No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Dark Side of the Moon: Nationalism, Human Rights, and the Erased Residents of Slovenia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2019
Abstract
In 1992, after the dissolution of Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the Slovenian government unlawfully erased 25,671 individuals—ethnically mainly Serbs, Croats, Bosnians, Macedonians, Montenegrins, and Roma—from the Register of Permanent Residents of Slovenia. The aim of this article is to analyze the logic of the governmental rationalities that served as a basis for the politics of the erasure. The article begins by refuting claims that the erasure was a tactic for achieving ethnocultural homogeneity and continues by explaining the mindset involved in this particular practice of government, resting upon Foucault’s notions of raison d’état, governmentality, and sovereign power. Highlighting the prominence of the individual’s political opinion and loyalty to the newly established state, the article discusses the principles of nationalism, which reinforce the very common-sense exclusionary politics related to political loyalty implied in citizenship and ethnic identity. Finally, the article deliberates on the effects of the contemporary diagram of power of the nation-state, which legitimizes the exclusion of individuals from the national polity and thus immobilizes universal respect of human rights.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © Association for the Study of Nationalities 2019
References
Act Regulating the Legal Status of Citizens of Former Yugoslavia Living in the Republic of Slovenia. 2010. Official Gazette RS No.76/2010. September 22. (In Slovenian.) https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina/2010-01-4131?sop=2010-01-4131. (Accessed February 2, 2017.)Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998.
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Translated by Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Aliens Act. 1991. Official Gazette RS No. 1/1991, June 5. (In Slovenian.) https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina?urlid=19911&stevilka=9. (Accessed March 6, 2017.)Google Scholar
Bajt, Veronika. 2010. “More Than Administratively Created ‘Foreigners’: The Erased People and a Reflection of the Nationalist Construction of the Other in the Symbolic Idea about ‘Us.’” In
The Scars of the Erasure, edited by Neža Kogovšek, Jelka Zorn, Sara Pistotnik, Uršula Lipovec Čebron, Veronika Bajt, Brankica Petković, and Lana Zdravković, 195–218. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. 2004.
We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship
. Translated by James Swenson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bakić-Hayden, Milica, and Hayden, Robert M.. 2007. “Orientalistične različice na temo ‘Balkana’: simbolna geografija v nedavni jugoslovanski politiki kulture” Orientalist Variations on the Theme of ‘Balkans’: Symbolic Geography in Recent Yugoslav Cultural Politics. In Zbornik postkolonialnih študij, edited by Nikolai Jeffs, 441–459. Ljubljana: Krtina.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, ed. 2006. Migration and Citizenship: Legal Status, Rights and Political Participation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald, ed. 1995. Theorizing Citizenship. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Blitz Brad, K. 2006. “Statelessness and the Social (De)construction of Citizenship: Political Restructuring and Ethnic Discrimination in Slovenia.” Journal of Human Rights 5 (4): 453–479.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. 2000. “Citizenship Denationalized.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 447–509.Google Scholar
Brown, David. 2003. Contemporary Nationalism: Civic, Ethnocultural and Multicultural Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1999. “The Manichean Myth: Rethinking the Distinction between ‘Civic’ and ‘Ethnic’ Nationalism.” In
Nation and National Identity: The European Experience in Perspective, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi, Klaus Armingeon, Hannes Siegrist, and Andreas Wimmer, 55–71. Zurich: Verlag Rüegger.Google Scholar
Citizenship Act of Republic of Slovenia. 1991. Official Gazette RS No. 1/91-I, June 25. (In Slovenian.) https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina/1991-01-0008?sop=1991-01-0008. (Accessed January 16, 2017.)Google Scholar
Constitutional Court. 1999. Constitutional Court Decision No. U-I-284/94. (In Slovenian.) http://odlocitve.us-rs.si/sl/odlocitev/US19309. (Accessed January 29, 2017.)Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Dedić, Jasminka. 2003. “Diskriminacija v postopkih pridobivanja slovenskega državljanstva” Discrimination in Granting Slovenian Citizenship. In Izbrisani: Organizirana nedolžnost in politike izključevanja [The erased: organized innocence and politics of exclusion], edited by Jasminka Dedić, Vlasta Jalušič, and Jelka Zorn, 23–84. Ljubljana: Mirovni inštitut.Google Scholar
Dedić, Jasminka, Jalušič, Vlasta, and Zorn, Jelka, eds. 2003. “Izbrisani: Organizirana nedolžnost in politike izključevanja [The Erased: Organized Innocence and Politics of Exclusion]. Ljubljana: Mirovni inštitut.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1856. The Old Regime and the Revolution. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard. 2004. “Loyalty and Plurality: Images of the Nation in Australia.” In Political Loyalty and the Nation-State, edited by Michael Waller and Andrew Linklater, 27–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights. 2012. Case of Kurić and Others v. Republic of Slovenia. June 26. Strasbourg. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["Kurić"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-111634"]}. (Accessed January 3, 2019.)Google Scholar
Fiaccadori, Elisa. 2015. “State Racism and the Paradox of Biopower.” Foucault Studies 19: 151–171.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. Vintage Books: New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. Edited by Mauro Bertani and Alessandro Fontana. Translated by David Macey. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Edited by Michel Senellart. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Edited by Michel Senellart. Translated by Graham Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Tony, and Powell, Jason L.. 2008. “Citizenship and Governmentality: People with Intellectual Disability as New Citizens of the 21st Century.” In Citizenship in the 21st Century, edited by Lester T. Kane and Marylyn R. Poweller, 185–204. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Gregorčič, Marta. 2007. “Phantom Irresponsibility, or Fascism in Disguise.” Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination, and New Anthropology 35 (226): 115–132.Google Scholar
Gündoğdu, Ayten. 2012. “Potentialities of Human Rights: Agamben and the Narrative of Fated Necessity.” Contemporary Political Theory 11 (l): 2–22.Google Scholar
Hayden, Robert M. 1996. “Imagined Communities and Real Victims: Self-Determination and Ethnic Cleansing in Yugoslavia.” American Ethnologist 23 (4): 783–801.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 1987. “The Myth of Citizenship.” Queen’s Law Journal 12 (3): 399–420.Google Scholar
Jalušič, Vlasta. 2007. “Renouncing the Political Capacities: Organized Innocence and Erasure of Citizenship Responsibility in Post-Yugoslav Nation-State Building.” Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination, and New Anthropology 35 (226): 95–114.Google Scholar
Kates, Gary. 2002. Introduction to The French Revolution: Recent Debates and New Controversies, edited by Gary Kates, 1–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kelly, Mark. 2004. “Racism, Nationalism and Biopolitics: Foucaultʼs Society Must Be Defended.” Contretemps 4 (September): 58–70.Google Scholar
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža. 2007. “The Erasure: The Proposal of a Constitutional Law as the Negation of the Rule of Law.”
Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination, and New Anthropology
35 (226): 196–220.Google Scholar
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža. 2010. “The Erasure as a Violation of Legally Protected Human Rights.” In
The Scars of the Erasure, edited by Neža Kogovšek, Jelka Zorn, Sara Pistotnik, Uršula Lipovec Čebron, Veronika Bajt, Brankica Petković, and Lana Zdravković, 83–143. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža. 2011a. “Nation-State Homogenization and the Battle for Legal Status: The Erased Residents of Slovenia.” Südosteuropa 59 (1): 2–24.Google Scholar
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža. 2011b. “Pravni vidiki izbrisa iz registra stalnega prebivalstva.” [Legal aspects of erasure from the register of permanent residents]. PhD diss., University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Kogovšek Šalamon, Neža. 2012. Izbris in (ne)ustavna demokracija [The erasure and (un)constitutional democracy]. Ljubljana: GV založba.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, and Norman, Wayne. 1994. “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory.” Ethics 104 (2): 352–381.Google Scholar
Lipovec Čebron, Uršula and Zorn, Jelka. 2011. Zgodbe Izbrisanih Prebivalcev [The life-stories of the erased residents]. Ljubljana: Založba Sanje.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth, Williams, Fiona, Anttonen, Anneli, Bussemaker, Jet, Gerhard, Ute, Heinen, Jacqueline, Johansson, Stina, Lira, Arnlaug, Siim, Birte, and Tobio, Constanza, with Anna Gavanas. 2007. Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe: New Challenges for Citizenship Research in a Cross-National Context. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Makarychev, Andrey, and Yatsyk, Alexandra. 2016. “Biopolitics and National Identities: Between Liberalism and Totalization.” Nationalities Papers 45 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 1997. “The Limits of National Partiality.” In
The Morality of Nationalism, edited by Robert McKim and Jeff McMahan, 107–138. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Internal Affairs. 1992a. Official Communication: Implementation of the Aliens Act—Instructions. www.mirovni-institut.si/izbrisani/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/depesa_05_1992_02_27.pdf. (Accessed February 4, 2019.)Google Scholar
Ministry of Internal Affairs. 1992b. Official Communication: Open Questions in regard to Aliens Act Implementation. www.mirovni-institut.si/izbrisani/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/depesa_06_1992_06_04.pdf. (Accessed February 4, 2019.)Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. 1995. “Ethnocentricity of the Nationalist Discourse.” Nations and Nationalism 1 (1): 25–52.Google Scholar
Procacci, Giovanna. 2004. “Governmentality and Citizenship.” In The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, edited by Kate Nash and Alan Scott, 342–352. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1987. “On the Social Contract.” In The Basic Political Writings. Translated and edited by Donald A. Cress, 140–227. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Schütz, Anton. 2008. “The Fading Memory of Homo non Sacer.” In
The Work of Giorgio Agamben: Law, Literature, Life, edited by Justin Clemens, Nicholas Heron, and Alex Murray, 114–131. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Šircelj, Milivoja. 2003. Verska, jezikovna in narodna sestava prebivalstva Slovenije [The Religious, Linguistic and Ethnic Composition of the Slovene Population]. Ljubljana: Statistični urad Republike Slovenije.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoğlu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1994. Final Report of the Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992). http://www.icty.org/x/file/About/OTP/un_commission_of_experts_report1994_en.pdf. (Accessed January 5, 2019.)Google Scholar
Vezjak, Boris. 2007. “Argumentation and Rhetoric in the Case of the Erased.” Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination, and New Anthropology 35 (226): 211–221.Google Scholar
Vezovnik, Andreja. 2010. “Kritična analiza političnih diskurzov o izbrisanih v žanrih mnenjske zvrsti” Critical analysis of political discourses on the “Erased”in Slovenian op-ed press. Družboslovne razprave 64: 45–62.Google Scholar
Vrbek, Sanja. 2015. “Reasons for EU Double Standards: Comparative Overview of the Cases of the Erased and the Non-citizens.” Nationalities Papers 43 (2): 302–318.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2004. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. 1996. “The Myth of the Civic Nation.” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2): 193–211.Google Scholar
Zorn, Jelka. 2007. “We, the Ethno-citizens of Ethno-democracy—The Formation of Slovene Citizenship.” Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination, and New Anthropology 35 (226): 52–70.Google Scholar
Zorn, Jelka. 2009. “A Case for Slovene Nationalism: Initial Citizenship Rules and the Erasure.” Nations and Nationalism 15 (2): 280–298.Google Scholar