Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:37:15.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ending the impasse in Kosovo: partition, decentralization, or consociationalism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Michael Rossi
Michael Rossi*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that current Western-backed approaches to conflict resolution in Kosovo have failed to alter Serbia's policy toward the region and have contributed to the exacerbation of political tensions between Belgrade and Brussels, while deepening ethnic cleavages between Serb and Albanian communities. While there is no possibility of Kosovo returning to Serbia's control, there is an equal unlikelihood that Serbian-populated regions of Kosovo, especially the north, will submit to Pristina's authority. Most importantly, there is little hope that Kosovo can gain full international recognition and membership in international organizations without a compromise settlement with Serbia. While territorial partition has long been a suggested option, I conclude that the best possible solution for Kosovo, given the positions of all parties involved, is a process of significant decentralization beyond the internationally supported measures in the Ahtisaari Plan. A model of consociational power sharing is one in which Serbian and Albanian municipalities are granted high levels of autonomy similar to arrangements made for Bosnia. While this solution may not be ideal and further weakens central authority, I argue that consociationalism reduces the problems of ethnic conflict, encourages local self-government, and preserves the overall territorial integrity of Kosovo.

Keywords

SerbiaKosovoconsociationalismpower sharingconflict resolution
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 867 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahtisaari, Maarti. 2007. Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo's Future Status. United Nations Security Council S/2007/168, March 26. Accessed June 23, 2012. http://www.unosek.org/docref/Comprehensive_proposal-english.pdf Google Scholar
Aliu, Fatmir. 2012. “Thousands Oppose ‘Discriminatory’ Law in Kosovo.” Balkanlnsight, Jan 18. Accessed June 10, 2013. http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/thousands-protest-against-the-historic-centre-of-prizren Google Scholar
B92. 2013a. “Unofficial Text of Proposed Kosovo Agreement.” April 19. Accessed June 1, 2013. http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2013&mm=04&dd=19&nav_id=85799 Google Scholar
B92. 2013b. “KSF ‘Will Not Be Able to Go North.”’ April 19. Accessed June 1, 2013. http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2013&mm=04&dd=19&nav_id=85793 Google Scholar
B92. 2013c. “Gorani Want to Join Community of Serbian Municipalities.” March 8. Accessed June 1, 2013. http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2013&mm=03&dd=08&nav_id=85060 Google Scholar
B92. 2013d. “Tekst Platforme za Kosovo.” January 13. Accessed June 1, 2013. http://www.b92.net/info/dokumenti/index.php?nav_id=677002 Google Scholar
B92. 2012e. “Referendum in North: 99.74% Say ‘No’ to Pristina.” February 16. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=02&dd=16&nav_id=78814 Google Scholar
B92. 2012f. “Tadic's Suggestion in Line with Ahtisaari Plan.” January 17, 2012. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=01&dd=17&nav_id=78329 Google Scholar
Bajrami, Agron. 2013. “Association of Serbian Municipalities: From a Tool of Integration, to a Disaster in the Making.” Group for Legal and Political Studies, Policy No. 5, December. Accessed May 29, 2014. http://legalpoliticalstudies.org/download/Policy%20Note%2005%202013.pdf Google Scholar
Berg, Eiki. 2009. “Re-examining Sovereignty Claims in Changing Territorialities: Reflections from ‘Kosovo Syndrome.'” Geopolitics 14 (2): 219–234.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2006. “After Dayton, Dayton? The Evolution of an Unpopular Peace.” Ethnopolitics 5 (1): 15–31.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2012. “Republika Srpska for Kosovo?” December 20. Accessed January 13, 2013. http://fbieber.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/republika-srpska-for-kosovo/ Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. 2013. “Power Sharing and Democracy in Southeast Europe.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy Special Issue: 129–148.Google Scholar
Brunnbauer, Ulf. 2002. “The Implementation of the Ohrid Agreement: Ethnic Macedonian Resentments.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 1: 1–24.Google Scholar
Brusis, Martin. 2003. “The European Union and Interethnic Power-Sharing Arrangements in Accession Countries.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Alan. 1992. “Self-determination and the Right to Secede.” Journal of International Affairs 42 (2): 247–365.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Ted Galen. 2011. “To Partition or Not to Partition?” The National Interest, February 25. Accessed June 9, 2013. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/partition-or-not-partition-4948 Google Scholar
Chivvis, Christopher. 2010. “The Dayton Dilemma.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 52 (5): 47–74.Google Scholar
Conversi, Daniele. 2000. “Autonomous Communities and the Ethnic Settlement in Spain.” In Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-ethnic States, edited by Ghai, Yash, 122–144. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Svante. 2002. “Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective.” World Politics 54 (2): 245–276.Google Scholar
Dahlman, Carl T., and Williams, Trent. 2010. “Ethnic Enclavisation and State Formation in Kosovo.” Geopolitics 15 (2): 406–430.Google Scholar
