etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1995), p. 29; Probuzhdenie finno-ugorskogo Severa, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar

62. Fryer, op. cit., pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

63. Sanukov, “Natsional'nye dvizheniia,” pp. 47–50; Probuzhdenie finno-ugorskogo Severa, p. 17. The executive board of the Association of Russia's Finno-Ugrian Peoples, elected in 1992, provides an example of the presence of the former Soviet establishment. Its members' professional experiences included holding such posts as a Communist Party obkom secretary, KGB officer, political instructor of a penal institution, and party historian.Google Scholar

64. Zubkov and Mares'ev, “Demograficheskie protsessy,” pp. 70–71; Kulikov, op. cit., p. 4.Google Scholar

65. Asmaev, Aleksandr, “V-she Marii pogynyn delegatshe-vlak oilat,” Cholman (Neftekamsk), 19 July 2000.Google Scholar

66. Lallukka, Seppo, Komipermjakit—perämaan kansa (Helsinki: Venäjän ja Itä-Euroopan instituutti, 1996), p. 144; Mezhetnicheskie otnosheniia i konflikty v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh. Ezhegodnyi doklad, 1999 (Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 2000), p. 103; E. Makarov, “Za kern poidet ‘Marii ushem‘?” Mariiskaia Pravda, 1 September 2000.Google Scholar

67. He is Nikolai Merkushkin (Mordovia).Google Scholar

68. Marii El (Ioshkar-Ola), 26 December 1996.Google Scholar

69. Shabaev, Rogachev, and Kotov, “Etnopoliticheskaia situatsiia,” p. 29; Kulikov, op. cit., pp. 10, 22–24.Google Scholar

70. See, for example, Tret'ia vneocherednaia sessiia Verkhovnogo Soveta Mariiskoi SSR (dvenatsatyi sozyv) (Ioshkar-Ola: Mariiskoe kn. izd-vo, 1991), p. 103; “Konstitutsiia Respubliki Komi,” Krasnoe znamia, 10 March 1994; “Natsional'noe vozrozhdenie i mezhnatsional'noe sotrudnichestvo—garant stabil'nosti etnopoliticheskoi situatsii v Komi Respublike,” Strikhi etnopoliticheskogo razvitiia Respubliki Komi, p. 14.Google Scholar

71. Parma (Moscow), No. 3-4, 1992, p. 64. About the rise and fall of the idea of a two-chamber parliament in the Komi Republic, see Fryer, op. cit., pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

72. Cf. Khazanov, op. cit., p. 240.Google Scholar

73. E. Chashkin, “Ynde mogai kalykysh savyrnena?” Kugarnia (Ioshkar-Ola) 7 November 1997; “Natsional'nyi pasport ili natsional'nost' v pasporte?” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 16 December 1997; Sergei Kulikov, “Mordva khochet sokhranit' v zakone natsional'nost',” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 13 October 1999.Google Scholar

74. “Obrashchenie k Predsedateliu Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii Primakovu, E. M.” Finno-ugorskii vestnik (Ioshkar-Ola), No. 1, 1999, p. 4.Google Scholar

75. For analyses of Russia's changing approaches to the problems of ethnic minorities see, for example, Graham Smith, “Russia, Ethnoregionalism and the Politics of Federation,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1996, pp. 391–410; Tamara J. Resler, “Dilemmas of Democratisation: Safeguarding Minorities in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1997, pp. 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76. Rossiiskaia gazeta, 16 May 2000 and 25 July 2000.Google Scholar

77. Igor' Bobrakov, “Vchera respublika poteriala ‘suverenitet’,” Respublika (Syktyvkar), 28 September 2000.Google Scholar

78. Rossiiskaia gazeta, 25 June 1996.Google Scholar

79. Iskhakov, Damir, “Tatarskaia diaspora v Rossii,” Zvezda Povolzh'ia (Kazan'), 18 May 2000.Google Scholar

80. Mariiskii mir (Ioshkar-Ola: Pravitel'stvo Respubliki Marii El, 2000), pp. 121–23.Google Scholar