Danspeckgruber, Wolfgang. 2005. “Self-governance Plus Regional Integration: A Possible Solution to Self-determination Claims.” In Autonomy, Self-governance and Conflict Resolution, edited by Weller, Marc and Wolff, Stefan, 26–48. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander. 2001. “The Holy Land Divided: Defending Partition as a Solution to Ethnic Wars.” Security Studies 10 (4): 58–116.Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander. 2004. “The Problem with Negotiated Settlements to Ethnic Civil Wars.” Security Studies 13 (4): 230–279.Google Scholar
Džihić, Vedran, and Kramer, Helmut. 2009. Kosovo After Independence: Is the EU's EULEX Mission Delivering on Its Promises? Berlin: International Policy Analysis. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/06571.pdf Google Scholar
Economides, Spyros, Ker-Lindsay, James, and Papadimitroiu, Dimitris. 2010. “Kosovo: Four Futures.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 52 (5): 99–116.Google Scholar
Eide, Kai. 2005. “A Comprehensive Review of the Situation in Kosovo.” S/2005/635. October 7. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.unosek.org/docref/KaiEidereport.pdf Google Scholar
Engström, Jenny. 2003. “Multiethnicity or Bi-nationalism? The Framework Agreement and the Future of the Macedonian State.” In European Yearbook of Minority Issues: 2001/2, 335–348. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2004. “Separatist Wars, Partition, and World Order.” Security Studies 13 (4): 394–415.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Laitin, David. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Gallucci, Gerard. 2011. “The Ahtisaari Plan and North Kosovo.” TransConflict, November. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.transconflict.com/10/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/PolicyPaper_AhtisaariPlanNorthKosovo.pdf Google Scholar
Gallucci, Gerard. 2012. “North Kosovo Referendum - Not Binding, No Surprise but It Changes Everything.” TransConflict, February 17. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.transconflict.com/2012/02/north-kosovo-referendum-not-binding-no-surprise-but-changes-everything-172/ Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash, ed. 2000. Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-ethnic States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gjoni, Roland, Wetterberg, Anna, and Dunbar, David. 2010. “Decentralization as a Conflict Transformation Tool: The Challenge of Kosovo.” Public Administration and Development 30 (5): 291–312.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Daniel. 2012. “Kosovo: Time for Partition.” The Commentator. June 7. Accessed June 9, 2013. http://www.thecommentator.com/article/1287/kosovo_time_for_partition Google Scholar
Hayden, Robert. 2005. “'Democracy’ Without a Demos? The Bosnian Constitutional Experiment and the Intentional Construction of Nonfunctioning States.” East European Politics and Societies 19 (2): 226–259.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 2000. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2004. Collapse in Kosovo. Europe Report 155. April 22.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2006. Kosovo: The Challenge of Transition. Europe Report 170. February 17.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2007. Kosovo: No Good Alternatives to the Ahtisaari Plan. Europe Briefing 182. May 14.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2009. Kosovo: Strpce: A Model Serbian Enclave? Europe Briefing 56. October 15.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2011a. Macedonia: Ten Years after the Conflict. Europe Report 212. August 11.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2011b. North Kosovo: Dual Sovereignty in Practice. Europe Report 211. March 14.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group). 2012. Kosovo and Serbia: A Little Goodwill Could Go a Long Way. Europe Report 215. February 2.Google Scholar
ICO (International Civilian Office). 2012. “Guests in Our Own House: The Comprehensive Settlement Proposal and the Serb Community in Northern Kosovo.” April. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://www.ico-kos.org/data/Image/1ICO_annual_Report_eng.pdf Google Scholar
Jenne, Erin K. 2009. “The Paradox of Ethnic Partition: Lessons from de facto Partition in Bosnia and Kosovo.” Regional and Federal Studies 19 (2): 273–289.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim. 1996. “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars.” International Security 20 (4): 136–175.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim. 1998. “When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century.” International Security 23 (2): 120–156.Google Scholar
Ker-Lindsay, James. 2009. Kosovo: The Path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans. New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Ker-Lindsay, James. 2011. “Principles and the Partition of Kosovo.” Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice 23 (2): 228–234.Google Scholar
King, Iain, and Mason, Whit. 2006. Peace at Any Price: How the World Failed Kosovo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kolst⊘, Pål. 2006. “The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States.” Journal of Peace Research 43 (6): 723–740.Google Scholar
Kumar, Radha. 1997. “The Troubled History of Partition.” Foreign Affairs 76 (1): 22–34.Google Scholar
Lapidoth, Ruth. 1996. Autonomy: Flexible Solutions to Ethnic Conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Licklider, Roy, ed. 1993. Stopping the Killing: How Civil Wars End. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Licklider, Roy. 1995. “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 681–690.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21 (2): 207–225.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 15 (2): 96–109.Google Scholar
Liotta, P. H. 2001. “Balkan Fragmentation and the Rise of the Parastate.” In Dismembering the State: The Death of Yugoslavia and Why It Matters, edited by Liotta, P. H., 187–216. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1979. “Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism Versus Control.” World Politics 31 (3): 325–344.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1997. “Lijphart, Lakatos, and Consociationalism.” World Politics 50 (1): 88–117.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian, Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J. 2004. “Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It?” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 209–229.Google Scholar
Leon, Malazogu, Ejdus, Filip, Nič, Milan, and Zornaczuk, Tomasz. 2014. Integration or Isolation? Northern Kosovo in 2014 Electoral Limbo. Central European Policy Institute, February 13. Accessed May 29, 2014. http://www.cepolicy.org/publications/integration-or-isolation-northern-kosovo-2014-electoral-limbo Google Scholar
McGarry, John, and O'Leary, Brendan, eds. 1993. The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation: Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGarry, John, and O'Leary, Brendan. 1994. “The Political Regulation of National and Ethnic Conflict.” Parliamentary Affairs 47 (1): 94–115.Google Scholar
McGarry, John, and O'Leary, Brendan. 2007. “Iraq's Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (4): 670–698.Google Scholar
Mearscheimer, John J., and Van Evera, Stephen. 1999. “Redraw the Map, Stop the Killing.” New York Times, April 19, A23.Google Scholar
Parish, Matthew. 2011. “Kosovo - The Politics of Partition.” Trans Conflict, August 8. Accessed June 9, 2013. http://www.transconflict.com/2011/08/kosovo-the-politics-of-partition-088/ Google Scholar
Peci, Edona. 2013. “Kosovo President Urges End to Serb Monastery Row.” Balkanlnsight, April 8. Accessed June 10, 2013. http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/parliamentary-debate-on-land-dispute-condemned Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 1993. “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict.” Survival 35 (1): 27–47.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P. 1992. Nationalism and Federalism in Yugoslavia, 1962–1991. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Risteka, Marija. 2013. “Insiders and Outsiders in the Implementation of the Principle of Just and Equitable Representation of Minority Groups in Public Administration in Macedonia.” International Journal of Public Administration 36 (1): 26–34.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 2009. “Ethnofederalism and the Mismanagement of Conflicting Nationalisms.” Regional & Federal Studies 19 (2): 203–219.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip G., and Rothchild, Donald, eds. 2005. Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, William. 2000. “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict: Some New Hypotheses.” Security Studies 9 (4): 1–51.Google Scholar
Salamey, Imad. 2009. “Failing Consociationalism in Lebanon and Integrative Options.” International Journal of Peace-Studies 14 (2): 83–105.Google Scholar
Salloukh, Bassel F. 2006. “The Limits of Electoral Engineering in Divided Societies: Elections in Postwar Lebanon.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 635–655.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2000. “Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature.” World Politics 52: 437–483.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg. 1981. “The Consociational Theory and Beyond.” Comparative Politics 13 (3): 339–354.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2002/2003. “Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War.” Security Studies 12 (2): 82–119.Google Scholar
Tullberg, Jan, and Tullberg, Birgitta. 1997. “Separation or Unity? A Model for Solving Ethnic Conflicts.” Politics and the Life Sciences 16 (2): 237–249.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244. 1999. S/RES/1244, June 10. Accessed May 23, 2012. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/172/89/PDF/N9917289.pdf?0penElement Google Scholar
Vaseljenska, TV. 2012. “Non-Paper.” December. Accessed. 13 Jan. 2013. http://www.vaseljenska.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/SKMBT_22312121813061.pdf Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization 51 (3): 335–364.Google Scholar
Weller, Marc. 2009. Contested Statehood: Kosovo's Struggle for Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Stefan. 2005. “Complex Autonomy Arrangements in Western Europe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Regional Consociationalism in Brussels, Northern Ireland, and South Tyrol.” In Autonomy, Self-governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies, edited by Weller, Marc and Wolff, Stefan, 158–179. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolff, Stefan. 2010. “Cases of Asymmetrical Territorial Autonomy.” In Asymmetric Autonomy and the Settlement of Ethnic Conflicts, edited by Weller, Marc and Nobbs, Katherine, 17–47. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Stefan, and Weller, Marc. 2005. “Self-determination and Autonomy: A Conceptual Introduction.” In Autonomy, Self-governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies, edited by Weller, Marc and Wolff, Stefan, 1–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan. 1995. Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar